Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:06:38.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Béatrice Longuenesse
Béatrice Longuenesse
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant on the Human Standpoint , pp. 291 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J., 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Aristotle. De interpretatione, trans. J. L. Ackrill, in The Complete Works of Aristotle.
Aristotle. Posterior Analytics, trans. Jonathan Barnes, in The Complete Works of Aristotle.
Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre. La Logique ou l'art de penser, ed. Clair, P. and Girbal, F. (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1981). Trans. Jill Vance Buroker, Logic or the Art of Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysica (Halle, 1739), repr. in Kant, AAxvii.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. Dissertatio de usu et limitibus principii rationis determinantis, vulgo sufficientis (Leipzig, 1743).Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunftwahrheiten, wie sie den zufälligen entgegen gesetzt werden (Metaphysik), 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1753).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Oeuvres, ed. Adam, Charles, Tannery, Paul, and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 11 vols. (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1971–5).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 1985, 1991).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Principles of Philosophy, in Philosophical Writings of Descartes.
Frege, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, in Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze (Hildesheim: Olms, 1964). Engl. trans. Begriffsschrift: a formula language for pure thought, modeled upon that of arithmetic, in Frege and Gödel: Two Fundamental Texts in Mathematical Logic, ed. Jean van Heijenhoort (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen, trans. H. B. Nisbet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Faith and Knowledge, trans. Walter Cerf and H. S. Harris (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Gesammelte Werke, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. Akad., Rhein-Westfäl.Wiss, d.. (Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1968–).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Hume, David. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd edn, with text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Jungius, Joachim. Logica Hamburgensis (Hamburg, 1638).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Mary Gregor (The Hague; Nijhoff, 1974).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes in Philosophy, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, ed. and trans. with introduction by White Beck, Lewis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1965; originally published, London: Macmillan, 1929).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality, Being an Answer to the Question Proposed for Consideration by the Berlin Royal Academy of Sciences for the year 1763, in Theoretical Philosophy.
Kant Immanuel. The Jäsche Logic, in Lectures on Logic.
Kant Immanuel. Kants Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Preußischen, Königlichen (later Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften, 29 vols. (Berlin: 1902–83; 2nd edn, De Gruyter, 1968, for vols. i–ix).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Lectures on Logic, ed. and trans. J Michael Young (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Logik Blomberg, in Lectures on Logic.
Kant Immanuel. Logik Philippi, in Lectures on Logic.
Immanuel, Kant. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. Michael Friedman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. A New Elucidation of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.
Immanuel, Kant. On a Discovery whereby any New Critique of Pure Reason is to be made superflous by an older one, trans. H. Allison in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.
Kant Immanuel. On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World (Inaugural Dissertation), in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.
Kant Immanuel. Philosophical Correspondence 1759–1799, ed. and trans. Zweig, Arnulf (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science (with Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason), trans. and ed. Hatfield, Gary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and Di Giovanni, George (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, ed. and trans. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. Engl. trans. and ed. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan, New Essays on Human Understanding (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, FriedrichThe Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, Vintage Books Edition, 1989).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, ArthurOn the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, trans. E. F. J. Payne (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 2001).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Über die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde (1813).
Sellars, Wilfrid. “Empiricism and the philosophy of mind,” in Feigl, Herbert and Scriven, Michael (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, i (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956), pp. 253–329; repr. with an introduction by Richard Rorty and a study guide by Robert Brandom (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms, 1962–).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Philosophia Prima sive Ontologia (Frankfurt-am-Main and Leibzig, 1736), repr. in Gesammelte Werke.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Philosophia rationalis sive Logica, in Gesammelte Werke.
Allison, Henry. “Causality and causal laws in Kant: a critique of Michael Friedman,” in Parrini, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology.
Allison, Henry. Kant's Theory of Taste: a Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: an Interpretation and Defense, rev. enlarged edn (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. “Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's Transcendental Deduction,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no.1 (2000), pp. 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (ed.). Essays on Kant and Hume (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. “Some pragmatic themes in Hegel's idealism”, in Brandom, Robert B., Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002), ch. 7.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76/B92–201 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991). Trans. Eric Watkins, The Table of Judgments: Critique of Pure Reason A67/76–B92–201, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, 4 (1995).Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd. Kant and the Dynamics of Reason: Essays on the Structure of Kant's Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. “Kant und die moderne Mathematik,” Kant-Studien, vol. 12 (1907), p. 35Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik (Berlin, 1910, repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1969). Trans. W. C. Swabey and M. C. Swabey, Substance and Function (New York: Dover, 1953).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. Kants Begründung der Ethik (Berlin, 1877; 2nd edn 1910).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, 3rd edn (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1918).Google Scholar
Fichant, Michel. “ ‘L'Espace est représenté comme une grandeur infinie donnée’. La radicalité de l'Esthétique,” Philosophie, no. 56 (1997), pp. 3–48.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “Freedom of the will and the concept of a person,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68 (1971), pp. 5–20. Repr. in The Importance of What We Care About.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, Michael and Lorenz, Krüger. “Über die Zuordnung der Quantitäten des Urteils und der Kategorien der Größe bei Kant,” Kant-Studien, vol. 61 (1970), pp. 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Causal laws and the foundations of natural science,” in Guyer, The Cambridge Companion to Kant.
Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Kant and the twentieth century,” in Parrini, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology.
Friedman, Michael. “Logical forms and the order of nature: comments on Béatrice Longuenesse's Kant and the Capacity to Judge”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 82 (2000), pp. 202–15.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer and Heidegger (Chicago and La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 2000).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Transcendental philosophy and a priori knowledge: a neo-Kantian perspective,” in Boghossian, Paul and Peacocke, Christopher (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000), pp. 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic judging and the intentionality of pleasure,” Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2 (2003), pp. 164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a law: Kant on the free play of imagination and understanding,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 25, no. 1 (1997), pp. 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the key to the critique of taste,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 72 (1991), pp. 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gram, Moltke S. (ed.). Kant: Disputed Questions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. “Internal critique: a logic is not a theory of reasoning and a theory of reasoning is not a logic,” Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, I (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, collected edn vol. iii (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991). Engl. trans. Richard Taft, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Phänomenologische Interpretation der Kritik der reinen Vernunft, collected edn vol. xxv (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977). Engl. trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly, Phenomenological Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E.Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kaulbach, Friedrich and Joachim, Ritter (eds.). Kritik und Metaphysik. Heinz Heimsoeth zum achtzigsten Geburtstag (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. Preface to Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.
Lachièze-Rey, Pierre. L'Idéalisme kantien, 3rd edn (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1972).Google Scholar
Lebrun, Gérard. Kant et la fin de la métaphysique (Paris: Armand Colin, 1970).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Hegel, Lecteur de Kant sur le jugement,” Philosophie, no. 36 (1992), pp. 62–7.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the “Critique of Pure Reason,” trans. Charles T. Wolfe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant et le pouvoir de juger. Sensibilité et discursivité dans l'Analytique transcendentale de la “Critique de la Raison Pure” (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: on Henry Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste,” Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2 (2003), pp. 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Point of view of man or knowledge of God: Kant and Hegel on concept, judgment and reason,” in Sedgwick, Kant and German Idealism: Fichte, Schelling, Hegel.
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Review of Michelle Grier's Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, in Mind, vol. 112, no. 448 (2003), pp. 718–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Self-consciousness and consciousness of one's own body: variations on a Kantian theme,” forthcoming in Philosophical Topics.
Lovejoy, Arthur. “On Kant's reply to Hume,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 18 (1906) pp. 380–407. Reprinted in Gram, Kant: Disputed Questions.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind and World, 2nd edn (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
MacFarlane, John. “Frege, Kant, and the logic in logicism,” Philosophical Review, vol. III (2002), pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia and Eileen, O'Neill (eds.). Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Parrini, Paulo (ed.). Kant and Contemporary Epistemology (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Charles. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, The Cambridge Companion to Kant.
Rawls, John. “Two concepts of rules,” Philosophyical Review, vol. 64 (1955), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus. Die Vollständigkeit der Kantischen Urteilstafel (Berlin: Schoetz, 1932; repr. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1986). Trans. J. Kneller and M. Losonsky, The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgments (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).
Schulthess, Peter. Relation und Funktion. Eine systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981).Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally. “Longuenesse on Kant and the priority of the capacity to judge,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no.1 (2000), pp. 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally (ed.). Kant and German Idealism: Fichte, Schelling, Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Sluga, Hans D.Gottlob Frege (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980).Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.The Bounds of Sense: an Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (London: Methuen, 1966).Google Scholar
Thompson, Manley. “Unity, plurality, and totality as Kantian categories,” The Monist, vol. 72 (1989), pp. 168–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. “Die Voraussetzungen zur Kantischen Urteilstafel in der Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts,” in Kaulbach and Ritter, Kritik und Metaphysik. Heinz Heimsoeth zum achtzigsten Geburtstag.
Waxman, Wayne. Kant's Model of the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. “Sufficient reason: a principle in diverse guises, both ancient and modern,” Acta Philosophia Fennica, vol. 61 (1996), pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Mit einem Essay über Freges “Begriffsschrift” (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. Kant's Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J., 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Aristotle. De interpretatione, trans. J. L. Ackrill, in The Complete Works of Aristotle.
Aristotle. Posterior Analytics, trans. Jonathan Barnes, in The Complete Works of Aristotle.
Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre. La Logique ou l'art de penser, ed. Clair, P. and Girbal, F. (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1981). Trans. Jill Vance Buroker, Logic or the Art of Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysica (Halle, 1739), repr. in Kant, AAxvii.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. Dissertatio de usu et limitibus principii rationis determinantis, vulgo sufficientis (Leipzig, 1743).Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunftwahrheiten, wie sie den zufälligen entgegen gesetzt werden (Metaphysik), 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1753).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Oeuvres, ed. Adam, Charles, Tannery, Paul, and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 11 vols. (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1971–5).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 1985, 1991).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Principles of Philosophy, in Philosophical Writings of Descartes.
Frege, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, in Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze (Hildesheim: Olms, 1964). Engl. trans. Begriffsschrift: a formula language for pure thought, modeled upon that of arithmetic, in Frege and Gödel: Two Fundamental Texts in Mathematical Logic, ed. Jean van Heijenhoort (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen, trans. H. B. Nisbet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Faith and Knowledge, trans. Walter Cerf and H. S. Harris (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Gesammelte Werke, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. Akad., Rhein-Westfäl.Wiss, d.. (Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1968–).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Hume, David. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd edn, with text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Jungius, Joachim. Logica Hamburgensis (Hamburg, 1638).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Mary Gregor (The Hague; Nijhoff, 1974).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes in Philosophy, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, ed. and trans. with introduction by White Beck, Lewis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1965; originally published, London: Macmillan, 1929).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality, Being an Answer to the Question Proposed for Consideration by the Berlin Royal Academy of Sciences for the year 1763, in Theoretical Philosophy.
Kant Immanuel. The Jäsche Logic, in Lectures on Logic.
Kant Immanuel. Kants Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Preußischen, Königlichen (later Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften, 29 vols. (Berlin: 1902–83; 2nd edn, De Gruyter, 1968, for vols. i–ix).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. Lectures on Logic, ed. and trans. J Michael Young (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Logik Blomberg, in Lectures on Logic.
Kant Immanuel. Logik Philippi, in Lectures on Logic.
Immanuel, Kant. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. Michael Friedman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. A New Elucidation of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.
Immanuel, Kant. On a Discovery whereby any New Critique of Pure Reason is to be made superflous by an older one, trans. H. Allison in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.
Kant Immanuel. On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World (Inaugural Dissertation), in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.
Kant Immanuel. Philosophical Correspondence 1759–1799, ed. and trans. Zweig, Arnulf (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science (with Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason), trans. and ed. Hatfield, Gary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and Di Giovanni, George (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, ed. and trans. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. Engl. trans. and ed. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan, New Essays on Human Understanding (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, FriedrichThe Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, Vintage Books Edition, 1989).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, ArthurOn the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, trans. E. F. J. Payne (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 2001).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Über die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde (1813).
Sellars, Wilfrid. “Empiricism and the philosophy of mind,” in Feigl, Herbert and Scriven, Michael (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, i (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956), pp. 253–329; repr. with an introduction by Richard Rorty and a study guide by Robert Brandom (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms, 1962–).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Philosophia Prima sive Ontologia (Frankfurt-am-Main and Leibzig, 1736), repr. in Gesammelte Werke.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Philosophia rationalis sive Logica, in Gesammelte Werke.
Allison, Henry. “Causality and causal laws in Kant: a critique of Michael Friedman,” in Parrini, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology.
Allison, Henry. Kant's Theory of Taste: a Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: an Interpretation and Defense, rev. enlarged edn (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. “Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's Transcendental Deduction,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no.1 (2000), pp. 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (ed.). Essays on Kant and Hume (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. “Some pragmatic themes in Hegel's idealism”, in Brandom, Robert B., Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002), ch. 7.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76/B92–201 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991). Trans. Eric Watkins, The Table of Judgments: Critique of Pure Reason A67/76–B92–201, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, 4 (1995).Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd. Kant and the Dynamics of Reason: Essays on the Structure of Kant's Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. “Kant und die moderne Mathematik,” Kant-Studien, vol. 12 (1907), p. 35Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik (Berlin, 1910, repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1969). Trans. W. C. Swabey and M. C. Swabey, Substance and Function (New York: Dover, 1953).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. Kants Begründung der Ethik (Berlin, 1877; 2nd edn 1910).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, 3rd edn (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1918).Google Scholar
Fichant, Michel. “ ‘L'Espace est représenté comme une grandeur infinie donnée’. La radicalité de l'Esthétique,” Philosophie, no. 56 (1997), pp. 3–48.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “Freedom of the will and the concept of a person,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68 (1971), pp. 5–20. Repr. in The Importance of What We Care About.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, Michael and Lorenz, Krüger. “Über die Zuordnung der Quantitäten des Urteils und der Kategorien der Größe bei Kant,” Kant-Studien, vol. 61 (1970), pp. 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Causal laws and the foundations of natural science,” in Guyer, The Cambridge Companion to Kant.
Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Kant and the twentieth century,” in Parrini, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology.
Friedman, Michael. “Logical forms and the order of nature: comments on Béatrice Longuenesse's Kant and the Capacity to Judge”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 82 (2000), pp. 202–15.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer and Heidegger (Chicago and La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 2000).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Transcendental philosophy and a priori knowledge: a neo-Kantian perspective,” in Boghossian, Paul and Peacocke, Christopher (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000), pp. 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic judging and the intentionality of pleasure,” Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2 (2003), pp. 164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a law: Kant on the free play of imagination and understanding,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 25, no. 1 (1997), pp. 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the key to the critique of taste,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 72 (1991), pp. 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gram, Moltke S. (ed.). Kant: Disputed Questions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. “Internal critique: a logic is not a theory of reasoning and a theory of reasoning is not a logic,” Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, I (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, collected edn vol. iii (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991). Engl. trans. Richard Taft, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Phänomenologische Interpretation der Kritik der reinen Vernunft, collected edn vol. xxv (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977). Engl. trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly, Phenomenological Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E.Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kaulbach, Friedrich and Joachim, Ritter (eds.). Kritik und Metaphysik. Heinz Heimsoeth zum achtzigsten Geburtstag (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. Preface to Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.
Lachièze-Rey, Pierre. L'Idéalisme kantien, 3rd edn (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1972).Google Scholar
Lebrun, Gérard. Kant et la fin de la métaphysique (Paris: Armand Colin, 1970).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Hegel, Lecteur de Kant sur le jugement,” Philosophie, no. 36 (1992), pp. 62–7.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the “Critique of Pure Reason,” trans. Charles T. Wolfe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant et le pouvoir de juger. Sensibilité et discursivité dans l'Analytique transcendentale de la “Critique de la Raison Pure” (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: on Henry Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste,” Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2 (2003), pp. 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Point of view of man or knowledge of God: Kant and Hegel on concept, judgment and reason,” in Sedgwick, Kant and German Idealism: Fichte, Schelling, Hegel.
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Review of Michelle Grier's Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, in Mind, vol. 112, no. 448 (2003), pp. 718–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Self-consciousness and consciousness of one's own body: variations on a Kantian theme,” forthcoming in Philosophical Topics.
Lovejoy, Arthur. “On Kant's reply to Hume,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 18 (1906) pp. 380–407. Reprinted in Gram, Kant: Disputed Questions.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind and World, 2nd edn (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
MacFarlane, John. “Frege, Kant, and the logic in logicism,” Philosophical Review, vol. III (2002), pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia and Eileen, O'Neill (eds.). Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Parrini, Paulo (ed.). Kant and Contemporary Epistemology (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Charles. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, The Cambridge Companion to Kant.
Rawls, John. “Two concepts of rules,” Philosophyical Review, vol. 64 (1955), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus. Die Vollständigkeit der Kantischen Urteilstafel (Berlin: Schoetz, 1932; repr. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1986). Trans. J. Kneller and M. Losonsky, The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgments (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).
Schulthess, Peter. Relation und Funktion. Eine systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981).Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally. “Longuenesse on Kant and the priority of the capacity to judge,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no.1 (2000), pp. 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally (ed.). Kant and German Idealism: Fichte, Schelling, Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Sluga, Hans D.Gottlob Frege (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980).Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.The Bounds of Sense: an Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (London: Methuen, 1966).Google Scholar
Thompson, Manley. “Unity, plurality, and totality as Kantian categories,” The Monist, vol. 72 (1989), pp. 168–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. “Die Voraussetzungen zur Kantischen Urteilstafel in der Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts,” in Kaulbach and Ritter, Kritik und Metaphysik. Heinz Heimsoeth zum achtzigsten Geburtstag.
Waxman, Wayne. Kant's Model of the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. “Sufficient reason: a principle in diverse guises, both ancient and modern,” Acta Philosophia Fennica, vol. 61 (1996), pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Mit einem Essay über Freges “Begriffsschrift” (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. Kant's Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Béatrice Longuenesse, New York University
  • Book: Kant on the Human Standpoint
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487279.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Béatrice Longuenesse, New York University
  • Book: Kant on the Human Standpoint
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487279.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Béatrice Longuenesse, New York University
  • Book: Kant on the Human Standpoint
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487279.012
Available formats
×