Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:43:14.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2020

Özgür Koca
Özgür Koca
Affiliation:
Bayan Claremont Islamic Graduate School
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Islam, Causality, and Freedom
From the Medieval to the Modern Era
 , pp. 262 - 278
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamov, B. “Ghazālī’s Theory of Causality,” Studia Islamica, 67 (1988), 75–89.Google Scholar
Abrahamov, B. “The Bi-lā kayfa Doctrine and Its Foundations in Islamic Theology,” Arabica, 42 (1995), 365–379.Google Scholar
Abū Ḥanīfa, al-Nuʿmān ibn Thābit. İmamı Azamın Beş Eseri, trans. Öz, Mustafa. Istanbul: Marmara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Vakfi, 1992.Google Scholar
Abū Rīda, . Min Shuyūh al-Muʿtazila Ibrahim ibn Sayyār al-Naẓẓām. Cairo: Dar al-Nadim, 1989.Google Scholar
Acikgenc, Alparslan. Islam Medeniyetinde Bilgi ve Bilim. Istanbul: Turkiye Diyanet Vakfi, 2006.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. “From Necessary Existent to God,” in Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays, ed. Adamson, Peter, 170–189. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Addas, Claude. Quest for the Red Sulphur: The Life of Ibn ʿArabi. Cambridge, UK: Islamic Texts Society, 1993.Google Scholar
Alami, Ahmed. L’ontologie modale: Étude de la théorie des modes d’Abū Hāshim al-Jubbāʾī. Paris: Vrin, 2001.Google Scholar
Alon, Ilai. “Ghazālī on Causality,” Journal of American Oriental Society, 100.4 (1980), 397–405.Google Scholar
Alousi, Husām Muhīddīn. The Problem of Creation in Islamic Thought. Baghdad: National Print Co., 1968.Google Scholar
Aminrazavi, Mahdi. (ed.), The Islamic Intellectual Tradition in Persia. Richmond: Curzon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Aminrazavi, Mahdi. (ed.), Suhrawardī and the School of Illumination. London: Curzon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Āmulī, Ḥaydar. Jāmīʿ al-Asrār wa Manbāʿ al-Anwār, Corbin, Henry and Yahya, Uthman. Tehran-Paris: Bibliothèque iranien, 1969.Google Scholar
Anawati, G. C. “Fakhr al-Din al-Razi,” Encyclopedia of Islam 2, 2010, https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2/fakhr-al-din-al-razi.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. “Aristotle on Inefficient Causes,” Philosophical Quarterly, 32 (1982), 311–326.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de potentia, ed. Pession, P. M.. Turin: 1965.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, Jonathan, 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Metaphysics, trans. Sachs, Joe. Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press, 1999 (2nd ed. 2002).Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Physics, Books I–II, trans. William, Charlton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970 (2nd ed. 1992).Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, . al-Ibāna ʿan Uṣūl al-Diyāna, ed. Sabbagh, Abbas. Beirut: Dar al-Nafaais, 1994/1414.Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, . The Elucidation from Islam’s Foundation (Kitāb al-Ibāna ʿan Uṣūl al-Diyāna), trans. Klein, Walter C.. American Oriental Series, vol. 19. New York: Kraus Reprint Corporation, 1967.Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, . Kitāb al-Lumaʿ, ed. Ghuraba, Hammuda. Cairo: Mattbaʻat Misr Sharikah Musahimah Misriyah, 1955.Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, . Maqālāt al-Islamiyyīn wa Ikhtilāf al-Muṣallīn, ed. Ritter, Helmut. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1963/1382.Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, . “A Vindication of the Science of Kalam (Risāla fī Istiḥsān al-Khawḍ fī ‘Ilm al-Kalām),” in The Theology of Ashʿarī, ed. McCarthy, Richard J., 117–134. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1953.Google Scholar
Baghdādī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir ibn Tāhir al-. Uṣūl al-Dīn. Istanbul: Dar al-Funun Ilahiyat Fakültesi, 1928.Google Scholar
Baghdādī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir ibn Tāhir al-. al-Farq bayn al-Firaq, ed. Zahid al-Kawthari, M.. Cairo: Maktab Nashr al-Thaqafah al-Islamiyya, 1948.Google Scholar
Bakar, Osman. Classification of Knowledge in Islam. Cambridge, UK: The Islamic Text Society, 1998.Google Scholar
Barbour, Ian G. When Science Meets Religion. New York: Harper Collins, 2000.Google Scholar
Bāqillānī, . al-Inṣāf, ed. Haydar, Imaduddin Ahmad. Beirut: Alam al-Kutub, 1986/1407.Google Scholar
Bāqillānī, . Kitāb al-Bayān, ed. McCarthy, Richard. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Sharqiyya, 1958.Google Scholar
Bāqillānī, . Kitāb al-Tamhīd, ed. Haydar, Imaduddin Ahmad. Beirut: Muassasa al-Kutub al-Thakafiyya, 1987/1407.Google Scholar
Bashier, Salman H. Ibn al-ʿArabi’s Barzakh: The Concept of the Limit and the Relationship between God and the World. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Belo, Catarina. Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes. Boston, MA: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Benevich, Fedor. “The Classical Ashʿarite Theory of Aḥwāl: Juwaynī and His Opponents,” Journal of Islamic Studies, 2.2 (2016), 136–175.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986 [1710, 1713].Google Scholar
Bertolacci, Amos. “The Doctrine of Material and Formal Causality in the ‘Ilāhiyyāt’ of Avicenna’s ‘Kitāb al-Shifāʾ’,” Quaestio, 2 (2002), 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolacci, Amos. “The Reception of Avicenna in Latin Medieval Culture,” in Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays, ed. Adamson, Peter, 242–269. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bigliardi, Stefano. Islam and the Quest for Modern Science: Conversations with Adnan Oktar, Mehdi Golshani, Mohammed Basil Altaie, Zaghloul El-Naggar, Bruno Guiderdoni and Nidhal Guessoum. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, 2014.Google Scholar
Brunschvig, Robert. “Mu’tazilisme et optimum,” Studia Islamica, 39 (1974), 5–23.Google Scholar
Chittick, W. “al-Kunawi” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. Bearman, P., Bianquis, T., Bosworth, C., van Donzel, E., and Heinrichs, W.. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Chittick, W. The Self Disclosure of God: The Principles of Ibn al-ʿArabīʿs Cosmology. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Chittick, W. The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-ʿArabīʿs Metaphysics of Imagination. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. God and Contemporary Science. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “Panentheism Today: A Constructive Systematic Evaluation,” in In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, ed. Clayton, P. and Peacocke, A., 249–264. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “The Pantheistic Turn in Christian Theology,” Dialog, 38 (1999), 289–293.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. In Quest of Freedom: The Emergence of Spirit in the Natural World. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2009.Google Scholar
Coope, Ursula. “Aristotle’s Account of Agency in Physics III.3,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 20 (2004), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John. “Mullā Ṣadrā Shirazi,” in The Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, ed. Craig, E., 595–599. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Corbin, Henry. Alone with the Alone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Corbin, Henry. Opera metaphysica et Mystica. Paris-Tehran: Adrien-Maisonnevue, 1952.Google Scholar
Costa, D’Ancona. “Plotinus and Later Platonic Philosophers on the Causality of the First Principle,” in Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, ed. Gerson, Lloyd P., 356–385. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. “The Critique on Natural Causality in the Mutakallimun and Nominalism,” Harvard Theological Review, 66 (1973), 77–94.Google Scholar
Dağlı, Caner K. Ibn al-ʿArabī and Islamic Intellectual Culture: From Mysticism to Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “Causal Relations,” in Essays on Actions and Events, 149–162. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Davidson, H. A. Proofs for Eternity, Creation, and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Dembski, William. “On the Very Possibility of Intelligent Design,” in The Creation Hypothesis, ed. Moreland, J. P., 113–138. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Demir, Osman. Kelamda Nedensellik: Ilk Dönem Kelamcılarında Tabiat ve İnsan. İstanbul: TC Kültür ve Türizm Bakanlığı, 2015.Google Scholar
Demirli, Ekrem. Ibnu’l Arabi Metafiziği. Istanbul: Sufi Kitap, 2013.Google Scholar
Dhanani, Alnoor. “The Impact of Ibn Sina’s Critique of Atomism on Subsequent Kalam Discusssions of Atomism” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 25 (2015), 79–104.Google Scholar
Dhanani, Alnoor. The Physical Theory of Kalām: Atoms, Space, and Void in Basrian Mu‘tazilī Cosmology. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Dhanani, Alnoor. “Problems in Kalām Physics,” Bulletin of the Royal Institute of Interfaith Studies, 4 (2002), 73–96.Google Scholar
Draper, Paul. “God, Science, and Naturalism,” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, ed. Wainwright, William J., 272–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Druart, T. A. “Ibn Sina(Avicenna) and Duns Scotus,” in John Duns Scotus, Philosopher. Proceedings of The Quadruple Congress on John Duns Scotus, ed. Ingham, M. B. and Bychkov, O., 13–27. Munster: Aschendorff, 2010.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. “Is Time a Continuum of Instants?” Philosophy, 75 (2000): 497–515.Google Scholar
Dutton, Blake D. “Al-Ghazāli on Possibility and the Critique of Causality,”Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 10 (2001), 23–46.Google Scholar
Ede, A. and Cormack, L. B. A History of Science in Society: From the Ancient Greeks to the Scientific Revolution. North York, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Edis, Taner. An Illusion of Harmony: Science and Religion in Islam. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard. “Mathematics and Philosophy in Medieval Islam,” in The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives, ed. Hogendijk, Jan P. and Sabra, Abdelhamid I., 159–160. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid. Averroes: His Life, Works and Influence. Oxford: One World, 2001.Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid. Islamic Occasionalism. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1958.Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea. “Aristotle on Causality,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/aristotle-causality/.Google Scholar
Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad al-. al-Madīna al-Fāḍila, ed. Nadir, Albert Nasri. Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq, 1985.Google Scholar
Fārūqī, Ismail al-. Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan. Washington, DC: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 1982.Google Scholar
Fīrūzābādī, Abu Ṭāhir. al-Qāmūs al-Muḥīṭ. Beirut: Muassasat al-Risala, 1986.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. “al-Aḥkām in Classical Ashʿarite Teaching,” in De Zenon d’Élée à Poincaré. Recueil d’études en hommage à Roshdi Rashed, ed. Morelon, R. and Hasnawi, A., 753–777. Louvain: Éditions Peeters, 2004.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. “Al-Maʿnā: Some Reflections on the Technical Meanings of the Term in the Kalâm and Its Use in the Physics of Mu’ammar,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 87.3 (Jul.–Sep. 1967), 248–259.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. “The Ashʿarite Ontology I: Primary Entities,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 9 (1999), 163–231.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. Beings and their Attributes: The Teaching of the Basrian School of the Muʿtazila in the Classical Period. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. “Bodies and Atoms: The Ashʿarite Analysis,” in Islamic Theology and Philosophy: Studies in Honor of George F. Hourani, ed. Marmura, Michael E., 39–63. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. Creation and the Cosmic System: Ghazālī Avicenna. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag, 1992.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. “Elements in the Development of the Teaching of Al- Ashʿarī,” Le Museon, 104 (1991), 141–190.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. Ghazālī and the Ashʿarite School. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. The Metaphysics of Created Being According to Abū al-Hudhayl al-‘Allāf. Istanbul: Netherlands Historische-Archeologisch Instituut, 1966.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. “Notes and remarks on the ṭabā’i‘ in the teaching of al-Māturīdī,” in Melanges d’islamologie a la memoire d’Armand Abel, ed. Salmon, P., 137–149. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1974.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. “Reason and Revealed Law: A Sample of Parallels and Divergences in Kalam and Falsafa,” in Recherches d’Islamologie. Recuil d’articles offert a Georges C. Anawati et Louis Gardet par leurs collegues et amis, ed. Arnaldez, R. and Van Riet, S., 123–138. Louvain: Peeters, 1977.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. “The Structure of Created Causality According to al-Ashʿarī,” Studia Islamica, 25 (1966), 53–59.Google Scholar
Freeland, Cynthia A. “Aristotle on Bodies, Matter, and Potentiality,” in Philosophical issues in Aristotle’s Biology, ed. Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James, 392–407. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad and Zonta, Mauro, “The Reception of Avicenna in Jewish Cultures, East–West,” in Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays, ed. Adamson, Peter, 214–241. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Gardet, L. “La pensé religieuse d’Avicenne’ (Ibn Sīnā),” in Études de Philosophie Médiévale, 41. Paris: Vrin, 1951.Google Scholar
Geulincx, Arnold. “Metaphysica vera,” in Arnoldi Geulincx antverpiensis Opera philosophica, ed. Land, J. P. N., vol. 2. Hague: Martinum Nijhoff, 1893.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . al-Iqtiṣād fī-l-Iʿtiqād, ed. Cubukcu, Ibrahim and Atay, Huseyin. Ankara: A. U. Ilahiyat Fakultesi Yayinlari, 1962.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . al-Iqtiṣād fī-l-Iʿtiqād (Moderation in Belief), trans. Michael Marmura in “Ghazālī’s Chapter on Divine Power in the Iqtisād,” in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, vol. 4 (1994).Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . Al-Maqsad al-Asnā fī Sharḥ al-Maʿānī Asmāʾ Allāh al-Ḥusnā (The Ninety-Nine Beautiful Names of God) trans. Burrel, David B. and Daher, Nazer. Cambridge, UK: The Islamic Texts Society, 1992.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . al-Munqidh min al-Dalāl and Other Relevant Works of Ghazālī, trans. McCarthy, R. J.. Boston, MA: Twayne Publishers, 1980.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn, 16 parts (Cairo: Lajnat Nashr al-Thaqafa al-Islamiyya. Reprinted Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi, n.d. [c.1990]).Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . The Incoherence of the Philosophers (Tahāfut al-Falāsifa), a Parallel English-Arabic Text, ed. and trans. Marmura, M. E.. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . Kitāb al-Arbaʿīn. Cairo, 1916.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . Mishkāt al-Anwār (The Niche of Lights), a dual-language edition trans. Buchman, David. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gill, Mary Louise. “Aristotle’s theory of causal action in Physics III. 3,” Phronesis, 25 (1980), 129–147.Google Scholar
Gilson, É. “Avicenne et les Origines de la Notion de Cause Efficiente,” Atti Del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia, 9 (1958), 121–130.Google Scholar
Gilson, É. History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. London: Random House, 1955.Google Scholar
Gilson, É. “Notes pour l’histoire de la cause efficiente,” Archives d’Histoire doctinrale et littéraire du Moyen Age, 37 (1962), 7–31.Google Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel. La doctrine d’al-Ashʿarī. Paris: Cerf, 1990.Google Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel. Théories de l’acte humain en théologie musulmane. Paris: J. Vrin, 1980.Google Scholar
Goichon, A. M. La distinction de l’essence et de l’existence d’après Avicenne. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1937.Google Scholar
Goldziher, Ignaz. The Zahiris: Their Doctrine and Their History, trans. Behn, Wolfgang. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971.Google Scholar
Golshani, Mehdi. From Physics to Metaphysics. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, 1997.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. E. Avicenna. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. E. “Did Ghazālī Deny Causality?,” Studia Islamica, 47 (1978), 83–120.Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank Al-Ghazā’lī’s Philosophical Theology: An Introduction to the Study of his Life and Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank “Al-Ghazali,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/al-ghazali/.Google Scholar
Griffin, David R. “Interpreting Science from the Standpoint of Whiteheadian Process Philosophy,” in The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, ed. Clayton, Philip and Simpson, Zachary, 453–471. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf. Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Guessoum, Nidhal. Islam’s Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. London and New York: I.B.Tauris, 2011.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. “Essay-Review: Suhrawardī and Greek Philosophy,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 13 (2003), 303–309.Google Scholar
Günaltay, M. Şemsettin. Kelam Atomculuğu ve Kaynağı Sorunu, ed. and noted by Bayın, Irfan. Ankara: Fecr, 2008.Google Scholar
Halkin, A. S. “The Hashwiyya,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 54 (1934), 1–28.Google Scholar
Hanioğlu, Şükrü. Atatürk: An Intellectual Biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Hasker, William “Occasionalism,” www.muslimphilosophy.com/ip/rep/K057.Google Scholar
Hayri Bolay, Süleyman. Türkiye’de Ruhçu ve Maddeci Düşüncenin Mücadelesi. Ankara: Nobel Kitap, 2008.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time, trans. by Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962 (first published in 1927).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “What is Metaphysics?,” in Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre. New York: New American Library, 1975.Google Scholar
Hocaoglu, Durmus. “Nursi ve Descartes Felsefelerinde Tabiat Uzerine Mukayeseli Calisma”: www.koprudergisi.com/index.asp?Bolum=EskiSayilarGoster=YaziYaziNo=500.Google Scholar
Hourani, George E. “The Dialogue between Ghazālī and the Philosophers on the Origin of the World,” The Muslim World, 48 (1958), 183–191.Google Scholar
Hourani, George E. “‘Ibn Sīnā’s ‘Essay on the Secret of Destiny’,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 2.1 (1966), 25–48.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., rev. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations, trans. Findlay, J.. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 1970 [1900].Google Scholar
Ibn ʿArabī, . al-Futūḥāt al-Makkīyya, 9 vols. Cairo, 1911; reprinted, Beirut: Dar Sadir, n.d.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿArabī, . al-Futūḥāt al-Makkīyya, 14 vols, ed. Yahia, O.. Cairo: al-Hayʿat al-Misriyyat al-ʿAmma liʿl-Kitab, 1972–1991.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿArabī, . Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam, ed. ʿAfīfī, A.. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-ʿArabi, 1946.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿArabī, . The Maccan Revelations: Ibn al-ʿArabī. Vols. 1 and 2, ed. Chodkiewicz, Michel, trans. Chittick, William and Morris, James W.. New York: Pir Press: 2005 [2002].Google Scholar
Ibn Fūrak, Abū Bakr Muḥammad. Mujarrad, ed. Gimaret, Daniel. Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq, 1987.Google Scholar
Ibn Fūrak, Abū Bakr Muḥammad. Kitāb al-Ḥudūd fī-l-Uṣūl, ed. Sulaymani, Muhammad. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami, 1999.Google Scholar
Ibn Ḥazm, Abū Muḥammad ʿAlī ibn Aḥmad ibn Saʿīd. al-Taqrīb li-Ḥadd al-Mantiq, ed. Abbas, Ihsan. Beirut: Dar al-Maktaba al-Hayat, 1959.Google Scholar
Ibn Ḥazm, Abū Muḥammad ʿAlī ibn Aḥmad ibn Saʿīd. al-Iḥkām fī Uṣūl al-Aḥkām. Beirut: Dar al-Afak al-Jadid, 1980.Google Scholar
Ibn Ḥazm, Abū Muḥammad ʿAlī ibn Aḥmad ibn Saʿīd. al-Faṣl fī-l-Milal wa-l-Ahwāʾ wa-l-Niḥal, ed. Nasr, Ibrahim and Umayra, Abdurrahman, Riyad-Jidda, 1982/1402.Google Scholar
Ibn Ḥazm, Abū Muḥammad ʿAlī ibn Aḥmad ibn Saʿīd. ʿIlm al-Kalām, ed. Hijazi, Ahmad, Cairo: al-Maktaba al-Thakafiyya, 1989.Google Scholar
Ibn Humām, Kamāl al-Dīn. Kitāb al-Musāyara. Istanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 1979.Google Scholar
Ibn Khaldūn, Abū Zayd ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Muḥammad. Muqaddima, ed. Dawood, N. J., trans. Rosenthal, Franz. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Manẓūr, Jamāl al-Dīn Abū al-Fadl. Lisān al-ʿArab. Beirut: Dar Sadr, n.d.Google Scholar
Ibn Mattawayh, , al-Tadhkira fī Aḥkām al-Jawāhir wa-l-Aʿrāḍ, ed. Gimaret, Daniel. Cairo: al-Ma’had al-’Ilm al-Faransi, 2009.Google Scholar
Ibn Maymūn, (Maimonides). The Guide for the Perplexed (Dalālat al-Ḥāʾirīn), trans. Friedlander, M., 2nd ed. Skokie, IL: Varda Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Murtazā, . al-Munya wa-l-Amal, ed. Ali, Isamuddīn ibn Muhammad. Alexandria: Dar al-Maʿrifa al-Jamiyya, 1985.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Nadīm, Abū al-Faraj Muḥammad. al-Fihrist. Beirut: Dar al-Marifa, 1978.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, , al-Kashf ʿan Manāhij al-Adilla, ed. Qasim, M.. Cairo, 1961.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, , Decisive Treatise and Epistle Dedicatory (Kitāb Faṣl al-Maqāl and Risala al-Ihdāʾ), trans. Butterworth, Charles. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, 2008.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, , Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, trans. Van den Bergh, Simon. London: Messrs. Luzac and Company, Ltd, 1954.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, . al-Shifāʾ al-Ilāhiyyāt (The Metaphysics of The Healing: A Parallel English-Arabic Text), ed. and trans. Marmura, Michael E.. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, . al-Ishārāt wa-l-Tanbīhāt (Pointers and Reminders with Naṣīr al-Dīn Ṭūsī’s Commentary) ed. Dunya, Suleyman. Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1957–1960, 3 vols.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, . Avicenna’s De anima, ed. Rahman, F.. London: Oxford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, . Dānesh Nāma-i ʿAlāʿī, MS Nuruosmaniye Library, No. 2258/2682.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, . Kitāb al-Shifāʾ/Ṭabīʿiyyāt (1): al-Samāʾ al-Ṭabīʿī, ed Zāyid, S.. Cairo, 1983.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, . Kitāb al-Najāt, ed. Fakhry, Majid. Beirut: Dar al-Afaq al-Jadida, 1985.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, . Kitāb al-Taʿlīqāt, ed. Mousavian, S. H.. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy, 2013.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīnā, . The Physics of the Healing, trans. McGinnis, J.. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Iqbal, Muhammad. The Reconstruction of Religious Thought. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ivry, A. “Destiny Revisited: Avicenna’s Concept of Determinism,” in Islamic Theology and Philosophy¸ ed. Marmura, Michael E.. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Izutsu, T. A Comparative Study of the Key Philosophical Concepts in Sufism and Taoism. Tokyo: Keio University; second ed., Sufism and Taoism, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1983 [1966].Google Scholar
Izutsu, T. The Concept and Reality of Existence. Tokyo: Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, 1971.Google Scholar
Jabrī, Mohammad Abed al-. The Formation of Arab Reason, trans. Centre for Arab Unity Studies. Hamra: The Centre for Arab Unity Studies, 2011.Google Scholar
Jāḥiẓ, Abū ʿUthman al-. Kitāb al-Ḥayawān, ed. Harun, Abdussalam Muahmmad. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turasi al-Arabi, 1969.Google Scholar
Janssens, J. “The Problem of Human Freedom in Ibn Sīnā,” in Actes del Simposi Internacional de Filosofia de l’Edat Mitjana, 112–118. Vic-Girona: Patronat d’Estudis Osonencs, 1996.Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean. “Aux origines de l’ontologie d’Ibn Sīnā,” in Etudes sur Avicenne. ed. Jolivet, and Rashed, R., 19–28. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1984.Google Scholar
Jurjānī, al-Sayyīd al-Sharīf ‘Ali ibn Muḥammad al-. al-Taʿrīfāt. Lipsiae: Sumptibus F. C. G. Vogelii, 1845.Google Scholar
Jurjānī, al-Sayyīd al-Sharīf ‘Ali ibn Muḥammad al-. Sharḥ al-Mawāqif, ed. al-Dimyati, Mahmud Omar, 8 vols. Beirut: Dar al-Qutub al-Ilmiyya, 2012/1433 H.Google Scholar
Jurjānī, al-Sayyīd al-Sharīf ‘Ali ibn Muḥammad al-. Sharḥ al-Mawāqif, trans. Turker, Omer, a Parallel Turkish–Arabic text, 3 vols. Istanbul: Turkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Baskanligi, 2015.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, ʿAbd al-Malik al-. Lumaʿ al-Adilla, ed. Mahmud, Fawqiya Husayn. Cairo: al-Dar al-Kawmiyya, 1965/1385.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, ʿAbd al-Malik al-. al-ʿAqīda al-Niẓāmiyya, ed. Zubaidi, Muhammad. Beirut: Dar Sabil al-Rashad, 2003/1424.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, ʿAbd al-Malik al-. al-Kitāb al-Irshād, ed. Tamīmī, Asad. Beirut: Muassasa al-Kutub al-Thakafiyya, 1985/1405.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, ʿAbd al-Malik al-. al-Shāmil fī Uṣūl al-Dīn, ed. al-Nashshar, A. S., Awn, Faysal Budayr, and Mukhtar, Suhayr Muhammad. Alexandria: Munshaʾat al-Maʿarif, 1969.Google Scholar
Kalın, Ibrahim. “An Annotated Bibliography of the Works of Mullā Ṣadrā with a Brief Account of his Life,” Islamic Studies, 42 (2003), 21–62.Google Scholar
Kalın, Ibrahim. Mullā Ṣadrā. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kalın, Ibrahim. “Mullā Ṣadra’s Realist Ontology of the Intelligibles and Theory of Knowledge” Muslim World, 94.1 (2004), 81–106.Google Scholar
Kalın, Ibrahim. “The Sacred versus the Secular: Nasr on Science,” in Library of Living Philosophers: Seyyed Hossein Nasr, ed. Hahn, L. E., Auxier, R. E., and Stone, L. W., 445–462. Chicago, IL: Open Court Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kalın, Ibrahim. “Three Views of Science in the Islamic World,” in God, Life and the Cosmos: Christian and Islamic Perspectives, ed. Peters, Ted, Iqbal, Muzaffar, and Haq, Syed Nomanul, 43–75. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason [1788], trans. and ed. Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. D. “On the Meaning of ‘Act of God,’” Harvard Theological Review, 61 (1968), 175–201.Google Scholar
Khayyāṭ, ʿAbd al-Raḥīm ibn Muḥammad al-. Kitāb al-Intiṣār wa-l-Rad ʿalā Ibn al-Rāwandī al-Mulḥid, ed. Nyberg, H. S. and Nader, A.. Beirut: al-Matbaa al-Katolikiyya, 1957.Google Scholar
Kindī, Yāʿqūb ibn al-Isḥāq al-. Rasāʾil al-Kindī al-Falsafiyya, ed. Abu Riadah, M. A. H.. Cairo: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi, 1950.Google Scholar
Koca, Ozgur. “Causality as a ‘Veil’: the Ashʿarites, ibn ʿArabī (1165–1240), and Said Nursi (1877–1960),” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 27.4 (2016), 455–470.Google Scholar
Koca, Ozgur. “Ibn ʿArabī, Ashʿarites and Causality,” in Occasionalism Revisited: New Essays from the Islamic and Western Philosophical Traditions, ed. Muhtaroglu, Nazif, 41–60. Abu Dhabi: Kalam Research and Media, 2017.Google Scholar
Koca, Ozgur. “The Idea of Causal Disproportionality in Said Nursi (1877–1960) and Its Implications,” Journal of Islamic Philosophy, 11 (2019), 5–32.Google Scholar
Koca, Ozgur. “Revisiting the Concepts of Necessity and Freedom in Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna) (c. 980–1037),” Sophia, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841–019-0706-9.Google Scholar
Koca, Ozgur. Said Nursi’s Synthesis of Ashʿarite Occasionalism and Ibn ‘Arabī’s Metaphysical Cosmology: “Diagonal Occasionalism,” Modern Science, and Free Will. Ph.D. dissertation, Claremont Graduate University, 2013.Google Scholar
Koca, Ozgur. “The World as a Theophany and Causality: Ibn ʿArabī, Causes, and Freedom,” Sophia, 2017, 10.1007/s11841–017-0621-x.Google Scholar
Kogan, Barry S. Averroes and the Metaphysics of Causation. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Koutzarova, T. Das Transzendentale bei Ibn Sīnā. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, Taneli. “Creation and Causation,” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Pasnau, R. and Van Dyke, C., 232–246. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kutluer, Ilhan. “er-Redd ale’l-Kindi el-Feylesuf Adli Risalenin Tahlili,” Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3 (2001), 23–40.Google Scholar
Lāhijī, Muhammad Jaʿfar. Sharḥ Risālat al-Mashāʿir, ed. Ashtiyani, Sayyid Jalal al-Din. Tehran: Muassasa-yi Intisharat-i Amir Kabir, 1376/1997.Google Scholar
Landolt, H. “Les idées platoniciennes et le monde de l’image dans la pensée du Šaykh al-išrāq Yahyā al-Suhrawardī (ca.1155–1191),” in Miroir et Savoir. La transmission d’un thème platonicien, des Alexandrins à la philosophie arabo-musulmane, ed. De Smet, D. and Sebti, M.. Leuven: Peeters, 2007.Google Scholar
Landolt, H. “Suhrawardī’s Tales of Initiation’,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 107.3 (1987), 475–486.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1979.Google Scholar
Mady, Penelope. Realism in Mathematics. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. “Ashʿari and the Ashʿarites and Islamic Religious History I,” Studia Islamica, 17 (1962), 37–80.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. Ibn ʿAqil: Religion and Culture in Classical Islam. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Malebranche, N. Oeuvres complètes de Malebranche, ed. Robinet, André, 20 vols. Paris: Vrin, 1958–1984.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E. “Some Aspects of Avicenna’s Theory of God’s Knowledge of Particulars,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 83 (1962), 299–312.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E. “Avicenna and the Kalam,” Zeitschriftfür Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften, 6 (1990), 172–206.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E. “Divine Omniscience and Future Contingents in Al-Farabi and Avicenna,” in Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy. Islamic, Jewish and Christian Perspectives, ed. Rudavsky, Tamar, 81–94. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E. “Ghazālīan Causes and Intermediaries,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 115 (1995), 89–100.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E. “Ghazālī on Bodily Resurrection and Causality in Tahafut and the Iqtisad,” Aligarh Journal of Islamic Thought, 1 (1989), 46–75.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E. “Ghazālī’s Second Causal Theory in the 17th Discussion of his Tahafut,” in Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, ed. Morewedge, Parviz, 85–112. New York: Caravan Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E. “The Metaphysics of Efficient Causality in Avicenna,” in Islamic Theology and Philosophy, ed. Marmura, Michael E., 171–189. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Māturīdī, Abū Manṣūr al-, Sharḥ al-Fiqh al-Akbar. Hyderabad: Dairat al-Maʿarif al-Uthmaniyya, 1946.Google Scholar
Māturīdī, Abū Manṣūr al-, Kitāb al-Tawhīd, ed. Topaloglu, Bekir and Aruci, Muhammad. İslam Araştırmaları Merkezi, 2003.Google Scholar
Mehmet, Dag, Cuveyni’nin Alem ve Allah Görüşü, Ph.D. thesis. Ankara Üniversitesi, 1976.Google Scholar
Michot, J. [Yahya]. La destinée de l’homme selon Avicenne. Louvain: Peeters, 1986.Google Scholar
Moad, Edward Omar. “Ghazālī on Power, Causation, and Acquisition,” Philosophy East West, 57.1 (2007), 1–13.Google Scholar
Moad, Edward Omar. “Ibn Khaldūn and Occasionalism,” in Occasionalism Revisited: New Essays from the Islamic and Western Philosophical Traditions, ed. Muhtaroglu, Nazif, 61–82. Abu Dhabi: Kalam Research Media, 2017.Google Scholar
Morris, James W. The Reflective Heart: Discovering Spiritual Intelligence in Ibn ʿArabi’s “Meccan Illuminations.” Louisville, KY: Fons Vitae, 2005.Google Scholar
Muhtaroglu, Nazif. “Ali Sedad Bey’s (d.1900) Kavāid al-Taḥavvulāt fī Ḥarakāt al-Zarrāt (Principles of Transformation in the Motion of Particles),” in Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy, ed. El-Rouayheb, Khaled and Schmidke, Sabine, 586–606. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Muhtaroglu, Nazif. “Islamic and Cartesian Roots of Occasionalism.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Kentucky, 2012.Google Scholar
Muhtaroglu, Nazif. “An Occasionalist Defense of Free Will,” in Classical Issues in Islamic Philosophy and Theology Today, ed. Tymieniecka, Anna and Muhtaroglu, N., 45–62. New York: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
Muhtaroglu, Nazif. and Koca, Özgür, “Late Ottoman Occasionalists and Modern Science,” in Occasionalism Revisited: New Essays from the Islamic and Western Philosophical Traditions, ed. Muhtaroglu, Nazif, 83–101. Abu Dhabi: Kalam Research and Media, 2017.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. “Divine Action in the Natural Order: Buridan’s Ass and Schrodinger’s Cat,” in Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Russell, R., Murphy, N., and Peacocke, A., 325–358. Vatican: Vatican Observatory and Berkeley, CA: The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1995.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. Reconciling Theology and Science: A Radical Reformation Perspective. Kitchener, ON: Pandora Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Muzaffar, Muḥammad Riḍa al-. ʿAqāʾid al-Imāmiyya, translated into Turkish by Gölpınarlı, Abdulbaki. Istanbul: Zaman Yayınları, 1978.Google Scholar
Nader, al-Bizri, “God: Essence and Attributes,” in The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology, ed. Winter, Tim, 121–140. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. “Knowledge, Volitional Agency and Causation in Malebranche and Geulincx,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7 (1999), 263–274.Google Scholar
Nasafī, Muḥammad al-. Tabṣirat al-Adilla, ed. Salame, Claude, 2 vols. Damascus: Institut Français de Damas, 1990–1993.Google Scholar
Nasr, S. H. An Annotated Bibliography of Islamic Science. 3 vols. Lahore: Suhail Academy, 1985.Google Scholar
Nasr, S. H. An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Nasr, S. H. Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi and his Transcendent Theosophy. Tehran: Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy, 1977.Google Scholar
Nasr, S. H. Science and Civilization in Islam. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Nasr, S. H. Three Muslim Sages: Avicenna-Suhrawardī-Ibn ‘Arabi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Nichols, Ryan and Yaffe, Gideon, “Thomas Reid,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reid/.Google Scholar
Nichols, Terence L. “Miracles in Science and Theology,” Zygon, 37.3 (2002), 703–716.Google Scholar
Nīsābūrī, , al-Masāʾil fi-l-Khilāf bayn al-Baṣriyyīn wa-l-Baghdādīyyīn, ed. Maʿn Ziyada, Ridwan Sayyid. Beirut, Maʿhad al-Inma al-Arabi: 1979.Google Scholar
Nursi, Said. The Flashes: From the Risale- i Nur Collection, trans. Vahide, Şükran. Istanbul: Sözler Neşriyat, 1995.Google Scholar
Nursi, Said. The Letters: From the Risale- i Nur Collection, trans. Vahide, Şükran. Istanbul: Sözler Neşriyat, 1994.Google Scholar
Nursi, Said. Mathnawi al-Nuriya (Epitomes of Light: The Essentials of The Risale-i Nur). Caglayan, A. S. Izmir: Kaynak Publications, 1999.Google Scholar
Nursi, Said. The Rays: From the Risale-i Nur Collection, trans. Vahide, Şükran. Istanbul: Sözler Neşriyat, 2002.Google Scholar
Nursi, Said. Risale- i Nur Külliyatı. 2 vols. Istanbul: Nesil Yayinlari, 2002.Google Scholar
Nursi, Said. The Words: From the Risale-i Nur Collection, trans. Vahide, Şükran (revised edition). Istanbul: Sözler Neşriyat, 2004.Google Scholar
Ormsby, Eric L. The Makers of the Muslim World: Ghazālī. Oxford: One World, 2007.Google Scholar
Ormsby, Eric L. Theodicy in Islamic Thought: The Dispute over Ghazālī’s ‘Best of All Possible Worlds.’ Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Pazdawī, Abū al-Yusr Muḥammad al-. Uṣūl al-Dīn, ed. Lins, Hans Peter. Cairo: Dar Ihya al-Kutub al-Arabiyya, 1963.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. Creation and the World of Science: The Reshaping of Belief, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. Theology for Scientific Age: Being and Becoming—Natural, Divine, and Human, 2nd edn. London: SCM Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Perler, D. and Rudolph, U.. Occasionalismus: Theorien der Kausalität im arabisch-islamischen und im europäischen Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2000.Google Scholar
Peters, Ted. Science and Theology: The New Consonance. Oxford: Westview Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Pines, Sholomo. Mazhab al-Zarra, trans. Rida, Muhammad Hadi Abu. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahdat al-Islamiyya, 1946.Google Scholar
Plato, , Complete Works, ed. Cooper, John M. with introduction and notes, ass. ed. Hutchinson, D. S.. Cambridge, MA: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. Belief in God in the Age of Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, and Nicholas Saunders, 1998 (2002).Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. Science and Providence: God’s Interaction with the World. Boston, MA: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. Science and Theology: An Introduction. Minneapolis, MN: First Fortress Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Qāḍī, ʿAbduljabbār. al-Mughnī fī Abwābi al-ʿAdl wa-l-Tawhīd, ed. Madkur, Ibrahim, Husayn, Taha, and various editors. 16 vols. Cairo: al-Dar al-Misriyya li al-Telif wa al-Tarjuma, 1962–1965.Google Scholar
Qāḍī, ʿAbduljabbār. al-Muḥīṭ bi-l-Taklīf, ed. Umar Sayyid Azmi and Ahmad Fu’ad al-Ahwani. Cairo: al-Sharika al-Misriyya, n.d.Google Scholar
Qāḍī, ʿAbduljabbār. al-Mukhtaṣar fī Uṣūl al-Dīn. Cairo: Dar al-Hilal, 1971.Google Scholar
Qāḍī, ʿAbduljabbār. Sharḥ al-Uṣūl al-Khamsa, ed. Uthman, Abd al-Karim. Cairo: Maktabat Wahbah 1965.Google Scholar
Qayṣarī, Dāwūd al-. Risāla fī ʿIlm al-Taṣawwuf, trans. into Turkish by Bedirhan, Muhammed. Istanbul: Nefes Yayinlari, 2013.Google Scholar
Qayṣarī, Dāwūd al-. Sharḥ Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam. Tahran, 1963 [1383].Google Scholar
Qayṣarī, Dāwūd al-. “Sharḥ Taʾwīlāt Basmala,” in Rasāʾil, ed. Bayraktar, Mehmet. Ankara, 1989.Google Scholar
Qūnawī, Ṣadraddīn al-. al-Murasalāt, Turkish trans. Demirli, Ekrem. Istanbul: Kapı Yayınları, 2014.Google Scholar
Qūnawī, Ṣadraddīn al-. Iʿjāz al-Bayān fī Taʾwīl Umm-Qurʾan, Turkish trans. Demirli, Ekrem. Istanbul: İz Yayıncılık-İslam Klasikleri Dizisi, 2009.Google Scholar
Qūnawī, Ṣadraddīn al-. Miftāḥ Ghayb al-Jamʿi wa-l-Wujūd fī-l-Kashf al-Shuhūd, Süleymaniye Yazma Eser Kütüphanesi (Manuscript), Ayasofya, no. 1930.Google Scholar
Rahman, Fazlur. The Philosophy of Mullā Ṣadrā. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. “Théodicée et approximation: Avicenne,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 10 (2000), 223–257.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-. Al-Mabāḥith al-Mashriqiyyah, ed. al-Baghdadi, Muhammad al-Mu’tasim biLlah, 2 vols. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi, 1990.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-. al-Maṭālib al-ʿĀliya, ed. al-Saqa, Ahmad Hijazi, 9 vols. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi, 1987.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-. Muḥaṣṣal Afkār al-Mutaqaddimīn wa-l-Mutaʾakhkhirīn, ed. Said, Abd al-Rauf. Cairo: Maktabat al-Kulliyāt al-Azhariyya, n.d.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-. al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr, 32 vols. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, 1996.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense [1764]: A Critical Edition, ed. Brookes, Derek. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. “al-Fārābī on the Question: Is Existence a Predicate?,” in Studies in the History of Arabic Logic, 39–42. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. “The Concept of Existence in Arabic Logic and Philosophy,” in Studies in Arabic Philosophy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kara. “Avicenna’s Conception of the Efficient Cause,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21.2 (2013), 220–239.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kara. “Causation in Arabic and Islamic Thought,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/arabic-islamic-causation/.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “An Islamic Subversion of the Existence-Essence Distinction? Suhrawardī’s Visionary Hierarchy of Lights,” Asian Philosophy, 9.3 (1999), 219–227.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Mullā Ṣadrā and Causation: Rethinking a Problem in Later Islamic Philosophy” Philosophy of East and West, 55.4 (2005), 570–583.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad H. Mullā Ṣadrā Shirazi: His Life, Works and the Sources for Safavid Philosophy. JSS Supplements 18. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Roots of an Aporia in Later Islamic Philosophy: the Existence-Essence Distinction in the Philosophies of Avicenna and Suhrawardī,” Studia Iranica, 29 (2000), 61–108.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad H. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/Mullā-Ṣadrā/.Google Scholar
Rosen, E. Copernicus and the Scientific Revolution. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Co., 1984.Google Scholar
Roxanne, Marcotte. “Suhrawardī,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/suhrawardī/.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Ulrich. Al-Māturīdī and the Development of Sunnī Theology in Samarqand, trans. Adem, Rodrigo. Boston, MA: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Ruffus, Anthony and McGinnis, Jon, “Willful Understanding: Avicenna’s Philosophy of Action and Theory of the Will,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 97.2 (2015), 160–195.Google Scholar
Rūmī, Jalāl al-Dīn, Dīwān Shams-i Tabrīzī, ed. Furūzānfar, B., 10 vols. Tehran: University of Tehran Press, 1957–1967.Google Scholar
Rūmī, Jalāl al-Dīn, The Mathnawī of Rūmī, ed. and trans. Nicholson, R. A., 8 vols. London: Luzac, 1925–1940.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J. “Does the ‘God Who Acts’ Really Act? New Approaches to Divine Action in the Light of Science,” Theology Today, 54.1 (1997), 43–65.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey, and Peacocke, Arthur, eds, Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
Ryan, Todd. “Hume’s Argument for the Temporal Priority of Causes,” Hume Studies, 29.1 (2003), 29–41.Google Scholar
Sabūnī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-. Maturidiyye Akaidi (al-Bidāya fī Uṣūl al-Dīn), Turkish trans. Bekir Topaloğlu. Istanbul: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, n.d.Google Scholar
Sabzawārī, Mulla Hādī. The Metaphysics of Sabzawari, trans. Mohaghegh, M. and Izutsu, T.. New York: Caravan Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Sadr, Muhammad Baqr al-. Our Philosophy, trans. Inati, Shams C.. CreateSpace Independent Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
Ṣadrā, Mullā. al-Ḥikmat al-Mutaʿāliya fī-l-Asfār al-ʿAqliyya al-Arbaʿa, ed. Lutfi, R. et al., 3rd ed. Beirut: Dar lhya al-Turath al-Arabi, 9 vols, 1981.Google Scholar
Ṣadrā, Mullā. Ḥuduth al-ʿĀlam. ed. Musaviyan, S. H.. Tehran: Bunyad-i Hikmat-i Islami-yi Sadra [Sadra Islamic Philosophy Research Institute], 1959.Google Scholar
Ṣadrā, Mullā. Īqāẓ al-Nāʾimīn. ed. Khansari, Mohammed; Tehran: SIPRIn, 1384/2005.Google Scholar
Ṣadrā, Mullā. Kitāb al-Mashāʿir, trans. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, ed. intr. and annot. Kalın, Ibrahim. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ṣadrā, Mullā. The Wisdom of the Throne (al-Ḥikmat al-ʿArshiyya), trans. Morris, James Winston. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C., ed. Zeno’s Paradoxes. Indianapolis, IN and New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1970. Reprinted in paperback in 2001.Google Scholar
Santayana, George. Skepticism and Animal Faith. New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar
Saritoprak, Zeki. “Bediüzzaman Said Nursi,” in The Islamic World, ed. Rippin, Andrew, 396–402. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Saritoprak, Zeki. “Said Nursi,” in Bibliographies in “Islamic Studies,” ed. Rippin, Andrew. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas. Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas. “Does God Cheat at Dice? Divine Action and Quantum Possibilities” Zygon, 35.3 (2000), 541–542.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph. “New Sources for the History of Muhammadan Theology,” Studia Islamica, 1 (1953), 23–42.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph. “Theology and Law in Islam,” in Theology and Law in Islam, ed. von Grunebaum, G. E., 3–23. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1971.Google Scholar
Schmidtke, S. Theologie, Philosophie und Mystik im zwölferschiitischen Islam des 9./15.Jahrhunderts: die Gedankenwelten des Ibn Abi Gumhur al-Ahsai (um 838/1434-35-nach 905/1501). Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar
Serdar, Ziauddin. Explorations in Islamic Science. London: Mansell Publishing Ltd, 1989.Google Scholar
Setia, Adi. “Atomism Versus Hylomorphism in the Kalām of al-Fakhr al-Dīn al- Rāzī,” Islam & Science, 4.2 (2006), 113–140.Google Scholar
Setia, Adi. “Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on Physics and the Nature of the Physical World: A Preliminary Survey,” Islam & Science, 2.2 (2004), 161–180.Google Scholar
Shahrastānī, ʿAbd al-Karīm al-. al-Milal wa-l-Niḥal, ed. Kilani, Muhammad Sayyid. Cairo: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi, 1961.Google Scholar
Shahrastānī, ʿAbd al-Karīm al-. Nihāyat al-Iqdām, ed. Guillaume, Alfred. London: Oxford University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Shamsi, F. A. “Ibn Sina’Arguments Against Atomicity of Space,” Islamic Studies, 23.2 (1984), 83–102.Google Scholar
Sirhindī, Aḥmad. Maktubāt, vols 1–2, trans. Yayla, Kasim. Istanbul: Merve Yayinlari, 1999.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Matter, Space, and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and their sequel. London: Duckworth and Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. London: Duckworth, 1980.Google Scholar
Stavrineas, Stasinos. “Nature as a principle of change,” in Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, ed. Leunissen, Mariska, 46–65. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Street, Tony. “Concerning the Life and Works of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi,” in Islam: Essays on Scripture, Thought and Society, a Festschrift in honour of Anthony H. Johns, 135–146. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Suhrawardī, , L’archange empourpré: quinze traités et récits mystiques, trans., intro., and notes Corbin, H.. Paris: Fayard, 1976.Google Scholar
Suhrawardī, , The Philosophy of Illumination: A New Critical Edition of the Text of Hikmat al-Ishraq, with English trans., notes, commentary, and intro. Walbridge, J. and Ziai, H.. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, N. and Neugebauer, O., Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus, 2 vols. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar
Taftazānī, Saʿd al-Dīn. Sharḥ al-Talwīh ʿala Tawḍih li Matni al-Tankīh fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, n.d.Google Scholar
Tahānawī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAli. Kashshāf Iṣṭilaḥāt al-Funūn, ed. Dahruj, Ali. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnan, 1996.Google Scholar
Tracy, Thomas F. “Particular Providence and the God of the Gaps” in Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Russell, R., Murphy, N., and Peacocke, A., 291–324. Vatican: Vatican Observatory and Berkeley, CA: The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1995.Google Scholar
Tracy, Thomas F. “Theologies of Divine Action,” in The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, ed. Clayton, Philip and Simpson, Zachary, 596–611. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ṭūsī, Naṣīr al-Dīn. Talkhīṣ al-Muḥaṣṣal, ed. Nurani, Abdullah. Muassasa-i Motalaat-i Islami Daneshgah-i McGill Şuba-i Tahran, 1980.Google Scholar
Ṭūsī, Naṣīr al-Dīn. Ṭūsī’s Commentary on Ibn Sīnā’s Pointers and Reminders (Sharḥ al-Ishārāt), ed. Dunyá, S., 4 vols. Cairo: 1957–1960.Google Scholar
Türker, Ömer. “Introduction,” in Sharḥ al-Mawāqif. Turkish trans. Türker, Ömer. Istanbul: Türkiye Yazma EserlerKurumu Başkanlığı, 2015.Google Scholar
Van Ess, Josef. Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra. Eine Geschichte des religiosen Denkens im fruhen Islam, 6 vols. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1991–1997.Google Scholar
Walbridge, John. The Leaven of the Ancients: Suhrawardī and the Heritage of the Greeks. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Walker, I. “The Problem of Evil and the Activity of God.” New Blackfriars, 62 (1982): 441–463.Google Scholar
Wallis, R. T. Neoplatonism, 2nd ed. London: Duckworth, 1995.Google Scholar
Waterlow, Sarah. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Watt, W. Montgomery. Islamic Creeds: A Selection. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Watt, W. Montgomery. “Some Muslim Discussions of Anthropomorphism,” in Early Islam, 86–93. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Wensinck, A. J. The Muslim Creed. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporation, 1979.Google Scholar
Wensinck, A. J. La Pensee de Ghazālī. Paris: Libr. d’Amérique et d’Orient A. Maisonneuve, 1950.Google Scholar
White, M. J. The Continuous and the Discrete: Ancient Physical Theories from a Contemporary Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N., Process and Reality, corrected edn., ed. Griffin, David R. and Sherburne, Donald W.. New York: Free Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Wiles, M. Reason to Believe. London: SCM Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Williams, Wesley. “Aspects of the Creed of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal: A study of Anthropomorphism in Early Islamic Discourse,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 34 (2002), 441–463.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert. “Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, ed. Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. C., 92–136. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert. “Avicenna’s Islamic Reception,” in Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays, ed. Adamson, Peter, 190–213. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert. Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert. “Final and Efficient Causality in Avicenna’s Cosmology and Theology,” Quaestio, 2 (2002), 97–124.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert. “Notes on Avicenna’s Concept of Thingness,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 10 (2000), 181–221.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. “Ibn Khaldun on Attributes and Predestination,” Speculum, 34.4 (1959), 585–597.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. “Muʿammar’s Theory of Maʿnā,” in Arabic and Islamic Studies in the Honor of Hamilton A.R. Gibb, ed. Makdisi, George, 673–688. Leiden: Brill, 1965.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. The Philosophy of Kalam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Yazdi, M. H. The Principles of Epistemology in Islamic Philosophy: Knowledge by Presence. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Yazicioglu, Umeyye Isra. Understanding the Qurʾanic Miracle Stories in the Modern Age. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Zarkān, Muhammad Salih al-. Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī wa Arāʿuhu al-Kalāmiyyah wa-l-Falsafiyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1963.Google Scholar
Ziai, H. “The Illuminationist Tradition,” in History of Islamic Philosophy, ed. Nasr, S. H. and Leaman, O., 465–496. London: Routledge, (2003) [1996].Google Scholar
Ziai, H. Knowledge and Illumination: A Study of Suhrawardī’s Hikmat al-Ishraq. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Ziai, H. “Mullā Ṣadrā,” in History of Islamic Philosophy, ed. Nasr, S. H. and Leaman, O., 635–642. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Özgür Koca
  • Book: Islam, Causality, and Freedom
  • Online publication: 14 May 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866965.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Özgür Koca
  • Book: Islam, Causality, and Freedom
  • Online publication: 14 May 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866965.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Özgür Koca
  • Book: Islam, Causality, and Freedom
  • Online publication: 14 May 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866965.014
Available formats
×