Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- About the Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Southeast Asia
- 3 Legacies of World War II in Indochina
- 4 Transient and Enduring Legacies of World War II: The Case of Indonesia
- 5 The ‘Black-out’ Syndrome and the Ghosts of World War II: The War as a ‘Divisive Issue’ in Malaysia
- 6 The Legacies of World War II for Myanmar
- 7 World War II: Transient and Enduring Legacies for the Philippines
- 8 Singapore's Missing War
- 9 World War II and Thailand after Sixty Years: Legacies and Latent Side Effects
- Part III Northeast Asia and India
- Index
7 - World War II: Transient and Enduring Legacies for the Philippines
from Part II - Southeast Asia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- About the Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Southeast Asia
- 3 Legacies of World War II in Indochina
- 4 Transient and Enduring Legacies of World War II: The Case of Indonesia
- 5 The ‘Black-out’ Syndrome and the Ghosts of World War II: The War as a ‘Divisive Issue’ in Malaysia
- 6 The Legacies of World War II for Myanmar
- 7 World War II: Transient and Enduring Legacies for the Philippines
- 8 Singapore's Missing War
- 9 World War II and Thailand after Sixty Years: Legacies and Latent Side Effects
- Part III Northeast Asia and India
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION: TWO PASTS IN THE PRESENT
The question of wartime legacies is particularly relevant to the Philippines because a key protagonist of the war in the Pacific was the United States, and the Philippines was its sole colony. Because of this forty-year colonial relationship, coupled with the experience of fighting shoulder-to-shoulder with Americans against the Japanese enemy, it seems a foregone conclusion that the Filipinos would continue to be fixated with the United States ever since. In contrast to the subjects of Britain, France and Holland, who managed to shrug off any special relationship with the former mother country, the Philippines is seen to be very much tied, still, to Mother America. World War II, if anything, would have cemented this relationship.
This image is partly true. As America's colony, the Philippines was inevitably a focal point of World War II in the Asia-Pacific. General Douglas MacArthur had been Field Marshall of the Philippine armed forces at the outbreak of the war. With the surrender of the Filipino-American forces to the Japanese in the Bataan Peninsula, MacArthur left in humiliation, vowing to return. For him, to retake or “redeem” the islands was almost a messianic endeavour. Remembering this promise, a great number of Filipinos, unlike their neighbours in Southeast Asia, continued to thumb their noses at the Japanese administration. Of all the Southeast Asian countries, the Philippines consequently suffered the most in terms of the destruction of life and property and the dislocation of millions of its inhabitants.
A brief rundown is in order for those unfamiliar with what the Philippines experienced in World War II. Political events certainly moved swiftly through the war years: the Japanese takeover, the dogged “last stand” of the defenders at Bataan and Corregidor, the establishment of a new colonial order with its own language, Nihongo, and its own visions of Asian co-prosperity. Then in October 1943 came the granting of independence, three years in advance of the American timetable, a move designed to win the Filipinos over to Japan and jointly defend the country against the imminent return of the United States.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Legacies of World War II in South and East Asia , pp. 74 - 91Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2007