Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:26:44.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Home Is Where the Heart Is

Geographic Variation in Relational Behavior and Outcomes

from Part I - Interdependence, Situations, and Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

By
William J. Chopik
Edited by
Laura V. Machia ,
Christopher R. Agnew  and
Ximena B. Arriaga
Laura V. Machia
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Christopher R. Agnew
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Ximena B. Arriaga
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

People often use relationships to characterize and describe places. Some places are described as warm, friendly, and welcoming. Others as cold, harsh, and unwelcoming. Is there any truth to these colloquialisms? How influential is the broader geographic context in affecting our close relationships? Where do people have the happiest relationships and why? In this chapter, I review recent research on geographic variation in relationship-related constructs and outcomes. The review will also feature some empirical examples and methodological considerations for studying geographic variation in close relationships and how they are expressed. A large portion of the chapter will be a discussion on the mechanisms that give rise to geographic variation in relationship-related constructs and behavior that unfold over different time scales. Step-by-step modules and supplementary information for asking geographic questions at different levels of analysis will be provided. Finally, I will conclude with unanswered conceptual and methodological questions related to the study of geographic variation in close relationship behavior.

Keywords

Geographic variationattachment theoryinterdependence theoryecological modelsmulti-level modelingselective migrationsocial influencesenvironmental influences
Type
Chapter
Information
Interdependence, Interaction, and Close Relationships , pp. 50 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abson, D. J., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2012). Using Principal Component Analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa. Applied Geography, 35, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, F. H. (1924). The group fallacy in relation to social science. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 19, 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. A. (2001). Heat and violence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 33–38.Google Scholar
Bach, R. A., Defever, A. M., Chopik, W. J., & Konrath, S. H. (2017). Geographic variation in empathy: A state-level analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barranti, M., Carlson, E. N., & Côté, S. (2017). How to test questions about similarity in personality and social psychology research: Description and empirical demonstration of response surface analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 465–475.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., Schönbrodt, F., Gebauer, J. E., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). To live among like-minded others: Exploring the links between person-city personality fit and self-esteem. Psychological Science, 27, 419–427.Google Scholar
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. K. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Boneva, B. S. & Frieze, I. H. (2001). Toward a concept of a migrant personality. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 477–491.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature–nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chein, I. (1954). The environment as a determinant of behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 115–127.Google Scholar
Chisholm, J. S. (1993). Death, hope, and sex: Life-history theory and the development of reproductive strategies. Current Anthropology, 34, 1–24.Google Scholar
Chisholm, J. S. (1996). The evolutionary ecology of attachment organization. Human Nature, 7, 1–38.Google Scholar
Chisholm, J. S. (1999). Death, Hope and Sex: Steps to an Evolutionary Ecology of Mind and Morality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chopik, W. J. (2017). Associations among relational values, support, health, and well-being across the adult lifespan. Personal Relationships, 24, 408–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopik, W. J. & Edelstein, R. S. (2014). Age differences in romantic attachment around the world. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 892–900.Google Scholar
Chopik, W. J., Edelstein, R. S., van Anders, S. M., Wardecker, B. M., Shipman, E. L., & Samples-Steele, C. R. (2014). Too close for comfort? Adult attachment and cuddling in romantic and parent-child relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 212–216.Google Scholar
Chopik, W. J., Kim, E. S., & Smith, J. (2018). An examination of dyadic changes in optimism and physical health over time. Health Psychology, 37, 42–50.Google Scholar
Chopik, W. J. & Lucas, R. E. (2019). Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on global and experienced well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chopik, W. J., Moors, A. C., & Edelstein, R. S. (2014). Maternal nurturance predicts decreases in attachment avoidance in emerging adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 47–53.Google Scholar
Chopik, W. J. & Motyl, M. (2016). Ideological fit enhances interpersonal orientations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 759–768.Google Scholar
Chopik, W. J. & Motyl, M. (2017). Is Virginia for lovers? Geographic variation in adult attachment orientation. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopik, W. J., O’Brien, E., & Konrath, S. H. (2017). Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.Google Scholar
Conway, L. G., Ryder, A. G., Tweed, R. G., & Sokol, B. W. (2001). Intranational cultural variation: Exploring further implications of collectivism within the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Cantú, S. M., & Tybur, J. M. (2012). Sex ratio and women’s career choice: Does a scarcity of men lead women to choose briefcase over baby? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690–702.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In Drasgow, F., & Schmitt, N. W. (Eds.), Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. (2007). Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. In Ostroff, C., & Judge, T. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on Organizational Fit (pp. 361–372). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. (2016). Excel file for plotting response surfaces. Retrieved from http://public.kenan-flagler.unc.edu/faculty/edwardsj/downloads.htmGoogle Scholar
Eichstaedt, J. C., Schwartz, H. A., Kern, M. L., Park, G., Labarthe, D. R., Merchant, R. M., … Seligman, M. E. P. (2015). Psychological language on Twitter predicts county-level heart disease mortality. Psychological Science, 26, 159–169.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1991). Maternal representations of attachment during pregnancy predict the organization of infant-mother attachment at one year of age. Child Development, 62, 891–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ, 337, a2338.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.Google Scholar
Frieze, I. H., Hansen, S. B., & Boneva, B. (2006). The migrant personality and college students’ plans for geographic mobility. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 170–177.Google Scholar
Fulmer, C. A., Gelfand, M. J., Kruglanski, A. W., Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Pierro, A., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). On “feeling right” in cultural contexts: How person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 21, 1563–1569.Google Scholar
Gelman, A. (2009). Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do – Expanded Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geoffroy, P. A., Bellivier, F., Scott, J., & Etain, B. (2014). Seasonality and bipolar disorder: A systematic review, from admission rates to seasonality of symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 168, 210–223.Google Scholar
Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., Simpson, J. A., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2015). “All or nothing”: Attachment avoidance and the curvilinear effects of partner support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 450–475.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, W. & Arriaga, X. B. (2018). Cognitive reframing of intimate partner aggression: Social and contextual influences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 2464–2477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 243–266.Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1959). On Lewin’s methods and theory. Journal of Social Issues, Supplement Series, No. 13.Google Scholar
Hoppmann, C. A. & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Spousal interrelations in old age – A mini-review. Gerontology, 55, 449–459.Google Scholar
Hoppmann, C. A., Gerstorf, D., & Hibbert, A. (2011). Spousal associations between functional limitation and depressive symptom trajectories: Longitudinal findings from the Study of Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD). Health Psychology, 30, 153–162.Google Scholar
Hotard, S. R., McFatter, R. M., McWhirter, R. M., & Stegall, M. E. (1989). Interactive effects of extraversion, neuroticism, and social relationships on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 321.Google Scholar
Hughes, A. & Saxton, P. (2006). Geographic micro-clustering of homosexual men: Implications for research and social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 28, 158–178.Google Scholar
Humberg, S., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2019). Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: Checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 409–419.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. J. & Chopik, W. J. (2019). Geographic variation in the Black-violence stereotype. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 287–294.Google Scholar
Jokela, M. (2009). Personality predicts migration within and between U.S. states. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 79–83.Google Scholar
Jokela, M. (2014). Personality and the realization of migration desires. In Rentfrow, P. J. (Ed.), Geographical Psychology: Exploring the Interaction of Environment and Behavior (pp. 71–88). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1991). Lewin, situations, and interdependence. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 211–233.Google Scholar
Kent, S., Bluthé, R.-M., Kelley, K. W., & Dantzer, R. (1992). Sickness behavior as a new target for drug development. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 13, 24–28.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Conway, L. G. III, Pietromonaco, P. R., Park, H., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Ethos of independence across regions in the United States: The production-adoption model of cultural change. American Psychologist, 65, 559–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K., & Ramaswamy, J. (2006). Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan’s “northern frontier.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 369–384.Google Scholar
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Lee, J. G. L., Wimark, T., Ortiz, K. S., & Sewell, K. B. (2018). Health-related regional and neighborhood correlates of sexual minority concentration: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13, e0198751-e0198751.Google Scholar
Levine, R. V., Martinez, T. S., Brase, G., & Sorenson, K. (1994). Helping in 36 U.S. cities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 69–82.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, C. J. & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.Google Scholar
Magnusson, A. (2000). An overview of epidemiological studies on seasonal affective disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101, 176–184.Google Scholar
McCann, S. J. H. (2014). Big five personality differences and political, social, and economic conservatism: An American state-level analysis. In Rentfrow, P. J. (Ed.), Geographical Psychology: Exploring the Interaction of Environment and Behavior (pp. 139–160). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeish, D. & Stapleton, L. M. (2016). Modeling clustered data with very few clusters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 495–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millward, H. & Spinney, J. (2013). Urban–rural variation in satisfaction with life: Demographic, health, and geographic predictors in Halifax, Canada. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 8, 279–297.Google Scholar
Moran, P. A. (1950a). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 17–23.Google Scholar
Moran, P. A. (1950b). A test for the serial independence of residuals. Biometrika, 37, 178–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 11–22.Google Scholar
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., … Chartier, C. R. (2018). The psychological science accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 501–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motyl, M. (2016). Liberals and conservatives are geographically dividing. In Valdesolo, P. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Bridging Ideological Divides: The Claremont Symposium for Applied Social Psychology. Los Angeles: Sage Press.Google Scholar
Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–14.Google Scholar
Murray, D. R. & Schaller, M. (2014). Pathogen prevalence and geographical variaion in traits and behavior. In Rentfrow, P. J. (Ed.), Geographical Psychology: Exploring the Interaction of Environment and Behavior (pp. 51–70). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Neal, J. W., Durbin, C. E., Gornik, A. E., & Lo, S. L. (2017). Codevelopment of preschoolers’ temperament traits and social play networks over an entire school year. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 627–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuttall, A. K. & Valentino, K. (2017). An ecological-transactional model of generational boundary dissolution across development. Marriage & Family Review, 53, 105–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, C. D., Roberts, B. W., Saucier, G., & Zhou, X. (2008). Testing the measurement equivalence of personality adjective items across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1524–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oishi, S. & Schimmack, U. (2010). Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 980–994.Google Scholar
Oishi, S., Talhelm, T., & Lee, M. (2015). Personality and geography: Introverts prefer mountains. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 55–68.Google Scholar
Park, N. & Peterson, C. (2010). Does it matter where we live?: The urban psychology of character strengths. American Psychologist, 65, 535–547.Google Scholar
Philbreck, N. (2007). Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Portes, A. & Hao, L. (2002). The price of uniformity: Language, family and personality adjustment in the immigrant second generation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 889–912.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J. (2011). Multilevel SEM strategies for evaluating mediation in three-level data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 691–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rentfrow, P. J. (2010). Statewide differences in personality: Toward a psychological geography of the United States. American Psychologist, 65, 548–558.Google Scholar
Rentfrow, P. J. (2014). Geographical Psychology: Exploring the Interaction of Environment and Behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Rentfrow, P. J., Gosling, S. D., Jokela, M., Stillwell, D. J., Kosinski, M., & Potter, J. (2013). Divided we stand: Three psychological regions of the United States and their political, economic, social, and health correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 996–1012.Google Scholar
Rentfrow, P. J., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). A theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 339–369.Google Scholar
Rentfrow, P. J., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2009). Statewide differences in personality predict voting patterns in 1996–2004 US presidential elections. In Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., & Thorisdottir, H. (Eds.), Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification (pp. 314–349). New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Reysen, S. & Levine, R. V. (2014). People, culture, and place: How place predicts helping toward strangers. In Rentfrow, P. J. (Ed.), Geographical Psychology: Exploring the Interaction of Environment and Behavior (pp. 241–260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schaller, M. & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 212–221.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. (1985). Culture, scarcity, and maternal thinking: Maternal detachment and infant survival in a Brazilian shantytown. Ethos, 13, 291–317.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. (1993). Death without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2013). No more angel-babies on the Alto. Berkeley Review of Latin American Studies, Spring 2013, 25–31.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., … Zupanèiè, A. (2003). Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions. Personal Relationships, 10, 307–331.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., … Scrimali, T. (2004). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: Are models of self and of other pancultural constructs? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 367–402.Google Scholar
Schönbrodt, F. D. (2016). RSA: An R package for response surface analysis (version 0.9.10). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=RSAGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Dziurzynski, L., Lucas, R. E., Agrawal, M., … Seligman, M. E. (2013). Characterizing geographic variation in well-being using tweets. Paper presented at the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, J. A. & Belsky, J. (2008). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (2nd ed., pp. 131–157). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Uskul, A. K., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 8552–8556.Google Scholar
van Herk, H., Poortinga, Y. H., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (2004). Response styles in rating scales: Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 346–360.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. & Visser, K. (1999). Locomotion in social dilemmas: How people adapt to cooperative, tit-for-tat, and noncooperative partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 762–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Poppel, F. & Day, L. H. (1996). A test of Durkheim’s theory of suicide – without committing the “ecological fallacy.” American Sociological Review, 61, 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Emmer, J. (2018). Ideological responses to the EU refugee crisis: The left, the right, and the extremes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 143–150.Google Scholar
van Scheppingen, M. A., Chopik, W. J., Bleidorn, W., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2019). Longitudinal actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, e51–e70.Google Scholar
Vandello, J. A. & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 279–292.Google Scholar
Vanhoutte, B., Wahrendorf, M., & Nazroo, J. (2017). Duration, timing and order: How housing histories relate to later life wellbeing. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 8, 227–243.Google Scholar
Varnum, M. E. W. & Kitayama, S. (2011). What’s in a name? Popular names are less common on frontiers. Psychological Science, 22, 176–183.Google Scholar
Ward, M. D. & Gleditsch, K. S. (2018). Spatial Regression Models. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. & Duffy, R. D. (2016). Losing faith in the intelligence–religiosity link: New evidence for a decline effect, spatial dependence, and mediation by education and life quality. Intelligence, 55, 15–27.Google Scholar
Weidmann, R., Schönbrodt, F. D., Ledermann, T., & Grob, A. (2017). Concurrent and longitudinal dyadic polynomial regression analyses of Big Five traits and relationship satisfaction: Does similarity matter? Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, G. C. (1995). A comparison of urban with rural support networks: Liverpool and North Wales. Ageing & Society, 15, 59–81.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×