Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:07:12.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2019

Mark McClish
Mark McClish
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The History of the Arthasastra
Sovereignty and Sacred Law in Ancient India
 , pp. 245 - 255
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Acharya, N. R. (ed.) 1949. Yājñavalkyasmṛti. Bombay: Nirnaya Sagar Press.Google Scholar
Caland, W. (tr.) 1931. Pañcaviṃśa Brāhmaṇa: The Brāhmaṇa of Twenty Five Chapters. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal.Google Scholar
Dātāra, Śrī Viśvanātha Śāstrī. (ed.) 1991. Kauṭalīyamarthaśāstram of Ācārya Viṣṇugupta, With the Commentaries Śrīmūla, Jayamaṅgalā, Cāṇakyaṭīkā, Pratipadapañcikā, Nītinirṇīti, and Nayacandrikā. Sarasvatībhavana Granthamālā, 130. Two vols. in four pts. Varanasi: Sampurnanad Sanskrit University.Google Scholar
Derrett, J. D. M. (ed. and tr.) 1975. Bhāruci’s Commentary on the Manusmṛti. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Dutt, M. N. (trans. and ed.) 1896. Kamandakiya Nitisara. Calcutta: H. C. Dass.Google Scholar
Ezhuthachan, K. N. (ed.) 1960. Bhāṣa Kauṭalīyam: Adhikaraṇas 4–7. Madras: University of Madras.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. (tr.) 2004. The Mahābhārata, Vol. 7: 11: The Book of the Women, 12: The Book of Peace, Part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gairola, Srī Vācaspati. (ed.) 1977. The Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya and the Cāṇakya-Sūtra [with Hindi translation]. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Vidyabhawan.Google Scholar
Gaṇapati Śāstrī, T. (ed.) 1924–1925. The Arthaśāstra of Kauṭalya, With the Commentary Śrīmūla. 3 pts. Trivandrum: Government Press. Reprint, Delhi: Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan, 1984.Google Scholar
Harihara Sastri, G. (ed.) 1958. Arthaśāstra-Vyākhyā Jayamaṅgalā. Mylapore: Kuppuswami Sastri Research Institute.Google Scholar
Harihara Sastri, G.. (ed.) 1956–1971. Arthaśāstra-vyākhyā Cāṇakyaṭīkā of Bhikṣu Prabhamati, With an Introduction. Journal of Oriental Research published serially in volumes 26–37.Google Scholar
Harihara Sastri, G.. (ed.) 2011. Two Commentaries on the Arthaśāstra: Jayamaṅgalā & Cāṇakyaṭīkā Critically Re-edited from Harihara Sastri’s Fascicle Editions. Ed. Pohlus, Andreas. Halle: Universitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie and Brereton, Joel. (trs.) 2014. The Rigveda: The Earliest Religious Poetry of India. 3 vols. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jayaswal, K. P. and Banerji-Sastri, A.. (eds.) 1925–1926. Pratipadapañcikā of Bhaṭṭasvāmin (Fragment 2.8.5 – 2.36.47). Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society (Patna) 11–12.Google Scholar
Jha, Ganganatha. 1999 [1920-1939]. Manusmṛti: With the ‘Manubhāṣya’ of Medhtāthiti. 10 Vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Jina Vijaya, Muni. (ed.) 1959. A Fragment of the Koutalya’s Arthaśāstra alias Rajāsiddānta, With the Fragment of the Commentary Named Nitinirṇīti of Ācārya Yogghama alias Mugdhavilāsa. Bombay: Bhāratīya Vidyā Bhavana.Google Scholar
Jolly, J. and Schmidt, R.. (eds.) 1923–1924. Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya: A New Edition. Vol. I: Edition; Vol. II: Notes, with the Commentary Naya Candrikā of Yajva, Mādhava. Lahore: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Kale, M. R. (tr.) 2000 [1976]. Mudrārākshasa of Viśākhadatta. 6th ed. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Kangle, R. P. (ed.) 1969. The Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra, Part I: Sanskrit Text with Glossary. 2nd ed. Bombay: University of Bombay.Google Scholar
Kangle, R. P.. (tr.) 1972. The Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra, Part II: An English Translation with Critical and Explanatory Notes. 2nd ed. Bombay: University of Bombay.Google Scholar
Lariviere, Richard W. (ed. and trans.) 1989. The Nāradasmṛti. 2 vols. Philadelphia: Department of South Asia Regional Studies, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. J. (tr.) 1926. Das altindische Buch vom Welt- und Staatsleben: Das Arthaçāstra des Kauṭilya. Leipzig: Otto Harrasowitz. Reprint, Graz: Akademische Druck-u. Verlangsanstalt, 1977.Google Scholar
Olivelle, P. (tr.) 1998. The Early Upaniṣads. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(tr.)Olivelle, P.. 2000. The Dharmasūtras: The Law Codes of Āpastamba, Gautama, Baudhāyana, and Vasiṣṭha. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Olivelle, P.. (ed. and tr.) 2005. Manu’s Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Mānava-Dharmaśāstra. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olivelle, P.. (tr.) 2013. King, Governance, and Law in Ancient India: Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sastri, K. Sambasiva. (ed.) 1972–1973 [1930–1945]. Kauṭalīyam: Bhāṣavyākhyānasahitam. 3 vols. Trivandrum: University of Kerala.Google Scholar
Shama Sastri, R. (ed.) 1909. The Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya. Mysore: Mysore Government Oriental Library Series. 4th rev. ed. by N. S. Vekatanathacharya, Mysore: Government Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Shama Sastri, R.. (tr.) 1915. Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra. Mysore: Mysore Printing and Publishing House.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. (ed.) 1905. Atharva-Veda-Saṃhitā. 2 vols. Rev. and ed. by Lanman, Charles Rockwell. Reprint, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1993.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Adams, Ian. 1999. “The Inevitability of Political Metaphysics.” Journal of Political Ideologies 4.3: 269–288.Google Scholar
Adluri, Vishwa and Bagchee, Joydeep. 2016. “Paradigm Lost: The Application of the Historical-Critical Method to the Bhagavad Gītā.” International Journal of Hindu Studies 20.2: 199–301.Google Scholar
Aiyangar, K. V. R. 1941. Rājadharma. Adyar: The Adyar Library.Google Scholar
Allchin, F. R. 1995. The Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: The Emergence of Cities and States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altekar, A. S. 1958. State and Government in Ancient India. 3rd ed., rev. and enlarged. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Apte, Vaman Shivaram. 1998. The Practical Sanskrit–English Dictionary. Rev. and enlarged ed., 1st compact ed. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.Google Scholar
Aufrecht, Theodor. 1874. “Zur Handschriftenkunde (Kommentare zum Amarakosha).” ZDMG 28: 103–124.Google Scholar
Ayyar, A. S. Ramanatha. 1925. “Chaksusiyam – An Arthaśāstra.” Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society XI: 81–84.Google Scholar
Bailey, Greg. 1996. “The Exaggeration of Religion in the Study of Hinduism.” Asian Studies Review 19.3: 62–65.Google Scholar
Bailey, Greg. 2008. “The Fundamental Problems of Contemporary Indology.” Cracow Indological Studies X: 47–73.Google Scholar
Balogh, Daniél. 2015. A Textual and Intertextual Study of the Mudrārākṣasa. Doktori disszertáció, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem.Google Scholar
Barua, D. K. 1945. “The Arthaśāstra: A Blend of Old and New.” Bhārata Kaumudi I: 85–119.Google Scholar
Berger, Hermann. 1955. “Kauṭalya ist älter als Kauṭilya.” Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 6: 27–29.Google Scholar
Bhandarkar, D. R. 1919. Lectures on the Ancient History of India on the Period from 650 to 325 B.C. The Carmichael Lectures, 1918. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
Bhandarkar, D. R.. 1926. “Date of Kauṭalya.” ABORI 7: 65–84.Google Scholar
Bhandarkar, D. R.. 1939. “Brahmanic Revival,” in Kartre, S. M. and Gode, P. K. (eds.), A Volume of Eastern and Indian Studies Presented to Professor F. W. Thomas, C. I. E., on his 72nd birthday 21st March 1939. Bombay: Karnatak Publishing House, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Bhandarkar, D. R.. 1981. Bhandarkar, D. R. et al. (eds.), Inscriptions of the Early Gupta Kings Rev. ed. of Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, Vol. 3. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India, 1981.Google Scholar
Bhandarkar, Ramkrishna Gopal. 1874. “The Veda in India.” IA 3: 132–135.Google Scholar
Bhandarkar, Ramkrishna Gopal. 1902. “A Peep into the Early History of India from the Foundation of the Maurya Dynasty to the Fall of the Imperial Gupta Dynasty (B. C. 322-Circa 500 A. D.).” JBBRAS 20: 356–408.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. 2002. “Moderate Machiavelli? Contrasting The Prince with the Arthashastra of Kautilya.” Critical Horizons 3.2: 253–276.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. 2002. The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Bose, A. N. 1937–1938. “The Date of the Arthaśāstra.” Indian Culture 4: 435–444.Google Scholar
Brekke, Torkel. 2004. “Wielding the Rod of Punishment: War and Violence in the Political Science of Kautilya.” Journal of Military Ethics 3.1: 40–52.Google Scholar
Breloer, B. 1929. “Zum Kauṭalīya-Problem.” ZII 7: 205–232.Google Scholar
Breloer, B.. 1973 [1927–1934]. Kauṭalīya Studien. Osnabrück: Otto Zeller Verlag.Google Scholar
Brereton, Joel. 1990. “The Upaniṣads,” in Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom (eds.), Approaches to the Asian Classics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 115–135.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, J. 2007. Greater Magadha: Studies in the Culture of Early India. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, J.. 2010. “Against Methodological Positivism in Textual Studies.” AS/EA LXIV.2: 265–274.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, J.. 2011. Buddhism in the Shadow of Brahmanism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, J.. 2014. “Rethinking India’s Past,” in Amitabh Matoo and Heeraman Tiwari (eds.), Culture, People and Power. New Delhi: Indian Council for Cultural Relations, pp. 94–101.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, J.. 2016. How the Brahmins Won: From Alexander to the Guptas. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, T. 1968. “Cāṇakya and Kauṭalya.” ABORI 48–49: 17–31.Google Scholar
Chevillard, Jean-Luc. 2009. “The Metagrammatical Vocabulary inside the Lists of 32 Tantrayukti-s and Its Adaptation to Tamil: Towards a Sanskrit-Tamil Dictionary,” in Wilden, Eva (ed.), Between Preservation and Recreation: Tamil Tradition of Commentary. Collection Indologie, 109. Pondichéry: École française d’Extrême-Orient, pp. 71–132.Google Scholar
Colas, Gérard. 1999. “The Criticism and Transmission of Texts in Classical India.” Diogenes 47.2 [no. 186]: 30–43.Google Scholar
Davis, Donald R. Jr. 2007. “Hinduism as a Legal Tradition.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 75.2: 241–267.Google Scholar
De Romanis, Federico. 2000. “Esportazioni di corallo mediterraneo in India nell’età ellenistico-romana,” in Morel, Jean-Paul et al. (eds.), Corallo di ieri corallo di oggi. Centro Universitario Europeo per i Beni Culturali, Scienze e materiali del patrimonio culturale, 5. Bari: Edipuglia, pp. 211–216.Google Scholar
Derrett, J. D. M. 1973. Dharmaśāstra and Juridical Literature. A History of Indian Literature, Vol. 5, Fasc. 1. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Derrett, J. D. M.. 1976. “Rājadharma.” JAOS 35.4: 597–609.Google Scholar
Deshpande, M. 1979. Sociolinguistic Attitudes in India: An Historical Reconstruction. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Dhavilkar, M. K. 1975. “The Beginning of Coinage in India.” World Archaeology 6.3: 330–338.Google Scholar
Dikshitar, V. R. R. 1929. “The Religious Data in Kauṭalya’s Arthaśāstra.” ZII 7: 251–258.Google Scholar
Dikshitar, V. R. R.. 1930. “Tantrayukti.” Journal of Oriental Research IV: 82–89.Google Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. 1989. “The Original Caste: Power, History and Hierarchy in South Asia.” Contributions to Indian Sociology n.s. 23.1: 59–77.Google Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B.. 1993. The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Doniger, Wendy. 2016. Redeeming the Kāmasūtra. New York: Oxford University Press. 2018. Against Dharma. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Drekmeier, C. 1962. Kingship and Community in Early India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus. Rev. ed. Trans. by Sainsbury, M., Dumont, Louis, and Gulati, Basia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, F. 1928. “The Latest Work on the Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra.” JAOS 48: 289–322.Google Scholar
Erdosy, George. 1995. “City States of North India and Pakistan at the Time of the Buddha,” in F. R. Allchia et al., The Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: The Emergence of Cities and States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
Falk, Harry. 1986. “Die Prüfung der Beamten im Arthaśāstra.” Wiener Zeitschrift zur Kunde Sudasiens 30: 57–72.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. 1983. “The Great Epic as Religious Rhetoric: A Fresh Look at the Mahābhārata.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 51.4: 611–630.Google Scholar
Fleet, J. F. 1915. “Introductory Note,” in Shama Sastri 1915.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, U. N. 1952. “The Authority of the King in Kauṭilya’s Political Thought.” IHQ 28.4: 307–311.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, U. N.. 1953. “Kauṭilya on Royal Authority.” IHQ 29.4: 286–292.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, U. N.. 1959. A History of Indian Political Ideas. Repr. with corrections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonda, J. 1966. Ancient Indian Kingship from the Religious Point of View. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Gonda, J.. 1975. Vedic Literature. A History of Indian Literature, Vol. 1, Fasc. 1. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Gonda, J.. 1977. The Ritual Sūtras. A History of Indian Literature, Vol. 1, Fasc. 2. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Gray, Stuart. 2014. “Reexamining Kautilya and Machiavelli: Flexibility and the Problem of Legitimacy in Brahmanical and Secular Realism.” Political Theory 42.6: 635–657.Google Scholar
Grünendahl, Reinhold. 2009/2010. “Post-philological Gestures – ‘Deconstructing’ Textual Criticism.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 52/53: 17–28.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. 1961. “Zur Methode der geschichtlichen Erforschung der anonymen Sanskritliteratur des Hinduismus.” ZDMG 111: 483–492.Google Scholar
Heesterman, J. C. 1985. The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hertel, J. 1910. “Literarisches aus dem Kauṭilīyaśāstra.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 24: 416–422.Google Scholar
Hillebrandt, A. 1909. “Über das Kauṭilīyaśāstra und Verwandtes.” Sechsundachtzigster Jahres-Bericht der Schlesischen Gesellschaft für vaterländische Cultur. Breslau: G. P. Aderholz’ Buchhandlung, pp. 19–48.Google Scholar
Hillebrandt, A.. 1915. “Zu Kauṭilya.” ZDMG 69: 360–364.Google Scholar
Hillebrandt, A.. 1923. Altindische Politik: Eine Übersicht auf Grund der Quellen. Jena.Google Scholar
von Hinüber, Oskar. 2000. A Handbook of Pāli Literature. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hocart, A. M. 1950. Caste: A Comparative Study. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hopkins, E. W. 1889. “The Social and Military Position of the Ruling Caste in Ancient India, as Represented by the Sanskrit Epic.” JAOS 13: 57–376.Google Scholar
Hopkins, E. W.. 1915. “Studies in Ancient Hindu Polity by Narenda Nath Law and Radhakumud Mookerji.” American Historical Review 20.2: 377–378.Google Scholar
Houben, Jan. 2002. “The Brahmin Intellectual: History, Ritual and ‘Time Out of Time’.”JIP 30: 463–479.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. 1921. “The Application of Thought to Textual Criticism.” Proceedings of the Classical Association 18: 67–84.Google Scholar
Hultzsch, E. 1925. Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, Vol. 1: Inscriptions of Asoka. 2nd ed. Oxford: Government of India.Google Scholar
Jacobi, H. 1911. “Zur Frühgeschichte der indischen Philosophie.” Sitzungsberichte der königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 33: 732–743.Google Scholar
Jacobi, H.. 1911. “Kultur-, Sprach- und Litterarhistorisches aus dem Kauṭilīya.” Sitzungsberichte der königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 33: 954–973. Trans. by N. B. Utgikar, “Cultural, Linguistic, and Literary Historical Gleanings from the Kautiliya,” IA 53 (1924): 128–136, 141–146.Google Scholar
Jacobi, H.. 1912. “Uber die Echtheit des Kauṭilīya.” Sitzungsberichte der königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 34: 832–849. Trans. by V. S. Sukthankar, “On the Authenticity of the Kauṭilīya,” IA 47 (1918): 157–161, 187–195.Google Scholar
Jacobi, H.. 1970. Kleine Schriften. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Johnston, E. H. 1929. “Two Studies in the Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya.” JRAS I: 77–102.Google Scholar
Jolly, Julius. 1912–1913. “Lexikalisches aus dem Arthaśāstra.” Indo-Germanische Forschungen 31: 204–210.Google Scholar
Jolly, Julius. 1913. “Arthaśāstra und Dharmaśāstra.” ZDMG 67: 49–96.Google Scholar
Jolly, Julius. 1914–1915. “Kollektaneen zum Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra.” ZDMG 68: 345–359; 69: 369–378.Google Scholar
Jolly, Julius. 1920. “Das Erste Buch des Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra.” ZDMG 74: 321–355.Google Scholar
Jolly, Julius. 1921. “Eine neue indische Rechstquelle.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 37: 329–347.Google Scholar
Jacobi, H.. 1925. “Über die alte Politische literature Indiens und ihre Bearbeiter.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 41: 305–318.Google Scholar
Jolly, Julius. 1927. “Kauṭilya oder Kauṭalya” ZII 5: 216–221.Google Scholar
Kalyanov, V. I. 1954. “Dating of the Arthaśāstra.” In Papers presented by the Soviet Delegation at the XXIII International Congress of Orientalists. Moscow: Pub. House of USSR Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Kane, P. V. 1926. “The Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya.” ABORI 7: 85–100.Google Scholar
Kane, P. V.. 1942. “The Meaning of ‘ācārya’.” ABORI 23: 206–213.Google Scholar
Kane, P. V.. 1962–1975. History of Dharmaśāstra. 5 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kangle, R. P. 1965. The Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra, Part III: A Study. Bombay: University of Bomba.Google Scholar
Katre, S. M. 1941. Introduction to Indian Textual Criticism. Bombay: Karnatak Publishing House.Google Scholar
Kavi, M. Ramakrishna. 1940. “Chākshūshīyam: An Ancient Work on Arthaśāstra.” Annals of the Shri Venkateswara Oriental Institute, Tirupati 1.4: 79–89.Google Scholar
Kavi, M. Ramakrishna. 1942–1945. “Cākṣuṣīyam.” Journal of the Sri Venkatesvara Oriental Institute, Tirupati 3.1 (1942): 99–116; 4.1 (1943): 123–140; 6.2 (1945): 33–55.Google Scholar
Keith, A. B. 1916. “The Authenticity of the Kauṭilīya.” JRAS January: 130–137.Google Scholar
Keith, A. B.. 1926–1928. “The Authenticity of the Kauṭilīya,” in Samaddar, J. N. (ed.), Sir Asutosh Memorial Volume, Part 1. Patna: J. N. Samaddar, pp. 8–22.Google Scholar
Keith, A. B.. 1941. A History of Sanskrit Literature. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Konow, Sten. 1945. Kauṭilya Studies. Oslo: I Kommisjon hos Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Kosambi, D. D. 1958. “The Text of the Arthaśāstra.” JAOS 78.3: 169–173.Google Scholar
Kosambi, D. D.. 1959. “The Text of the Arthaśāstra,” in Jina Vijaya, Muni (ed.), A Fragment of the Koutalya’s Arthaśāstra alias Rajāsiddānta: With the Fragment of the Commentary Named Nītinirṇīti of Achārya Yogghama alias Mugdhavilāsa. Bombay: Bhāratīya VidyāBhavana, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Kulke, H. and Rothermund, D.. 1998. History of India. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lariviere, Richard W. 1997. “Power and Authority: On the Interpretation of Indian Kingship from Sanskrit Sources,” in Lienhard, S. and Piovano, I. (eds.), Lex et Litterae: Studies in Honor of Professor Oscar Botto. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso, pp. 313–327.Google Scholar
Lévi, Sylvain. 1936. “Alexander and Alexandria in Indian Literature.” IHQ 12: 121–133.Google Scholar
Lingat, R. 1998 [1973]. The Classical Law of India. Trans. with additions by J. D. M. Derrett. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Losch, H. 1959. Rājadharma: Einsetzung und Aufgabenkreis des Königs im Lichte des Purāṇas. Bonn: Orientalischen Seminars der Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
Lubin, Tim. 2016. “Custom in the Vedic Ritual Codes as an Emergent Legal Principle.” JAOS 136.4: 669–687.Google Scholar
Maas, Philip A. 2010. “On What Became of the Carakasaṃhitā after Dṛḍhabala’s Revision.” eJournal of Indian Medicine 3: 1–22.Google Scholar
Mabbett, I. W. 1964. “The Date of the Arthaśāstra.” JAOS 84.2: 162–169.Google Scholar
Malamoud, Charles. 2006. “Sur une forme d’argumentation dans l’Arthaśāstra.” Rue Descartes 54: 65–70.Google Scholar
McClish, Mark. 2009. Political Brahmanism and the State. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
McClish, Mark. 2012. “Is the Arthaśāstra a Maurya Document?” in Olivelle, Patrick, Leoshko, Janice, and Ray, Himanshu Prabha (eds.), Reimagining Aśoka: Memory and History. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 280–309.Google Scholar
McClish, Mark. 2014. “The Dependence of Manu’s Seventh Chapter on Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra.” JAOS 134.2: 241–262.Google Scholar
McClish, Mark. 2018. “King: rājadharma,” in Patrick Olivelle and Donald R. Davis, Jr. (eds.), Hindu Law: A New History of Dharmaśāstra. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–272.Google Scholar
McClish, Mark. 2018. “Titles of Law: vyavahārpada,” in Patrick Olivelle and Donald R. Davis, Jr. (eds.), Hindu Law: A New History of Dharmaśāstra. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClish, Mark. 2018. “Punishment: daṇḍa,” in Patrick Olivelle and Donald R. Davis, Jr. (eds.), Hindu Law: A New History of Dharmaśāstra. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 273–282.Google Scholar
McClish, Mark. (forthcoming). “From Law to Dharma: State Law and Sacred Duty in Ancient India.” Journal of Law and Religion.Google Scholar
Mishra, Suresh Chandra. 1989. “Historiographical Critique of the Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya.” ABORI 70.1: 145–162.Google Scholar
Mishra, Suresh Chandra. 1993. Evolution of Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra: An Inscriptional Approach. Delhi: Anamaka Prakashan.Google Scholar
Nag, K. 1923. Les théories diplomatiques de l’Inde ancienne et l’Arthaçāstra. Paris: Librairie Orientale et Américaine.Google Scholar
Nath, Pran. 1931. “The Date of the Compilation of Kauṭalya’s Arthaśāstra (484–510 A.D.).” IA 60: 109–112, 121–123.Google Scholar
Nath, Pran. 1931. “Was the Kauṭalīya Arthaśāstra in Prose or in Verse?” IA 60: 171–174.Google Scholar
Neelis, Jason. 2011. Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks: Mobility and Exchange within and beyond Northwestern Borderlands of South Asia. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Oberlies, Thomas. 1998. Die Religion des Ṛgveda. Wien: Publications of the de Nobil Research Library.Google Scholar
Ojha, K. C. 1952. “On the Controversy about the Arthaśāstra.” IHQ 28: 265–272.Google Scholar
Ojha, K. C.. 1970. “The Date of the Arthaśāstra,” in Saksena, B. R. et al. (eds.) Umesha Mishra Commemoration Volume. Allahabad: Ganganatha Jha Research Institute, pp. 743–746.Google Scholar
Oldenberg, Hermann. 1988 [1916]. The Religion of the Veda [Die Religion des Veda, 2nd ed.]. Trans. by Shridhar B. Shrotri. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Olivelle, J. P. 1993. The Āśrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of a Religious Institution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olivelle, J. P.. 2002. “Structure and Composition of the Mānava Dharmaśāstra.” JIP 30: 535–574.Google Scholar
Olivelle, J. P.. 2004. “Manu and the Arthaśāstra: A Study in Śāstric Intertextuality.” JIP 32: 281–291.Google Scholar
Olivelle, J. P.. 2004. “The Semantic History of Dharma: The Middle and Late Vedic Periods.” JIP 32: 491–511.Google Scholar
Olivelle, J. P.. 2005. “Power of Words: The Ascetic Appropriation and the Semantic Evolution of Dharma,” in Patrick Olivelle, Language, Text and Society: Explorations in Ancient Indian Culture and Religion. Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Olivelle, J. P.. 2010. “Dharmaśāstra: A Textual History,” in Lubin, T. et al. (eds.), Hinduism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 28–57.Google Scholar
Olivelle, J. P.. (ed.) 2015. A Sanskrit Dictionary of Law and Statecraft. Delhi: Primus Books.Google Scholar
Olivelle, J. P.. 2017. “Aśoka in Ancient India by Nayanjot Lahiri.” JAOS 137.1: 162–164.Google Scholar
Parel, Anthony J. 2008. “Gandhi and the Emergence of the Modern Indian Political Canon.” The Review of Politics 70: 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 1995. “Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History.” Journal of International Affairs 48.2: 353–368.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 1989. “Mīmāṃsā and the Problem of History in Traditional India.” JAOS 109.4: 603–610.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 1996. “The Sanskrit Cosmopolis, 300–1300: Transculturation, Vernacularization, and the Question of Ideology,” in Houben, J. E. M. (ed.), Ideology and Status of Sanskrit. Leiden: E. J. Brill, pp. 197–247.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2006. The Language of the Gods in the World of Men. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Prasad, Beni. 1927. Theory of Government in Ancient India (Post-Vedic). Allahabad: The Indian Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
Raja, K. Kunjunni. 1976. “Textual Studies and Editorial Problems in Theory and Practice.” Annals of Oriental Research 26: 1–10.Google Scholar
Rau, W. 1957. Staat und Gesellschaft im Alten Indien: Nach dem Brāhmaṇa-Texten dargestellt. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Renou, L. 1957. “Les divisions dans les textes sanskrits.” IIJ I.1: 1–32.Google Scholar
Renou, L.. 1961. “Sur la forme de quelques textes sanskrite: Le Kauṭilīya.” JA 249: 183–197.Google Scholar
Renou, L.. 1963. “Sur le genre du Sūtra dans la littérature sanskrite.” JA 251: 165–216.Google Scholar
Ritschl, E. and Schetelich, M.. 1973. Studien zum Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rocher, Ludo. 1977–1978. “The Purāṇa of Fate and Human Effort.” ABORI 58/59: 271–278.Google Scholar
Samozvantsev, A. M. 1980–1981. “Arthaśāstra and Dharmaśāstra – Two Traditions.” Indologica Taurinensia 8–9 (Dr. Ludwik Sternbach Commemoration Volume): 353–363.Google Scholar
Samozvantsev, A. M.. 1982–1983. “The Legal Systems of the Arthaśāstra and the Dharmaśāstra and Some Problems in the Evolution of Two Genres of Literature.” Orientalia Suecana 31–32: 147–162.Google Scholar
Samozvantsev, A. M.. 1985. “Some Remarks on the Principles of Composition of the Kaṇṭakaśodhana in the Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra.” Altorientalische Forschungen 12: 296–300.Google Scholar
Sarkar, B. K. 1937. The Positive Background of Hindu Sociology, Book 1: Introduction to Hindu Positivism. Allahabad: Panini Office.Google Scholar
Sastri, K. A. Nilakanta. 1953. “Kauṭilya on Royal Authority.” IHQ 29.2: 175–179.Google Scholar
Sastri, K. A. Nilakanta. 1967. “Mauryan Polity,” in Sastri, K. A. Nilakanta (ed.), Age of the Nandas and Mauryas. 2nd ed. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, pp. 171–201.Google Scholar
Scharfe, Hartmut. 1989. The State in Indian Tradition. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Scharfe, Hartmut. 1993. Investigations into Kauṭalya’s Manual of Political Science. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Scharfe, Hartmut. 2002. Education in Ancient India. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Shah, K. J. 1981. “Of Artha and the Arthaśāstra.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 15.1–2: 55–73.Google Scholar
Shamasastry, R. 1905. “Chanakya’s Land and Revenue Policy (4th Century B. C.).” IA 34: 5–10, 47–59, 110–119.Google Scholar
Sharma, N. S. 1977. Brahmins through the Ages. Delhi: Ajanta Books International.Google Scholar
Sharma, R. S. 1968. Aspects of Political Ideas and Institutions in Ancient India. 2nd ed. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass; 1st ed. 1959.Google Scholar
Sharma, R. S.. 1980. Śūdras in Ancient India. 2nd rev. ed. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Sharma, R. S. and Jha, D. N.. 1974. “The Economic History of India up to AD 1200: Trends and Prospects.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 17.1: 48–80.Google Scholar
Sil, Narasingha Prosad. 1985. “Political Morality vs. Political Necessity: Kauṭilya and Machiavelli Revisited.” Journal of Asian History 19.2: 101–142.Google Scholar
Smith, B. K. 1994. Classifying the Universe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Esther A. 1976. Indian Dialectics: Methods of Philosophical Discussion, Vol. 1 Ahmedabad: B. J. Institute of Learning and Research.Google Scholar
Stein, Otto. 1928. “Versuch einer Analyse des śāsanādhikāra.” ZII 6: 45–71.Google Scholar
Sternbach, L. 1968. “Quotations from the Kauṭalīya-Arthaśāstra I.” JAOS 88.3: 495–520.Google Scholar
Sternbach, L.. 1973. Bibliography on Dharma and Artha in Ancient and Medieval India. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Sternbach, L.. 1973. Bibliography of Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra. Hoshiapur: Vishveshvaranand Institute.Google Scholar
Strauch, Ingo. 2008. “The Bajaur Collection of Kharoṣṭhī Manuscripts – A Preliminary Survey.” Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 25: 103–136.Google Scholar
Sukthankar, Vishnu S. 1933. “Prolegomena,” in Sukthankar, Vishnu S. et al. (eds.) The Māhābhārata: For the First Time Critically Edited, Vol. 1. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, pp. i–cx.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thapar, Romila. 2004. Early India: From Origins to AD 1300. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, Muneo. 1993. “Structure of the Rājadharma Section in the Yājñavalkyasmṛti (i.309–368).” 京都大學文學部研究紀要 (Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters of Kyoto University) 32: 1–42.Google Scholar
Trautmann, T. R. 1968. “A Metrical Original for the Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra?” JAOS 88.2: 347–349.Google Scholar
Trautmann, T. R.. 1971. Kauṭilya and the Arthaśāstra: A Statistical Investigation of the Authorship and Evolution of the Text. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Vigasin, A. A. and Samozvantsev, A. M.. 1985. Society, State, and Law in Ancient India. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Ltd.Google Scholar
Voigt, Johannes H. 1966. “Nationalist Interpretations of Arthaśāstra in Indian Historical Writing,” in Mukherjee, S. N. (ed.), South Asian Affairs Number Two: The Movement for National Freedom in India. St Antony’s Papers No. 18. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–66.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2004. “Politics as a Vocation,” in Owen, David and Strong, Tracy B. (eds.), The Vocation Lectures. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 32–94.Google Scholar
Wezler, Albrecht. 1972. “Some Observations on the Yuktidīpikā.” ZDMG, Supplement 2: 18, 434–455.Google Scholar
Wezler, Albrecht. 1993. “Über Form und Charakter der sogenannten ‘Polemiken im Staatslehrbuch des Kauṭalya.’” ZDMG 143: 106–134.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Friedrich. 1960. Politische Polemiken im Staatslehrbuch des Kauṭalya. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Friedrich. 1966. “Die Beziehungen zwischen Kāmasūtra und Arthaśāstra.” ZDMG 116.2: 291–310.Google Scholar
Winternitz, M. 1925. Some Problems in Indian Literature. Calcutta: Calcutta University Press.Google Scholar
Winternitz, M.. 1926–1928. “Dharmaśāstra and Arthaśāstra,” in Samaddar, J. N. (ed.), Sir Asutosh Memorial Volume. Patna 1: 25–48.Google Scholar
Winternitz, M.. 1928. “Zwei Neue Arthaśāstra-Manuskripte.” ZII 6: 14–27.Google Scholar
Winternitz, M.. 1998 [1963–1967]. History of Indian Literature, Vol. 3. Trans. by Subhadra Jha. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Witzel, M. 1995. “Early Sanskritization: Origins and Development of the Kuru State.” Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 1–4: 1–26.Google Scholar
Witzel, M.. 1997. “The Development of the Vedic Canon and Its Schools: The Social and Political Milieu,” in Witzel, M. (ed.), Inside the Texts, Beyond the Texts. Cambridge, MA: Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University, pp. 257–345.Google Scholar
Witzel, M.. 2009. “Moving Targets? Texts, Language, Archaeology and History in the Late Vedic and Early Buddhist Periods.” IIJ 52.2–3: 287–310.Google Scholar
Witzel, M.. 2014. “Textual Criticism.” Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 21.3: 9–91.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. P. 1990. In Defense of Anarchism. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, Gen’ichi. 2005. The Structure of Ancient Indian Society: Theory and Reality of the Varṇa System. Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko.Google Scholar
Zachariae, Theodor. 1883. Beiträge zur indischen Lexikographie. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Mark McClish, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The History of the Arthasastra
  • Online publication: 28 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641586.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Mark McClish, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The History of the Arthasastra
  • Online publication: 28 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641586.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Mark McClish, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The History of the Arthasastra
  • Online publication: 28 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641586.020
Available formats
×