Book contents
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Ecosystem of ICT Standardization
- Part II The Law of ICT Standardization
- Part III Governance Architecture and Decision-Making Process of SDOs
- Part IV Due Process in ICT Standardization
- 10 Case Studies on Dispute Resolution in SDOs
- 11 Tendencies and Best Practices in the Industry
- 12 Revisiting the Legitimacy of ICT Standardization
- Conclusion
- Annex I List of Interviews
- Bibliography
- Index
10 - Case Studies on Dispute Resolution in SDOs
from Part IV - Due Process in ICT Standardization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2023
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Ecosystem of ICT Standardization
- Part II The Law of ICT Standardization
- Part III Governance Architecture and Decision-Making Process of SDOs
- Part IV Due Process in ICT Standardization
- 10 Case Studies on Dispute Resolution in SDOs
- 11 Tendencies and Best Practices in the Industry
- 12 Revisiting the Legitimacy of ICT Standardization
- Conclusion
- Annex I List of Interviews
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter offers three case studies on recent disagreements in the bodies and committees of three SDOs, where procedural guarantees were at stake. These disagreements arose at three different “levels”: standards development, policy-making, and appeal procedures. The discussed disagreements were either resolved through the internal dispute resolution bodies of these SDOs, or escalated to litigation. In particular, this chapter attempts to reveal what can be learned from the experiences of stakeholders involved in these disagreements and concludes that, despite the different nature of these disputes, they arose from the (potential) exclusion of the relevant stakeholders from particular institutional processes.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Law and Practice of Global ICT Standardization , pp. 241 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023