Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:10:43.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Rise of an Innovation Tiger

The Catch-Up of the Indian National System of Innovation

from Part I - Drivers of Innovation in Emerging Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2021

By
Kristin Brandl  and
Ram Mudambi
Edited by
Fernanda Cahen ,
Lourdes Casanova  and
Anne Miroux
Fernanda Cahen
Affiliation:
Centro Universitario FEI, Brazil
Lourdes Casanova
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Anne Miroux
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

The rise of India’s national system of innovation (NSI) reflects a rapid catch-up process toward developed country innovation standards. However, industries have evolved at a varying pace, reflecting influences by government-driven activities, while others are more influenced by business strategies. Government policies and firm strategies have co-evolved with one another and a variety of endogenous/domestic and exogenous/foreign pressures. We analyze the impact of these pressures on locally based innovation processes within the Indian NSI. We examine three disparate industrial contexts: the wind turbine, pharmaceutical, and auto component industries, and present evidence of considerable industry-specific effects. Domestic firms largely drove innovation in the Indian wind turbine and pharmaceutical industries, drawing knowledge from abroad through various means. In contrast, innovation in the auto components industry was driven by domestic firms’ participation in global value chains coordinated by advanced country MNCs. Eventually, these domestic firms become eMNCs in their own right, some becoming global competitors. Our chapter contributes to the debates related to innovation policies, NSIs and the catch-up processes of eMNCs.

Keywords

National systems of innovation (NSIs)catch-upIndiainnovation policiessupranational institutions pressures
Type
Chapter
Information
Innovation from Emerging Markets
From Copycats to Leaders
 , pp. 63 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABLE. (2016). ABLE – Biospectrum industry survey, Make in India, Ministry of External Affairs, TechSci Research, Global Industry Analysts Report (GIA).Google Scholar
Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385–406.Google Scholar
Abrol, D. (2013). Where is India‘s innovation policy headed? Social Scientist, 41 (3/4), 65–80.Google Scholar
Arora, B. (2019). Why India‘s wind turbine makers are under stress. Bloomberg Quit. Retrieved September 2019, from www.bloombergquint.com/business/why-indias-wind-turbine-makers-are-under-stress.Google Scholar
Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190.Google Scholar
Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. (2012). EMNE catch‐up strategies in the wind turbine industry: Is there a trade‐off between output and innovation capabilities? Global Strategy Journal, 2(3), 205–223.Google Scholar
Beugelsdijk, S., & Mudambi, R. (2013). MNEs as border corssing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5), 413–426.Google Scholar
Bharat Forge Limited. (2019). Bharat Forge annual report 2017–2018. Retrieved September 2019, from www.bharatforge.com/AR2018/pdf/00-bharat-forge-annual-report-2017-18.pdf.Google Scholar
Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3), 247–277.Google Scholar
Brandl, K., Darendeli, I., & Mudambi, R. (2019). Foreign actors and intellectual property protection regulations in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5), 826–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandl, K., & Mudambi, R. (2014). EMNCs and catch-up processes: The case of four Indian industries. In Cuervo-Cazurra, A. & Ramamurti, R. (Eds.), Understanding multinationals from emerging markets (pp. 129–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandl, K., Mudambi, R., & Scalera, V. G. (2015, December). The spectacular rise of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Entrepreneur & Innovation Exchange.Google Scholar
Business Standard. (2019). Bharat Forge Ltd. Retrieved September 2019, from www.business-standard.com/company/bharat-forge-69/information/company-history.Google Scholar
Cagliarini, A., & Baker, M. (2010, September 19–24). Economic change in India. RBA Bulletin.Google Scholar
Choudhury, P., & Khanna, T. (2014). Toward resource independence – Why state-owned entities become multinationals: An empirical study of India‘s public R&D laboratories. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), 943–960.Google Scholar
Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. (2019). The global innovation index 2019: Creating healthy lives – The future of medical innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva: Author. www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Dr. Reddy Laboratories. (2019). Dr. Reddy Laboratories Ltd. website. Retrieved September 2019, from www.drreddys.com/.Google Scholar
Dr. Reddy Laboratories. (2019). Dr. Reddy Laboratories Ltd. annual report 2018. Retrieved September 2019, from www.drreddys.com/media/904463/annualreport2019forwebsite.pdf.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. (1995). The “National System of Innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
Global Wind Energy Council [GWEC]. (2016). Indian wind energy. A brief outlook. Retrieved September 2019, from www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/vip/GWEC_IWEO_2016_LR.pdf.Google Scholar
Government of India. (2013). Social, technology and innovation policy 2013. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Science and Technology. Retrieved September 2019, from http://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/STI%20Policy%202013-English.pdf.Google Scholar
Guennif, S., & Ramani, S. V. (2012). Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework. Research Policy, 41(2), 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonsson, S. J., Jensen, P. D. Ø., & Mudambi, S. M. (2012). A co-evolutionary perspective on the drivers of international sourcing of pharmaceutical R&D to India. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 677–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
India Brand Equity Foundation [IBEF]. (2016). Auto components industry in India. Retrieved September 2019, from www.ibef.org/industry/autocomponents-india.aspx.Google Scholar
India Brand Equity Foundation [IBEF]. (2018). Indian pharmaceutical industry. Retrieved September 2019, from www.ibef.org/industry/pharmaceutical-india.aspx.Google Scholar
Kale, D. (2010). The distinctive patterns of dynamic learning and inter-firm differences in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 223–238.Google Scholar
Kale, D., & Little, S. (2007). From imitation to innovation: The evolution of R&D capabilities and learning processes in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19(5), 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyani Group. (2012). About us. Company website. Retrieved September 2019, from www.bharatforge.com/company/about-us.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Mohapatra, P. K., & Chandrasekhar, S. (2009). India‘s global powerhouses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., & Tripathy, A. (2012). Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 368–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. I. (2011). Building a national wind turbine industry: Experiences from China, India and South Korea. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 5(3–4), 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). New York: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, I., & Mitchell, W. (2004). Two faces: Effects of business groups on innovation in emerging economies. Management Science, 50(10), 1348–1365.Google Scholar
McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. (2005). Analytical differences in the economics of geography: The case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning A, 37(10), 1857–1876.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 235–252.Google Scholar
Motohashi, K. (2005). University–industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34(5), 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudambi, R. (2008). Location, control and innovation in knowledge intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 699–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudambi, R., & Helper, S. (1998). The “close but adversarial” model of supplier relations in the US auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 775–792.Google Scholar
Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2014). Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 126–145.Google Scholar
Nair, G. G. (2008). Impact of TRIPS on Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13, 432–441.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
Nicholson, M. W. (2007). The impact of industry characteristics and IPR policy on foreign direct investment. Review of World Economics, 43(1), 27–54.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2014). OECD better policies series: India policy brief. OECD. Retrieved September 2019, from www.oecd.org/policy-briefs/India-Addressing-Economic-and-Social-Challenges-through-Innovation.pdf.Google Scholar
Pachouri, A. (2018). How innovation is playing an increasingly central role in Indian diplomacy. World Economic Forum. Retrieved September 2019, from www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/08/innovation-new-pillar-india-diplomacy-joint-israel/.Google Scholar
Panagariya, A. (2008). India: The emerging giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rajsekhar, B., Van Hulle, F., & Jansen, J. C. (1999). Indian wind energy programme: Performance and future directions. Energy Policy, 27(11), 669–678.Google Scholar
Renic, S. (2009). Pfizer sues Dr. Reddy’s over cholesterol drug Lipitor. Stock Watch.Google Scholar
Scherer, F. M. (1993). Pricing, profits, and technological progress in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 97–115.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, T., Van Biesebroeck, J., & Gereffi, G. (2008). Value chains, networks and clusters: Reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 297–321.Google Scholar
Suzlon. (2019). Suzlon annual report 2017–2018 Retrieved September 2019, from www.suzlon.com/pdf/investor/annual-report-2017-18.pdf.Google Scholar
Technovia. (2019). Winds of change in the power sector: The top 10 global wind turbine companies. Retrieved September 2019, from https://blog.technavio.com/blog/top-10-global-wind-turbine-companies.Google Scholar
United States Patent and Trademark Office [US PTO]. (2019). Patent search. India assignee country. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html.Google Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization [WIPO]. (2019). PCT – The International Patent System. Patent search. India assignee country. Retrieved September 2019, from https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/search.jsf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×