Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:32:18.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

72 - Infertility Treatment in Perimenopausal Women: Ethical Considerations

from PART IV - ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN FERTILITY AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

By
Hyacinth N. Browne ,
Alicia Armstrong  and
Alan DeCherney
Edited by
Botros R. M. B. Rizk ,
Juan A. Garcia-Velasco ,
Hassan N. Sallam  and
Antonis Makrigiannakis
Botros R. M. B. Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Juan A. Garcia-Velasco
Affiliation:
Rey Juan Carlos University School of Medicine,
Hassan N. Sallam
Affiliation:
University of Alexandria School of Medicine
Antonis Makrigiannakis
Affiliation:
University of Crete
Get access

Summary

The number of women seeking treatment for infertility continues to grow. It is estimated that approximately 1 in 136 or two million people in United States are infertile (1). These numbers are explained, in part, by an age-related decline in fertility that is well documented in the medical literature. Despite the availability of new technologies such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), this age-related loss of fertility cannot be overcome by the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), if donor oocytes are not used (2–10).

ART has been viewed as a panacea for perimenopausal women seeking motherhood late in their reproductive lives. According to the 2003 CDC Assisted Reproductive Technology Report (11), 20 percent of women seeking ART were of the age of forty and older. Most women in this age-group either delayed childbearing to pursue higher education and careers, or are part of the large cohort of women born during the “baby boom” (1946–1964) period. Although these women can have spontaneous pregnancies, the likelihood of pregnancy and live birth is less than 1–2 percent in those older than forty-three (11), and the time to conception can be prolonged.

Age is the most important factor affecting the chance of a live birth when a woman uses her own eggs. Among women in their twenties, pregnancy and live birth rates are relatively stable; and decline steadily from the mid-thirties onward (11).

Keywords

assisted reproductive technologyethical issuesfemale fertilityinfertility treatmentperimenopausal womanoocyte donation
Type
Chapter
Information
Infertility and Assisted Reproduction , pp. 723 - 727
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

www.wrongdiagnosis.com/f/female_infertility/prevalence.htm. (No author is listed.)
DeCherney, AH, Berkowitz, GS. Female fecundity and age. The New England Journal of Medicine 1982;306(7):424–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearlstone, AC, Fournet, N, Gambone, JC, Pang, SC, Buyalos, RP. Ovulation induction in women age 40 and older: the importance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone level and chronological age. Fertility and Sterility 1992;58(4):674–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gindoff, PR, Jewelewicz, R. Reproductive potential in the older woman. Fertility and Sterility 1986;46(6):989–1001.Google ScholarPubMed
Toner, JP. Ovarian reserve, female age and the chance for successful pregnancy. Minerva Ginecologica 2003;55(5):399–406.Google ScholarPubMed
Speroff, L. The effect of aging on fertility. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994;6(2):115–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ron-El, R, Raziel, A, Strassburger, D, Schachter, M, Kasterstein, E, Friedler, S. Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in women over the age of 41. Fertility and Sterility 2000;74(3):471–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, J, Sauer, MV. Assessing fertility in women of advanced reproductive age. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;185(3):758–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levi, AJ, Raynault, MF, Bergh, PA, Drews, MR, Miller, BT, Scott, RT Jr. Reproductive outcome in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Fertility and Sterility 2001;76(4):666–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, T. Fertility and a woman's age. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2006;51(3):157–63.Google Scholar
www.cdc.gov/art/art2003/section2a.htm. (No author is listed.)
Soules, MR, Sherman, S, Parrott, E, et al. Executive summary: Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW). Fertility and Sterility 2001;76(5):874–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, N, Brown, JR, Adel, T, Skurnick, JH. Characterization of reproductive hormonal dynamics in the perimenopause. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1996;81(4):1495–501.Google ScholarPubMed
Fertility treatment when the prognosis is very poor or futile. Ethics Committee, American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility and Sterility 2004;82(4):806–10.
Tietze, C. Reproductive span and rate of reproduction among Hutterite women. Fertility and Sterility 1957;8(1):89–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D, Mayaux, MJ. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. The New England Journal of Medicine 1982;306(7):404–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Toner, JP. The significance of elevated FSH for reproductive function. Bailliere's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993;7(2):283–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toner, JP, Philput, CB, Jones, GS, Muasher, SJ. Basal follicle- stimulating hormone level is a better predictor of in vitro fertilization performance than age. Fertility and Sterility 1991;55(4):784–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aging and infertility in women. Practice Committee, American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility and Sterility 2006;82 (Suppl 5):S248–52.
Scott, RT, Leonardi, MR, Hofmann, GE, Illions, EH, Neal, GS, Navot, D. A prospective evaluation of clomiphene citrate challenge test screening of the general infertility population. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;82(4 Pt. 1):539–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, WM, Nesbitt, TS, Danielsen, B. Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;93(1):9–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Angell, RR. Aneuploidy in older women. Higher rates of aneuploidy in oocytes from older women. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 1994;9(7):1199–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, AS, Tsakok, MF. Age-related decline in fertility: a link to degenerative oocytes?Fertility and Sterility 1997;68(2):265–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassold, T, Hunt, P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nature Reviews 2001;2(4):280–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, SH. Informed demand for “non-beneficial” medical treatment. The New England Journal of Medicine 1991;325(7):512–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneiderman, LJ, Jecker, NS, Jonsen, AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 1990;112(12):949–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No.362: Medical Futility. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;109(3):791–4.CrossRef
Rome, N. Childless: Some by chance, some by choice. The Washington Post, November 28, 2006.Google Scholar
Lantos, JD, Singer, PA, Walker, RM, et al. The illusion of futility in clinical practice. The American Journal of Medicine 1989;87(1):81–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jecker, NS, Schneiderman, LJ. Medical futility: the duty not to treat. Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics 1993;2(2):151–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×