Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:39:52.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - World War II Legacies for India

from Part III - Northeast Asia and India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Sunanda K. Datta-Ray
Affiliation:
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), Singapore
Get access

Summary

Modern India was born out of the ashes of World War II. For more than a hundred years before the war India had no international personality, or had only a notional one when the British needed another signatory to the Peace of Versailles or an extra vote at the League of Nations. The war changed all that. Though other factors were at work, the timing and manner of India's midnight tryst with destiny — the transfer of power on 14–15 August 1947 — were largely the result of the tectonic shifts that altered the contours of the world after six searing years of conflict.

The India that emerged was hungry, bankrupt and in ferment. It had very little industry because of the “desire to keep India as a market for British manufactured goods after the war”, as Lord Mountbatten noted when his wartime request for large-scale parachute production in India was turned down. Sixty years later, India's rulers are still grappling with the residue of some of those problems. Regardless of the political party they might belong to, they find it unacceptable that the global balance of power as reflected in the composition of the United Nations Security Council, the constitution and operations of international economic and financial agencies and the distribution of nuclear weapons shou to reflect the war's outcome. Ironically, India was technically one of the victorious nations in 1945. But that does not mean that it either enjoys or approves of the spoils of victory.

While the victors of World War I sought to crush their vanquished enemies, the victors of World War II tried to establish their own permanent supremacy, albeit in a polity that institutions like the United Nations and the World Bank tried to make more equitable. It was the creation of a new two-tier world order.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×