Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Foreword
- Who Will Be Indonesian President in 2014?
- The Seventh Plenum of the Communist Party of Vietnam:The Gains of the Central Committee
- The Struggle to Amend Thailand's Constitution
- Whither China's Myanmar Stranglehold?
- Malaysia's BN Stays in Power, But Deep Changes Have Nevertheless Occurred
- The Significance of China-Malaysia Industrial Parks
- Steadily Amplified Votes Decide Malaysian Elections
- The Rise of Chinese Power and the Impact on Southeast Asia
- The China-Myanmar Energy Pipelines: Risks and Benefits
- Moving ASEAN+1 FTAs towards an Effective RCEP
- Ethnic Insurgencies and Peacemaking in Myanmar
- Japan's Growing Angst over the South China Sea
- Taking the Income Gap in Southeast Asia Seriously
- Indonesian Parties Struggle for Electability
- Rohingya Boat Arrivals in Thailand: From the Frying Pan into the Fire?
- APEC's Model of Green Growth is a Move Forward
- China's FDI in Southeast Asia
- Hidden Counter-Revolution: A History of the Centralisation of Power in Malaysia
- The Dominance of Chinese Engineering Contractors in Vietnam
- RCEP and TPP: Comparisons and Concerns
- Implications of Demographic Trends in Singapore
- Big Power Contest in Southeast Asia
- The Resurgence of Social Activism in Malaysia
- Pivoting Asia, Engaging China—American Strategy in East Asia
- Towards a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea
- List of ISEAS Perspective Issues
Steadily Amplified Votes Decide Malaysian Elections
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Foreword
- Who Will Be Indonesian President in 2014?
- The Seventh Plenum of the Communist Party of Vietnam:The Gains of the Central Committee
- The Struggle to Amend Thailand's Constitution
- Whither China's Myanmar Stranglehold?
- Malaysia's BN Stays in Power, But Deep Changes Have Nevertheless Occurred
- The Significance of China-Malaysia Industrial Parks
- Steadily Amplified Votes Decide Malaysian Elections
- The Rise of Chinese Power and the Impact on Southeast Asia
- The China-Myanmar Energy Pipelines: Risks and Benefits
- Moving ASEAN+1 FTAs towards an Effective RCEP
- Ethnic Insurgencies and Peacemaking in Myanmar
- Japan's Growing Angst over the South China Sea
- Taking the Income Gap in Southeast Asia Seriously
- Indonesian Parties Struggle for Electability
- Rohingya Boat Arrivals in Thailand: From the Frying Pan into the Fire?
- APEC's Model of Green Growth is a Move Forward
- China's FDI in Southeast Asia
- Hidden Counter-Revolution: A History of the Centralisation of Power in Malaysia
- The Dominance of Chinese Engineering Contractors in Vietnam
- RCEP and TPP: Comparisons and Concerns
- Implications of Demographic Trends in Singapore
- Big Power Contest in Southeast Asia
- The Resurgence of Social Activism in Malaysia
- Pivoting Asia, Engaging China—American Strategy in East Asia
- Towards a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea
- List of ISEAS Perspective Issues
Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• The principle of “one man, one vote” was never entirely adopted in Malaysia and disproportionate weightage to favour rural areas was in-corporated into the electoral system from the beginning. The ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) has since used the apportionment of seats and the demarcation of constituency boundaries to reinforce its advantage.
• In the recent 13th General Elections, BN's mal-apportionment and ger-rymandering strategies over decades resulted for the first time in the opposition Pakatan Rakyat winning the popular vote yet failing to gain control of parliament.
• Since 1972, electoral delineation rules have allowed for rural weight-age without clear limitations. The erosion of Malay electoral support in the 1999 election further led BN to use constituency re-delineation in 2002 to pre-empt future Malay vote swings against it and to take advantage of the opposition parties’ inability to overcome ethnic vote-pooling.
• However, with the emergence of an opposition multi-ethnic coalition Pakatan Rakyat (PR) that can also gain from ethnic vote-pooling, mixed constituencies ceased to be BN strongholds. Since 2008, the ethnic voting trend favours PR.
INTRODUCTION
The principle of “one man, one vote” was never entirely adopted in Malaysia and disproportionate “weightage” to favour rural areas was incorporated into the electoral system from the beginning. In a first-past-the-post system, “the manner in which the…total electorate is divided into electoral constituencies is crucially important in determining outcomes” (Lim 2003, p. 26). Excessive use by Barisan Nasional (BN) of the apportionment of seats and the demarcation of constituency boundaries to reinforce its advantage has invariably devalued the “one man, one vote” principle.
In the 13th General Election held on 5th May 2013, the opposition coalition Pakatan Rakyat (PR)39 won 50.85 per cent of the popular vote but only 89 parliament seats or 40.09 per cent of the total (Table 1). In contrast, though winning only 46.87 per cent of the popular vote, BN won 133 federal seats and retained control over parliament with 59.91 per cent of the seats. PR's loss despite winning the popular vote can arguably be attributed to BN's long-term use of electoral delineation to create unequal-sized constituencies.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- ISEAS PerspectiveSelections 2012-2013, pp. 55 - 66Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2014