Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Introduction The government’s lawyer
- 1 The Israeli legal system and the rise of judicial activism in the High Court of Justice
- 2 The High Court of Justice Department (HCJD): overview and history
- 3 Litigating for the government
- 4 The dilemma of serving two masters
- 5 Sorting things out: government lawyers in transformative litigation
- 6 The government lawyer as adjudicator: “pre-petitions” and the HCJD
- Conclusion
- Table of Cases
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Introduction The government’s lawyer
- 1 The Israeli legal system and the rise of judicial activism in the High Court of Justice
- 2 The High Court of Justice Department (HCJD): overview and history
- 3 Litigating for the government
- 4 The dilemma of serving two masters
- 5 Sorting things out: government lawyers in transformative litigation
- 6 The government lawyer as adjudicator: “pre-petitions” and the HCJD
- Conclusion
- Table of Cases
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lawyering for the Rule of LawGovernment Lawyers and the Rise of Judicial Power in Israel, pp. 195 - 207Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
and (eds.), Lawyers in Society: An Overview (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995)
and Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988)Google Scholar
ACRI (Association for Civil Rights in Israel), “Negev Bedouins and Unrecognized Villages” (2010)
ACRI (Association for Civil Rights in Israel) Report, Negev Bedouin: Info Sheet (February 5, 2009)
“The Government Rejects the Criticism Made by Religious MKs on Justice Barak,” Ha’aretz December 12, 1994Google Scholar
, , and Israel, The ‘Intifada’ and the Rule of Law (Israeli Ministry of Defense Publications, 1993)Google Scholar
et al. “Auditing Israeli Democracy: Democratic Values in Practice,” (The Israel Democracy Institute, 2010)
“Alternative Model of Appeal Mobilization in Judicial Hierarchies,” 37 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 780 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conflicting Loyalties: Law and Politics in the Attorney General’s Office 1789–1990 (University Press of Kansas, 1992)Google Scholar
“The Attorney General as a Legal Policy-Maker: Conflicting Loyalties,” in (ed.), Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kansas, 1995)Google Scholar
“From an Unwritten to a Written Constitution: The Israeli Challenge in American Perspective,” 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 309 (1995)Google Scholar
Outlawed Pigs: Law, Religion, and Culture in Israel (University of Wisconsin Press, 2007)Google Scholar
“Between the Rule of Law and the Laws of the Ruler: The Supreme Court in Israeli Legal Culture,” 49 (152) Int’l Soc. Sci. J. 193 (1997)Google Scholar
“Fantasies of Liberalism and Liberal Jurisprudence: State Law and Israeli Arab-Palestinian Community,” 34 Isr. L. Rev. 425 (2000)Google Scholar
, and —“Supreme Courts and Public Opinion: General Paradigms and the Israeli Case,” 4(3) Law & Courts 3 (1994)Google Scholar
and Bureaucratic Harassment; Abuse and Maltreatment during Operational Activities in the West Bank in the First Year of the Declaration of Principles (B’Tselem information sheet, September 1994)Google Scholar
“Television Coverage of the Israeli Supreme Court 1968–1992: The Persistence of the Mythical Image,” 42 Isr. L. Rev. 306 (2009)Google Scholar
“The Bedouin in Israel,” Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (July 1999)
“Public Lawyers, Private Values: Can, Should, and Will Government Lawyers Serve the Public Interest?,” 41 B.C.L. Rev. 789 (2000)Google Scholar
“The Duty Defined: Specific Obligations that Follow from Civil Government Lawyers’ General Duty to Serve the Public Interest,” 42 Brandeis L.J. 13 (2003)Google Scholar
“Courting Justice? Legitimation in Lawyering under Israeli Occupation,” 20 Law & Soc. Inquiry 349 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court (Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Practice of Law as Confidence Game,” in (ed.), Sociology of Law (1969)
and “Mutual Bonds: Media Frames and the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 33 Law & Soc. Inquiry 53 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Protection of Human Rights in Israel,” 12 Israel Yearbook of Human Rights 110 (1982)Google Scholar
, “10 Years to the Second Intifada” (press release, September 27, 2010)
“The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation,” 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1281 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Policies (University Press of Kansas, 1995)Google Scholar
The Politics of Justice: The Attorney General and the Making of Legal Policy (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1992)Google Scholar
et al. Impossible Coexistence: Human Rights in Hebron since the Massacre at the Cave of the Patriarchs (B’Tselem information sheet, September 1995)Google Scholar
and (eds.) Ethics and the Legal Profession (New York: Prometheus Books, 1986)
, , and Le Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 5th edn., vol. I (London:Sweet & Maxwell, 1995)Google Scholar
“Unitariness and Independence: Solicitor General Control over Independent Agency Litigation,” 82 Cal. L. Rev. 255 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Judge as Political Powerbroker: Superintending Structural Change in Public Institutions,” 65 Va. L. Rev. 43 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al. “A decade to ‘Amicus Curiae’: Empirical Analysis of Court Decisions,” 34 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 667 (2011) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“Cause Lawyers Crossing the Lines: Patterns of Fragmentation and Cooperation between State and Civil Rights Lawyers in Israel,” 5 Int’l J. Legal Prof. 193 (1998)Google Scholar
“Constitution to Israel? The Constitutional Dialog After the ‘Constitutional Revolution’,” 28 Mishpatim [Law] 149 (1997)Google Scholar
“Does Israel Need A Constitutional Court,” 5 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 117 (1999)Google Scholar
“Do the ‘Haves’ Still Come Out Ahead? Resource Inequalities in Ideological Courts: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 33 Law & Soc’y Rev. 1059 (1999)Google Scholar
“Government Lawyers as Adjudicators: Pre-petitions in the High Court of Justice Department 1990–1997,” 35 Isr. Law Rev. 453 (2003)Google Scholar
“Judicial Activism and Government Practices in Litigation in the Israeli High Court of Justice 1970–2000,” Paper presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco June 2–5, 2011
“Judicial Review and Political Accountability: The Case of the High Court of Justice in Israel”, 32 Isr. L. Rev. 448 (1998)Google Scholar
“Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers and Human Rights: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice during the Intifada,” 33 Law & Soc’y Rev. 319 (1999)Google Scholar
“Non-Delegation and the Reformulation of Legality,” 42 Mishpatim [Law] 397 (2012) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“‘Pre-petitions’ and Constitutional Dilemmas Regarding the Role of Government Lawyers,” 7 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 159 (2004) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“Public Lawyers and Private Clients: An Empirical Observation on the Relative Success Rates of Cause Lawyers,” 21 Law & Pol’y 401 (1999)Google Scholar
“Ripeness and Politics in the High Court of Justice,” 20 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 93 (1996) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“Should Prosecutorial Discretion Enjoy Special Treatment in Judicial Review? A Comparative Analysis of the Law in England and Israel,” Pub. L. 513 (1997)Google Scholar
and “Interest Groups in the Israeli High Court of Justice: Measuring Success in Litigation and in Out-of-Court Settlements,” 23 Law & Pol’y 1 (2001)Google Scholar
and “Legal Defeats – Political Wins: Why Do Elected Representatives Go to Court?,” 38 Comp. Pol. Stud. 75 (2005)Google Scholar
“Do Liberals and Conservatives Differ in Judicial Activism?,” 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1401 (2002)Google Scholar
“Israel,” in and (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New YorkUniversity Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Counsel for the United States: U.S. Attorney General in the Political and Legal System (Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978)Google Scholar
, and “Israel’s Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: An Empirical Study,” 96 Cornell L. Rev. 693 (2011)Google Scholar
and The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty (Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
“More than 100,000 ultra-orthodox took part in protest against the rule of law,” Ha’Aretz June 18, 2010Google Scholar
and Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons (Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
“The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy,” 91 Yale L.J. 635 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawyers’ Ethics in an Adversary System (New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1975)
“The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of the Lawyer-Client Relation,” 85 Yale L.J. 1060 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Adversary System in Forum Lectures, Series 3, 1 (Washington, D.C.: Voice of America, 1961)Google Scholar
and “Professional Responsibility: Report of the Joint Conference,” 44 Am. Bar Ass’n. J. 1159 (1958)Google Scholar
“Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Soc’y Rev. 95 (1974)Google Scholar
Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)Google Scholar
“Jewish and Democratic? A Rejoinder to the ‘Ethnic Democracy’ Debate,” 4 Isr. Stud. 44 (1999)Google Scholar
“The Attorney General: A Critical Examination of New Trends,” 5 Plilim [Israel Journal of Criminal Justice] 27 (1996) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Attorney General Freezes the Appointment of the Chief Commissioner,” Ynet, November 18, 2010Google Scholar
“The Ideal and the Actual in the Law: Fantasies and Practices of New York City Lawyers, 1870–1910,” in (ed.), The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America (1984)
Disaster by Decree: The Supreme Court Decisions on Race and the Schools (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
“Must Government Lawyers ‘Seek Justice’ in Civil Litigation?” 9 Widener J. Pub. L. 235 (2000)Google Scholar
“Ulmert Calls for Investigation of the OAG for Obstruction of Justice,” Walla News June 23, 2011Google Scholar
Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
III “Note, Loyalty in Government Litigation: Department of Justice Representation of Agency Clients,” 37 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1569 (1996)Google Scholar
“Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court,” 56 J. Pol. 752 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and “Judging in an Unjust Regime: South Africa’s Appellate Division, 1950–1990,” 17 Am. Rev. Pol. 245 (1996)Google Scholar
“The Night on which the Supreme Court was Almost Conquered,” Yediot Acharonot, May 14, 1997Google Scholar
and “The Consequences of DOJ Control of Litigation on Agencies’ Programs,” 52 Admin. L. Rev. 1345 (2000)Google Scholar
“The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions,” 25 Law & Soc. Inquiry 91 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
and “Judicial Setbacks, Material Gains: Terror Litigation at the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 7 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 664 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Jurocracy: Government Lawyers, Agency Programs and Judicial Decisions (Washington, D.C.: Lexington Books, 1977)Google Scholar
“An Effort to Prevent Violence in the Ultra-orthodox and Secular Demonstrations in Jerusalem Today,” Ha’Aretz February 14, 1999Google Scholar
“Inflation of Bills: From Four to Average of 40 Bills for Each MK,” Ha’aretz October 30, 2000Google Scholar
“Rabbi David Yosef: ‘Antisemistic forces in the legal bureaucracy calls the Shas people parasites’,” Ha’aretz February 2, 1999Google Scholar
“Rabbi Ovadia Yosef: ‘The HCJ Justices Are Worse than Non-Jewish Courts and Should not Be Regarded as Judges of Israel’,” Ha’aretz, October 8, 1996Google Scholar
, and “An Extreme Ultra-orthodox Attack on the HCJ: ‘Barak is the Enemy of the Jewish People’,” Ha’Aretz February 10, 1999Google Scholar
, , and “Rabbi Yosef: The HCJ Justices are Villains and are the Cause of All the Suffering in the World,” Ha’Aretz February 11, 1999Google Scholar
Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and the United States (Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
“Adversarial Legalism and American Government,” 10 J. Pol’y Analysis & Mgmt. 369 (1991)Google Scholar
“Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty: A Biography of Power Struggles,” 1 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 323 (1993) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“The Legal Transformation of Ethnic Geography: Israeli Law and the Palestinian Landholder 1948–1967,” 33 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 923 (2001)Google Scholar
“Bureaucratic Activism and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Department of Justice and Its Entry into the Centre of Government,” 42 Can. Pub. Admin. 476 (1999)Google Scholar
“Canada: Legal Services and the Role of Government Lawyers” (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Budapest, July 4–7, 2001)
“Lifting the Veil of Secrecy: Judicial Review of Administrative Detention in the Israeli Supreme Court,” 45 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 639, 689 (2012)Google Scholar
“The Origin and Current Meaning of ‘Judicial Activism’,” 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1441 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The HCJ and Its Wide Concept of Its Role,” in , , and Judicial Activism at the High Court of Justice (Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000)
“The New Basic Laws on Human Rights: A Mini-revolution in Israeli Constitutional Law?,” in and (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
“The Government Gorilla: Why Does Government Come Out Ahead in Appellate Courts?,” in and (eds.), In Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? (Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Judgment in Jerusalem: Chief Justice Simon Agranat and the Zionist Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar
“The Duty of Zealous Advocacy and the Ethics of the Federal Government Lawyer: The Three Hardest Questions,” 64 S. Cal. L. Rev. 951 (1991)Google Scholar
and “Skewing the Results: The Role of Lawyers in Transmitting Legal Rules,” 5 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 375 (1997)Google Scholar
“Who is the Client of the Federal Government Lawyer? An Analysis of the Wrong Question,” 37 Fed. B.J. 61 (1978)Google Scholar
“The Solicitor General as Mediator between Court and Agency,” 185 Mich. St. L. Rev. 2009Google Scholar
“The Modification of Equitable Decrees in Institutional Reform Litigation: A Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Adoption of the Second Circuit’s Flexible Test,” 58 Brook. L. Rev. 1239 (1993)Google Scholar
“Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform,” 49 B. C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)Google Scholar
“Representation of the State in Court” (PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2009)
and “The ‘Binding’ Position of the Attorney General,” in (ed.), Shamgar Book, vol. I (2003)
“Let’s Sue All the Lawyers: The Rise of Claims Against Lawyers for Aiding and Abetting a Client’s Breach of Fiduciary Duty,” 40 Ariz. St. L.J. 135 (2008)Google Scholar
“The Invention of ‘Hebrew Law’ in Mandatory Palestine,” 46 Am. J. Comp. L. 339 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and The Betrayed Profession: Lawyering at the End of the Twentieth Century (Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
“The Adversary System Excuse,” in (ed.) The Good Lawyer: Lawyers’ Roles and Lawyers’ Ethics (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld, 1983)Google Scholar
and “Reflections on Professional Responsibility in a Regulatory State,” 63 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1105 (1995)Google Scholar
“Aharon Barak: We Shall Fight Like Lions against the Individual Survey on Judges,” Globs December 12, 2001
“Changes in the New Proposal to Implement the Or Commission Report,” Globs November 22, 1998Google Scholar
“Conservatives and the Seven Sins of Judicial Activism,” 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1217 (2002)Google Scholar
“Public Interest Litigation & The Transformation of the Supreme Court of India,” in , and (eds.), Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Law and Culture in Israel at the Threshold of the Twenty First Century (Tel Aviv: Am Oved, 2008)Google Scholar
The Decline of Formalism and the Rise of Values in Israeli Law (Tel Aviv: Ma’agalei Deot, 1993)Google Scholar
Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar
and “Rethinking Law’s ‘Allurements’: A Relational Analysis of Social Movement Lawyers in the United States,” in and (eds.), Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
“Party Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada 1949–1992,” 26 Can. J. Pol. Sci. 523 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
As Nomadism Ends: The Israeli Bedouin of the Negev (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997)Google Scholar
“On the Job of the Lawyer at the High Court of Justice Department,” 2 Ma’asei Mishpat [The Practice of Law] 53 (2009) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“Government Lawyers’ Ethics in a System of Checks and Balances,” 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1293 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“A Wave of Intimidation against OAG Staff after the Ultra-orthodox Demonstration against the HCJ,” Ha’aretz February 17, 1999Google Scholar
“Separation of Powers and the Scope of Federal Equitable Remedies,” 30 Stan. L. Rev. 661 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Note, “Developments in the Law: Conflicts of Interest in the Legal Profession,” 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1244 (1981)
Note, “Government Counsel and their Obligations,” 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1409 (2008)
Note, “Rethinking the Professional Responsibilities of Federal Agency Lawyers,” 115 Harv. L. Rev. 1170 (2002)
, Jr. and “Keeping Gideon’s Promise: A Comparison of the American and Israeli Public Defender Experience,” 29 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 203 (2004)Google Scholar
and “Judicial Guidance: Comments for Legislative Amendment in Supreme Court Decisions,” 34 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 473 (2011) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
, Jr. Between Law and Politics: The Solicitor General and the Structuring of Race, Gender and Reproductive Rights Litigation (Texas A&M University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
, Jr. “United States Attorneys – Whom Shall They Serve?,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 129 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Two Problems in Administrative Law: Political Polarity on the District of Columbia Circuit and Judicial Deterrence of Agency Rulemaking,” Duke L.J. 300 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Am I My Client?: The Role Confusion of a Lawyer Activist,” 31 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 443 (1996)Google Scholar
“Enlightened Despot,” The New Republic, April 2007 (Review of The Judge in a Democracy by Aharon Barak, 2006)Google Scholar
“A Very Narrow Bridge: Constitution, Justice, Equity and Remedy,” 37 Mishpatim [law] 701 (2007) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“The Movement for the Quality of Government to HCJ: Order the Bar to Discharge Hoter Yishai,” Ha’aretz March 13, 1997Google Scholar
“The Public Lawyer and the Protection of Human Rights” (Lecture, 2004)
“Unfair Federal Rules of Procedure: Why Does the Government Get More Time?” 33 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 493 (2010)Google Scholar
The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?, 2nd edn. (University of Chicago Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taking Space Seriously: Law, Space and Society in Contempoary Israel (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004)Google Scholar
, and The Arab-Bedouin in the Negev-Naqab Desert in Israel: Response to the Report of the State of Israel on Implementing the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (Shadow Report submitted by The Negev Coexistence Forum for Civil Equality, 2010)
“The Ethical Negotiator: Ethical Dilemmas, Unhappy Clients, and Angry Third Parties,” 26 Constr. Law. 12 (2006)Google Scholar
“Politics, Law, and the Office of the Solicitor General,” in (ed.), Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kansas, 1995)Google Scholar
The Solicitor General: The Politics of Law (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
and Democracy by Decree: What Happens When Courts Run Government (Yale University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
and “Cause Lawyering and the Reproduction of Professional Authority,” in and (eds.), Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change (New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1974)Google Scholar
and Intifada: The Palestinian Uprising – Israel’s Third Front (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990)Google Scholar
“Book Review: Beyond the Hero Judge: Institutional Reform Litigation as Litigation,” 97 Mich. L. Rev. 1994 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Civil Rights Injunctions over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders,” 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 550 (2006)Google Scholar
“The Role of Judges in Settling Complex Cases: The Agent Orange Example,” 53 U. Chi. L. Rev. 337 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and “Anatomy of Discourse and Division in the Supreme Court: Quantitative Analysis,” 20 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 749 (1997) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
, and “Reference Patterns of the Supreme Court: A Quantitative Analysis,” 27 Mishpatim [Law] 119 (1996) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“The Government to Set Up Clinics for Bedouin: We Shall Build One Clinic,” Ha’aretz March 21, 2003Google Scholar
Collective Punishment in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (B’Tselem Report, November, 1990)Google Scholar
“The Observance of International Law in the Administered Territories,” 1 Israeli Yearbook of Human Rights 262 (1971)Google Scholar
“‘Landmark Cases’ and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel’s High Court of Justice,” 24 Law & Soc’y Rev. 781 (1990)Google Scholar
“Suspended in Space: Bedouins under the Law of Israel,” 30 Law & Soc’y Rev. 231 (1996)Google Scholar
“The Politics of Reasonableness: Discretion as Judicial Power,” 5 Theory and Criticism 7 (1994)Google Scholar
Who Guards the Guardians?: Judicial Control of Administration (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1988)Google Scholar
, and “Ideology, Status and Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court,” 86 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 464 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Reflections on the Protection of the Rights of the Individual: Form and Substance,” 12 Isr. L. Rev. 32 (1977)Google Scholar
“The Critical Challenge of Judicial Independence in Israel,” in and (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World (2001)
“The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics,” Wis. L. Rev. 29 (1978)Google Scholar
“Wearing Many Hats: Confidentiality and Conflicts of Interests Issues for the California Public Lawyer,” 25 Sw. U.L. Rev. 265 (1996)Google Scholar
and “Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals,” 36 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 235 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Solicitor General and the Interests of the United States,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 165 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and Gellhorn & Byse’s Administrative Law: Cases and Materials, 10 edn. (New York:Foundation Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Radicals in Robes (New York:Basic Books, 2005)
Supreme Court of Canada: Statistics 2001 to 2011
Symposium: Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers, 9(2) Widener J. Pub. L. 199 (2000)
and (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York University Press, 1995)
“Sued into Submission: Judicial Creation of Standards in the Manufacture and Distribution of Lawful Products – The New Orleans Lawsuit Against Gun Manufacturers,” 46 Loy. L. Rev. 1275 (2000)Google Scholar
United Kingdom Ministry of Justice, Judicial and Court Statistics 2010
“Two Models of Prosecutorial Professionalism,” in (ed.), The Prosecutor (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979)Google Scholar
“Exporting the Missouri Plan: Judicial Appointment Commissions,” (in: “Symposium: The Fallacies and Fixables of Merit Selection and the Constituencies that Support Missouri Plan Reform”) 74 Mo. L. Rev. 783 (2009)Google Scholar
“‘For the United States’: Government Lawyers in Court,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 107 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel,” 8 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 556 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970,” 21 Law & Soc’y Rev. 403 (1987)Google Scholar
(ed.), Violations of Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 1990/1991 (Jerusalem:B’Tselem, 1991)Google Scholar
“The Labor Party: Friedman’s Proposal Will Cause Coalition Crisis,” Ha’Aretz November 16, 2007Google Scholar
“Administrative Law,” in and (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar
“Evidence in the High Court of Justice,” 1 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 295 (1993) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“Secondary Legislation: Procedures and Directives,” 11 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 339 (1986) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“The Attorney General: A Public Servant, Not a Government Servant,” in (ed.), The Klinghoffer Book on Public Law (Jerusalem, 1993)Google Scholar
“The Lawyer in the Public Service,” in and (eds.), Zamir Book: On Law, Government and Society (Jerusalem, 1995) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“The Role of the Attorney General in Times of Crisis: The Israeli Shin Bet Affair,” in (ed.), The Role of Courts in Society (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1988)Google Scholar
“Unreasonableness as Ground of Review,” in and (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar
“This is how Noam Solberg’s Road is Paved to the Supreme Court,” Ha’aretz October 27, 2011Google Scholar
“National Rulemaking Through Trial Courts: The Big Case and Institutional Reform,” 51 UCLA L. Rev. 1015 (2004)Google Scholar
“The Lawyer’s Duty not to Mislead the Court,” 24 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 413 (2000) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
“Hoter Yishai: The Judicial System is Frozen and Very Conservative,” Ha’aretz February 25, 1997Google Scholar
“Symposium: The Legal Profession: Looking Backward: Combining Professionalism, Nation Building and Public Service: The Professional Project of the Israeli Bar 1928–2002,” 71 Fordham L. Rev. 1621 (2003)Google Scholar
“Introduction: The System of Government,” in and (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar
“Protecting Fundamental Rights in Israel without a Written Constitution,” in and (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar