Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:11:14.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Customary law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Janina Dill
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

The US has not ratified the API. The next task is hence to establish the customary definition of a legitimate target of attack. Customary law is defined as a ‘general practice accepted as law’. The 168 ratifications of the API bear testimony to the fact that the definition of a legitimate target that was hammered out during the diplomatic conference and adopted on 8 June 1977 is widely accepted as law. A universally ratified treaty provides a strong presumption that customary law is congruent with its positive counterpart. Yet the API, contrary to the Geneva Conventions, is not universally ratified. Among other countries, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Eritrea, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Pakistan and the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, like the US, are not parties to the treaty, suggesting they do not accept it as binding IL. While not a large group, it includes the states that have most often been involved in interstate armed conflict in the recent past. In fact, with one exception there has never been an international armed conflict in which the Protocol was applicable among parties on different sides in the war since its entry into force in 1979. The practice of warfare is hence dominated by states that are not bound by the positive definition of a legitimate target of attack. Do these states disagree with the way in which the principles of proportionality and distinction are enshrined in the treaty? If they do and their practice hence diverges from positive law, what is the customary definition of a legitimate target of attack?

The definition of a legitimate target of attack

The first step in attempting to establish the customary definition of a legitimate target of attack is an investigation of the status of proportionality and distinction pre-positivisation, meaning before the diplomatic conference was convened in 1971. To that end I will briefly sketch the principles’ respective histories. This endeavour prepares the ground for an assessment of how the API may have influenced the customary definition of a legitimate target of attack.

Type
Chapter
Information
Legitimate Targets?
Social Construction, International Law and US Bombing
, pp. 112 - 142
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Customary law
  • Janina Dill, University of Oxford
  • Book: Legitimate Targets?
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297463.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Customary law
  • Janina Dill, University of Oxford
  • Book: Legitimate Targets?
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297463.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Customary law
  • Janina Dill, University of Oxford
  • Book: Legitimate Targets?
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297463.008
Available formats
×