Book contents
- History and Historiography in Classical Utilitarianism, 1800–1865
- Ideas in Context
- History and Historiography in Classical Utilitarianism, 1800–1865
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Conventions
- Introduction
- Part I Enlightened Historicisms
- Part II Historicism and Historiography
- Part III Sciences of History
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2021
Book contents
- History and Historiography in Classical Utilitarianism, 1800–1865
- Ideas in Context
- History and Historiography in Classical Utilitarianism, 1800–1865
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Conventions
- Introduction
- Part I Enlightened Historicisms
- Part II Historicism and Historiography
- Part III Sciences of History
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Primary Sources
Bentham, J., ‘Bentham papers’, University College London Library, 161.Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘Bodleian Library Oxford Additional Manuscript’, Eng.Let.d.122.Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘Fragments of Mr. Grote’s handwriting’, Bodleian Library Oxford Additional Manuscript, c. 208.9.Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘George Grote. Four notebooks’, Senate House Library, MS429, III.Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘Grote papers, 1818–1822’, British Library Additional Manuscript, 29514–29529.Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘Grote papers. Essays and notes’, Bodleian Library Oxford Additional Manuscript, MS. d. 85.Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘Grote papers’, University College London Additional Manuscripts, A2.Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘Papers of George Grote’, Cambridge University Library Additional Manuscripts, 1933.Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘Papers of the Mayor and related families’, Trinity College, Cambridge, Additional Manuscript, C12/53.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., ‘Hutzler collection’, Johns Hopkins University Special Collections, HUT. 004.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., ‘By what means may sentimentality be checked without discouraging healthy sentiment & individuality of character?’, John Stuart Mill papers, Yale University Library, MS 350.Google Scholar
Walker, A., ‘Walker papers’, National Library of Scotland, MSS. 13724.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Alison, A., A history of Europe from the commencement of the French Revolution to the restoration of the Bourbons (Edinburgh: William Blackwood, 1833–1843), 10 vols.Google Scholar
Alison, A., ‘Guizot and the philosophy of history’, The Eclectic Magazine 4 (1845), pp. 177–192.Google Scholar
Arnold, T., The history of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides: with notes, chiefly historical and geographical [1830] (London: John Henry and James Parker, 1861), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (eds. Jardine, L. and Silverthorne, M.), The new organon [1620] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (ed. Wright, W. A.), The advancement of learning [1605] (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1876).Google Scholar
Bazard, A. and others, Doctrine de Saint-Simon. Exposition (Paris: Bureau de l’organisateur, 1831).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. and trans. Bentham, G.), Essai sur la nomenclature et la classification des principles branches d’art-et-science (Paris: Bossange, 1823).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Bowring, J.), The works of Jeremy Bentham (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1838–1843), 11 vols.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (eds. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A.), A comment on the Commentaries and A fragment on government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (eds. Christie, I. R., Milne, A. T., Sprigge, T. L. S.), The correspondence of Jeremy Bentham (London: UCL Press, 2017), 5 vols.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Dumont, E., trans. Neal, J.), Principles of legislation (Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1830).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Engelmann, S. G.), Selected writings (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Larrabee, H. A.), Handbook of political fallacies (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Schofield, P. and Harris, J.), Legislator of the world: writings on codification, law, and education (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Schofield, P.), Official aptitude maximized; expense minimized (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Schofield, P.), Of the limits of the penal branch of jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Schofield, P.), The book of fallacies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Smith, M. J. and Burston, W. H.), Chrestomathia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (eds. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A.), An introduction to the principles and morals of legislation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (eds. Schofield, P., Pease-Watkin, C., and Blamires, C.), Rights, representation, and reform: nonsense upon stilts and other writings on the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (ed. Goldworth, A.), Deontology together with A table of the springs of action and Article on utilitarianism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Bentham, J., A plan for parliamentary reform in the form of a catechism, with reasons for each article, with an introduction, shewing the necessity of radical, and the inadequacy of moderate, reform (London: R. Hunter, 1817).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (eds. Long, D. G. and Schofield, P.), Preparatory principles (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. (eds. Stock, J. and Wright, G. N.), The works of George Berkeley (London: Thomas Tegg, 1843), 4 vols.Google Scholar
Blackstone, W., Commentaries on the laws of England (London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1783), 4 vols.Google Scholar
Blair, H., Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres (Philadelphia: Robert Aitken, 1784).Google Scholar
Bolingbroke, H., Letters on the study and use of history (Basil: J. J. Tourneisen, 1791).Google Scholar
Bolingbroke, H., The patriot king; and, an essay on the spirit of patriotism [1738] (London: John Brooks, 1831).Google Scholar
Buckle, H., History of civilisation in England (London: Parker, Son, and Bourn, 1861), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Bulwer-Lytton, E. (ed. Murray, O.), Athens: its rise and fall [1837] (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Burke, E., The works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1856), 6 vols.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H., The history of Scotland from Agricola’s invasion to the Revolution of 1688 (Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1867), 7 vols.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (ed. Sanders, C. R.) The collected letters of Thomas and Jane Welsh Carlyle (Durham: Duke University Press, 1976), 15 vols.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (ed. Shelston, A.), Thomas Carlyle: selected writings (London: Penguin, 1971).Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (ed. Tennyson, G. B.), A Carlyle reader: selections from the writings of Thomas Carlyle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (ed. Traill, H. D.), The works of Thomas Carlyle [1896] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 30 vols.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (ed. Vanden Bossche, C. R.), Historical essays (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Carlyle, T., ‘The signs of the times’ in Himmelfarb, G. (ed.), The spirit of the age: Victorian essays (Yale: Yale University Press, 2007), pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T., Aids to reflection in the form of a manly character (London: Taylor and Hessey, 1825).Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (ed. Griggs, E. L.), Collected letters (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956–1971), 6 vols.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (eds. Coleridge, S., Coleridge, H. N., and Shedd, W. G. T.), The complete works (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1854), 7 vols.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (eds. McFarland, T. and Halmi, N.), Opus maximum (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (eds. Morrow, J., Taylor, A., Goodson, A., Beer, J., Vallins, D.), Coleridge’s writings (London: Macmillan, 1990–2003), 5 vols.Google Scholar
Comte, A., Cours de philosophie positive (Paris: Bachelier, Imprimeur-Libraire, 1841), 6 vols.Google Scholar
Comte, A. (ed. Lenzer, G.), Auguste Comte and positivism (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar
Comte, A. (ed. Martineau, H.), The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte (London: John Chapman, 1853), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Comte, A. (eds. de Berredo Carneiro, P. E. and Arnaud, P.), Écrits de jeunesse, 1816–1828: suivis du memoire sur la cosmogonie de Laplace, 1835 (Paris: Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, 1970).Google Scholar
Constant, B., De la liberté chez les modernes: écrits politiques (Paris: Pluriel, 1980).Google Scholar
Conway, S. (ed.), The correspondence of Jeremy Bentham. Volume 8 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Cornewall Lewis, G., A treatise on the methods of observation and reasoning in politics (London: John W. Parker and Son, 1852), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution [1885] (London: Macmillan, 1931).Google Scholar
Drummond, R. B., Free will in relation to statistics. A lecture containing some suggestions in way of reply to certain objections advanced to the doctrine of free will, by Mr Buckle, in his History of civilisation in England (London: E. T. Whitefield, 1860).Google Scholar
Dumont, E., Traités de législation civile et pénale (Paris: Bossange, Masson et Besson, 1802), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A., An essay on the history of civil society (Philadelphia: A. Finley, 1819).Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (trans. Smith, W. R.), Characteristics of the present age (London: John Chapman, 1847).Google Scholar
Freeman, E. A., ‘A history of Greece by George Grote’, The North British Review 25 (1856), pp. 141–173.Google Scholar
Freeman, E. A., The growth of the English constitution from the earliest times (London: Macmillan, 1872).Google Scholar
Gibbon, E. (ed. Smith, W.), The history of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire (London: John Murray, 1855), 8 vols.Google Scholar
Gillies, J., The history of ancient Greece, its colonies, and conquests, from the earliest accounts to the division of the Macedonian Empire in the East [1786] (London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1801), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, O., The history of Greece from the earliest state, to the death of Alexander the Great [1774] (London: Rivington, 1823), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Grote, G. (ed. Bain, A.), The minor works of George Grote. With critical remarks on his intellectual character, writings and speeches (London: John Murray, 1873).Google Scholar
Grote, G., ‘Clinton’s Fasti Hellenici. The civil and literary chronology of Greece’, Westminster Review 5 (1826), pp. 269–331.Google Scholar
Grote, G., History of Greece; from the earliest period to the close of the generation contemporary with Alexander the Great [1846–1856] (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1880), 12 vols.Google Scholar
Grote, G., Plato and other companions of Socrates (London: John Murray, 1867), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Grote, G., Seven letters concerning the politics of Switzerland, pending the outbreak of the civil war in 1847 (London: John Murray, 1876).Google Scholar
Grote, G., Statement on the question of parliamentary reform (London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, 1821).Google Scholar
Grote, H. (ed.), The personal life of George Grote. Compiled from family documents, private memoranda, and original letters to and from various friends (London: John Murray, 1873).Google Scholar
Grote, J., A few remarks on a pamphlet by Mr. Shilleto, entitled “Thucydides or Grote?” (Cambridge: John Deighton, 1851).Google Scholar
Guizot, F. (ed. De Witt, H.), Lettres de m. Guizot à sa famille et à ses amis, recueillies par Mme de Witt (Paris: Hachette, 1884).Google Scholar
Guizot, F., Histoire générale de la civilisation en Europe, depuis la chute de l’empire romain jusqu’a la Révolution Français [1828] (Bruxelles : J. Jamar, 1839).Google Scholar
Guizot, F., L’histoire de France: depuis les temps les plus reculés jusqu’en 1789 (Paris: Hachette, 1870–1876), 5 vols.Google Scholar
Haac, O. A. (ed.), The correspondence of John Stuart Mill and Auguste Comte (London: Transaction, 1995).Google Scholar
Hallam, H., Introduction to the history of Europe in the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries [1837] (New York: Harper, 1848), 8 vols.Google Scholar
Hartley, D., Observations on man, his fame, his duty, and his expectations [1749] (London: Thomas Tegg, 1834).Google Scholar
Hazlitt, W., ‘Bentham, Principes de legislation, par Dumont’, The Edinburgh Review 4 (1804), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, W., ‘The new school of reform: a dialogue between a rationalist and a sentimentalist’ [1826] in Hazlitt, W. (ed. Hazlitt, W. C.), The plain speaker: opinions on books, men, and things (London: Bell and Daldy, 1870), pp. 250–273.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, W. (eds. Waller, A. R. and Glover, A.), The collected works of William Hazlitt (London: Dent & Co., 1904), 12 vols.Google Scholar
Helvétius, C. (trans. Hooper, W.), A treatise on man: his intellectual faculties and his education (London: Albion Press, 1810), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (ed. Tuck, R.), Leviathan [1651] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Hodgson, S., The philosophy of reflection (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1878), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Howard, R., ‘The Westminster Review’, Edinburgh Literary Journal 2 (1829), pp. 262–266.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. (trans. Coulthard, J.), The sphere and duties of government (London: John Chapman, 1854).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (ed. Greig, J. Y. T.) The letters of David Hume [1932] (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (ed. Steinberg, E.), An enquiry concerning human understanding (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993).Google Scholar
Hume, D., A treatise of human nature [1738–40] (London: Thomas and Joseph Allman, 1817), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (eds. Warner, S. D. and Livingston, D. W.), Political writings (Indiana: Hackett, 1994).Google Scholar
Hume, D., Essays and treatises on several subjects: essays, moral, political and literary (Edinburgh: Bell and Bradfute, 1825), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, F., Contributions to the Edinburgh Review (London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1844).Google Scholar
Kemble, J. M., The Saxons in England: a history of the English Commonwealth till the period of the Norman Conquest (London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans, 1849), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Kingsley, C., The limits of exact science as applied to history (Cambridge: Macmillan & Co., 1860).Google Scholar
Leslie, T. E. C., Essays in political and moral philosophy (London: Longmans, Green, & Co, 1879).Google Scholar
Macaulay, T. B. (ed. Burrow, J.), Lord Macaulay’s History of England (London: Continuum, 2009).Google Scholar
Macaulay, T. B., Miscellaneous writings of Lord Macaulay (London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts, 1869), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Macaulay, T. B., The works of Lord Macaulay (London: Spottinswoode and Co., 1871), 8 vols.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, J., Dissertation on the progress of ethical philosophy, chiefly during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries [1830] (Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black, 1862).Google Scholar
Mackintosh, J. (ed. Mackintosh, R. J.), Memoirs of the life of the Right Honourable Sir James Mackintosh (London: Edward Moxon, 1835), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, J., The miscellaneous works of the Right Honourable Sir James Mackintosh (London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1851).Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (ed. Whitaker, J. K.), The correspondence of Alfred Marshall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (ed. Engels, F. and trans. Moore, S. and Aveling, E.), Capital [1867] (New York: International, 1967), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Maurice, F. D. (ed. Maurice, F.), The life of Frederick Denison Maurice chiefly told in his own letters (London: Macmillan, 1885), 2 vols.Google Scholar
McIlwraith, W., The life and writings of George Grote. An essay. (Wolverhampton: Barford & Newitt, 1885).Google Scholar
Michelet, J. (ed. and trans. Villaneix, P. and Digeon, C.), Journal (Paris: Gallimard, 1959), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Michelet, J., Introduction à l’histoire universelle [1831] (Paris: Libraire Classique de L. Hachette, 1834).Google Scholar
Michelet, J., Oeuvres de M. Michelet (Bruxelles: Meline, Cans et Compagnie, 1840), 8 vols.Google Scholar
Mill, J. (ed. Ball, T.), ‘Education’, Political writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Mill, J. (ed. Fenn, R. A.), James Mill’s common place books (2010), http://intellectualhistory.net/mill/cpb3ch5.html, accessed on 10 March 2014.Google Scholar
Mill, J. (eds. Mill, J. S., Bain, A., Findlater, A., and Grote, G.), Analysis of the phenomena of the human mind (London: Longman, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1878), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Mill, J., ‘Voyages à Peking, Manille et l’île de France. Par M. de Guignes’, The Edinburgh Review; or Critical Journal 28 (1809), pp. 407–429.Google Scholar
Mill, J., ‘An historical view of the English government by J. Millar’, The Literary Journal 2.6 (1803), pp. 325–333.Google Scholar
Mill, J., ‘Elements of the philosophy of mind, by Dugald Stewart’, British Review and London Critical Journal 6 (1815), pp. 170–200.Google Scholar
Mill, J., ‘Theory and practice: a dialogue’, The London and Westminster Review 25 (1836), pp. 223–234.Google Scholar
Mill, J., A fragment on Mackintosh: being strictures on some passages in the dissertation by Sir James Mackintosh prefixed to the Encyclopædia Britannica (London: Longman, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1870).Google Scholar
Mill, J., An essay of the impolicy of a bounty on the exportation of grain (London: C. and R. Baldwin, 1804).Google Scholar
Mill, J., The history of British India [1817] (London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, 1826), 6 vols.Google Scholar
Mill, J., ‘The state of the nation’, The London and Westminster Review 25 (1835), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Mill, J., ‘Whether political economy is useful?’, The London and Westminster Review 30 (1836), pp. 553–572.Google Scholar
Mill, J., ‘William Dawson’s thoughts on public trusts’, Literary Journal 5.12 (1805), pp. 1297–1311.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (ed. Robson, J. M. and others), The collected works of John Stuart Mill, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963–1991), 33 vols.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. (ed. Cohler, A. M.), The spirit of the laws (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Niebuhr, B. G. (trans. Smith, W. and Schmitz, L.), The history of Rome (Philadelphia: Lea & Blanchard, 1844), 5 vols.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D., Reply to Mr. Bosanquet’s observations on the report of the bullion committee (London: John Murray, 1811).Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (ed. Sraffa, P.), The works and correspondence of David Ricardo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951), 11 vols.Google Scholar
Robertson, W., The history of Scotland during the reigns of Queen Mary and of King James VI [1759] (London: T. Cadell, 1794), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Saint-Simon, H., Noveau chrstianisme, dialogues entre un conservateur et un novateur (Paris: Bossange Père, 1825).Google Scholar
Saint-Simon, H. (ed. Rodrigues, O.), Œuvres de Saint-Simon (Paris: Capelle, libraire-éditeur, 1841).Google Scholar
Saint-Simon, H. (trans. Iggers, G. G.), The doctrine of Saint-Simon: an exposition, first year, 1828–9 (Boston: Beacon Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Seeley, J. R., Classical studies as an introduction to the moral sciences (London: Bell and Daldy, 1864).Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H., The elements of politics [1891] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Smith, A. (ed. Stewart, D.), Essays on philosophical subjects (Dublin: Wogan, Byrne, Moore, Colbert, Rice, Jones, Porter, and Folingsby, 1795).Google Scholar
Smith, A. (eds. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.), An enquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations [1776] (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Sortain, J., ‘Bentham’s Science of morality’, The Edinburgh Review 61 (1835), pp. 365–379.Google Scholar
Spencer, H., Essays: scientific, political, speculative (London: Williams and Norgate, 1863).Google Scholar
Stephen, J., ‘Buckle’s History of civilisation in England’, The Edinburgh Review 107 (1858), pp. 238–262.Google Scholar
Stephen, J., Lectures on the history of France [1852] (London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, and Roberts, 1857), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Stewart, D., The works of Dugald Stewart (Cambridge: Hilliard and Brown, 1829), 7 vols.Google Scholar
Taine, H. A., ‘Philosophie anglaise: John Stuart Mill’, Revue des deux mondes 32 (1861), pp. 44–83.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, C. (ed. Liddel, P.), History of Greece [1835] (Exeter: Bristol Phoenix Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Thirlwall, C., A history of Greece (London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1835–1844), 8 vols.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, C. (ed. Stewart Perowne, J. J.), Remains literary and theological of Connop Thirlwall (London: Daldy, Isbister & Co., 1878), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Thucydides (trans. Lattimore, S.), The Peloponnesian War (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1998).Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A., De la démocratie en Amérique [1835–1840] (Paris: M. Lévy, 1864), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Tytler, A. F., Memoirs of the life and writings of the Honourable Henry Home of Kames [1807] (Edinburgh: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1814), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Villers, C. (trans. and ed. Mill, J.), An essay on the spirit and influence of the Reformation of Luther (London: Baldwin, 1805).Google Scholar
Wells, D. B., St. Paul vindicated: being part one of a reply to a late publication by Gamaliel Smith (T. Sevenson: Cambridge, 1824).Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (ed. Yeo, R. R.), Collected works of William Whewell (Bristol: Thoemmes, 2001), 16 vols.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. H., ‘Preface’ in Mill, J., The history of British India (London: James Madden, 1840), I, pp. i-xxxvi.Google Scholar
Winkworth, S. (ed.), The life and letters of Barthold Georg Niebuhr: with essays on his character and influence (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1852).Google Scholar
Wordsworth, W. (eds. Wordsworth, J., Abrams, M. H. and Gill, S.), The Prelude: 1799, 1805, 1850 (New York and London: Norton, 1979).Google Scholar
Abbatista, G., ‘The historical thought of the French philosophes’ in Rabasa, J. and Woolf, D. R. (eds.), The Oxford history of historical writing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), III, pp. 406–428.Google Scholar
Abi-Marshed, O. W., Apostles of modernity: Saint-Simonians and the colonial civilising mission in Algeria (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Alexander, E., ‘The principles of permanence and progression in the thought of J. S. Mill’ in Robson, J. M. and Laine, M. (eds.), James and John Stuart Mill/Papers of the centenary conference (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976), pp. 126–142.Google Scholar
Allen, P., ‘S. T. Coleridge’s church and state and the idea of an intellectual establishment’, Journal of the History of Ideas 46 (1985), pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Anderson, O., ‘The political uses of history in mid nineteenth-century England’, Past and Present 36 (1967), pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
Anschutz, R. P., ‘The logic of J. S. Mill’ in Schneewind, J. B. (ed.), Mill: a collection of critical essays (London: Macmillan, 1968), pp. 46–83.Google Scholar
Armenteros, C., The French idea of history: Joseph de Maistre and his heirs, 1794–1854 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Armitage, D., ‘A patriot for whom? The afterlives of Bolingbroke’s Patriot King’, The Journal of British Studies 36.4 (1997), pp. 397–418.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., ‘Globalising Jeremy Bentham’, History of Political Thought 32.1 (2011), pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
Baker, T. N., ‘National history in the age of Michelet, Macaulay, and Bancroft’ in Kramer, L. and Maza, S. (eds.), A companion to Western historical thought (London: Blackwell, 2002), pp. 185–204.Google Scholar
Ball, T., ‘The formation of character: Mill’s “ethology” reconsidered’, Polity 33 (2000), pp. 25–48.Google Scholar
Baum, B., ‘J. S. Mill and liberal socialism’ in Urbinati, N. and Zakaras, A. (eds.), J. S. Mill’s political thought: a bicentennial reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 98–124.Google Scholar
Baum, B. D., Rereading freedom and power in J. S. Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Baumgarten, M., ‘The ideas of history of Thomas Carlyle and John Stuart Mill: a summary statement’, The Mill Newsletter 3.1 (1967), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
Bayly, C., Recovering liberties: Indian thought in the age of liberalism and empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Bebbington, D. W., Evangelicalism in modern Britain: a history from the 1730s to the 1980s (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Beecher, J., Charles Fourier: the visionary and his world (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Beiser, F. C., ‘Historicism’ in Rosen, M. and Leiter, B. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of continental philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 155–180.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. C., The German historicist tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Ben-Israel, H., English historians on the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Benn, A. W., The history of English rationalism in the nineteenth century (London: Longmans and Green, 1906), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Bentley, M., Modernising England’s past: English historiography in the age of modernism, 1870–1970 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Bentley, M., ‘Theories of world history since the Enlightenment’ in Bentley, J. H. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of world history (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S., French political and intellectual history (New Brunswick: Transaction, 1955).Google Scholar
Betts, J., ‘John Stuart Mill, Victorian liberalism, and the failure of cooperative production’, The Historical Journal 59.1 (2016), pp. 153–174.Google Scholar
Bevir, M. (ed.), Historicism and the human sciences in Victorian Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Bevir, M., ‘The long nineteenth century in intellectual history’, Journal of Victorian Culture 6.2 (2001), pp. 313–336.Google Scholar
Biagini, E., ‘Liberalism and direct democracy: John Stuart Mill and the model of ancient Athens’ in Biagini, E. (ed.), Citizenship and community: liberals, radicals and collective identities in the British Isles, 1865–1931 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
Blaas, P. B. M., Continuity and anachronism: parliamentary and constitutional development in Whig historiography and in the anti-Whig reaction between 1890 and 1930 (Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff, 1978).Google Scholar
Blakemore, S., Intertextual war: Edmund Burke and the French Revolution in the writings of Mary Wollstonecraft, Thomas Paine, and James Mackintosh (London: Associated University Presses, 1997).Google Scholar
Blamires, C., The French Revolution and the creation of Benthamism (London: Palgrave, 2008).Google Scholar
Bolgar, R. R. (ed.), Classical influences on western thought, A.D. 1650–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Bord, J., Science and Whig manners: science and political style in Britain, c. 1750–1850 (London: Palgrave, 2009).Google Scholar
Bourke, R., Empire and revolution: the political life of Edmund Burke (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bouton, C. W., ‘John Stuart Mill on liberty and history’, Western Political Quarterly 18 (1965), pp. 569–578.Google Scholar
Bowden, B., The strange persistence of universal history in political thought (New York: Springer, 2017).Google Scholar
Bowles, P., ‘Adam Smith and the “natural progress of opulence”’, Economica 53 (1986), pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
Breisach, E., Historiography: ancient, medieval, and modern (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Brimnes, N., ‘Globalisation and Indian civilisation: questionable continuities’ in Mozaffari, M. (ed.), Globalisation and civilisations (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 242–263.Google Scholar
Britton, K. and Robson, J. M., ‘Mill’s debating speeches’, The Mill Newsletter 1 (1965), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Broadie, A., The Scottish Enlightenment: the historical age of the historical nation (Edinburgh: Birlinn, 2001).Google Scholar
Brundage, A. and Cosgrove, R. A., British historians and national identity (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Bruno, G., ‘A note on the “is/ought” problem in Hume’s ethical writings’, Journal of Value Enquiry 19 (1985), pp. 311–318.Google Scholar
Budge, G. (ed.), Romantic empiricism: poetics and the philosophy of common sense 1780–1830 (New Jersey: Associated University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Burns, J. H., ‘Bentham and the French Revolution’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 16 (1966), pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H., ‘The light of reason: philosophical history in the two Mills’ in Smith, G. W. (ed.), John Stuart Mill’s social and political thought: critical assessments (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Burrow, J., A liberal descent: Victorian historians and the English past (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Burrow, J., ‘Historicism and social evolution’ in Stuchtey, B. and Wende, P. (eds.), British and German historiography 1750–1950: traditions, perceptions, and transfers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 251–265.Google Scholar
Burrow, J., ‘Introduction’ in Macaulay, T. B. (Burrow, J.), Lord Macaulay’s History of England (London: Continuum, 2009), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Burrow, J., Evolution and society: a study in Victorian social theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Butterfield, H., The Englishman and his history (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1944).Google Scholar
Butterfield, H., The Whig interpretation of history [1931] (London: W. W. Norton, 1961).Google Scholar
Cairns, J. C., ‘Mill and history’, CW, XX, pp. viii–xciii.Google Scholar
Capaldi, N., John Stuart Mill: a biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Carli, S., ‘Poetry is more philosophical than history: Aristotle on mimêsis and form’, The Review of Metaphysics 64.2 (2010), pp. 303–326.Google Scholar
Carrithers, D. W., ‘Montesquieu and Tocqueville as philosophical historians’ in Kingston, R. E. (ed.), Montesquieu and his legacy (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009), pp. 149–179.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P., ‘Grote’s Sparta/Sparta’s Grote’ in Demetriou, K. N. (ed.), Brill’s companion to George Grote and the classical tradition (Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 255–273.Google Scholar
Castell, A., Mill’s logic of the moral sciences: a study of the impact of Newtonism on early nineteenth century social thought (Chicago: University of Chicago Libraries, 1936).Google Scholar
Ceserani, G., ‘Antiquarian transformations in eighteenth-century Europe’ in Schnapp, A. (ed.), World antiquarianism: comparative perspectives (Los Angeles: Getty, 2013), pp. 317–343.Google Scholar
Ceserani, G., ‘Modern histories of ancient Greece: genealogies, contexts, and eighteenth-century narrative historiography’ in Lianeri, A. (ed.), The western time of ancient history: historiographical encounters with the Greek and Roman pasts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 138–156.Google Scholar
Chabert, G., Un nouveau pouvoir spirituel. Auguste Comte et la religion scientifique au XIXe siècle (Presses universitaires de Caen, 2004).Google Scholar
Chattopadhyaya, D. P., Sociology, ideology and utopia: socio-political philosophy of east and west (Leiden: Brill, 1997).Google Scholar
Chen, J. S., James Mill’s History of British India in its intellectual context, PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh (2000).Google Scholar
Chen, J. S., ‘Providence and progress: the religious dimension in Ferguson’s discussion of civil society’ in Heath, E. and Merolle, V. (eds.), Adam Ferguson: history, progress and human nature (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2008), pp. 171–187.Google Scholar
Claeys, G., Citizens and saints: politics and anti-politics in early British socialism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Clark, E. A., History, theory, text: historians and the linguistic turn (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Class, M., Coleridge and Kantian ideas in England, 1796–1817: Coleridge’s responses to German philosophy (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012).Google Scholar
Cléro, J. P., ‘Bentham et Montesquieu’, Revue Française d’histoire des idées politiques 35 (2012), pp. 171–182.Google Scholar
Clive, J., ‘The use of the past in Victorian England’, Salmagundi 68/69 (1986), pp. 48–65.Google Scholar
Collini, S., English pasts: essays in history and culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Collini, S., Liberalism and sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and political argument in England 1880–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Collini, S., Public moralists: political thought and intellectual life in Britain, 1850–1930 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Collini, S., Winch, D., and Burrow, J., That noble science of politics: a study in nineteenth-century intellectual culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Compton, J. W., ‘The emancipation of the American mind: J. S. Mill on the Civil War’, Review of Politics 70 (2008), pp. 221–244.Google Scholar
Conti, G., ‘James Fitzjames Stephen, John Stuart Mill, and the Victorian theory of toleration’, History of European Ideas 42.3 (2016), pp. 364–398.Google Scholar
Coward, H. G., The perfectibility of human nature in Eastern and Western thought (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Craiutu, A., Liberalism under siege: the political thought of the French Doctrinaires (Oxford: Lexington, 2003).Google Scholar
Crimmins, J. E., ‘Bentham and utilitarianism in the early nineteenth century’ in Eggleston, B. and Miller, D. (eds.), The Cambridge companion to utilitarianism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 38–61.Google Scholar
Crimmins, J. E., ‘Bentham on religion: atheism and the secular society’, Journal of the History of Ideas 47.1 (1986), pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
Crimmins, J. E., ‘Bentham’s philosophical politics’, The Harvard Review of Philosophy 3.1 (1993), pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
Crimmins, J. E., Secular utilitarianism: social science and the critique of religion in the thought of Jeremy Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Crimmins, J. E., Utilitarian philosophy and politics. Bentham’s later years (London: Continuum, 2011).Google Scholar
Crisp, R., The cosmos of duty: Henry Sidgwick’s method of ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Croce, B. (trans. Ainslie, D.), Theory and history of historiography (London: G. G. Harrap & Co, 1921).Google Scholar
Crossley, C., ‘History as a principle of legitimation in France (1820–48)’ in Berger, S., Donovan, M., and Passmore, K. (eds.), Writing national histories: Western Europe since 1800 (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 49–57.Google Scholar
Crossley, C., Edgar Quinet: a study in romantic thought (Lexington: French Forum, 1983).Google Scholar
Crossley, C., French historians and romanticism: Thierry, Guizot, the Saint-Simonians, Quinet, Michelet (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Culler, A. D., The Victorian mirror of history (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Cumming, I., Helvétius: his life and place in the history of educational thought (London: Routledge, 1955).Google Scholar
D’Amico, R., ‘Historicism’ in Tucker, A. (ed.), A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), pp. 243–253.Google Scholar
Daston, L., Classical probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
De Champs, E., Enlightenment and utility: Bentham in French, Bentham in France (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
De Champs, E., ‘The place of Jeremy Bentham’s theory of fictions in eighteenth-century linguistic thought’, Journal of Bentham Studies 2 (1999), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N., ‘Bishop Thirlwall: historian of Ancient Greece’, Quaderni di Storia 56 (2002), pp. 49–91.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N., ‘In defence of the British constitution: theoretical implications of the debate over Athenian democracy in Britain, 1770–1850’, History of Political Thought 27.2 (1996), pp. 280–297.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N., ‘The sophists, democracy, and modern interpretation’, Polis 14 (1995), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N., ‘The spirit of Athens: George Grote and John Stuart Mill on classical republicanism’ in Demetriou, K. N. and Loizides, A. (eds.), John Stuart Mill: a British Socrates (London: Palgrave, 2013), pp. 176–207.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N., George Grote on Plato and Athenian democracy: a study in classical reception (Berne: Peter Lang, 1999).Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N., Studies in the reception of Plato and Greek political thought in Britain (Surrey: Ashgate, 2011).Google Scholar
Den Otter, S. M., ‘The origins of a historical political science in Late Victorian and Edwardian Britain’ in Adcock, R., Bevir, M., and Stimson, S. C. (eds.), Modern political science: Anglo-American exchanges since 1880 (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2007), pp. 37–66.Google Scholar
Devigne, R., Reforming liberalism: J. S. Mill’s use of ancient, liberal, and romantic moralities (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R. (ed. Twining, W.), Bentham. Selected writings of John Dinwiddy (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R, ‘Early-nineteenth-century reactions to Benthamism’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 34 (1984), pp. 47–69.Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R., ‘Bentham’s transition to political radicalism, 1809–10’, Journal of the History of Ideas 36.4 (1975), pp. 683–700.Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R., ‘Sir Frances Burdett and Burdette radicalism’, Journal of the Historical Association 65 (1980), pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R., Radicalism and reform in Britain, 1780–1850 (London: Hambledon, 1992).Google Scholar
Distad, N. M., ‘The Philological Museum of 1831–1833’, Victorian Periodicals Newsletter 18 (1972), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Dockhorn, K., Der Deutsche Historismus in England: Ein Beitrag zur Englischen Geistesgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1950).Google Scholar
Donner, W., ‘Mill’s utilitarianism’ in Skorupski, J. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 255–292.Google Scholar
Donner, W., ‘Morality, virtue, and aesthetics in Mill’s art of life’ in Eggleston, B., Miller, D., and Weinstein, D. (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the art of life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 146–165.Google Scholar
Donner, W., The liberal self: John Stuart Mill’s moral and political philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Dreyer, F. A., Burke’s politics: a study in Whig orthodoxy (Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Dube, A., ‘The tree of utility in India’ in Moir, M. I., Peers, D. M., and Zastoupil, L. (eds.), J. S. Mill’s encounter with India (Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1999), pp. 34–52.Google Scholar
Ebery, D., ‘Introduction’, in Ebery, D. (ed.), Theory and practice in Aristotle’s natural science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Edge, M., ‘Athens and the spectrum of liberty’, History of Political Thought 30 (2009), pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Edwards, P., ‘Coleridge on politics and religion’ in Burwick, F. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 235–254.Google Scholar
Edwards, P., The statesman’s science: history, nature, and law in the political thought of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, V., Man, state, and deity: essays in ancient history [1974] (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Eisenach, E. J., ‘Mill and liberal Christianity’ in Eisenach, E. J. (ed.), Mill and the moral character of liberalism (Pennsylvania: Penn State Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Eisenach, E. J., ‘The dimension of history in Bentham’s theory of law’ in Parekh, B. C. (ed.), Jeremy Bentham: critical assessments (London: Routledge, 1993), III, pp. 139–163.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J., John Stuart Mill’s philosophy of history, PhD dissertation, Drew University (2016).Google Scholar
Elster, J., Alexis de Tocqueville, the first social scientist (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. G. and Pitts, J., ‘Bentham’s “place and time”’, La revue Tocqueville 32.1 (2011), pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Evnine, S., ‘Hume, conjectural history, and the uniformity of human nature’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 31.4 (1993), pp. 589–606.Google Scholar
Feuer, L. S., ‘John Stuart Mill as a sociologist: the unwritten ethology’ in Robson, J. M. and Laine, M. (eds.), James and John Stuart Mill/Papers of the centenary conference (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976), pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
Filipiuk, M., ‘John Stuart Mill and France’, in Laine, M. (ed.), A cultivated mind: essays on J. S. Mill presented to John M. Robson (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991), pp. 80–120.Google Scholar
Fink, Z. S., The classical republicans: an essay in the recovery of a pattern of thought in seventeenth-century England [1945] (Illinois; Northwestern University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Finley, M. I., Ancient slavery and modern ideology (New Jersey: Viking Penguin, 1989).Google Scholar
Fischer, D. H., Historians’ fallacies: toward a logic of historical thought (London: Routledge, 1970).Google Scholar
Fontana, B., Benjamin Constant and the post-revolutionary mind (New Haven : Yale University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Fontana, B., ‘Democracy and civilisation: John Stuart Mill and the critique of political economy’, Economies et sociétés 20.3 (1986), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Fontana, B., Rethinking the politics of commercial society: The Edinburgh Review 1802–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Forbes, D., Hume’s philosophical politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Forbes, D., The liberal Anglican idea of history (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Franklin, M. J., ‘Orientalist Jones’: Sir William Jones, poet, lawyer, and linguist, 1746–1794 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Frazer, M., The enlightenment of sympathy: justice and the moral sentiments in the eighteenth century and today (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Fredman, L. E. and Gordin, B. L. J., ‘John Stuart Mill and socialism’, The Mill Newsletter 3.1 (1967), pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
Frye, L. T., ‘Temporality and spatial relations in Past and present: new insights into Carlyle’s philosophy of history’ in Kerry, E. and Judd, L. (eds.), Thomas Carlyle resartus: reappraising Carlyle’s contribution to the philosophy of history, political theory, and cultural criticism (New Jersey: Associated University Press, 2010), pp. 148–170.Google Scholar
Fuchs, E., ‘Conceptions of scientific history in the nineteenth-century west’ in Wang, E. and Iggers, G. G. (eds.), Turning points in historiography: a cross-cultural perspective (Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2002), pp. 147–163.Google Scholar
Fuller, C., ‘Bentham, Mill, Grote, and An analysis of the influence of natural religion on the temporal happiness of mankind’, Journal of Bentham Studies 10 (2008), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Garforth, F. W., John Stuart Mill’s theory of education (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1979).Google Scholar
Garver, E., Aristotle’s Politics: living well and living together (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Gibbins, J., ‘J. S. Mill, liberalism, and progress’ in Bellamy, R. (ed.), Victorian liberalism. Nineteenth-century political thought and practice (London: Routledge, 1990), pp. 91–110.Google Scholar
Gibbins, J. R., John Grote, Cambridge University and the development of Victorian ideas, 1830–1870, PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle (1987).Google Scholar
Gilmour, R., The Victorian period: the intellectual and cultural context of English literature, 1830–1890 (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C., ‘Checking the evidence: the judge and the historian’, Critical Enquiry 1 (1991), pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
Giorgini, G., ‘Three visions of liberty: John Stuart Mill, Isaiah Berlin, Quentin Skinner’ in Demetriou, K. N. and Loizides, A. (eds.), John Stuart Mill: a British Socrates (London: Palgrave, 2013), pp. 207–230.Google Scholar
Goldman, L., ‘Victorian social science: from singular to plural’ in Daunton, M. (ed.), The organisation of knowledge in Victorian Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 87–115.Google Scholar
Goodin, R., Utilitarianism as a public philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Gray, J. N., ‘John Stuart Mill: traditional and revisionist interpretations’, Literature of Liberty 11.2 (1979), pp. 7–37.Google Scholar
Griggs, T., ‘Universal history from the Counter-Reformation to Enlightenment’, Modern Intellectual History 4.2 (2007), pp. 219–247.Google Scholar
Grint, K., James Mill’s common place books and their intellectual context, 1773–1836, PhD dissertation, University of Sussex (2013).Google Scholar
Guillin, V., Auguste Comte and John Stuart Mill on sexual equality: historical, methodological and philosophical issues (Leiden: Brill, 2009).Google Scholar
Habibi, D. A., John Stuart Mill and the ethic of human growth (Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 2001).Google Scholar
Halévy, E. (trans. Morris, M.), The growth of Philosophic Radicalism (London: Faber and Faber, 1972).Google Scholar
Harré, R., ‘Positivist thought in the nineteenth-century’ in Baldwin, T., (ed.), The Cambridge history of philosophy 1870–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 11–26.Google Scholar
Harris, A. L., ‘John Stuart Mill’s theory of progress’, Ethics 66 (1956), pp. 157–175.Google Scholar
Harrison, R., ‘John Stuart Mill, mid-Victorian’ in Stedman Jones, G. and Claeys, G. (eds.), The Cambridge history of nineteenth-century political thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 295–319.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., Essays on Bentham. Studies in jurisprudence and political theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Hawkins, A., Victorian political culture: ‘habits of heart and mind’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Henary, S., ‘Tocqueville and the challenge of historicism’, The Review of Politics 76 (2014), pp. 469–494.Google Scholar
Herbert, C., Victorian relativity: radical thought and scientific discovery (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hesketh, I., The science of history in Victorian Britain: making the past speak (Oxford: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Heyck, T. W., The transformation of intellectual life in Victorian England (London: Cromo Helm, 1982).Google Scholar
Heydt, C. , ‘Narrative, imagination, and the religion of humanity in Mill’s ethics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 44.1 (2006), pp. 99–115.Google Scholar
Hilton, B., A mad, bad, and dangerous people? England 1783–1846 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, G., ‘Bentham scholarship and the Bentham problem’ in Parekh, B. C. (ed.), Jeremy Bentham: critical assessments (London: Routledge, 1993), I, pp. 423–443.Google Scholar
Hoesch, M., ‘From theory to practice: Bentham’s reception of Helvétius’, Utilitas 30.3 (2018), pp. 294–317.Google Scholar
Hollander, S., The economics of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1985), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Holmes, S., ‘The liberty to denounce: ancient and modern’ in Rosenblatt, H. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Constant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 47–69.Google Scholar
Hont, I., ‘Adam Smith’s history of law and government as political theory’ in Bourke, R. and Geuss, R. (eds.), Political judgement: essays for John Dunn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 131–172.Google Scholar
Hont, I., ‘The language of sociability and commerce: Samuel Pufendorf and the theoretical foundations of the four stages theory’ in Pagden, A. (ed.), The languages of political theory in early modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 227–99.Google Scholar
Hont, I., Jealousy of trade: international competition and the nation-state in historical perspective (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hoogensen, G., International relations, security and Jeremy Bentham (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Höpfl, H. M., ‘From savage to Scotsman: conjectural history in the Scottish Enlightenment’, Journal of British Studies 17.2 (1978), pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
Houghton, W., The Victorian frame of mind 1830–1870 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Hulliung, M., ‘Rousseau, Voltaire, and the revenge of Pascal’ in Riley, P. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Rousseau (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
Iggers, G. G., ‘Historicism: the history and meaning of the term’, Journal of the History of Ideas 56.1 (1995), pp. 129–152.Google Scholar
Iggers, G. G., The cult of authority: the political philosophy of the Saint-Simonians (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970).Google Scholar
Iggers, G. G., The German conception of history: the national tradition of historical thought from Herder to the present (Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H., ‘Mill and the classical world’ in Skorupski, J. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 423–463.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. E., The voice of Harriet Taylor Mill (Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Jann, R., The art and science of Victorian history (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Jaume, L., Tocqueville: the aristocratic sources of liberty (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Jennings, J., ‘Constant’s idea of modern liberty’ in Rosenblatt, H. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Constant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 69–92.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S., Intellect and character in Victorian England: Mark Pattinson and the invention of the Don (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Jones, H. S., ‘John Stuart Mill as moralist’, Journal of the History of Ideas 53.2 (1992), pp. 287–308.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S., ‘“The true Baconian and Newtonian method”: Tocqueville’s place in the formation of Mill’s System of logic’, History of European Ideas 25.3 (1999), pp. 153–161.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S., ‘The early utilitarians, race, and empire: the state of the argument’ in Schultz, B. and Varouxakis, G. (eds.), Utilitarianism and empire (Oxford: Lexington, 2005), pp. 179–187.Google Scholar
Jones, T. B., ‘George Grote and his History of Greece’, The Classical Weekly 29.8 (1935), pp. 59–61.Google Scholar
Joy, G. C. and McKinney, A. M., ‘On a supposed inconsistency in Mill’s utilitarianism’, Southwest Philosophical Studies 14 (1992), pp. 84–91.Google Scholar
Jung, T., ‘The politics of time: Zeitgeist in early nineteenth-century political discourse’, Contributions to the History of Concepts 9.1 (2014), pp. 24–49.Google Scholar
Jupp, P., The governing of Britain, 1688–1848: the executive, Parliament, and the people (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Justman, S., The hidden text of Mill’s liberty (Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 1991).Google Scholar
Kahan, A., Tocqueville, democracy, and religion: checks and balances for democratic souls (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Kawana, Y., John Stuart Mill’s projected science of society: 1827–1848, PhD dissertation, University College London (2009).Google Scholar
Kawana, Y., Logic and society: the political thought of John Stuart Mill, 1827–1848 (London: Palgrave, 2018).Google Scholar
Kent, C., Brains and numbers: elitism, Comtism, and democracy in mid-Victorian England (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Kent Wright, J., ‘History and historicism’ in Porter, T. M. and Ross, D. (eds.), The Cambridge history of science: the modern social sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 113–131.Google Scholar
Kierstead, J., ‘Grote’s Athens: the character of democracy’ in Demetriou, K. N. (ed.), Brill’s companion to George Grote and the classical tradition (Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 161–211.Google Scholar
Kiliminster, R., The sociological revolution: from the Enlightenment to the global age (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Kingstone, H., Victorian narratives of the recent past: memory, history, fiction (London: Palgrave, 2017).Google Scholar
Kinzer, B., ‘George Grote, the Philosophic Radical and politician’ in Demetriou, K. N. (ed.), Brill’s companion to George Grote and the classical tradition (Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 16–47.Google Scholar
Kinzer, B., ‘J. S. Mill and the secret ballot’, Historical Reflections 5. 1 (1978), pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
Kinzer, B., J. S. Mill revisited: biographical and political explorations (London: Palgrave, 2007).Google Scholar
Kippur, S. A., Jules Michelet: a study of mind and sensibility (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Kitcher, P., ‘Mill, education, and the good life’ in Eggleston, B., Miller, D., and Weinstein, D. (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the art of life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 192–215.Google Scholar
Knights, B., The idea of the clerisy in nineteenth-century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Knowles, A., ‘Conjecturing rudeness: James Mill’s utilitarian philosophy of history and the British civilising mission’ in Watt, C. A. and Mann, M. (eds.), Civilising missions in colonial and postcolonial South Asia (London: Anthem, 2011), pp. 37–65.Google Scholar
Knudsen, J., ‘The historicist Enlightenment’ in Baker, K. M. and Reill, P. (eds.), What’s left of Enlightenment? A postmodern question (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001), pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
Koditschek, T., Liberalism, imperialism, and the historical imagination: nineteenth-century visions of a greater Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Kooy, M. J., ‘Romanticism and Coleridge’s idea of history’, Journal of the History of Ideas 60.4 (1999), pp. 717–735.Google Scholar
Kosso, P., ‘Philosophy of historiography’ in Tucker, A. (ed.), A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
Krieger, L., Ranke: the meaning of history (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Krieger, L., Time’s reasons: philosophies of history old and new (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Kuklick, B., ‘Seven thinkers and how they grew’ in Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Q. (eds.), Philosophy in history: essays on the historiography of philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 125–141.Google Scholar
Laborde, C. and Maynor, J., ‘The republican contribution to political theory’ in Laborde, C. and Maynor, J. (eds.), Republicanism and political theory (Oxford: Wiley & Sons, 2009), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Lachs, J., ‘Mill and Constant: a neglected connection in the history of the idea of liberty’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (1992), pp. 87–96.Google Scholar
Lane, M., ‘Political theory and time’ in Baert, P. N. (ed.), Time in modern intellectual thought (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000), pp. 233–251.Google Scholar
Le Rider, J., ‘La codification, objet de la controverse Thibaut-Savigny’ in Kamecke, G. and Rider, Le, J. (eds.), La codification: perspectives transdisciplinaires (Paris: Librairie Droz, 2007), pp. 161–179.Google Scholar
Levine, P. J. A., The amateur and the professional: antiquarians, historians, and archaeologists in Victorian England 1838–1886 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Lewisohn, D., ‘Mill and Comte on the methods of social science’, Journal of the History of Ideas 33 (1972), pp. 315–324.Google Scholar
Lianeri, A., ‘Unfounding times: the idea and ideal of ancient history in Western historical thought’ in Lianeri, A. (ed.), The western time of ancient history: historiographical encounters with the Greek and Roman pasts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Liddel, P., ‘Liberty and obligation in George Grote’s Athens’, Polis 23 (2006), pp. 140–161.Google Scholar
Liddel, P., ‘The comparative approach in Grote’s History of Greece’ in Demetriou, K. N. (ed.), Brill’s companion to George Grote and the classical tradition (Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 211–254.Google Scholar
Liddel, P., Civic obligation and individual liberty in ancient Athens (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Liebel, H. P., ‘The Enlightenment and the rise of historicism in German thought’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 4.4 (1971), pp. 359–385.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., ‘Adam Smith on justice, rights, and law’ in Haakonssen, K. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Adam Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 214–246.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., ‘From Bentham to Benthamism’, The Historical Journal 28.1 (1985), pp. 199–224.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., The province of legislation determined (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Lifschitz, A., Language and Enlightenment: the Berlin debates of the eighteenth century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Lindsay, A. D., ‘Introduction’ in Grote, G. (ed. Lindsay, A. D.), History of Greece [1846–1856] (London: Dent, 1906), I, pp. vii-xiv.Google Scholar
Lively, J. and Rees, J. (eds.), Utilitarian logic and politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Loizides, A., ‘Induction, deduction, and James Mill’s “Government”’, Modern Intellectual History (2015), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Loizides, A., ‘James Mill and George Grote: a defence of “theoretic freedom”’ in Demetriou, K. N. (ed.), Brill’s companion to George Grote and the classical tradition (Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 47–85.Google Scholar
Loizides, A., ‘Mill on the method of politics’ in Loizides, A. (ed.), Mill’s A system of logic: critical appraisals (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 218–246.Google Scholar
Loizides, A., John Stuart Mill’s Platonic heritage: happiness through character (Lanham: Lexington, 2013).Google Scholar
Long, D. G., Bentham on liberty: Jeremy Bentham’s idea of liberty in relation to his utilitarianism (Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Long, D. G., ‘Censorial jurisprudence and political radicalism: a reconsideration of the early Bentham’, The Bentham Newsletter 12 (1988), pp. 4–24.Google Scholar
López, R., ‘John Stuart Mill’s idea of history: a rhetoric of progress’, Res Publica: Revista de Filosofía Política, 27 (2012), pp. 63–74.Google Scholar
Loring, R., ‘The role of universal jurisprudence in Bentham’s legal cosmopolitanism’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 13 (2014), http://journals.openedition.org/etudes-benthamiennes/749, last accessed on 7 June 2017.Google Scholar
Losman, D. L., ‘J. S. Mill on alternative economic systems’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 30 (1971), pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
Macedo, S., Liberal virtues: citizenship, virtue, and community in liberal constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Macgregor Morris, I., ‘Navigating the Grotesque; or, rethinking Greek historiography’ in Moore, J., Macgregor Morris, I., and Bayliss, A. J. (eds.), Reinventing history: the Enlightenment origins of ancient history (London: Institute of Historical Research, 2008), pp. 247–290.Google Scholar
Macintyre, S., Maiguashca, J., and Pók, A. (eds.), The Oxford history of historical writing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011–2015), 5 vols.Google Scholar
Macleod, C., ‘Mill on history’ in Macleod, C. and Miller, D. (eds.), A companion to Mill (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2017), pp. 266–279.Google Scholar
Mack, M. P., Jeremy Bentham: an odyssey of ideas, 1748–1792 (London: Heinemann, 1962).Google Scholar
Majeed, J., ‘James Mill’s The history of British India: a reevaluation’ in Moir, M. I., Peers, D. M., and Zastoupil, L. (eds.), J. S. Mill’s encounter with India (Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1999), pp. 53–72.Google Scholar
Majeed, J., Ungoverned imaginings: James Mill’s The history of British India and orientalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Mandler, P., The English national character: the history of an idea from Edmund Burke to Tony Blair (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Manin, B., The principles of representative government (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Mansfield, H. C. and Winthrop, D., ‘Tocqueville’s new political science’ in Welch, C. B. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Tocqueville (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 81–108.Google Scholar
Manuel, F., The prophets of Paris: Turgot, Condorcet, Saint-Simon, Fourier, and Comte (New York: Harper, 1962).Google Scholar
Manuel, F., The new world of Henri Saint-Simon (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Marsh, J. L., Critique, action and liberation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Marshall, D., Vico and the transformation of rhetoric in early modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Marwah, I. S. ‘Complicating barbarism and civilisation: Mill’s complex sociology of human development’, History of Political Thought 32.2 (2011), pp. 345–366.Google Scholar
Marwah, I. S., Liberalism, diversity, and domination: Kant, Mill, and the government of difference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Mayer, P., ‘Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill’, The Listener 43 (1950), pp. 471–472.Google Scholar
Mazlish, B., James and John Stuart Mill. Father and son in the Nineteenth Century (London: Hutchinson, 1975).Google Scholar
McCabe, H., ‘Navigating by the North Star: the role of the “ideal” in John Stuart Mill’s view of “utopian” schemes and the possibilities of social transformation’, Utilitas 31 (2019), pp. 291–309.Google Scholar
McCalla, A., ‘Romantic Vicos: Vico and providence in Michelet and Ballanche’, Réflexions historiques 19.3 (1993), pp. 389–408.Google Scholar
McKown, D. B., Behold the antichrist. Bentham on religion (New York: Prometheus, 2004).Google Scholar
Mehta, U., Liberalism and empire: a study in nineteenth-century British liberal thought (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Meinecke, F., Historism: the rise of a new historical outlook (New York: Herder and Herder, 1972).Google Scholar
Melman, B., ‘Claiming the nation’s past: the invention of an Anglo-Saxon tradition’, Journal of Contemporary History 26 (1991), pp. 575–595.Google Scholar
Merrill, T. W., Hume and the politics of Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Meyer, A., ‘Ferguson’s “appropriate stile”’ in Heath, E. and Merolle, V. (eds.), Adam Ferguson: history, progress and human nature (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2008), pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
Middell, M., ‘The French Revolution in the global world of the eighteenth century’ in Forest, A. and Middell, M. (eds.), The Routledge companion to the French Revolution in world history (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
Mill, A. J., ‘John Stuart Mill’s visit to Wordsworth, 1831’, The Modern Language Review 44 (1949), pp. 341–350.Google Scholar
Millgram, E., John Stuart Mill and the meaning of life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. A., ‘Bentham and his school’ in Parekh, B. C. (ed.), Jeremy Bentham: critical assessments (London: Routledge, 1993), I, pp. 290–317.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H., Individual choice and the structures of history: Alex de Tocqueville as historian reappraised (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Picturing the past: English history in text and image, 1830–1870 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (eds. Bowersock, G. W. and Cornell, T. J.), A. D. Momigliano: studies on modern scholarship (London: University of California Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Morales, M., Perfect equality: John Stuart Mill on well-constituted communities (Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Moyer, C. R., ‘The idea of history in Thomas and Matthew Arnold’, Modern Philology 67 (1969), pp. 160–167.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. W., John Stuart Mill and French thought (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Muhlack, U., ‘German Enlightenment historiography and the rise of historicism’ in Bourgault, S. and Sparling, R. (eds.), A companion to Enlightenment historiography (Leiden: Brill, 2013), pp. 249–307.Google Scholar
Muhlack, U., ‘Universal history and national history: eighteenth- and nineteenth-century German historians and the scholarly community’ in Stuchtey, B. and Wende, P. (eds.), British and German historiography 1750–1950: traditions, perceptions, and transfers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
Mulgan, T., ‘Utilitarianism and our obligations to future people’ in Eggleston, B. and Miller, D. (eds.), The Cambridge companion to utilitarianism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 325–348.Google Scholar
Murray, C. J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Romantic era (London: Routledge, 2004), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Newbould, I., Whiggery and reform 1830–41: the politics of government (California: Stanford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Nicholson, P., The political philosophy of the British Idealists: selected studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Nickau, K., ‘Karl Otfried Müller, Professor der Klassischen Philologie 1819–1840’ in Classen, C. J. (ed.), Die Klassische Altertumswissenschaft an der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989), pp. 27–53.Google Scholar
Nippel, W., Ancient and modern democracy: two concepts of liberty? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Nippel, W., Antike oder moderne Freiheit? Die Begründung der Demokratie in Athen und in der Neuzeit (Berlin: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 2008).Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. A., Metaphor and history: the Western idea of social development [1969] (London: Transaction, 2009).Google Scholar
Nora, P., ‘Introduction’ in Nora, P. (ed.), Rethinking France: les lieux de mémoire [1984] (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010), IV, pp. vii–xiv.Google Scholar
Noronha-DiVanna, I., Writing history in the Third Republic (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
O’Brien, K., ‘English Enlightenment histories 1750–c.1815’ in Rabasa, J. and Woolf, D. R. (eds.), The Oxford history of historical writing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), III, pp. 518–536.Google Scholar
O’Brien, K., Narratives of Enlightenment: cosmopolitan history from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
O’Neill, D. I., The Burke-Wollstonecraft debate: savagery, civilisation, and democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Ober, J., ‘What the ancient Greeks can tell us about democracy’, Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008), pp. 67–91.Google Scholar
Oexle, O. G., Geschichtswissenschaft im Zeichen des Historismus: Studien zu Problemgeschichten der Moderne (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1996).Google Scholar
Okie, L., Augustan historical writing: histories of England in the English Enlightenment (New York: University Press of America, 1991).Google Scholar
Palmer, T. G., Realising freedom: libertarian theory, history, and practice (Washington: Cato Institute, 2009).Google Scholar
Palmeri, F., State of nature, stages of society: Enlightenment conjectural history and modern social discourse (New York: Columbia University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Pappé, H. O., ‘Mill and Tocqueville’, Journal of the History of Ideas 25.2 (1964), pp. 217–234.Google Scholar
Parker, C., ‘English historians and the opposition to positivism’, History and Theory 22 (1983), pp. 120–145.Google Scholar
Pateman, C., Participation and democratic theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Peltonen, M. ‘Introduction’ in Peltonen, M. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Bacon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Petit, A., Le système d’Auguste Comte: de la science à la religion par la philosophie (Paris: Vrin, 2016).Google Scholar
Pettit, P., Made with words: Hobbes on language, mind, and politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Phillips, M. S., ‘Relocating inwardness: historical distance and the transition from Enlightenment to Romantic historiography’, Modern Language Association 118.3 (2003), pp. 436–449.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. S., Society and sentiment: genres of historical writing in Britain, 1740–1820 (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Philp, M., Reforming ideas in Britain: politics and language in the shadow of the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Pick, D., ‘Psychoanalysis, history and national culture’ in Feldman, D. and Lawrence, J. (eds.), Structures and transformations in modern British history (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 210–237.Google Scholar
Pickering, M., ‘Auguste Comte and the Saint-Simonians’, French Historical Studies 18 (1993), pp. 211–236.Google Scholar
Pickering, M., Auguste Comte: an intellectual biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993–2009), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Pilbeam, P., Saint-Simonians in nineteenth-century France: from free love to Algeria (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Pittcock, M. G. H., ‘Historiography’ in Broadie, A. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 258–280.Google Scholar
Pitts, J., A turn to empire: the rise of imperial liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Pitts, J., ‘The global in Enlightenment historical thought’ in Duara, P., Murthy, V., and Sartori, A. (eds.), A companion to global historical thought (Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2014), pp. 184–197.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., Political thought and history: essays on theory and method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Adam Smith and history’ in Haakonssen, K. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Adam Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 270–288.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Perceptions of modernity in early modern historical thinking’, Intellectual History Review 17 (2007), pp. 55–63.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., Barbarism and religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999–2015), 6 vols.Google Scholar
Pompa, L., Vico: a study of the ‘new science’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Popper, K., The open society and its enemies [1945] (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Porter, T. N., The rise of statistical thinking 1820–1900 (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Posner, R. A., ‘Blackstone and Bentham’, The Journal of Law and Economics 19.3 (1976), pp. 569–606.Google Scholar
Postema, G., ‘The expositor, the censor, and the common law’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9.4 (1979), pp. 643–670.Google Scholar
Potter, E., Confronting modernity: ancient Athens and modern British political thought c. 1780s–1880s, PhD dissertation, University of Royal Holloway (2004).Google Scholar
Pradhan, S. V., ‘The historiographer of reason: Coleridge’s philosophy of history’, Studies in Romanticism 25.1 (1986), pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Prest, W., ‘William Blackstone and the “free constitution of Britain”’ in Galligan, D. (ed.), Constitutions and the classics: patterns of constitutional thought from Fortescue to Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 191–231.Google Scholar
Preyer, R. O., ‘John Stuart Mill on the utility of classical Greece’, Browning Institute Studies 10 (1982), pp. 41–70.Google Scholar
Preyer, R. O., Bentham, Coleridge, and the science of history (Bochum-Langendreer: Verlag Heinrich Pöppinghaus, 1958).Google Scholar
Price, R., ‘Historiography, narrative, and the nineteenth century’, Journal of British Studies 35.2 (1996), pp. 220–256.Google Scholar
Qualter, T. H., ‘John Stuart Mill, disciple of de Tocqueville’, Western Political Quarterly 13 (1960), pp. 880–889.Google Scholar
Quinalt, R., ‘The French Revolution of 1830 and parliamentary reform’, History 79 (1994), pp. 377–393.Google Scholar
Quinn, M., ‘Which comes first, Bentham’s chicken of utility, or his egg of truth?’, Journal of Bentham Studies 14 (2012), pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Raeder, L. C., John Stuart Mill and the religion of humanity (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (ed. Freeman, S.), Lectures on the history of political philosophy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Regan, J., ‘No “nonsense upon stilts”: James Mill’s History of British India and the poetics of Benthamite historiography’ in Fermanis, P. and Regan, J. (eds.), Rethinking British Romantic history (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 72–94.Google Scholar
Reill, P. H., ‘Barthold Georg Niebuhr and the Enlightenment tradition’, German Studies Review 3 (1980), pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
Reill, P. H., The German Enlightenment and the rise of historicism (California: University of California Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Rendall, J., ‘Scottish orientalism: from Robertson to James Mill’, Historical Journal 25.1 (1982), pp. 43–69.Google Scholar
Richter, C., ‘Friedrich Schleiermacher: symbol theory, hermeneutics, and forms of religious communication’ in Sockness, B. W. and Gräb, W. (eds.), Schleiermacher, the study of religion, and the future of theology: a transatlantic dialogue (Walter de Gruyter, 2010), pp. 375–391.Google Scholar
Riley, J., ‘Interpreting Mill’s quantitative hedonism’, The Philosophical Quarterly 53 (2003), pp. 410–18.Google Scholar
Riley, J. R., ‘J. S. Mill’s liberal utilitarian assessment of capitalism versus socialism’, Utilitas 8.1 (1996), pp. 39–71.Google Scholar
Riley, J. R., ‘Mill’s Greek ideal of individuality’ in Demetriou, K. N. and Loizides, A. (eds.), John Stuart Mill: a British Socrates (London: Palgrave, 2013), pp. 97–126.Google Scholar
Riley, J. R., ‘Mill’s neo-Athenian model of liberal democracy’ in Urbinati, N. and Zakaras, A. (eds.), J. S. Mill’s political thought: a bicentennial reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 221–250.Google Scholar
Roberts, C., The logic of historical explanation (Pennsylvania: Penn State Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Roberts, J. T., Athens on trial: the antidemocratic tradition in Western thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Roberts, W., ‘Bentham’s conception of political change: a liberal approach’ in Parekh, B. C. (ed.), Jeremy Bentham: critical assessments (London: Routledge, 1993), III, pp. 952–966.Google Scholar
Robson, J. M., The improvement of mankind: the social and political thought of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Rosen, F., ‘The method of reform: J. S. Mill’s encounter with Bentham and Coleridge’ in Urbinati, N. and Zakaras, A. (eds.), J. S. Mill’s political thought: a bicentennial reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 124–147.Google Scholar
Rosen, F., ‘The philosophy of error and liberty of thought: J. S. Mill on logical fallacies’ in Demetriou, K. N. and Loizides, A. (eds.), John Stuart Mill: a British Socrates (London: Palgrave, 2013), pp. 17–49.Google Scholar
Rosen, F., Jeremy Bentham and representative democracy: a study of The constitutional code (Clarendon: Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
Rosen, S., The ancients and the moderns: rethinking modernity (Indianapolis: St Augustine Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Rossi, P., ‘Bacon’s idea of science’ in Peltonen, M. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Bacon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Rudan, P., ‘Society as a code: Bentham and the fabric of order’, History of European Ideas 42.1 (2016), pp. 39–54.Google Scholar
Rumble, W. E., ‘John Austin and his nineteenth-century critics: the case of Sir Henry Summer Maine’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 39 (1988), pp. 119–149.Google Scholar
Ryan, A., ‘Two concepts of democracy: James and John Stuart Mill’ in Lively, J. and Reeve, A. (eds.), Modern political theory from Hobbes to Marx: key debates (London: Routledge, 1989), pp. 220–248.Google Scholar
Sabine, G. H., ‘Hume’s contribution to the historical method’, Philosophical Review 15 (1906), pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Sato, S., Edmund Burke as historian: war, order, and civilisation (Cham: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A. W., Free speech and democracy in ancient Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Scarre, G., ‘Mill on induction and scientific method’ in Skorupski, J. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 112–138.Google Scholar
Scarre, G., Logic and reality in the philosophy of John Stuart Mill (Dordect: Kluwer Academic, 1989).Google Scholar
Schlicke, P., ‘Hazlitt, Horne, and the spirit of the age’, Studies in English Literature 45.4 (2005), pp. 829–851.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C., David Hume: reason in history (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., ‘Dugald Stewart, “conjectural history” and the decline of Enlightenment historical writing in the 1790s’ in Broich, U., Dickinson, H. T., Hellmuth, E., and Schmidt, M. (eds.), Reactions to revolutions: the 1790s and their aftermath (Berlin: Verlag, 2007), pp. 231–263.Google Scholar
Schofield, P., ‘Bentham on taste, sex, and religion’ in Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (eds.), Bentham’s theory of law and public opinion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 90–119.Google Scholar
Schofield, P., ‘Bentham on the identification of interests’, Utilitas 8 (1996), pp. 223–234.Google Scholar
Schofield, P., ‘Jeremy Bentham and nineteenth-century English jurisprudence’, The Journal of Legal History 12.1 (1991), pp. 58–88.Google Scholar
Schofield, P., ‘Jeremy Bentham: legislator of the world’, Current Legal Problems 51 (1998), pp. 115–147.Google Scholar
Schofield, P., Utility and democracy: the political thought of Jeremy Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Schultz, A., Mind’s world: imagination and subjectivity from Descartes to Romanticism (Seattle: Washington University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Scott, J., Commonwealth principles: republican writing on the English Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Sebastiani, S., The Scottish Enlightenment: race, gender, and the limits of progress (London: Palgrave, 2013).Google Scholar
Seidman, S., Liberalism and the origins of European social theory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Sell, A. P. F., Mill on God: the pervasiveness and elusiveness of Mill’s religious thought (London: Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar
Sikka, S., Herder on humanity and cultural difference: enlightened relativism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Simmons, C. A., Eyes across the channel: French revolutions, party history, and British writing, 1830–1832 (Amsterdam: Harwood, 2000).Google Scholar
Skinner, Q., Visions of politics: regarding method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Smith, C., ‘The Scottish Enlightenment, unintended consequences, and the science of man’, The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7.1 (2009), pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Fact and feeling: Baconian science and the nineteenth-century literary imagination (Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Smith, R., Free will and the human sciences in Britain, 1870–1910 (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Smith, R. J., The Gothic bequest: medieval institutions in British thought, 1688–1863 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Snyder, L. J., Reforming philosophy: a Victorian debate on science and society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M., ‘Ideology, social science and general facts in late eighteenth-century French political thought’, History of European Ideas 35 (2009), pp. 24–37.Google Scholar
Spadafora, D., The idea of progress in eighteenth-century Britain (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Spahn, P., ‘George Grote, John Stuart Mill und die antike Demokratie’ in Gähde, U. and Schrader, W. H. (eds.), Der klassische Utilitarianismus (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1991), pp. 145–172.Google Scholar
Sperber, J., The European revolutions, 1848–1851 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Srbik, H. R., Geist und Geschichte vom deutschen Humanismus bis zur Gegenwart (Salzberg: Otto Muller Verlag, 1960).Google Scholar
Stanley, A. P., The life and correspondence of Thomas Arnold (Boston: Ticknor and Fields, 1868), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Staum, M. S., Minerva’s message: stabilising the French Revolution (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Stewart, L., ‘A meaning for machines: modernity, utility, and the eighteenth‐century British public’, Journal of Modern History 70.2 (1998), pp. 259–294.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. S., ‘Utilitarianism meets Romanticism: J. S. Mill’s theory of imagination’, History of Philosophy 10.4 (1993), pp. 369–388.Google Scholar
Stray, S., ‘“Thucydides or Grote?” Classical disputes and disputed classics in nineteenth-century Cambridge’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 127 (1974), pp. 363–371.Google Scholar
Stroud, B., ‘Hume and the idea of causal necessity’, Philosophical Studies 33.1 (1978), pp. 39–59.Google Scholar
Stuchtey, B. and Wende, P., ‘Towards a comparative history of Anglo-German historiographical traditions and transfers’ in Stuchtey, B. and Wende, P. (eds.), British and German historiography 1750–1950: traditions, perceptions, and transfers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Thomas, W., ‘James Mill’s politics: the Essay on government and the movement for reform’, History Journal 12.2 (1969), pp. 249–284.Google Scholar
Thomas, W., ‘James Mill’s politics: a rejoinder’, Historical Journal 14.4 (1971), pp. 735–770.Google Scholar
Thomas, W., ‘Introduction’ in Mill, J., The History of British India (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Thomas, W., The Philosophic Radicals. Nine studies in theory and practice 1817–1841 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Thompson, D., John Stuart Mill and representative government (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Tresch, J., The romantic machine: utopian science and technology after Napoleon (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Tritle, L. A., ‘The Athens of George Grote: historiography and Philosophic Radicalism’ in Mellor, R. and Tritle, L. A. (eds.), Text and tradition: studies in Greek history and historiography in honour of Mortimer Chambers (California: Regina, 1999), pp. 368–379.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. (ed.), A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).Google Scholar
Turner, F. M., ‘Antiquity in Victorian contexts’, Browning Institute Studies 10 (1982), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Turner, F. M., The Greek heritage in Victorian Britain (Yale: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Turner, J., Philology: the forgotten origins of the modern humanities (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Turner, M. J., Independent radicalism in early Victorian Britain (London: Greenwood, 2004).Google Scholar
Turner, S. (eds. Cohen, R. S. and Wartowsky, M. W.), The search for a methodology of social science: Durkheim, Weber, and the nineteenth-century problem of cause, probability, and action (Dordrecht: Springer, 1986).Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., ‘The many heads of the hydra: J. S. Mill on despotism’ in Urbinati, N. and Zakaras, A. (eds.), J. S. Mill’s political thought: a bicentennial reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 66–97.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., Mill on democracy: from the Athenian ‘polis’ to representative government (London: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Valls, A., ‘Self-development and the liberal state: the cases of John Stuart Mill and Wilhelm von Humboldt’, The Review of Politics 61 (1999), pp. 251–274.Google Scholar
Van Holthoon, F. L., ‘Hume and the end of history’ in Spencer, M. G. (ed.), David Hume: historical thinker, historical writer (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press, 2013), pp. 143–163.Google Scholar
Van Holthoon, F. L., The road to utopia: a study of John Stuart Mill’s social thought (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1971).Google Scholar
Varouxakis, G., ‘French radicalism through the eyes of John Stuart Mill’, History of European Ideas 30.4 (2004), pp. 433–461.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, G., ‘Guizot’s historical works and J. S. Mill’s reception of Tocqueville’, History of Political Thought 20.2 (1999), pp. 292–312.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, G., ‘National character in John Stuart Mill’s thought’, History of European Ideas 24.6 (1998), pp. 375–391.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, G., Victorian political thought on France and the French (London: Palgrave, 2002).Google Scholar
Vartanian, A., Science and humanism in the French Enlightenment (Charlottesville: Rockwood, 1999).Google Scholar
Vernon, R., ‘The political self: Auguste Comte and phrenology’, History of European Ideas 7 (1986), pp. 271–86.Google Scholar
Vieira, R. A., Time and politics: parliament and the culture of modernity in Britain and the British world (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Vlassopoulos, K., Politics: antiquity and its legacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Wagner, P., ‘Transformations of democracy: towards a history of political thought and practice in long-term perspective’ in Arnason, J. P., Raaflaub, K. A., and Wagner, P. (eds.), The Greek polis and the invention of democracy: a politico-cultural transformation and its interpretations (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013), pp. 47–69.Google Scholar
Walch, J., Les maîtres de l’histoire 1815–1850: Augustin Thierry, Mignet, Guizot, Thiers, Michelet, Edgar Quinet (Paris: Champion-Slatkine, 1986).Google Scholar
Wallace, V., ‘Benthamite radicalism and its Scots Presbyterian contexts’, Utilitas 24.1 (2012), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Ward, L., The politics of liberty in England and Revolutionary America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Watkins, M., The philosophical progress of Hume’s Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Wormald, H. G., Francis Bacon: history, politics, and science, 1561–1626 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Webb, S. (ed. Shaw, G. B.), Fabian essays in socialism (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1948).Google Scholar
Weinberg, A., The influence of Auguste Comte on the economics of John Stuart Mill [1949] (London: E.G. Weinberg, 1982).Google Scholar
Wernick, A., Auguste Comte and the religion of humanity: the post-theistic program of French social theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
West, H. R., An introduction to Mill’s utilitarian ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Whedbee, K. E., ‘Reclaiming rhetorical democracy: George Grote’s defense of Cleon and the Athenian Demagogues’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 34.4 (2004), pp. 71–95.Google Scholar
Whelan, F. J., Order and artifice in Hume’s political philosophy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K., ‘John Stuart Mill’s methodology’, Journal of Political Economy 83 (1975), pp. 1033–1049.Google Scholar
White, H., Metahistory: the historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Williams, G. L., ‘J. S. Mill on the Greeks: history put to use’, The Mill newsletter 17.1 (1982), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R., Jules Michelet: historian as critic of French literature (Alabama: Summa, 1987).Google Scholar
Winch, D. (ed.), James Mill: selected economic writings (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1966).Google Scholar
Wintle, M., ‘Britain, Belgium, and the Netherlands and the historical imagination in the nineteenth century: an introduction’ in Dunthorne, H. and Wintle, M., The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Britain and the Low Countries (Leiden: Brill, 2012), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Wolloch, N., History and nature in the Enlightenment: praise of the mastery of nature in eighteenth-century historical literature (Surrey: Ashgate, 2011).Google Scholar
Wood, I., The modern origins of the Early Middle Ages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Wood, N., Cicero’s social and political thought (California: University of California Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Wright, T. R., The religion of humanity: the impact of Comtean positivism on Victorian England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Wroth, W. W. and Taylor, J. S., ‘William Mitford’, Oxford dictionary of national biography, www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/18860, accessed on 10 January 2013.Google Scholar
Young, B. W., ‘History’ in Bevir, M. (ed.), Historicism and the human sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 154–186.Google Scholar
Young, B. W., The Victorian eighteenth century: an intellectual history (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Zakaras, A., Individuality and mass democracy: Mill, Emerson, and the burdens of citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Zastoupil, L., ‘Moral government: J. S. Mill on Ireland’, The Historical Journal 26.3 (1983), pp. 707–717.Google Scholar