Book contents
- Law and Jewish Difference
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Law and Jewish Difference
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter One Introduction
- Chapter Two From Jewish Other to Citizen of the Mosaic Faith
- Chapter Three Contentious Cut
- Chapter Four The Body of the Other
- Chapter Five Dividing Lines
- Chapter Six When Orthodox Judaism Goes Public
- Chapter Seven Persistent Ambivalence
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
Chapter Six - When Orthodox Judaism Goes Public
An Eruv Dispute in Australia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2024
- Law and Jewish Difference
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Law and Jewish Difference
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter One Introduction
- Chapter Two From Jewish Other to Citizen of the Mosaic Faith
- Chapter Three Contentious Cut
- Chapter Four The Body of the Other
- Chapter Five Dividing Lines
- Chapter Six When Orthodox Judaism Goes Public
- Chapter Seven Persistent Ambivalence
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
Summary
In Sydney’s north, planning for an eruv began in the early 2000s by a group of Shabbat-observant Jews. What looked like an innocent project that did not involve much more than erecting a couple of poles in inconspicuous colours with wire attached to them, most of them on private land with the consent of the owners, became a several years-long dispute in which the imagined boundary turned into a real one for many residents, which they sought to prevent by recourse to planning law. This chapter explores how residents and councillors in St. Ives mobilised planning law to draw the acceptable boundaries of Jewishness. By analysing public documents, including a survey on the eruv commissioned by the Local Council as well as Council meeting minutes, media reports, and submissions to local newspapers, I trace the implicit religious and racial boundaries of belonging in this Australian suburb that the eruv rendered visible and I examine how the planning law regime participated in protecting these boundaries, thereby affirming White Christian settlers as rightful inhabitants of this suburban land.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Law and Jewish DifferenceAmbivalent Encounters, pp. 183 - 217Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024