Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:04:33.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Deborah Schiffrin
Deborah Schiffrin
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
In Other Words
Variation in Reference and Narrative
 , pp. 353 - 371
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, B. (1993). A pragmatic account of the definiteness effect in existential sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 191, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Akel, A. (1999). Episodic boundaries in conversational narratives. Discourse Studies 1:4, 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, J. (1987). Words in the mind: an introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Allen, B., and Montell, L. (eds.). (1981). From memory to history. Nashville, Tennessee: The American Association for State and Local History.Google Scholar
Aniya, S. (1992). semantics and the syntax of the existential there-construction. Linguistic Analysis 22 (3–4) 154–184.Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnold, J., Fagnano, M., and Tanenhaus, M. (2003). Disfluencies signal thee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32/1, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J. E., Wasow, T., Losongco, T., and Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76(1), 28–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroneau, E. (1996). Inside the concentration camps: eyewitness accounts of life in Hitler's Death Camps. Translated by Whiseen, ThomasWestport CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (1975). “This is just a first approximation, but…”. Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Linguistics Department, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Translated by , M. Holquist and , C. Emerson; , M. Holquist (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Translated by , V. W. McGee, , M. Holquist and , C. Emerson (eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ballinger, P. (1999). The culture of survivors: post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic memory. History and Memory 11/2, 99–132.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1987). The acquisition of narratives: learning to use language. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1991). Narrative activity as perspective taking: the role of emotionals, negations, and voice in the construction of the story realm. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 54, 275–290.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. (1983). Ad-hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartaux, D. (1981). Biography and society. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartrop, P. (2000). Surviving the camps: unity in adversity during the Holocaust. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972). Metalogue: why do things have outlines? In , G. Bateson. Steps to an ecology of mind. pp. 27–32. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance and event. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. L. (1984). Biography of a sentence: a Burmese proverb. In , E. Bruner (ed.), Text, play and story: the construction and reconstruction of self and society. pp. 135–155. American Ethnological Society.Google Scholar
Becker, A. L. (1988). Language in particular: a lecture. In , D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in Context. pp. 17–35. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2001) Back in style: reworking audience design. In , P. Eckert, and , J. Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation. pp. 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C., Gregory, M., and Gildea, D. (2003). Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113/2, 1001–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (1994) Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackwell, S. (2003) Implicatures in Discourse. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2001). Investigating narrative inequality: African asylum seekers' stories in Belgium. Discourse & Society 12 (4), 413–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredart, S. (1991). Word interruption in self-repairing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20/2, 123–138.Google Scholar
Brennan, S., and Schober, M. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 44/2, 274–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, D. (1992). Linguistic change in intonation: the use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English, Linguistic Variation and Change 4, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speaking and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, J. (1988). The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society 172, 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, L. (1991). Tellers and listeners. In , P. Hayes (ed.), Lessons and legacies. pp. 316–328. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Dinner talk: cultural patterns of locality and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1997). Meaning and form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, B., and Pellegrini, A. (1990). Narrative thought and narrative language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brockmeier, J. (2001). From the end to the beginning: narrative, identity and the reconstruction of the self. In Brockman, and Carbaugh, (eds.), Narrative and Identity. pp. 283–298. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brockmeier, J., and Carbaugh, D. (2001). Narrative and identity: studies in autobiography, self, and culture. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broszat, M. (1968). The concentration camps, 1933–1945. In , H. Krausnick, , H. Buchheim, , M. Broszat, and , H-A. Jacobsen (eds.), Anatomy of the SS State. p. 403. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1995). Speakers, listeners and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, C. (1988). The syntax and semantics of HAVE and its complements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research 54, 11–31.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990). Autobiography as self. In Acts of meaning. pp. 99–138. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (2001). Self-making and world-making. In , J. Brockmeier and , D. Carbaugh (eds.), Narrative and identity: studies in autobiography, self and culture. pp. 25–37. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. (1981). Speech errors: old data in search of new theories. Linguistics 19/7–8, 627–662.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In , C. Li and , S. Thompson (eds.), Subject and topic. pp. 25–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (ed.) (1980a). The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1980b). The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In , W. Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. pp. 9–50. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1986). Beyond Bartlett: Narratives and remembering. Poetics 15, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In , R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1990). Some things that narratives tell us about the mind. In , B. Britton and , A. Pellegrini (eds.), Narrative thought and narrative language. pp. 79–98. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1991). Prosodic and functional units of language. In , J. Edwards and , M. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1998). Things we can learn from repeated tellings of the same experience. Narrative Inquiry 8, 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., and Schilling-Estes, N. (2002). The handbook of language variation and change. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. (1980). Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In , W. Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. pp. 127–202. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1978). Locationals: A study of existential, locative and possessive sentences. In , J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (vol. 4). Syntax (pp. 85–126). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. and Tree, Fox J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84, 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H., and Haviland, J. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In , R. Freedle (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. pp. 1–40. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.Google Scholar
Clark, H., and Marshall, C. (1992). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In , H. Clark, Arenas of language use. pp. 9–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H., Schreuder, R., and Buttrick, S. (1992). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. In , H. Clark, Arenas of language use. pp. 78–99. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. and Schober, M. (1992). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. In Clark, H. (ed.), Arenas of language use. pp. 176–197. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H., and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1992). Referring as a collaborative process. Reprinted in , H. Clark, Arenas of language use. pp. 107–143. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohn-Sherbock, D. (1992). The Blackwell dictionary of Judaica. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. (2001). Some discourse functions of existential sentences in English. In C. Allen (ed.), Proceedings of the Australian Linguistics Society. pp. 1–6.
Conrad, S., and Biber, D. (2001). Variation in English: multi-dimensional studies. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (1999). Anaphora, discourse, and understanding: evidence from English and French. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (1983). Patterns of encounter management: further arguments for discourse variables. Language in Society 12, 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, R. (1981). Concentration Camps, North America. Malabar, FA: R. E. Krieger.Google Scholar
Davies, B. and Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: the social construction of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20: 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawidowicz, L. (1981). The Holocaust and the historians. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
DeConcini, B. (1990). Narrative remembering. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Fina, A., Bamberg, M., and Schiffrin, D. (in press). Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S., and Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 20, 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dines, E. (1980). Variation in discourse: “And stuff like that”. Language in Society 9 (1), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnellan, K. S. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75, 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnellan, K. (1978). Speaker reference, descriptions, and anaphora. In , P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics (Syntax and Semantics 9). pp. 47–68. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Drinnon, R. (1987). Keeper of concentration camps. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Downing, P. (1996). Proper names as a referential option in English Conversation, in , B. Fox (Ed.) Studies in Anaphora. pp. 95–143. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
DuBois, J. (1980). Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse. In , W. Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. pp. 203–274. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
DuBois, J. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63, 805–55.Google Scholar
DuBois, S., and Sankoff, D. (2001) in , D. Schiffrin, , D. Tannen, and , H. Hamilton, Handbook of discourse analysis. pp. 282–303. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Eckert, P., and Rickford, J. (2001). Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C. (1981). Who's got the floor?Language in Society. 10, 383–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, M. (1996). Context-sensitivity in conversation: eye gaze and the German repair initiator “bitte?”. Language in Society 25 (4), 587–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eitinger, L. (1998). Holocaust survivors in past and present. In , B. and , A. Peck (eds.), The known, the unknown, the disputed and the re-examined. pp. 767–784. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, J., and Boadi, L. A. (1969). “‘To be’ in Twi”. In , J. W. M. Verhaar, (ed.), The verb “be” and its synonyms: philosophical and grammatical studies, part 4. pp. 1–70. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. (2001). The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive linguistics 12:4, 333–378.Google Scholar
Erdmann, P. (1976). There sentences in English. Munich: Tuduv.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of American English directives. Language in Society 5, 25–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. (1999). In defense of history. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. (1990). Sociolinguistics of language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ferrera, K. (1994). Therapeutic ways with words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, A., and Meierkord, C. (2002) Rethinking sequentiality. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1975). The case for case. In , E. Bach and , R. Harns (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. pp. 1–88. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1964) On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. In Travaux linguistiques de Prague (vol. 1). pp. 267–280. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, S. (2004) Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance. Discourse Studies 6 (4), 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanzbaum, H. (1999). The Americanization of the Holocaust. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. (1990). Tense and narrativity. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C. (1993). Grammar in interaction: adverbial clauses in American English conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C., and Fox, B. (1996) Interactional motivations for reference formulation. In , B. Fox (Ed.) Studies in anaphora. pp. 146–166. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fox, B. (1987). Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, B., and Jasperson, R. (1995). A syntactic exploration of repair in conversation. In , P. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in the alternative linguistics. pp. 77–134. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fox, B., Hayashi, M., and Jasperson, R. (1996). Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In , E. Ochs, , E. Schegloff, and , S. Thompson, (eds.) Interaction and grammar. pp. 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, B., and Thompson, S. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66/2, 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tree, Fox J. E., and Clark, H. (1997). Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking. Cognition 62 (2), 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, R. (1992). Existentials and other locatives. Language 68/3, 553–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretheim, T., and Gundel, J (1996). Reference and referent accessibility. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, S. (1992). Trauma, transference and “working through” in writing the history of the Shoah. History and Memory 4/1: 39–55.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. (1973). Slips of the tongue. Scientific American 229/6, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V. (1980). Errors in linguistic performance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1974). On the origins of the term “ethnomethodology”. In , R. Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. pp. 13–18. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Garnham, A., Shillcock, R., Brown, G., Mill, A., and Cutler, A. (1981). Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation. Linguistics 19/7–8, 805–817.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (1989). Two styles of narrative construction and their linguistic and educational implications. Discourse Processes 12, 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P, and Michaels, S. (1989). Discourse styles: variations across speakers, situations, and tasks. Discourse Processes 12/3, 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geluykens, R. (1994). The pragmatics of discourse anaphora in English: evidence from conversational repair. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983b). Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-linguistic study. Typological studies in language series (vol. 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code, and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971a). Supportive interchanges, in Relations in Public, pp. 62–94. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971b). Remedial interchanges, in Relations in Public. pp. 95–187. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981a). Footing. In Forms of talk. pp. 124–159. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981b). Radio talk. In Forms of talk. pp. 197–330. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981c). Replies and responses. In Forms of talk. pp. 5–77. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1986). Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text 6, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G. (1989). Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. (1998). On listening to Holocaust survivors. Westport CN: Praeger.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. (1999). Imagining survivors: Testimony and the rise of Holocaust consciousness. In , H. Flanzbaum (ed.), The Americanization of the Holocaust. pp. 45–67. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. (2001). The awakening of memory. Monna and Otto Weinmann Lecture Series. Washington DC: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In , P. Cole and , J. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts syntax and semantics (vol. 3). pp. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J. 1981. Focusing and description in natural language dialogues. In , A. K. Joshi, , B. L. Webber and , I. A. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding. pp. 84–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grosz, Barbara J., Joshi, Aravind K., and Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21:2, 203–225.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., and Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69/2, 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. (1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Parts 1 and 2. Journal of Linguistics 3: 37–81, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, H. (1996) Intratextuality, intertextuality and the construction of identity as patient in Alzheimer's Disease. Text 16/1, 61–90.Google Scholar
Hammer, R. (1998). Commemorations and the Holocaust. In , P. Hayes (ed.), Lessons and legacies: teaching the Holocaust in a changing world. pp. 175–191. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Hannay, M. (1985). English existentials in functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, G. (1996). The longest shadow: in the aftermath of the Holocaust. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1978). Definiteness and indefiniteness: a study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm; Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M. (2004). Discourse within a sentence. Language in Society 33 (3), 343–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, A. W. (1996). Narrative processes and institutional activities: recipient guided storytelling in academic counseling encounters. Pragmatics 6/s, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. (1982). What no bedtime story means: narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society 11, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words: language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heeman, P. A., and Hirst, G. (1995). Collaborating on referring expressions. Computational linguistics 21:3, 351–382.Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1997) Possession: cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, J. (2002) Grammar and function of we. In , A. Duszak (ed.), Us and others. pp. 31–50. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethomethodology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, A. (1996). The first encounters: survivors and Americans in the late 1940s. Washington D.C: The United States Holocaust Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hilberg, R. (1992). Perpetrators, victims, bystanders. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M., and Suleiman, S. R. (2001). Material memory: Holocaust testimony in post-Holocaust art. In , J. Epstein and , L. Lefkovitz (eds.), Shaping losses: cultural memory and the Holocaust. pp. 87–104. Chicago and Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, R. (1992). Speech errors and the poetics of conversation. Text and Performance Quarterly 12/2, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, S. (1997). Voicing the void. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Horvath, B. (1987). Text in conversation: variability in story-telling texts. In , K. Denning, S. Inkelas, , F. McNair-Knox and , J. Rickford (eds.), Variation in language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. pp. 212–223. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Linguistics Department.Google Scholar
Houston, A. (1989). The English gerund: syntactic change and discourse function. In , R. Fasold and , D. Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation. pp. 173–196. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. (1994). The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, J. and Heasley, B. (1983). Semantics: A coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974a). Toward ethnographies of communication. In Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. pp. 3–28. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974b). Why linguistics needs the sociologist. In Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. pp. 69–82. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1981). “In vain I tried to tell you.”Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1985). Language, memory and selective performance: Cultee's “Salmon Myth” as twice told to Boas, Journal of American Folklore 98, 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.Google Scholar
Iggers, G. (1997). Historiography in the twentieth century. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. (1996). Shadow conversations. In , M. Silverstein and , G. Urban (Eds.) Natural Histories of Discourse. pp. 131–159. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1971 [1957]). Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb, in Selected Writings of Roman Jakobson. (vol. 2). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In , T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. pp. 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jasperson, R. 2003. Some linguistic aspects of closure cut-off. In The language of turn and sequence. pp. 257–286. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In , D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. pp. 294–338. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1974). Error corrections an interactional resource. Language in Society 3: 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In , J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. pp. 219–248. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (1980). Stories, community and place: narratives from middle America.Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (1994). Perspectives on repetition: interdisciplinary perspectives, vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.Google Scholar
Kacandes, I. (1994). “You who live safe in your warm houses”: Your role in the production of Holocaust testimony. In , D. Lorenz and , G. Weinberger (eds.), Insiders and outsiders: Jewish and Gentile culture in Germany and Austria. pp. 189–213. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Kaltenbock, G. (2003). On the syntactic and semantic status of anticipatory it. English language and linguistics 7:2, 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartunnen, L. (1976). Discourse referents. In , J. D. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: notes from the Linguistic Underground. pp. 363–394. New York: Academic Press.
Kirschenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1974). The concept and varieties of narrative performance in east European Jewish culture. In , R. Bauman and , J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. pp. 283–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korobov, N. & Bamberg, M. (2003). Between childhood and adolescence: multiple positioning in 10 year olds. American Association of Applied Linguistics Panel,Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue, and the novel. In , T. Moi (ed.), The Kristeva reader. pp. 35–61. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kronfeld, A. (1990). Reference and computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In , J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. pp. 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972a). The isolation of contextual styles. In Sociolinguistic patterns. pp. 70–109. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972b). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the inner city. pp. 354–396. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In , C-J. Bailey and , R. Shuy (Eds.) New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. pp. 340–373. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1978). Where does the linguistic variable stop?: A reply to Beatriz Lavandera. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, 44. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1990). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lang, B. (2002). Uncovering certain mischievous questions about the Holocaust. Monna and Otto Weinmann Lecture Series. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Langer, L. (1991). Holocaust testimonies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Laub, D. (1992). Bearing witness: of the vicissitudes of listening. In , S. Felman and , D. Laub (eds.), Testimony. pp. 75–104. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laub, D., and Allard, M. (1998). History, memory and truth: Defining the place of the survivor. In , B. and , A. Peck (eds.), The known, the unknown, the disputed and the re-examined. pp. 799–813. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lavandera, B. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop?Language in Society 7, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C. (1989). Some problems in determining syntactic variables: The case of WH questions in Montreal French. In , R. Fasold, and , D. Schiffrin, D. (eds), Language Change and Variation. pp. 351–366. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Levelt, W. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14/1, 41–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6/27, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22/1, 1–38.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (1988) Putting Linguistics on a proper footing. In , P. Drew and , A. Wootton (Eds.) Erving Goffman: an interdisciplinary appreciation. pp. 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S (2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Linde, C. (1993). Life stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linenthal, E. (1995). Preserving memory. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Linenthal, E. (2001) The unfinished bombing: Oklahoma City in American memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipstadt, D. (1994). Denying the Holocaust. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Luborsky, M. (1987). Analysis of multiple life history narratives. Ethos 15/4, 366–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1967). A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language 3, 390–396.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. (2002). Discourse variation. In , J. K. Chambers, , P. Trudgill and , N. Schilling-Estes (eds.) The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: aspects of a schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Margulies, D. (1998). Collected stories: A play. New York: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
Marrus, M. (1987). The Holocaust in history. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marrus, M. (1988). The Holocaust in history. London: George Weidenfeld and Nicolson Limited.Google Scholar
Marrus, M. (1991). The use and misuse of the Holocaust. In , P. Hayes (ed.), Lessons and Legacies. pp. 106–119. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. (1999). The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society 28: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meechan, M, and Foley, M. (1994). On resolving disagreement: linguistic theory and variation – “There's bridges.” Linguistic Variation and Change 6 (1), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Michaels, S., and Collins, J. (1984). Oral discourse styles: Classroom interaction and the acquisition of literacy. In , D. Tannen (ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse. pp. 219–244. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (1990). One, by one, by one. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Milsark, G. (1977). Towards an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3 1–31.Google Scholar
Mishler, E. (1999). Storyline: craftartists' narratives of identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
Mishler, E. (In press). Narrative and identity: the double arrow of time. In , D. Schiffrin, , A. De Fina, and , M. Bamberg (eds.), Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, A. (2001). Popular culture and the shaping of Holocaust memory in AmericaSeattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, M. (1988). Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. In , O. Neurath, , R. Carnap, and , C. Morris (eds.), International encyclopedia of unified science. pp. 77–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mulkern, A. (1996). The game of the name. In , T. Fretheim and , J. Gundel (eds.) Reference and referent. pp. 263–289. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mushin, I. (2001). Evidentiality and epistemological stance. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, J. (1988). A quantitative study of future tense marking in Spanish. In , K. Ferrara et al. (eds.), Linguistic change and contact. pp. 263–272. Austin: The University of Texas Linguistics Department.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (ed.) (1989). Narratives from the crib. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolle, S. (1988). “Be going to” and “will”: a monosemous account. English Language and Linguistics 2, 223–243.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. (1980). Speaking and unspeaking: detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech. In , V. Fromkin (ed.) Errors in Linguistic performance. pp. 87–95. NY: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. (1997). Retelling stories in spontaneous conversation. Discourse Processes 25, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. (1998). Retelling again. Narrative Inquiry 8, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. (2000). Conversational narrative. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, P. (1999). The Holocaust in American life. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1985). Clarification and culture. In , D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form and use: linguistic applications. pp. 325–341. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1993). Indexing gender. In , A. Duranti and , C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. pp. 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ochs, E. and Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E., and Thompson, S. (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., Taylor, C., Rudolph, D., and Smith, R. (1991). Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes 151, 37–72.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., and Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Y. (2000). Politeness in Chinese face-to-face interaction. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishers.Google Scholar
Philips, S. (1992). The routinization of repair in courtroom discourse. In , A. Duranti and , C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. pp. 311–322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. (1978). False Starts Can Be True. In Proceedings of Fourth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society. pp. 628–639. University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. (1981) Telling the same story twice. Text 1: 4, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. (1991). Narrative and self-concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History (1): 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In , J. Atkinson and , J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. pp. 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Portelli, A. (1997). The Battle of Valle Giulia: Oral history and the art of dialogue. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Premilovac, A. (2002). The Discursive Construction of Memory in Holocaust Survivor Testimonies. M.S. Thesis. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In , P. Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics. pp. 223–256. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1992) The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status In Thompson, S. and , W. Mann, W., eds. Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund raising text. pp. 295–325. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rando, E., and Napoli, D. J. (1978). Definites and there sentences. Language 54/2: 300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reaser, J. (2003). A Quantitative approach to (sub)registers: the case of ‘Sports Announcer Talk’Discourse Studies 5 (3), 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L. (1993). How reference works: explanatory models for indexicals, descriptions and opacity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1981). On the problem of syntactic variation: a reply to B. Lavandera and W. Labov. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 82. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1967). The linguistic turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4, 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In , E. Rosch and , B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization. pp. 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosen, H. (1988). The autobiographical impulse. In , D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context. pp. 69–88. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, A. (1996). Is the Holocaust unique?Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, R. (2004). Those who forget the past: the question of anti-Semitism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Roth, A. (2002). Social epistomology in broadcast news interviews. Language in Society 31 (3), pp. 355–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1973). Lecture notes. School of Social Sciences, University of California at Irvine.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), In , J. Atkinson and , J. Heritage (eds), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. pp. 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. 1992[1966). The baby cried: the mommy picked it up. In , H. SacksLectures on conversation. pp. 236–266. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., and Schegloff, E. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In , G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. pp. 15–21. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1988). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In , F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey. pp. 140–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., and Thibault, P. (1981). Weak complementarity: tense and aspect in Montreal French. In , B. Johns and , D. Strong (eds), Syntactic change. Natural Language Studies (vol. 26). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1972a). Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In , D. Sundow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. pp. 75–119. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax for conversation. In , T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax. pp. 261–288. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff. E. (1987). Recycled Turn Beginnings, in , G. Button and , J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social OrganizationClevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. pp. 70–85. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97: 5, 1295–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., , G. Jefferson, and , H. Sacks (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, B., Noy, C. and , B. Cohler 2001. “Collected Stories in the Life Narratives of Holocaust Survivors”. 11:1, 159–194.Google Scholar
Schiff, B., and Noy, C. (In press). Making it personal: Shared meanings in the narratives of Holocaust survivors. In , D. Schiffrin, Fina, A. and , M. Bamberg (eds.), Discourse and identity.Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1977). Opening encounters. American Sociological Review 424, 671–691.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry 50 (3/4), 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1981). Tense variation in narrative. Language 57/1, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1984a). How a story says what it means and does. Text 44, 313–346.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1984b). Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13 (3), pp. 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1985). Multiple constraints on discourse options: a quantitative analysis of causal sequences. Discourse Processes 8 (3), 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1986). Turn-initial variation: structure and function in conversation. In , D. Sankoff (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. pp. 367–380. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1990). Between text and context: Deixis, anaphora and the meaning of then. Text 103: 245–70.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1991). Conditionals as topics in discourse. Linguistics 30/1, 165–197.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1992). Anaphoric then: Aspectual, textual and epistemic meaning. Linguistics 30: 4, 753–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1993). “Speaking for another” in sociolinguistic interviews. In , D. Tannen (ed.) Framing in discourse. pp. 231–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1994a). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1994b). Making a list. Discourse Processes 17/3, 377–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1996). Narrative as self portrait: the sociolinguistic construction of identity. Language in Society 25/2, 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (2000). Mother/daughter discourse in a Holocaust oral history. Narrative Inquiry 10/1, 1–44.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (2001a). Discourse markers: language meaning and context In , D. Schiffrin, , D. Tannen, and , H. Hamilton (eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis. pp. 54–75. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (2001b). Language, experience and history: “What happened” in World War II. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5/3, 323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (2001c). Language and public memorial: “America's concentration camps.” Discourse and Society 12: 505–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (2002). Mother and friends in a Holocaust life story. Language in Society 31/3, 309–354.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (2003). Linguistics and history: The narrative connection. In , D. Tannen and , J. Alatis (eds.), Discourse and beyond. pp. 35–60. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (in press). From linguistic reference to social identity. In , A. De Fina, , M. Bamberg, and , D. Schiffrin (eds.), Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., and , S. W. Scollon (2003). Discourses in place. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1981). Tellings, retellings and tellings within tellings: The structuring and organization of narrative in Kuna Indian discourse. In , R. Bauman and , J. Sherzer (eds.), Case studies in the ethnography of speaking. pp. 249–273. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Shuman, A. (1986). Storytelling rights: Uses of oral and written texts by urban adolescents. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M., and Urban, G. (1996). Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1950[1908]). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated by , K. Wolff (ed.). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1995). Democracy on trial: the Japanese American evacuation and relocation in World War II. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Smith, S. W., and Jucker, A. H. (1998). Interactive aspects of reference assignment in conversations. Pragmatics and cognition 6:1–2, 153–187.Google Scholar
Strassfeld, M. (1985). The Jewish holidays. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Strauss, C. (2004). Cultural standing in expression of opinion. Language in Society 33: 2, 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swerts, M. (1998). Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure, Journal of Pragmatics 30, 486–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1980). A Comparative analysis of oral narrative strategies: Athenian Greek and American English. In , W. Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. pp. 51–88. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishers.
Tannen, D. (1982). Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 58, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishers.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (1989) Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
, Taylor J. (1996) Possessives in English: an exploration in cognitive grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1999). The internment of Americans of Japanese ancestry, in , R. Brooks (ed.) When sorry isn't enough: the controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustice. pp. 165–168. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. (1984). Editing rules and understanding: the case against sentence-based syntax. Language and Communication 4/2, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T., and Cameron, D. (1987). Analyzing conversation. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Tonkin, E. (1992). Narrating our past: the social construction of oral history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toole, J. (1996). The effect of genre on referential choice. In , T. Fretheim and , J. Gundel (eds.), Reference and referent accessibility. pp. 263–289. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, M., Joshi, A., and Prince, E. (1998). Centering theory in discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ward, G. and Birner, B. (1995). Definiteness and the English existential. Language 71, 722–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, G., and Birner, B. (2001). Discourse and information structure. In , D. Schiffrin, , H. Hamilton, and , D. Tannen (eds), Handbook of discourse analysis. pp. 119–137. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Webb, K. (1977) An evolutionary aspect of social structure and a verb “have”. American Anthropologist March 79 (1), 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Wieviorka, A. (1994). On testimony. In , G. Hartman (ed.), Holocaust remembrance. pp. 23–32. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1976). Speech events and natural speech: some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society 5: 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1978). A feature of performed narrative: The conversational historical present. Language in Society 7, 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1979). The conversational historical present alternation. Language 55, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in action. New York: Teachers' College Press.Google Scholar
Wu, R-J. (2004). Stance in talk: a conversation analysis of Mandarin final particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. (1988). Writing and rewriting the Holocaust. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. (1993). The texture of memory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ziv, Y. (1982). Another look at definites in existentials. Journal of Linguistics 18, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Deborah Schiffrin, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: In Other Words
  • Online publication: 14 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616273.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Deborah Schiffrin, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: In Other Words
  • Online publication: 14 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616273.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Deborah Schiffrin, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: In Other Words
  • Online publication: 14 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616273.014
Available formats
×