Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:32:59.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Populism and International Human Rights Law Institutions

A Survival Guide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2020

By
Laurence R. Helfer
Edited by
Gerald L. Neuman
Gerald L. Neuman
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Confronting hostile governments is nothing new for international human rights courts, treaty bodies, and other monitoring mechanisms. Yet there is a growing sense that the recent turn to populism poses a new type of threat that international human rights law (IHRL) institutions are ill equipped to meet. This chapter begins by identifying the facilitating conditions that have, until recently, supported the international human rights system. It then assesses the distinctive challenges that populism poses to IHRL institutions. Turning from diagnosis to prescription, the chapter reviews a range of legal and political tools that might be deployed to address those challenges and explores their potential efficacy and risks. The chapter’s final section argues that IHRL institutions should adopt four survival strategies for an age of populism—playing a long game, circumspection in interpretation, publicity and outreach, and creating windows of opportunity for supporters to mobilize.

Keywords

Populismhuman rights institutionshuman rights strategyhuman rights interpretationbacklash
Type
Chapter
Information
Human Rights in a Time of Populism
Challenges and Responses
 , pp. 218 - 249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, Philip. “The Populist Challenge to Human Rights.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 9, no. 1 (2017): 1–15.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Gathii, James T., and Helfer, Laurence R.. “Backlash against International Courts in West, East and Southern Africa: Causes and Consequences.” European Journal of International Law 27, no. 2 (2016): 293–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R., and Madsen, Mikael Rask. “How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts.” In International Court Authority, edited by Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R., and Madsen, Mikael Rask, 24–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Icazaa, Emilio. “The Inter-American System and Challenges for its Future.” American University International Law Review 29, no. 5 (2014): 989–1001.Google Scholar
Andorno, Roberto. “Is Vulnerability the Foundation of Human Rights?” In Human Dignity of the Vulnerable in the Age of Rights: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Masferrer, Aniceto and García-Sánchez, Emilio, 257–272. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll. “The Brighton Aftermath and the Changing Role of the European Court of Human Rights.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9, no. 2 (2018): 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberá, Pablo, Godzimirska, Zuzanna, and Mayoral, Juan A.. “Courting the Public? The Strategic Use of Social Media by International Courts.” Paper presented at ECPR General Conference, Hamburg, Germany, August 24, 2018.Google Scholar
Biegon, Japhet. “The Rise and Rise of Political Backlash: African Union Executive Council’s Decision to Review the Mandate and Working Methods of the African Commission.” EJIL: Talk! August 2, 2018.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, Jonathan, and McCorquodale, Robert. “The Concept of ‘Due Diligence’ in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 28, no. 3 (2017): 899–919.Google Scholar
Bossuyt, Marc. “Categorical Rights and Vulnerable Groups: Moving Away from the Universal Human Being.” George Washington International Law Review 48, no. 4 (2016): 717–742.Google Scholar
Brandes, Tamar Hostovsky. “International Law in Domestic Courts in an Era of Populism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17, no. 2 (2019): 576–596.Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison, and Stohl, Michael, ed. Contracting Human Rights: Crisis, Accountability, and Opportunity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas. “International Human Rights Law and Institutions: Accomplishments and Prospects.” Washington Law Review 63, no. 1 (1988): 1–20.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas. “New Upload – Remembering the Early Years of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37, no. 2 (2005): 259–280.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas. “The Evolving International Human Rights System.” American Journal of International Law 100, no. 4 (2006): 783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çali, Başak. “Specialized Rules of Treaty Interpretation: Human Rights.” In The Oxford Guide to Treaties, edited by Hollis, Duncan B., 525–550. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Çali, Başak. “Coping with Crisis: Whither the Variable Geometry in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 35, no. 2 (2018): 237–276.Google Scholar
Carrillo-Santarelli, Nicolás. “The Politics behind the Latest Advisory Opinions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, February 24, 2018. www.iconnectblog.com/2018/02/the-politics-behind-the-latest-advisory-opinions-of-the-inter-american-court-of-human-rights/Google Scholar
Cassel, Doug. “Regional Human Rights Regimes and State Push Back: The Case of the Inter-American Human Rights System.” Human Rights Law Journal 33, no. 1–6 (2013): 1–10.Google Scholar
Charles, Deborah. “Honduras Readmitted to OAS after Coup.” Reuters, June 1, 2011. www.reuters.com/article/us-honduras-oas/honduras-readmitted-to-oas-after-coup-idUSTRE75063P20110601.Google Scholar
Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge. “The Doctrine of State Responsibility as a Potential Means of Holding Private Actors Accountable for Human Rights.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 5, no. 1 (2004): 1–36.Google Scholar
Contesse, Jorge. “Judicial Backlash in Inter-American Human Rights Law?” International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, March 2, 2017. www.iconnectblog.com/2017/03/judicial-backlash-interamerican/Google Scholar
Contesse, Jorge. “The International Authority of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: A Critique of the Conventionality Control Doctrine.” International Journal of Human Rights 22, no. 9 (2018): 1168–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contesse, Jorge. “Resisting Inter-American Human Rights Law.” Yale Journal of International Law 44 (2019): 179–237.Google Scholar
Daly, Tom Gerald. The Alchemists: Questioning our Faith in Courts as Democracy-Builders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Daly, Tom Gerald, and Wiebusch, Micha. “The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Mapping Resistance against a Young Court.” International Journal of Law in Context 14, no. 2 (2018): 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dederke, Julian. “Media Attention, Politicization, and the CJEU’s Public Relations Toolbox.” Paper presented at iCourts: Centre of Excellence for International Courts, University of Copenhagen, September 5, 2018.Google Scholar
de Londras, Fiona, and Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. “Mission Impossible? Addressing Non-Execution through Infringement Proceedings in the European Court of Human Rights.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 66, no. 2 (2017): 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, Alice. “Backlog, Backlash and Beyond: Debating the Long Term Future of Human Rights Protection in Europe.” UK Human Rights Blog, April 14, 2014. https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2014/04/14/backlog-backlash-and-beyond-debating-the-long-term-future-of-human-rights-protection-in-europe-alice-donald/.Google Scholar
Dothan, Shai, ed. “Special Issue: Margin of Appreciation and Democracy: Human Rights and Deference to Political Bodies.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9, no. 2 (2018): 145–253.Google Scholar
Dulitzky, Ariel E. “Conventionality Control: An Inter-American Constitutional Court? The Invention of the Conventionality Control by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” Texas International Law Journal 50, no. 1 (2015): 45–93.Google Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. “How Many Judgments Does One Need to Enforce A Judgment? The First Ever Infringement Proceedings at the European Court of Human Rights.” Strasbourg Observers Blog, June 4, 2019. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2019/06/04/how-many-judgments-does-one-need-to-enforce-a-judgment-the-first-ever-infringement-proceedings-at-the-european-court-of-human-rights/.Google Scholar
Egan, Suzanne. “Strengthening the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Body System.” Human Rights Law Review 13, no. 2 (2013): 209–243.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Par, and Hillebrecht, Courtney, eds. “Special Issue: The Inter-American Human Rights System.” International Journal of Human Rights 22, no. 9 (2018): 1111–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engström, Viljam. “Deference and the Human Rights Committee.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 34, no. 2 (2016): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farer, Tom. “The Rise of the Inter-American Human Rights Regime: No Longer a Unicorn, Not Yet an Ox.” In The Inter-American Human Rights System, edited by Harris, David J. and Livingstone, Stephen, 31–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Flogaitis, Spyridon, Zwart, Tom, and Frase, Julie, eds. The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Stuart. “How Special is the Special Court’s Outreach Section?” In The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law, edited by Jalloh, Charles Chernor, 505–526. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
García-Sayán, Diego. “The Role of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Americas.” U.C. Davis Journal of International Law and Policy 19, no. 1 (2012): 103–112.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Steven. “Human Rights and International Constitutionalism.” In Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, edited by Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P., 233–257. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Giménez, Francisca Pou. “Quo Vadis, Inter-American Court? Activism, Backlash and Latin American Constitutionalism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, April 11, 2018. www.iconnectblog.com/2018/04/quo-vadis-inter-american-court-activism-backlash-and-latin-american-constitutionalism-i-connect-column/.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Aziz. “Democracy’s Near Misses.” Journal of Democracy 29, no. 4 (2018): 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glas, Lize R. “The Committee of Ministers Goes Nuclear: Infringement Proceedings against Azerbaijan in the Case of Ilgar Mammadov.” Strasbourg Observers Blog, December 20, 2017. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2017/12/20/the-committee-of-ministers-goes-nuclear-infringement-proceedings-against-azerbaijan-in-the-case-of-ilgar-mammadov/.Google Scholar
Grant, Sarah, Jurecic, Quinta, Kahn, Matthew, Tait, Matt, and Wittes, Benjamin. “Russian Influence Campaign: What’s in the Latest Mueller Indictment.” Lawfare Blog, February 16, 2018. www.lawfareblog.com/russian-influence-campaign-whats-latest-mueller-indictment.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. “Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights.” Cornell International Law Journal 26, no. 1 (1993): 133–166.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. “Overlegalizing Human Rights: International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash Against Human Rights Regimes.” Columbia Law Review 102, no. 7 (2002): 1832–1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. “Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime.” European Journal of International Law 19, no. 1 (2008): 125–159.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. “The Benefits and Burdens of Brighton.” ESIL Reflections 1, no. 1 (2012), http://esil-sedi.eu/node/138.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication.” Yale Law Journal 107, no. 2 (1997): 273–391.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Showalter, Anne E., “Opposing International Justice: Kenya’s Integrated Backlash Strategy Against the ICC.” International Criminal Law Review 17, no. 1 (2017): 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, Louis. The Age of Rights. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Heri, Corina. “Merabishvili, Mammadov and Targeted Criminal Proceedings: Recent Developments under Article 18 ECHR.” Strasbourg Observers Blog, December 15, 2017. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2017/12/15/merabishvili-mammadov-and-targeted-criminal-proceedings-recent-developments-under-article-18-echr/.Google Scholar
Hern, Alex. “Thirty Countries Use ‘Armies of Opinion Shapers’ to Manipulate Democracy – Report.” The Guardian, November 14, 2017.Google Scholar
Hopgood, Stephen. The Endtimes of Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, “Elaboration of an International Legally Binding Instrument on Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Respect to Human Rights.” U.N. Doc. A/HRC/26/L.22/Rev.1, June 24, 2014.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. “Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights.” Cornell International Law Journal 44, no. 3 (2011): 493–534.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. “Introduction to Symposium on the Constitutionalization of International Law in Latin America.” AJIL Unbound 109 (2015): 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra, and Urueña, René. “Treaty Exit and Latin America’s Constitutional Courts.” AJIL Unbound 111 (2017): 456–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huq, Aziz, and Ginsburg, Tom. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Rikke Frank. “Human Rights and Private Actors in the Online Domain.” In New Technologies for Human Rights Law and Practice, edited by Land, Molly K. and Aronson, Jay D., 243–269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Keith, Linda Camp. “Judicial Independence and Human Rights Protection Around the World.” Judicature 85, no. 4 (2002): 195–200.Google Scholar
Keller, Helen, and Heri, Corina. “Selective Criminal Proceedings and Article 18 ECHR: The European Court of Human Rights’ Untapped Potential to Protect Democracy.” Human Rights Law Journal 36, no. 1-6 (2016): 1–10.Google Scholar
Keller, Helen, and Marti, Cedric. “Interim Relief Compared: Use of Interim Measures by the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights.” Heidelberg Journal of International Law 73, no. 3 (2013): 325–372.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Patrick. “On the Surface, Hungary Is a Democracy. But What Lies Underneath?” New York Times, December 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Kosař, David, and Šipulová, Katarina. “The Strasbourg Court Meets Abusive Constitutionalism: Baka v. Hungary and the Rule of Law.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law (2017). DOI:10.1007/s40803–017-0065-y.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Jay N. “The Politics of Judicial Procedures: The Role of Public Oral Hearings in the German Constitutional Court.” American Journal of Political Science 60, no. 4 (2016): 990–1005.Google Scholar
Land, Molly K., and Aronson, Jay D., “The Promise and Peril of Human Rights Technology.” In New Technologies for Human Rights Law and Practice, edited by Land, Molly K. and Aronson, Jay D., 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas. “The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56, no. 2 (2007): 585–604.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. “The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash.” Law and Contemporary Problems 79, no. 1 (2016): 141–178.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. “Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe?” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9, no. 2 (2018): 199–222.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael Rask, Cebulak, Pola, and Wiebusch, Micha. “Special Issue – Resistance to International Courts.” International Journal of Law in Context 14 (2018): 193–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkin, Elisabeth. “In Costa Rica Election, Gay-Marriage Foe Takes First Round.” New York Times, February 5, 2018.Google Scholar
Mälksoo, Lauri, and Benedek, Wolfgang. Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Marchuk, Iryna. “Flexing Muscles (Yet Again): The Russian Constitutional Court’s Defiance of the Authority of the ECtHR in the Yukos Case.” EJIL: Talk! February 13, 2017. www.ejiltalk.org/flexing-muscles-yet-again-the-russian-constitutional-courts-defiance-of-the-authority-of-the-ecthr-in-the-yukos-case/.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, Dominic. “A Defence of the Margin of Appreciation and an Argument for its Application by the Human Rights Committee.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 65, no. 1 (2016): 21–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. “How the Human Rights Movement Failed.” New York Times, April 23, 2018.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51, no. 13 (2018): 1667–1693.Google Scholar
Mutua, Makau. “Is the Age of Human Rights Over?” In Routledge Companion to Literature and Human Rights, edited by McClennen, Sophia A. and Moore, Alexandra Schultheis, 450–458. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, Yumiko. “Mechanisms to Protect Human Rights in the EU’s External Relations.” In Contemporary Issues in Human Rights Law: Europe and Asia, edited by Nakanishi, Yumiko, 3–22. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2017.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L. “Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 19, no. 1 (2008): 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasqualucci, Jo M. “Interim Measures in International Human Rights: Evolution and Harmonization.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 38, no. 1 (2005): 1–49.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, and Hamilton, Rebecca J.. “Exit from International Tribunals.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9, no. 4 (2018): 679–690.Google Scholar
Piracés, Enrique. “The Future of Human Rights Technology: A Practitioner’s View.” In New Technologies for Human Rights Law and Practice, edited by Land, Molly K. and Aronson, Jay D., 289–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Poperlier, Patricia Sarah Lambrecht, and Lemmens, Koen. Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. “Liberal Internationalism and the Populist Backlash.” Arizona State Law Journal 49, special issue (2016): 795–819.Google Scholar
Posner, Michael. “Why U.S. Withdrawal from the Human Rights Council Is a Dangerous Leadership Mistake.” Forbes, June 19, 2018.Google Scholar
Riestra, Michelle. “International Court Pushes Gay Marriage on 20 Latin American Nations.” The Daily Signal, January 17, 2018, available at http://dailysignal.com/2018/01/17/overstepping-its-mandate-inter-american-court-of-human-rights-orders-20-countries-to-recognize-same-sex-marriage/.Google Scholar
Rieter, Eva. Preventing Irreparable Harm: Provisional Measures in Human Rights Adjudication. Oxford: Intersentia, 2010.Google Scholar
Rona, Gabor, and Aarons, Lauren. “State Responsibility to Respect, Protect and Fulfill Human Rights Obligations in Cyberspace.” Journal of National Security Law and Policy 8, no. 3 (2016): 503–530.Google Scholar
[Ruggie, John.] Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework.” Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/17/31, March 21, 2011.Google Scholar
Ryan, Clare. “Europe’s Moral Margin: Parental Aspirations and the European Court of Human Rights.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 56, no. 3 (2018): 467–530.Google Scholar
Santora, Marc. “Poland Purges Supreme Court, and Protesters Take to Streets.” New York Times, July 3, 2018.Google Scholar
Santora, Marc. “Poland’s Supreme Court in Disarray after Judges Defy Purge.” New York Times, July 4, 2018.Google Scholar
Schlütter, Birgit. “Aspects of Human Rights Interpretation by the UN Treaty Bodies.” In UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Law and Legitimacy, edited by Keller, Helen and Ulfstein, Geir, 261–319. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Yuval. “Towards a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law.” European Journal of International Law 16, no. 5 (2005): 907–940.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, and Huneeus, Alexandra. “In re Direct Action of Unconstitutionality Initiated Against the Declaration of Acceptance of the Jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” American Journal of International Law 109, no. 4 (2015): 866–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smet, Stijn. Resolving Conflicts between Human Rights: The Judge’s Dilemma. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Soley, Ximena, and Steininger, Silvia. “Parting Ways or Lashing Back? Withdrawals, Backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” International Journal of Law in Context 14, no. 2 (2018): 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ssenyonjo, Manisuli. “State Withdrawal Notifications from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: South Africa, Burundi and The Gambia.” Criminal Law Forum 29, no. 1 (2018): 63–119.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiansen, Øyvind, and Voeten, Erik. “Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” Unpublished manuscript, March 30, 2018. PDF file.Google Scholar
Thielbörger, Pierre, and Ackermann, Tobias, “A Treaty on Enforcing Human Rights Against Business: Closing the Loophole or Getting Stuck in a Loop?” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 24, no. 1 (2017): 43–79.Google Scholar
Urueña, René. “Double or Nothing? The Inter-American Court of Human Rights in an Increasingly Adverse Context.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 35, no. 2 (2018): 398–425.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, Armin, Mac-Gregor, Eduardo Ferrer, Antoniazzi, Mariela Morales, and Piovesan, Flavia. Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Emergence of a New Ius Commune. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Voss, M. Joel. “Contesting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity at the UN Human Rights Council.” Human Rights Review 19, no. 1 (2018): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Julia. “Fight over Cambodian Leader’s Facebook ‘Likes’ Reaches a U.S. Court.” New York Times, February 9, 2018.Google Scholar
Wildhaber, Luzius. “The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56, no. 2 (2007): 217–231.Google Scholar
Wuerth, Ingrid B. “International Law in the Post-Human Rights Era.” Texas Law Review 96, no. 2 (2017): 279–349.Google Scholar
Zschirntsimon, Simon. “Is the Inter-American Human Rights System Biased? A Quantitative Analysis of Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Americas.” International and Comparative Law Review 17, no. 1 (2017): 51–81.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×