Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:32:50.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2021

By
Giacomo Figueredo
Edited by
J. R. Martin ,
Beatriz Quiroz  and
Giacomo Figueredo
J. R. Martin
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Beatriz Quiroz
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Giacomo Figueredo
Affiliation:
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we take paradigmatic reasoning as point of departure and describe axial relations for interpersonal clause systems in Brazilian Portuguese. We reason axially about MOOD types first in relation to discourse-semantic systems and then by agnating clause structures. Our description is text-based and privileges the view from above as it investigates how exchanges are enacted in language through the discourse-semantic systems of NEGOTIATION, SPEECH FUNCTION and ENGAGEMENT – which in turn are realised by MOOD and ASSESSMENT in the grammar. A corpus based on a range of text types forms the basis of the study. The core of interpersonal grammar comprises the functions of Predicator, Finite and Subject realising MOOD – responsible for dialogic interaction and negotiation. Positioner is the function realising ASSESSMENT – the grammatical system responsible for assessing the roles of speaker and listener, thus managing their voices in the negotiation of moves.

Keywords

Brazilian Portugueseinterpersonal grammarclauseMOODNEGOTIATIONSPEECH FUNCTIONASSESSMENTENGAGEMENT
Type
Chapter
Information
Interpersonal Grammar
Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description
 , pp. 191 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caffarel, A. (2006). A Systemic Functional Grammar of French: From Grammar to Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., (2004), Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagliari, L. C. (1981). Elementos de Fonética do Português Brasileiro [Elements of Phonetics in Brazilian Portuguese]. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Institute of Language Studies. State University of Campinas.Google Scholar
Eggins, S. & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. P. (1988). What Makes a ‘Good’ System Network Good? In Benson, J. D. and Greaves, W. S., eds., Systemic Perspectives on Discourse. Norwood: Ablex, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2011). Introdução ao Perfil Metafuncional do Português Brasileiro: Contribuições para os Estudos Multilíngues [Introduction to the Metafunctional Profile of Brazilian Portuguese: Contributions to Multilingual Studies]. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.Google Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2014). Uma metodologia de perfilação gramatical sistêmica baseada em corpus [A Corpus-Based Methodolody for Systemic Grammar Profiling]. Letras & Letras, 30(2), 17–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2015). A Systemic Functional Description of Modal Particles in Brazilian Portuguese: The System of assessment. Alfa, 59(2), 275–302.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1965). Linguistics and English Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the Theory of Grammar, Word, 17(3),241–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Text as a Semantic Choice in Social Contexts. In van Dijk, T. A. and Petöfi, J. S., eds., Grammars and Descriptions. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 176–225.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). The Construction of Knowledge and Value in the Grammar of Scientific Discourse, with Reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. In Coulthard, M., ed., Advances in Written Text Analysis. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 136–56.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). On Grammar and Grammatics. In Webster, J., ed., (2002), On Grammar, Vol. 1, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London: Continuum, pp. 384–417.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: a Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, J. (2020). Analysing Scientific Discourse from a Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective: A Framework for Exploring Knowledge Building in Biology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2018). Interpersonal Meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 2–19.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Cruz, P. (2018). Interpersonal Grammar of Tagalog: A Systemic Functional Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 54–96.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Quiroz, B. (2020). Functional Language Typology:A Discourse Semantic Perspective. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. London: Routledge, 189–237.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause, 2nd ed., London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2013). The Interpersonal and Experiential Grammar of Chilean Spanish: Towards a Principled Systemic-Functional Description Based on Axial Argumentation. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2015). La cláusula como movimiento interactivo: una perspectiva semántico-discursiva de la gramática interpersonal del español [The Clause as an Interactive Movement: A Discourse-Semantic Perspective to Spanish Interpersonal Grammar]. Documentação de Estudios em Linguística Teorica e Aplicada – DELTA, 31(1), 261–301. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-445023762456121953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2018). Negotiating Interpersonal Meanings: Reasoning about MOOD. Functions of Language, 25(1), 135–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17013.qui.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2005). Narrative and the Origins of Discourse: Construing Experience in Stories around the World. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (Series S19), 151–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Anderson, T., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C., Petersen, U., Patpong, P. & Smedegaard, F. (2007). Typology of MOOD: A Text-Based and System-Based Functional view. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Webster, J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Vol. 2. London: Equinox, pp. 859–920.Google Scholar
Wang, P. (2020). Axial Argumentation and Cryptogrammar in Interpersonal Grammar: A Case Study of Classical Tibetan mood. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. London: Routledge, 73–101.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. (2020). Axial Argumentation below the Clause: The Verbal Group in Khorchin Mongolian. In Martin, J.R., Doran, Y. J. and Figueredo, Giacomo, eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 35–72.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×