Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:53:31.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2024

Willem Otterspeer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

‘The forests were on fire – / they however/ wreathed their necks with their hands/ like bouquets of roses / … / like two drops / stuck at the edge of a face.’ These lines are by the Polish poet Zbigniew Herbert, and are quoted by the Polish teacher Smutek. They refer to the two drops of water that are his pupils, Ada and Alev. They are also a presentiment of the two drops that he himself would form with Ada. ‘So doth each teare, / Which thee doth weare, / A globe, yea, world by that impression grow,’ wrote the seventeenth-century poet John Donne.

For Donne, a ball becomes a globe, a tear a world, and the mixing of lovers’ tears a deluge. This is what Eliot called ‘poetry as thinking,’ feeling a thought ‘as immediately as the odour of a rose’. It is what Erasmus called Christianity and Huizinga called symbolism. Not everyone is receptive to it, but it is the lifeblood of literature.

According to philosophy, it is the misuse of language. As John Locke once wrote, ‘the two ideas of a man and a centaur, supposed to be the ideas of real substances, are the one true and the other false; the one having a conformity to what has really existed, the other not.’ Yet it was precisely this that Huizinga so envied in the child, the savage and the poet: that they became a kangaroo in the magic dance. ‘A person who is not skilled in the force of language,’ wrote Erasmus, ‘is, of necessity, short-sighted, deluded, and unbalanced in his judgement of things as well.’

Words do not reflect things, they create things; language is not a representation of the world, it creates worlds. It is not something we can use free of obligation. As Aristoteles complained, the figurative use of language can make a crime of a mistake and a mistake into a crime. What one might call ‘literary ambiguity,’ another might call ‘doublethink.’ ‘To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully-constructed lies,’ is how George Orwell described doublethink in Nineteen Eighty-Four: ‘to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them…’

Type
Chapter
Information
In Praise of Ambiguity
Erasmus, Huizinga and the Seriousness of Play
, pp. 83 - 84
Publisher: Amsterdam University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Willem Otterspeer, Universiteit Leiden
  • Book: In Praise of Ambiguity
  • Online publication: 18 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789400603264.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Willem Otterspeer, Universiteit Leiden
  • Book: In Praise of Ambiguity
  • Online publication: 18 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789400603264.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Willem Otterspeer, Universiteit Leiden
  • Book: In Praise of Ambiguity
  • Online publication: 18 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789400603264.005
Available formats
×