Book contents
- Justice in Extreme Cases
- Justice in Extreme Cases
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Cases, Statutes, and Other Authorities
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction and Problem
- Part II Proposed Solution: A Humanist, Coherentist, Deontic Account
- Part III Illustration through Application
- Book part
- Glossary of Selected Terms
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2020
Book contents
- Justice in Extreme Cases
- Justice in Extreme Cases
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Cases, Statutes, and Other Authorities
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction and Problem
- Part II Proposed Solution: A Humanist, Coherentist, Deontic Account
- Part III Illustration through Application
- Book part
- Glossary of Selected Terms
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Justice in Extreme CasesCriminal Law Theory Meets International Criminal Law, pp. 284 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Akerson, D & Knowlton, N, “President Obama and the International Criminal Law of Successor Liability” (2009) 37 Denver J Intl L & Pol’y 615.Google Scholar
Aksenova, M, van Sliedregt, E & Parmentier, S, eds, Breaking the Cycle of Mass Atrocities: Criminological and Socio-legal Approaches in International Criminal Law (Hart, 2019).Google Scholar
Alexander, L & Kessler Ferzan, K, Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Alexy, R & Peczenik, A, “The Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discursive Rationality” (1990) 3 Ratio Iuris 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amann, D M, “In Bemba and beyond, Crimes Adjudged to Commit Themselves” (13 June 2018), online: www.ejiltalk.org/in-bemba-and-beyond-crimes-adjudged-to-commit-themselves/.Google Scholar
Amaya, A, The Tapestry of Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Coherence and Its Role in Legal Argument (Hart, 2015).Google Scholar
Ambos, K, “Superior Responsibility,” in Cassese, A, Gaeta, P & Jones, J R W D, eds, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Vol 2 (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Ambos, K, “Remarks on the General Part of International Criminal Law” (2006) 4 JICJ 660.Google Scholar
Ambos, K, “Article 25,” in Triffterer, O, ed, Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd ed (Beck, 2008).Google Scholar
Ambos, K, “Critical Issues in the Bemba Confirmation Decision” (2009) 22 LJIL 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambos, K, “Toward a Universal System of Crime: Comments on George Fletcher’s Grammar of Criminal Law” (2010) 28 Cardozo L Rev 2647.Google Scholar
Ambos, K, Treatise on International Criminal Law, Vol I: Foundations and General Part (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Ambos, K, “Punishment without a Sovereign? The Ius Puniendi Issue of International Criminal Law: A First Contribution towards a Consistent Theory of International Criminal Law” (2013) 33 Oxf J L Stud 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambos, K, “The ICC and Common Purpose: What Contribution Is Required?,” in Stahn, C, ed, The Law and Practice of the ICC: A Critical Account of Challenges and Achievements (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Ambos, K, “Article 25,” in Triffterer, O & Ambos, K, eds, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd ed (Beck, Hart, Nomos, 2016).Google Scholar
Ambos, K, “Complicity in War Crimes through (Legal) Arms Supplies?” (20 January 2020), online: www.ejiltalk.org/complicity-in-war-crimes-through-legal-arms-supplies/.Google Scholar
Ambos, K & Steiner, C, “On the Rationale of Punishment at the Domestic and International Level,” in Henzelin, M & Roth, R, eds, Le Droit Pénale à l’Éprouve de l’Internationalisation (LGDJ, 2002).Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Model Penal Code: Official Draft and Explanatory Notes – Complete Text of Model Penal Code as Adopted at the 1962 Annual Meeting of the American Law Institute at Washington (ALI, 1985).Google Scholar
Archibugi, D, “Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace” (1995) 1 Eur J Int’l Rel 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibugi, D, Held, D & Köhler, M, Re-imagining Political Community: Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy (Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Arnold, R, “Command Responsibility: A Case Study of Alleged Violations of the Laws of War at Khiam Detention Centre” (2002) 7 J Conflict & Sec L 191.Google Scholar
Arnold, R & Triffterer, O, “Article 28: Responsibility of Commanders and Other Superiors,” in Triffterer, O, ed, Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd ed (Beck, 2008).Google Scholar
Ashworth, A, “The Elasticity of Mens Rea,” in Tapper, C F H, ed, Crime, Proof and Punishment: Essays in Memory of Sir Rupert Cross (Butterworths, 1981).Google Scholar
Ashworth, A & Horder, J, Principles of Criminal Law, 7th ed (Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aukerman, M J, “Extraordinary Evil, Extraordinary Crime: A Framework for Understanding Transitional Justice” (2002) 15 Harvard HRJ 39.Google Scholar
Badar, M E, “Just Convict Everyone! Joint Perpetration from Tadić to Stakić and Back Again” (2006) 6 Int’l Crim L Rev 293.Google Scholar
Badar, M E, The Concept of Mens Rea in International Criminal Law: The Case for a Unified Approach (Hart, 2013).Google Scholar
Badinter, R, “International Criminal Justice: From Darkness to Light,” in Cassese, A, Gaeta, P & Jones, J R W D, eds, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Bandura, A, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves (Worth, 2016).Google Scholar
Bantekas, I, “The Contemporary Law of Superior Responsibility” (1999) 93 AJIL 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantekas, I, “On Stretching the Boundaries of Responsible Command” (2009) 7 JICJ 1197.Google Scholar
Bantekas, I, “Legal Anthropology and the Construction of Complex Liabilities,” in Jalloh, C, ed, The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M C, “The Normative Framework of International Humanitarian Law: Overlaps, Gaps and Ambiguities” (1998) 8 Transnat’l L & Contemp Probs 199.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M C, The Shari’a and Islamic Criminal Justice in Time of War and Peace (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Bayles, M, “Mid-level Principles and Justification,” in Pennock, J R & Chapman, J W, eds, Justification (New York University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Bayles, M, “Moral Theory and Application,” in Howie, J, ed, Ethical Principles and Practice (Southern Illinois University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T & Childress, J, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Beitz, C R, Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Bergsmo, M, Buis, E J & Bergsmo, N H, “Setting a Discourse Space: Correlational Analysis, Foundational Concepts, and Legally Protected Interests in International Criminal Law,” in Bergsmo, M & Buis, E J, eds, Philosophical Foundations of International Criminal Law: Correlating Thinkers (Torkel Opshal Academic, 2018).Google Scholar
Berman, P S, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Blake, W, “Auguries of Innocence,” in Nicholson, D H S & Lee, A H E, eds, The Oxford Book of English Mystical Verse (Clarendon Press, 1917).Google Scholar
Bock, S & Stark, F, “Preparatory Offences,” in Ambos, K et al, eds, Core Concepts in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Vol I (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Bohlander, M, “Commentary,” in Klip, A & Sluiter, G, eds, The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia 2000–2001 (Intersentia, 2003).Google Scholar
Bohman, J & Lutz-Bachmann, M, eds, Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Boister, N & Cryer, R, eds, Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal; Charter, Indictment and Judgments (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
BonJour, L, “The Coherence Theory of Empirical Knowledge” (1976) 30 Philosophical Studies 281.Google Scholar
Boot, M, Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes: Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (Intersentia, 2002).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P, “Participant Objectivation” (2003) 9 Journal of the Royal Anthropology Institute 281.Google Scholar
Brody, B, “Quality of Scholarship in Bioethics” (1990) 15 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 161.Google Scholar
Brooks, R E, “Law in the Heart of Darkness: Atrocity and Duress” (2003) 43 Virginia J Int’l L 861.Google Scholar
Broomhall, B, “Article 22, Nullum Crimen Sine Lege,” in Triffterer, O, ed, Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd ed (Beck, 2008).Google Scholar
Brudner, A, Punishment and Freedom: A Liberal Theory of Penal Justice (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, E, “Social Change and Written Law in Early Chinese Legal Thought” (2014) 32 LHR 1.Google Scholar
Capps, P & Olsen, H P, eds, Legal Authority beyond the State (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Cassese, A, “Current Trends towards Criminal Prosecution,” in Passas, N, ed, International Crimes (Ashgate/Dartmouth, 2003).Google Scholar
Cassese, A, “The Proper Limits of Individual Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise” (2007) 5 JICJ 109.Google Scholar
Cassese, A, Gaeta, P & Jones, J, eds, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Vol 2 (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Cavanagh, E, “A Company with Sovereignty and Subjects of Its Own? The Case of the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670-1763” (2011) 26 Can J L & Soc 25.Google Scholar
Ching, A, “Evolution of the Command Responsibility Doctrine in Light of the Čelebići Decision of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia” (1999–2000) 25 NC J Intl & Com Reg 167.Google Scholar
Choi, T H & Kim, S, “Nationalized International Criminal Law: Genocidal Intent, Command Responsibility, and an Overview of the South Korean Implementing Legislation of the ICC Statute” (2011) 19 Michigan State J Int’l L 589.Google Scholar
Chouliaras, A, “Bridging the Gap between Criminological Theory and Penal Theory within the International Criminal Justice System” (2014) 22 Eur J Crime Cr L Cr J 249.Google Scholar
Christie, H, “The Poisoned Chalice: Imperial Justice, Moral Relativism, and the Origins of International Criminal Law” (2010) 72 U Pittsburgh L Rev 361.Google Scholar
Churchland, P S, Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality (Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Cogan, J K, “The Regulatory Turn in International Law” (2011) 52 Harvard Int’l LJ 322.Google Scholar
Coleman, J, The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Cryer, R, “International Criminal Law vs State Sovereignty: Another Round?” (2005) 16 EJIL 979.Google Scholar
Cryer, R, Prosecuting International Crimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Cryer, R, “Superior Orders and the International Criminal Court,” in Burchill, R, White, N & Morris, J, eds, International Conflict and Security Law: Essays in Memory of Hilaire McCoubrey (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Cryer, R, “The Ad Hoc Tribunals and the Law of Command Responsibility: A Quiet Earthquake,” in Darcy, S & Powderly, J, eds, Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cupido, M, Facts Matter: A Study into the Casuistry of Substantive International Criminal Law (Eleven International, 2015).Google Scholar
Dana, S, “Beyond Retroactivity to Realizing Justice: A Theory on the Principle of Legality in International Criminal Law Sentencing” (2009) 99 JCLC 857.Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, M, “Responsibility and the Boundaries of the Self” (1992) 105 Harvard L Rev 959.Google Scholar
Daniels, N, “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics” (1979) 76 J Phil 256.Google Scholar
Danner, A M, “When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War” (2006) 59 Vanderbilt L Rev 1.Google Scholar
Danner, A M & Martinez, J S, “Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility and the Development of International Criminal Law” (2005) 93 Calif L Rev 75.Google Scholar
Darcy, S, “Imputed Criminal Liability and the Goals of International Justice” (2007) 20 LJIL 377.Google Scholar
Davidson, C, “How to Read International Criminal Law: Strict Construction and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court” (2017) 91 St John’s L Rev 37.Google Scholar
Davidson, E, “Economic Oppression as an International Wrong and a Crime against Humanity” (2005) 23 Neth Q Hum Rights 173.Google Scholar
DePaul, M, “Two Conceptions of Coherence Methods in Ethics” (1987) 96 Mind 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePaul, M, “The Problem of the Criterion and Coherence Methods in Ethics” (1988) 18 Canadian J Phil 67.Google Scholar
DePaul, M, Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry (Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Dewey, J, The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action (Putnam, 1929).Google Scholar
Diaz, P C, “The ICC in Northern Uganda: Peace First, Justice Later” (2005) 2 Eyes on the ICC 17.Google Scholar
Dickstein, M, ed, The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture (Duke University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Diekmann, S, “Moral Mid-level Principles in Modeling” (2013) 226 Eur J Oper Res 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsett, S & McVeigh, S, “Jurisprudences of Jurisdiction: Matters of Public Authority” (2014) 23 Griffith L Rev 569.Google Scholar
Dressler, J, “Reassessing the Theoretical Underpinnings of Accomplice Liability: New Solutions to an Old Problem” (1985) 37 Hastings LJ 91.Google Scholar
Drumbl, M, “Toward a Criminology of International Crime” (2003) 19 Ohio St J on Disp Resol 263.Google Scholar
Drumbl, M, “Collective Violence and Individual Punishment: The Criminality of Mass Atrocity” (2005) 99 Nw U L Rev 539.Google Scholar
Drumbl, M, “Pluralizing International Criminal Justice” (2005) 103 Michigan L Rev 1295.Google Scholar
Drumbl, M, Atrocity, Punishment and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Drumbl, M, “Collective Responsibility and Postconflict Justice,” in Isaacs, T & Vernon, R, eds, Accountability of Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Drumbl, M, “International Criminal Law and Moral Agency” (10 April 2013), online: http://opiniojuris.org/2013/04/10/ljil-symposium-international-criminal-law-and-moral-agency/.Google Scholar
Dubber, M, “A Political Theory of Criminal Law: Autonomy and the Legitimacy of State Punishment” (15 March 2004), online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=529522.Google Scholar
Dubber, M, “Theories of Crime and Punishment in German Criminal Law” (2005) 53 Am J Comp L 679.Google Scholar
Dubber, M, “Common Civility: The Culture of Alegality in International Criminal Law” (2011) 24 LJIL 923.Google Scholar
Duff, R A, Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law (Hart, 2007).Google Scholar
Dungel, J & Ghadiri, S, “The Temporal Scope of Command Responsibility Revisited: Why Commanders Have a Duty to Prevent Crimes Committed after the Cessation of Effective Control” (2010) 17 U C Davis J Int’l L & Pol’y 1.Google Scholar
Duttwiler, M, “Liability for Omissions in International Criminal Law” (2006) 6 Int’l Crim L Rev 1.Google Scholar
Ebertz, R, “Is Reflective Equilibrium a Coherentist Model?” (1993) 23 Canadian J Phil 193.Google Scholar
Engel, M Jr, “Coherentism and the Epistemic Justification of Moral Beliefs: A Case Study in How to Do Practical Ethics without Appeal to a Moral Theory” (2012) 50 Southern J Phil 50.Google Scholar
Epps, V, “The Soldier’s Obligation to Die When Ordered to Shoot Civilians or Face Death Himself” (2003) 37 New England L Rev 987.Google Scholar
Erskine, T, “Kicking Bodies and Damning Souls: The Danger of Harming Innocent Individuals While Punishing Delinquent States,” in Isaacs, T & Vernon, R, eds, Accountability of Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Eser, A, “Individual Criminal Responsibility,” in Cassese, A, Gaeta, P & Jones, J R W D, eds, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Vol 2 (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Estreicher, S & Stephan, P B, “Foreword: Taking International Law Seriously” (2003) 44 Virginia J Int’l L 1.Google Scholar
Fanselow, R, “Self-Evidence and Disagreement in Ethics” (2011) 5 J Ethics Soc Philos 1.Google Scholar
Fenrick, W, “Some International Law Problems Related to Prosecutions before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia” (1995) 6 Duke J Comp & Int’l L 103.Google Scholar
Fenrick, W, “Article 8, War Crimes,” in Triffterer, O, ed, Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd ed (Beck, 2008).Google Scholar
Fichtelberg, A, “Liberal Values in International Criminal Law: A Critique of Erdemović” (2008) 6 JICJ 3.Google Scholar
Fisher, K J, Moral Accountability and International Criminal Law: Holding the Agents of Atrocity Accountable to the World (Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Fletcher, G, “Liberals and Romantics at War: The Problem of Collective Guilt” (2002) 111 Yale LJ 1499.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G, “Collective Guilt and Collective Punishment” (2004) 5 Theoretical Inq L 163.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G, The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative and International, Vol 1 (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Fletcher, G & Ohlin, J D, “Reclaiming Fundamental Principles of Criminal Law in the Darfur Case” (2005) 3 JICJ 539.Google Scholar
Fletcher, L, “From Indifference to Engagement: Bystanders and International Criminal Justice” (2005) 26 Michigan J Int’l L 1013.Google Scholar
Fletcher, L & Weinstein, H, “Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation” (2002) 24 HRQ 573.Google Scholar
Foka Taffo, F, “Analysis of Jean-Pierre Bemba’s Acquittal by the International Criminal Court” (13 December 2018), online: www.accord.org.za/conflict-trends/analysis-of-jean-pierre-bembas-acquittal-by-the-international-criminal-court.Google Scholar
Ford, R T, “Law’s Territory (A History of Jurisdiction)” (1998–99) 97 Michigan L Rev 843.Google Scholar
Fournet, C, “When the Child Surpasses the Father: Admissible Defences in International Criminal Law” (2008) 8 Int’l Crim L Rev 509.Google Scholar
Fox, C T, “Closing a Loophole in Accountability for War Crimes: Successor Commanders’ Duty to Punish Known Past Offences” (2004) 55 Case W Res L Rev 443.Google Scholar
Frulli, M, “Are Crimes against Humanity More Serious than War Crimes?” (2001) 12 EJIL 329.Google Scholar
Gaeta, P, “The Defence of Superior Orders: The Statute of the International Criminal Court versus Customary International Law” (1999) 10 EJIL 172.Google Scholar
Gallant, K, The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Gardner, J, “Introduction,” in Hart, H L A, ed, Punishment and Responsibility, 2nd ed (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Garraway, C, “Command Responsibility: Victors’ Justice or Just Deserts?,” in Burchill, R, White, N D & Morris, J, eds, International Conflict and Security Law: Essays in Memory of Hilaire McCoubrey (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Grabert, A, Dynamic Interpretation in International Criminal Law: Striking a Balance between Stability and Change (Herbert Utz Verlag, 2014).Google Scholar
Graham, R, “Politics and Prices: Judicial Utility Maximization and Construction” (2007) 1 Indian J Const L 57.Google Scholar
Green, L C, The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict (Manchester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Greenawalt, A K A, “The Pluralism of International Criminal Law” (2011) 86 Indiana LJ 1063.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, A K A, “International Criminal Law for Retributivists” (2014) 35 U Pa J Int’l L 969.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J & Sechler, M J, “Constitutionalism Ancient and Early Modern: The Contributions of Roman Law, Cannon Law, and English Common Law” (2013) 34 Cardozo L Rev 1021.Google Scholar
Greenwood, C, “Command Responsibility and the Hadžihasanović Decision” (2004) 2 JICJ 598.Google Scholar
Grover, L, “A Call to Arms: Fundamental Dilemmas Confronting the Interpretation of Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court” (2010) 21 EJIL 543.Google Scholar
Grover, L, Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, D, “Responsibility for Collective Atrocities: Fair Labelling and Approaches to Commission in International Criminal Law” (2011) 64 Current Legal Problems 255.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, D, “Of Babies, Bathwater, and List B Judges at the International Criminal Court” (13 November 2019), online: www.ejiltalk.org/of-babies-bathwater-and-list-b-judges-at-the-international-criminal-court/.Google Scholar
Haan, V, “The Development of the Concept of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia” (2005) 5 Int’l Crim L Rev 167.Google Scholar
Habermas, J, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans C Lenhart & S Weber Nicholson (MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Habermas, J, “Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years’ Hindsight,” in Bohman, J & Lutz-Bachmann, M, eds, Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hamdorf, K, “The Concept of a Joint Criminal Enterprise and Domestic Modes of Liability for Parties to a Crime” (2007) 5 JICJ 208.Google Scholar
Hart, H L A, Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 2nd ed (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Hayden, P, “Cosmopolitanism and the Need for Transnational Criminal Justice: The Case of the International Criminal Court” (2004) 104 Theoria 69.Google Scholar
Hegel, G W F, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed Wood, A (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Held, D, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Polity, 1995).Google Scholar
Heller, K J, The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Heller, K J, “Why the ICTY’s ‘Specifically Directed’ Requirement Is Justified” (2 June 2013), online: http://opiniojuris.org/2013/06/02/why-the-ictys-specifically-directed-requirement-is-justified/.Google Scholar
Heller, K J & Dubber, M, The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law (Stanford Law Books, 2011).Google Scholar
Hencaerts, J M & Doswald-Beck, L, Customary International Law, Vol II: Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Henley, K, “Abstract Principles, Mid-level Principles and the Rule of Law” (1993) 12 L & Phil 121.Google Scholar
Horder, J, Ashworth’s Principles of Criminal Law, 8th ed (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Hunt, D, “High Hopes, ‘Creative Ambiguity’ and an Unfortunate Mistrust in International Judges” (2004) 2 JICJ 56.Google Scholar
Husak, D, “Omissions, Causation and Liability” (1980) 30 The Philosophical Quarterly 318.Google Scholar
Husak, D, Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays (Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Hyland, B, “The Impact of the Bemba Appellate Judgment on Future Prosecution of Crimes of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence at the ICC” (25 May 2019), online: https://iccforum.com/forum/permalink/116/31935.Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), Corporate Complicity and Legal Accountability, Report of the International Commission of Jurists Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes (ICJ, 2008).Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Martinus Nijhoff, 1987).Google Scholar
Isaacs, T, “Individual Responsibility for Collective Wrongs,” in Harrington, J, Milde, M & Vernon, R, eds, Bringing Power to Justice? The Prospects of the International Criminal Court (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Isser, D, ed, Customary Justice and the Rule of Law in War-Torn Societies (USIP Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Jackson, M, “The Attribution of Responsibility and Modes of Liability in International Criminal Law” (2016) 29 LJIJ 879.Google Scholar
Jackson, M, “Commanders’ Motivations in Bemba” (15 June 2018), online: www.ejiltalk.org/commanders-motivations-in-bemba/.Google Scholar
Jackson, M, “Geographic Remoteness in Bemba” (30 July 2018), online: www.ejiltalk.org/geographical-remoteness-in-bemba/.Google Scholar
Jackson, M, “Virtuous Accomplices in International Criminal Law” (2019) 68 Int’l & Comp LQ 818.Google Scholar
Jain, N, “The Control Theory of Perpetration in International Criminal Law” (2011) 12 Chicago J Int’l L 159.Google Scholar
Jain, N, Principals and Accessories in International Criminal Law: Individual Modes of Responsibility for Collective Crimes (Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Jain, N, “Judicial Lawmaking and General Principles of Law in International Criminal Law” (2016) 57 Harvard Int’l LJ 111.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K, The Question of German Guilt, trans E B Ashton (Fordham University Press, 1947).Google Scholar
Jescheck, H, “The General Principles of International Criminal Law Set out in Nuremberg, as Mirrored in the ICC Statute” (2004) 2 JICJ 38.Google Scholar
Jia, B B, “The Doctrine of Command Responsibility Revisited” (2004) 3 Chinese J Int’l L 1.Google Scholar
Kadish, S H, “Complicity, Cause and Blame: A Study in the Interpretation of Doctrine” (1985) 73 Calif L Rev 323.Google Scholar
Kahombo, B, “Bemba’s Acquittal by the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court: Why Is It So Controversial?” (9 July 2018), online: www.icjafrica.com/single-post/2018/07/09/Bemba%E2%80%99s-acquittal-by-the-Appeals-Chamber-of-the-International-Criminal-Court-Why-is-it-so-controversial.Google Scholar
Kamel, T, “The Principle of Legality and Its Application in Islamic Criminal Justice,” in Bassiouni, M C, ed, The Islamic Criminal Justice System (Oceana, 1982).Google Scholar
Kant, I, The Metaphysics of Morals, trans M Gregor (Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans M Gregor (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kant, I, “On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy,” in Practical Philosophy, trans M J Gregor (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Karnavas, M G, “Forms of Perpetration,” in Behrens, P & Henham, R, Elements of Genocide (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H, “Will the Judgment in the Nuremberg Trial Constitute a Precedent in International Law?” (1947) 1 Int’l LQ 153.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D, “Strategizing Legal Behaviour in Legal Interpretation” (1996) 3 Utah L Rev 785.Google Scholar
Kiyani, A G, “International Crime and the Politics of Criminal Theory: Voices and Conduct of Exclusion” (2015) 48 NYU J Int’l L & Pol 187.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, J T, “Pragmatism: An Old Name for Some New Ways of Thinking?,” in Dickstein, M, ed, The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture (Duke University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Knop, K, “Statehood: Territory, People, Government,” in Crawford, J & Koskenniemi, M, eds, The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Koch, C Jr, “Judicial Dialogue for Legal Multiculturalism” (2004) 25 Michigan J Int’l L 879.Google Scholar
Kochenov, D, “The Just World,” in Kochenov, D, de Búrca, G & Williams, A, Europe’s Justice Deficit? (Hart, 2015).Google Scholar
Koller, D, “The Faith of the International Criminal Lawyer” (2008) 40 NYU J Int’l L & Pol 1019.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Reissue with new epilogue) (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, “Humanity’s Law, Ruti G. Teitel” (2012) 26 Ethics & International Affairs 395.Google Scholar
Kreß, C, “On the Outer Limits of Crimes against Humanity: The Concept of Organization within the Policy Requirement: Some Reflections on the March 2010 ICC Kenya Decision” (2010) 23 LJIJ 855.Google Scholar
Kreß, C, Towards a Truly Universal Invisible College of International Criminal Lawyers (Torkel Opsahl Academic, 2014).Google Scholar
Krieger, H, “International Law and Governance by Armed Groups: Caught in the Legitimacy Trap?” (2018) 12 Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 563.Google Scholar
Lacey, N, State Punishment: Political Principles and Community Values (Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar
Lamb, S, “Nullum Crimen, Nullum Poena Sine Lege,” in Cassese, A, Gaeta, P & Jones, J R W D, eds, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Lang, A F, “Punishing Genocide: A Critical Reading of the International Court of Justice,” in Isaacs, T & Vernon, R, eds, Accountability of Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Langston, E, “The Superior Responsibility Doctrine in International Law: Historical Continuities, Innovation and Criminality – Can East Timor’s Special Panels Bring Militia Leaders to Justice?” (2004) 4 Int’l Crim L Rev 141.Google Scholar
Larcom, S, “Accounting for Legal Pluralism: The Impact of Pre-colonial Institutions on Crime” (2013) 6 LDR 25.Google Scholar
Liss, R, “Crimes against the Sovereign Order: Rethinking International Criminal Justice” (2019) 113 AJIL 727.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Origins of Chinese Law: Penal and Administrative Law in its Early Development (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Lorton, D, “The Treatment of Criminals in Ancient Egypt: Through the New Kingdom” (1977) 20 Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient 2.Google Scholar
Lu, C, “Cosmopolitan Liberalism and the Faces of Injustice in International Relations” (2005) 31 Review of International Studies 401.Google Scholar
Luban, D, “State Criminality and the Ambition of International Criminal Law,” in Isaacs, T & Vernon, R, eds, Accountability of Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Luban, D, Strudler, A & Wasserman, D, “Moral Responsibility in the Age of Bureaucracy” (1992) 90 Michigan L Rev 2348.Google Scholar
Lucas, J, Graif, C & Lovaglia, M, “Misconduct in the Prosecution of Severe Crimes: Theory and Experimental Test” (2006) 69 Soc Psychol Q 97.Google Scholar
MacCormack, N, “Coherence in Legal Justification,” in Peczenik, A, Lindahl, L & van Roermund, B, eds, Theory of Legal Science (Reidel, 1984).Google Scholar
Maier-Katkin, D, Mears, D P & Bernard, T J, “Towards a Criminology of Crimes against Humanity” (2009) 13 Theoretical Criminology 227.Google Scholar
Malekian, F, “The Homogeneity of the International Criminal Court with Islamic Jurisprudence” (2009) 9 Int’l Crim L Rev 607.Google Scholar
Manning, J G, “The Representation of Justice in Ancient Egypt” (2012) 24 Yale J L & Humanity 111.Google Scholar
Martinez, J S, “Understanding Mens Rea in Command Responsibility: From Yamashita to Blašskić and beyond” (2007) 5 JICJ 638.Google Scholar
May, L, Crimes against Humanity: A Normative Account (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
May, L, “Collective Punishment and Mass Confinement,” in Isaacs, T & Vernon, R, eds, Accountability of Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Mayr, E, “International Criminal Law, Causation and Responsibility” (2014) 14 Int’l Crim L Rev 855.Google Scholar
McGonigle Leyh, B, “Pragmatism over Principles: The International Criminal Court and a Human Rights-Based Approach to Judicial Interpretation” (2018) 41 Fordham Int’l LJ 697.Google Scholar
Mégret, F, “Prospects for ‘Constitutional’ Human Rights Scrutiny of Substantive International Criminal Law by the ICC,” Paper presented at Washington University School of Law, February 2010.Google Scholar
Mègret, F, “Too Much of a Good Thing? ICC Implementation and the Uses of Complementarity,” in Stahn, C & El-Zeidy, M, eds, The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Mégret, F, “What Sort of Justice Is ‘International Criminal Justice’?” (2015) 13 JICJ 77.Google Scholar
Meloni, C, “Command Responsibility: Mode of Liability for the Crimes of Subordinates or Separate Offence of the Superior?” (2007) 5 JICJ 619.Google Scholar
Merges, R, “Foundations and Principles Redux: A Reply to Professor Blankfein-Tabachnik” (2013) 101 Calif L Rev 1361.Google Scholar
Mettraux, G, “Crimes against Humanity in the Jurisprudence of the ICTY and ICTR” (2002) 43 Harvard Int’l LJ 237.Google Scholar
Mettraux, G, International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Mill, J S, “Utilitarianism,” in Lerner, M, ed, Essential Works of John Stuart Mill (Bantam Books, 1961).Google Scholar
Mill, J S, “Bentham,” in Ryan, A, ed, Utilitarianism and Other Essays (Penguin Random House, 1987).Google Scholar
Mohamed, S, “Of Monsters and Men: Perpetrator Trauma and Mass Atrocity” (2015) 115 Columbia L Rev 1157.Google Scholar
Møllmann, M, “Who Can Be Held Responsible for the Consequences of Aid and Loan Conditionalities? The Global Gag Rule in Peru and Its Criminal Consequences,” Michigan State University’s Women and International Development Program Working Paper #29 (2004).Google Scholar
Moloto, B J, “Command Responsibility in International Criminal Tribunals” (2009) 3 Publicist 12.Google Scholar
Moore, M S, Placing Blame: A General Theory of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Moore, M S, “Causing, Aiding, and the Superfluity of Accomplice Liability” (2007) 156 U Pa L Rev 395.Google Scholar
Moore, M S, Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals and Metaphysics (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Morse, S J, “The Moral Metaphysics of Causation and Results” (2000) 88 Calif L Rev 879.Google Scholar
Morss, J R, “Saving Human Rights from Its Friends: A Critique of the Imaginary Justice of Costas Douzinas” (2003) 27 Melbourne U L Rev 889.Google Scholar
Napoleon, V & Friedland, H, “Indigenous Legal Traditions: Roots to Renaissance,” in Dubber, M D & Hörnle, T, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Nerlich, V, “Superior Responsibility under Article 28 ICC Statute: For What Exactly Is the Superior Held Responsible?” (2007) 5 JICJ 665.Google Scholar
Nersessian, D, “Whoops, I Committed Genocide! The Anomaly of Constructive Liability for Serious International Crimes” (2006) 30 Fletcher F World Aff 81.Google Scholar
Neurath, O, “Anti-Spengler,” in Neurath, M & Cohen, R, eds, Empiricism and Sociology (D Reidel, 1973).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A & van der Wilt, H, eds, System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Nouwen, S, “International Criminal Law: Theory All over the Place,” in Orford, A & Hoffman, F, eds, Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Nybondas, M L, Command Responsibility and Its Applicability to Civilian Superiors (TMC Asser Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Ohlin, J D, “Three Conceptual Problems with the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise” (2006) 5 JICJ 69.Google Scholar
Ohlin, J D, “MJIL Symposium: A Response to Darryl Robinson by Jens Ohlin” (15 November 2012), online: http://opiniojuris.org/2012/11/15/mjil-symposium-a-response-to-darryl-robinson-by-jens-ohlin/.Google Scholar
Ohlin, J D, “Second-Order Linking Principles: Combining Vertical and Horizontal Modes of Liability” (2012) 25 LJIL 771.Google Scholar
Ohlin, J D, “Co-perpetration: German Dogmatik or German Invasion?,” in Stahn, C, ed, The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court: A Critical Account of Challenges and Achievements (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Ohlin, J D, “Specific Direction Again” (17 December 2015), online: http://opiniojuris.org/2015/12/17/specific-direction-again/.Google Scholar
Ohlin, J D, van Sliedregt, E & Weigend, T, “Assessing the Control Theory” (2013) 26 LJIL 725.Google Scholar
Olásolo, H, “Developments in the Distinction between Principal and Accessory Liability in Light of the First Case Law of the International Criminal Court,” in Stahn, C & Sluiter, G, eds, The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Brill, 2009).Google Scholar
Olivelle, P, Dharmasutras: The Law Codes of Apastamba, Gautama, Baudhayana, and Vasistha (Motilal Banarsidass, 2003).Google Scholar
O’Reilly, A T, “Command Responsibility: A Call to Realign the Doctrine with Principles of Individual Accountability and Retributive Justice” (2004–05) 40 Gonzaga L Rev 127.Google Scholar
Orford, A, “Jurisdiction without Territory: From the Holy Roman Empire to the Responsibility to Protect” (2008–09) 30 Michigan J Int’l L 981.Google Scholar
Orie, A M M, “Stare Decisis in the ICTY Appeal System: Successor Responsibility in the Hadžihasanović Case” (2012) 10 JICJ 635.Google Scholar
Osiel, M, Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline and the Law of War (Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Osiel, M, “The Banality of Good: Aligning Incentives against Mass Atrocity” (2005) 105 Columbia L Rev 1751.Google Scholar
Paust, J J, “Content and Contours of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity, and War Crimes,” in Yee, S & Tieya, W, International Law in the Post-Cold War World: Essays in Memory of Li Haopei (Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Pejic, J, “The International Criminal Court Statute: An Appraisal of the Rome Package” (2000) 34 International Lawyer 65.Google Scholar
Pellet, A, “Applicable Law,” in Cassese, A, Gaeta, P & Jones, J R W D, eds, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Perova, N, “Stretching the Joint Criminal Enterprise Doctrine to the Extreme: When Culpability and Liability Do not Match” (2016) 16 Int’l Crim L Rev 761.Google Scholar
Piacente, N, “Importance of the Joint Criminal Enterprise Doctrine for the ICTY Prosecutorial Policy” (2004) 2 JICJ 446.Google Scholar
Piragoff, D & Robinson, D, “Article 30,” in Ambos, K, ed, Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 4th ed (Beck, 2020).Google Scholar
Posner, R, “What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everyone Else Does)” (1993) 3 SCER 1.Google Scholar
Powderly, J C, “Judicial Interpretation at the Ad Hoc Tribunals: Method from Chaos?,” in Powderly, J C & Darcy, S, eds, Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Powderly, J C, “The Rome Statute and the Attempted Corseting of the Interpretative Judicial Function: Reflections on Sources of Law and Interpretative Technique,” in Stahn, C, ed, The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Powderly, J C, “Introductory Note to Prosecutor v Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo” (2018) 57 Int’l Legal Materials 1031.Google Scholar
Powderly, J C, “International Criminal Justice in an Age of Perpetual Crisis” (2019) 32 LJIL 1.Google Scholar
Powderly, J C & Hayes, N, “The Bemba Appeal: A Fragmented Appeals Chamber Destabilises the Law and Practice of the ICC” (26 June 2018), online: humanrightsdoctorate.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-bemba-appeal-fragmented-appeals.html.Google Scholar
Powles, S, “Joint Criminal Enterprise: Criminal Liability by Prosecutorial Ingenuity and Judicial Creativity?” (2004) 2 JICJ 606.Google Scholar
Prost, K & Robinson, D, “Canada,” in Kress, C et al, eds, The Rome Statute and Domestic Legal Orders, Vol 2 (Nomos, 2000–05).Google Scholar
Provost, R, “Authority, Responsibility, and Witchcraft: From Tintin to the SCSL,” in Jalloh, C, ed, The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Provost, R, Rebel Courts: The Administration of Justice by Armed Insurgents (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Ramasastry, A & Thompson, R C, Commerce, Crime and Conflict: Legal Remedies for Private Sector Liability for Grave Breaches of International Law – A Survey of Sixteen Countries (FAFO, 2006).Google Scholar
Rauter, T, Judicial Practice, Customary International Criminal Law and Nullum Crimen Sine Lege (Springer, 2017).Google Scholar
Rawls, J, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed Kelly, E (Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Reisman, W M, “Legal Responses to Genocide and Other Massive Violations of Human Rights” (1996) 4 Law & Contemp Probs 75.Google Scholar
Richardson, H, Practical Reasoning about Final Ends (Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Roach, S C, Politicizing the ICC: The Convergence of Ethics, Politics and Law (Rowman & Littlefield, 2006).Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J K, “Outcome Severity and Judgments of ‘Responsibility’: A Meta-Analytical Review” (2000) 30 J Appl 2575.Google Scholar
Roberts, P & MacMillan, N “For Criminology in International Criminal Justice” (2003) 1 JICJ 315.Google Scholar
Robertson, G, Crimes against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice (The New Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Robinson, D, “Legality and Our Contradictory Commitments: Some Thoughts about the Way We Think” (2009) 103 ASIL Proc 104.Google Scholar
Robinson, D, “The Two Liberalisms of International Criminal Law,” in Stahn, C & van den Herik, L, eds, Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (TMC Asser Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Robinson, D, “The Controversy over Territorial State Referrals and Reflections on ICL Discourse” (2011) 9 JICJ 355.Google Scholar
Robinson, D, “How Command Responsibility Got So Complicated: A Culpability Contradiction, Its Obfuscation, and a Simple Solution” (2012) 13 Melbourne J Int’l L 1.Google Scholar
Robinson, D, “Take the Long View of International Justice” (24 October 2016), online: www.ejiltalk.org/take-the-long-view-of-international-justice/.Google Scholar
Robinson, D, “The Other Poisoned Chalice: Unprecedented Evidentiary Standards in the Gbagbo Case?” (5 November 2019), online: www.ejiltalk.org/the-other-poisoned-chalice-unprecedented-evidentiary-standards-in-the-gbagbo-case-part-1/.Google Scholar
Robinson, D, “The Strangest Debate in Complementarity and the Better Debate Ahead,” in Stahn, C & El Zeidy, M, eds, The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice, 2nd ed (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Robinson, D & MacNeil, G, “The Tribunals and the Renaissance of International Criminal Law: Three Themes” (2016) 110 AJIL 191.Google Scholar
Robinson, P H, “Fair Notice and Fair Adjudication: Two Kinds of Legality” (2005) 154 U Pa L Rev 335.Google Scholar
Robinson, P H, Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Robinson, P H, “Natural Law and Lawlessness: Modern Lessons from Pirates, Lepers, Eskimos, and Survivors” [2013] U Illinois L Rev 433.Google Scholar
Robinson, P H & Kurzban, R, “Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice” (2006–07) 91 Minnesota L Rev 1829.Google Scholar
Root, J, “Some Other Mens Rea? The Nature of Command Responsibility in the Rome Statute” (2013) 23 Transnat’l L & Policy 119.Google Scholar
Rorty, R, Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays: 1972–1980 (University of Minnesota Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Roth, B, “Coming to Terms with Ruthlessness: Sovereign Equality, Global Pluralism, and the Limits of International Criminal Justice” (2010) 8 Santa Clara J Int’l L 231.Google Scholar
Rothe, D L & Mullins, C W, “Toward a Criminology of International Criminal Law: An Integrated Theory of International Criminal Violations” (2009) 33 IJCACJ 97.Google Scholar
Rundle, K, Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Russell-Brown, S L, “The Last Line of Defense: The Doctrine of Command Responsibility and Gender Crimes in Armed Conflict” (2004) 22 Wisconsin Int’l L J 125.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C, “Territory in the Law of Jurisdiction: Imagining Alternatives” (2017) 47 NYIL 49.Google Scholar
SáCouto, S, “The Impact of the Appeals Chamber Decision in Bemba: Impunity for Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes?” (22 June 2018), online: www.ijmonitor.org/2018/06/the-impact-of-the-appeals-chamber-decision-in-bemba-impunity-for-sexual-and-gender-based-crimes.Google Scholar
SáCouto, S & Viseur Sellers, P, “The Bemba Appeals Chamber Judgment: Impunity for Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes” (2019) 27 Wm & Mary Bill Rts J 599.Google Scholar
Sadat, L N, The ICC and the Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium (Transnational Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Sadat, L N, “Can the ICTY Šainović and Perišić Cases Be Reconciled?” (2014) 108 AJIL 475.Google Scholar
Sadat, L N, “Fiddling While Rome Burns? The Appeals Chamber’s Curious Decision in Prosecutor v Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo” (12 June 2018), online: www.ejiltalk.org/fiddling-while-rome-burns-the-appeals-chambers-curious-decision-in-prosecutor-v-jean-pierre-bemba-gombo/.Google Scholar
Sadat, L N, “Judicial Speculation Made Law: More Thoughts about the Acquittal of Jean-Pierre Bemba Gomba by the ICC Appeals Chamber and the Question of Superior Responsibility under the Rome Statute” (27 May 2019), online: https://iccforum.com/responsibility.Google Scholar
Sadat, L N & Jolly, J, “Seven Canons of ICC Treaty Interpretation: Making Sense of Article 25’s Rorschach Blot” (2014) 27 LJIL 755.Google Scholar
Saland, P, “International Criminal Law Principles,” in Lee, R S, ed, The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer, 1999).Google Scholar
Sander, B, “Unravelling the Confusion Concerning Successor Superior Responsibility in the ICTY Jurisprudence” (2010) 23 LJIL 105.Google Scholar
Sarch, A, “Condoning the Crime: The Elusive Mens Rea for Complicity” (2015–16) 47 Loy U Chi LJ 131.Google Scholar
Sayre, F B, “Criminal Responsibility for the Acts of Another” (1930) 43 Harvard L Rev 689.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G, “Coherentism and the Justification of Moral Beliefs,” in Timmons, M & Armstrong, W S, eds, Moral Knowledge (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Schabas, W, “Sentencing by International Tribunals: A Human Rights Approach” (1997) 7 Duke J Comp Int’l L 461.Google Scholar
Schabas, W, “General Principles of Criminal Law in the International Criminal Court (Part III)” (1998) 6 Eur J Crime Cr L Cr J 400.Google Scholar
Schabas, W, Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Schabas, W, “Interpreting the Statutes of the Ad Hoc Tribunals,” in Vohrah, L C et al, eds, Man’s Inhumanity to Man (Brill, 2003).Google Scholar
Schauer, F, “Incentives, Reputation and the Inglorious Determinants of Judicial Behavior” (1999–2000) 68 U Cincinnati L Rev 615.Google Scholar
Schechter, F, “Popular Law and Common Law in Medieval England” (1928) 28 Columbia L Rev 269.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C, The Concept of the Political (Duncker & Humblot, 1932; trans and reprinted University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Sepinwall, A J, “Failures to Punish: Command Responsibility in Domestic and International Law” (2009) 30 Michigan J Int’l L 251.Google Scholar
Sepinwall, A J, “Citizen Responsibility and the Reactive Attitudes: Blaming Americans for War Crimes in Iraq,” in Isaacs, T & Vernon, R, eds, Accountability of Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Shahabuddeen, M, “Does the Principle of Legality Stand in the Way of Progressive Development of the Law?” (2004) 2 JICJ 1007.Google Scholar
Shany, T & Michaeli, K R, “The Case against Ariel Sharon: Revisiting the Doctrine of Command Responsibility” (2001–02) 34 NYU J Int’l L & Pol 797.Google Scholar
Simester, A P & Sullivan, G R, Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine, 3rd ed (Hart, 2007).Google Scholar
Simons, K, “Culpability and Retributive Theory: The Problem of Criminal Negligence” (1994) 5 J Contemp Legal Iss 365.Google Scholar
Simpson, G, “Politics, Sovereignty, Remembrance,” in McGoldrick, D, Rowe, P & Donnelly, E, eds, The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues (Hart, 2004).Google Scholar
Simpson, G, Law, War and Crime: War Crimes Trials and the Reinvention of International Law (Polity, 2007).Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, S, “Courts of Armed Opposition Groups: Fair Trials or Summary Justice?” (2009) 7 JICJ 489.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, S, “Ownership of International Humanitarian Law: Non-state Armed Groups and the Formation and Enforcement of IHL Rules,” in Perrin, B, ed, Modern Warfare: Armed Groups, Private Militaries, Humanitarian Organizations, and the Law (UBC Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Smandych, R & Linden, R, “Administering Justice without the State: A Study of the Private Justice System of the Hudson’s Bay Company to 1800” (1996) 11 Can J L & Soc 21.Google Scholar
Smeulers, A, “What Transforms Ordinary People into Gross Human Rights Violators?,” in Carey, S C & Poe, S C, eds, Understanding Human Rights Violations: New Systematic Studies (Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar
Smeulers, A, “Why International Crimes Might Not Seem ‘Manifestly Unlawful’ to Low-Level Perpetrators” (2019) 17 JICJ 1.Google Scholar
Smeulers, A, “A Criminological Approach to the ICC’s Control Theory,” in Heller, K Jet al, eds, Oxford Handbook on International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Smeulers, A & Grünfeld, F, International Crimes and Other Gross Human Rights Violations: A Multi- and Inter-disciplinary Textbook (Martinus Nijhoff, 2011).Google Scholar
Smeulers, A & Haveman, R, eds, Supranational Criminology: Towards a Criminology of International Crimes (Intersentia, 2008).Google Scholar
Smeulers, A, Weerdesteijn, M & Hola, B, “The Selection of Situations by the ICC: An Empirically Based Evaluation of the OTP’s Performance” (2015) 15 Int’l Crim L Rev 1.Google Scholar
Smeulers, A, Weerdesteijn, M & Hola, B, Perpetrators of International Crimes: Theories, Methods, and Evidence (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Smidt, M, “Yamashita, Medina, and beyond: Command Responsibility in Contemporary Military Operations” (2000) 164 Military L Rev 155.Google Scholar
Soares, P P, “Tangling Human Rights and International Criminal Law: The Practice of International Tribunals and the Call for Rationalized Legal Pluralism” (2012) 23 Crim L Forum 161.Google Scholar
Somer, J, “Jungle Justice: Passing Sentence on the Equality of Belligerents in Non-international Armed Conflict” (2007) 89 International Review of the Red Cross 655.Google Scholar
Stahn, C, “Between Faith and Facts: By What Standards Should We Assess International Criminal Justice?” (2012) 25 LJIL 251.Google Scholar
Stahn, C, A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Stahn, C, Justice as Message: Expressivist Foundations of International Criminal Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Steer, C, Translating Guilt: Identifying Leadership Liability for Mass Atrocity Crimes (TMC Asser Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Stern, P J, “‘A Politie of Civill & Military Power’: Political Thought and the Late Seventeenth-Century Foundations of the East India Company-State” (2008) 47 Journal of British Studies 253.Google Scholar
Stewart, J, “The End of ‘Modes of Liability’ for International Crimes” (2011) 25 LJIL 165.Google Scholar
Stewart, J, “‘Specific Direction’ Is Indefensible: A Response to Heller on Complicity” (12 June 2013), online: http://opiniojuris.org/2013/06/12/specific-direction-is-indefensible-a-response-to-heller-on-complicity/.Google Scholar
Stewart, J & Kiyani, A, “The Ahistoricism of Legal Pluralism in International Criminal Law” (2017) 65 Am J Comp L 393.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M & Solove, D J, “Radical Pragmatism,” in Malachowski, A, ed, The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C, “Is Deontology a Heuristic? On Psychology, Neuroscience, Ethics and Law” (2014) 63 Jerusalem Phil Q 83.Google Scholar
Tallgren, I, “The Sensibility and Sense of International Criminal Law” (2002) 13 EJIL 561.Google Scholar
Tellenbach, S, “Aspects of the Iranian Code of Islamic Punishment: The Principle of Legality” (2009) 9 Int’l Crim L Rev 691.Google Scholar
Thagard, P & Verbeugt, K, “Coherence as Constraint Satisfaction” (1998) 22 Cognitive Science 1.Google Scholar
Théodoridès, A, “The Concept of Law in Ancient Egypt,” in Harris, J R, The Legacy of Egypt, 2nd ed (Clarendon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Thorburn, M, “The Criminal Law as Public Law,” in Duff, R A & Green, S, eds, The Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Timmons, M, “Foundationalism and the Structure of Ethical Justification” (1987) 97 Ethics 595.Google Scholar
Tooby, J & Cosmides, L, “The Psychological Foundations of Culture,” in Barkow, J H, Cosmides, L & Tooby, J, eds, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Trahan, J, “Bemba Acquittal Rests on Erroneous Application of Appellate Review Standard” (25 June 2018), online: http://opiniojuris.org/2018/06/25/bemba-acquittal-rests-on-erroneous-application-of-appellate-review-standard/.Google Scholar
Triffterer, O, “Causality, a Separate Element of the Doctrine of Superior Responsibility as Expressed in Article 28 Rome Statute?” (2002) 15 LJIL 179.Google Scholar
Triffterer, O & Arnold, R, “Article 28,” in Triffterer, O & Ambos, K, eds, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd ed (Beck, Hart, Nomos, 2016).Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N, “Command Responsibility and the Principle of Individual Criminal Responsibility: A Critical Analysis of International Jurisprudence,” in Eboe-Osuji, C, ed, Essays in International Law and Policy in Honour of Navanethem Pillay (Martinus Nijhoff, 2010).Google Scholar
Tulkens, F, “The Paradoxical Relationship between Criminal Law and Human Rights” (2011) 9 JICJ 577.Google Scholar
Tyldesley, J, Judgement of the Pharaoh: Crime and Punishment in Ancient Egypt (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2000).Google Scholar
Uhler, O & Coursier, H, Commentary on the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Vol IV (ICRC, 1958).Google Scholar
van der Wilt, H, “Genocide, Complicity in Genocide and International v Domestic Jurisdiction: Reflections on the van Anraat Case” (2006) 4 JICJ 239.Google Scholar
van der Wilt, H, “Command Responsibility in the Jungle: Some Reflections on the Elements of Effective Command and Control,” in Jalloh, C, ed, The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy; The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
van Dyke, J M, “The Fundamental Human Right to Prosecution and Compensation” (2001) 29 Denver J Int’l L & Pol’y 77.Google Scholar
van Hooft, S, Cosmopolitanism: A Philosophy for Global Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
van Schaack, B, “Command Responsibility: A Step Backwards” (1998), online: www.advocacynet.org/resource/369#Command_Responsibility:_A_Step_Backwards.Google Scholar
van Schaack, B, “Crimen Sine Lege: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals” (2008) 97 Georgetown L Rev 119.Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E, “Joint Criminal Enterprise as a Pathway to Convicting Individuals for Genocide” (2007) 5 JICJ 184.Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E, “Article 28 of the ICC Statute: Mode of Liability and/or Separate Offence?” (2009) 12 New Crim L Rev 420.Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E, “Command Responsibility at the ICTY: Three Generations of Case Law and Still Ambiguity,” in Swart, A H, Zahar, A & Sluiter, G, eds, The Legacy of the ICTY (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E, Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E, “International Criminal Law,” in Dubber, M & Hörnle, T, The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E, “International Criminal Law: Over-Studied and Underachieving?” (2016) 29 LJIL 1.Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E & Vasiliev, S, “Pluralism: A New Framework for International Criminal Justice,” in van Sliedregt, E & Vasiliev, S, eds, Pluralism in International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E & Vasiliev, S, eds, Pluralism in International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Vanocore, G, “Legality, Culpability and Dogmatik: A Dialogue between the ECtHR, Comparative and International Criminal Law” (2015) 15 Int’l Crim L Rev 823.Google Scholar
Vasiliev, S, “On Trajectories and Destinations of International Criminal Law Scholarship” (2015) 28 LJIL 701.Google Scholar
Vasiliev, S, “The Crises and Critiques of International Criminal Justice,” in Heller, K J et al, Oxford Handbook on International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Vernon, R, Cosmopolitan Regard: Political Membership and Global Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
VerSteeg, R, “The Machinery of Law in Pharaonic Egypt: Organization, Courts, and Judges on the Ancient Nile” (2001) 9 Cardozo J of Int’l & Comp L 105.Google Scholar
Vetter, G, “Command Responsibility of Non-military Superiors in the International Criminal Court” (2000) 25 Yale J Int’l L 89.Google Scholar
Walsh, A, “Evolutionary Psychology and the Origins of Justice” (2000) 17 Justice Quarterly 841.Google Scholar
Weigend, T, “Superior Responsibility: Complicity, Omission or Over-Extension of the Criminal Law?,” in Burchard, C, Triffterer, O & Vogel, J, eds, The Review Conference and the Future of International Criminal Law (Kluwer, 2010).Google Scholar
Weigend, T, “Perpetration through an Organization: The Unexpected Career of a German Legal Concept” (2011) 9 JICJ 91.Google Scholar
Weigend, T, “Mr Bemba’s Acquittal: A Shortcut to Justice?” (25 June 2019), online http://jamesgstewart.com/mr-bembas-acquittal-a-shortcut-to-justice/.Google Scholar
Werle, G & Jessberger, F, “‘Unless Otherwise Provided’: Article 30 of the ICC Statute and the Mental Element of Crimes under International Criminal Law” (2005) 3 JICJ 35.Google Scholar
Werle, G & Jessberger, F, Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd ed (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wessel, J, “Judicial Policy-Making at the International Criminal Court: An Institutional Guide to Analyzing International Adjudication” (2006) 44 Columbia J Transnat’l L 377.Google Scholar
Whiting, A, “Appeal Judges Turn the ICC on Its Head with Bemba Decision” (14 June 2008), online: www.justsecurity.org/57760/appeals-judges-turn-icc-head-bemba-decision/.Google Scholar
Wilson, R J, “Defences in Contemporary International Criminal Law” (2002) 96 AJIL 517.Google Scholar
Womack, B, “The Development and Recent Application of the Doctrine of Command Responsibility, with Particular Reference to the Mens Rea Requirement,” in Yee, S, ed, International Criminal Law and Punishment (University Press of America, 2003).Google Scholar
Wright, R W, “Causation: Metaphysics or Intuition?,” in Ferzan, K & Morse, S, eds, Legal, Moral and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael Moore (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Wu, T & Kang, Y S, “Criminal Liability for the Actions of Subordinates: The Doctrine of Command Responsibility and Its Analogues in United States Law” (1997) 38 Harvard Int’l LJ 272.Google Scholar
Yahaya, N, “Legal Pluralism and the English East India Company in the Straits of Malacca during the Early Nineteenth Century” (2015) 33 Law & Hist Rev 945.Google Scholar
Zahar, A, “Command Responsibility of Civilian Superiors for Genocide” (2001) 14 LJIJ 591.Google Scholar
Zahar, A, “Civilizing Civil War: Writing Morality as Law at the ICTY,” in Swart, B, Sluiter, G & Zahar, A, eds, The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil (Random House, 2007).Google Scholar