Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:26:35.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2017

Christian A. Witting
Christian A. Witting
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Liability of Corporate Groups and Networks , pp. 423 - 450
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Antunes, J. E., Liability of Corporate Groups: Autonomy and Control in Parent–Subsidiary Relationships in US, German and EU Law (Deventer, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1994)Google Scholar
Austin, R. P., Ford, H. A. J., and Ramsay, I. M., Company Directors: Principles of Law and Corporate Governance (Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2005)Google Scholar
Austin, R. P. and Ramsay, I. M., Ford’s Principles of Corporations Law (12th edn., Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2005)Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M. and Henderson, M. R., Limited Liability: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2016)Google Scholar
Bakan, J., The Corporation (London, Constable & Robinson Ltd, 2004)Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., An Introduction to English Legal History (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 4th edn., 2007)Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., and Lodge, M., Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2012)Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I., The Law of Corporate Groups: Substantive Law (Boston, MA, Little, Brown & Company, 1987)Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I., The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I., et al., Blumberg on Corporate Groups (2nd edn., New York, NY, Aspen Publishers, 2005)Google Scholar
Boggio, A., Compensating Asbestos Victims: Law and the Dark Side of Industrialization (Burlington, VT, Ashgate Publishing Company, 2013)Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Regulatory Capitalism (Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2008)Google Scholar
Calabresi, G., The Costs of Accidents (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Carroll, S. J., et al., Asbestos Litigation (Santa Monica, CA, RAND Institute for Civil Justice, 2005)Google Scholar
Carty, H., An Analysis of the Economic Torts (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2012)Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Boston, MA, Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Cheffins, B., Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Coase, R. H., The Firm, the Market and the Law (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Coburn, N., Coburn’s Insolvent Trading (2nd edn., Pyrmont, NSW, Law Book Co., 2003)Google Scholar
Coleman, J., The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Collins, Lord et al., Dicey, Morris and Collins: The Conflict of Law (15th edn., London, Sweet and Maxwell, 2012)Google Scholar
Cooke, C. A., Corporation, Trust and Company: An Essay in Legal History (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1951)Google Scholar
Cooke, R., Turning Points of the Common Law (London, Sweet and Maxwell, 1997)Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G., A Behavioural Theory of the Firm (2nd edn., Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1992)Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, M., Rights, Persons, and Organizations: A Legal Theory for Bureaucratic Society (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Davies, P. L., Introduction to Company Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Davies, P. L. and Worthington, S., Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law (9th edn., London, Sweet and Maxwell, 2012)Google Scholar
Davies, P. S., Accessory Liability (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2015)Google Scholar
Deakin, S., Johnston, A., and Markesinis, B., Markesinis and Deakin’s Tort Law (7th edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Dietrich, J. and Ridge, P., Accessories in Private Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Dine, J., The Governance of Corporate Groups (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (Wokingham, UK, Addison-Wesley, 1993)Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Boston, MA, Harvard University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Eroglu, M., Multinational Enterprises and Tort Liabilities (Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2008)Google Scholar
Farrar, J., Corporate Governance: Theories, Principles, and Practice (2nd edn., South Melbourne, Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Ferran, E., Corporate Finance Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Finnis, J. M., Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Fischer, J. and Ravizza, M., Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Fisse, B. and Braithwaite, J., Corporations, Crime and Accountability (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
French, P. A., Collective and Corporate Responsibility (New York, NY, Columbia University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Gaughan, P. A., Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Restructurings (4th edn., Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 2007)Google Scholar
Gilbert, M., A Theory of Political Obligation (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Giliker, P., The Europeanisation of English Tort Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2014)Google Scholar
Giliker, P., Vicarious Liability in Tort: A Comparative Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Goldacre, B., Bad Pharma (London, Fourth Estate, 2013)Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. C. P. and Zipursky, B. C., The Oxford Introductions to US Law: Torts (New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Goode, R., Principles of Corporate Insolvency Law (4th edn., London, Sweet and Maxwell, 2011)Google Scholar
Gordley, J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contracts, Unjust Enrichment (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Green, S., Causation in Negligence (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2015)Google Scholar
Griffin, R. W., Fundamentals of Management (8th edn., Mason, OH, South-Western Cengage Learning, 2011)Google Scholar
Gullifer, L. and Payne, J., Corporate Finance Law: Principles and Policy (2nd edn., Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2015)Google Scholar
Haigh, G., Asbestos House: The Secret History of James Hardie Industries (Carlton North, Scribe Publications Pty Ltd, 2006)Google Scholar
Hannigan, B., Company Law (4th edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Harding, A., The Law Courts of Medieval England (London, Allen and Unwin, 1973)Google Scholar
Hatch, M. J., Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Views (3rd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J., From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism (San Francisco, CA, New Lexington Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Howells, G. (ed.), The Law of Product Liability (2nd edn., London, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2007)Google Scholar
Hutter, B. and Powers, M. (eds.), Organizational Encounters with Risk (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D., A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Isaacs, T., Moral Responsibility in Collective Contexts (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T. M. and Wertheimer, A. I. (eds.), Modern Pharmaceutical Industry: A Primer (Sudbury, MA, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2010)Google Scholar
Jones, G., Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Jones, G., Multinationals and Global Capitalism: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Joseph, S., Corporations and Transnational Human Rights Litigation (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2004)Google Scholar
Kraakman, R., et al., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Kutz, C., Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Li, J. J., Blockbuster Drugs (New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
List, C. and Pettit, P., Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Lo, S. H. C., In Search of Corporate Accountability: Liabilities of Corporate Participants (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar
Lucy, W., Philosophy of Private Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Luntz, H., Hambly, D., Burns, K., Dietrich, J., and Foster, N., Torts: Cases and Commentary (7th edn., Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2012)Google Scholar
Marmor, A., Positive Law and Objective Values (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
McCullough, J. and Tweedale, G., Defending the Indefensible: The Global Asbestos Industry and its Fight for Survival (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
McQueen, R., A Social History of Company Law (Burlington, VT, Ashgate Publishing Company, 2009)Google Scholar
Mevorach, I., Insolvency within Multinational Enterprise Groups (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A., The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea (London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2003)Google Scholar
Miller, C. J. and Goldberg, R. S., Product Liability (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Morse, G. (ed.), Palmer’s Company Law, Volume 1 (Online) (London, Sweet and Maxwell, 2016)Google Scholar
Mortensen, R., Garnett, R., and Keyes, M., Private International Law in Australia (3rd edn., Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2015)Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P. T., Multinational Enterprises and the Law (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Muscat, A., The Liability of the Holding Company for the Debts of its Insolvent Subsidiaries (Aldershot, UK, Dartmouth, 1996)Google Scholar
Nohria, N., Dyer, D., and Dalzell, F., Changing Fortunes: Remaking the Industrial Corporation (New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 2002)Google Scholar
Oliphant, K. (ed.), The Law of Tort (3rd edn., London, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2015)Google Scholar
Owen, D. G. and Davis, M. J., Owen and Davis on Products Liability (4th edn., Thomson Reuters, 2014)Google Scholar
Perrow, C., The Next Catastrophe (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T., A Concise History of the Common Law (5th edn., Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Co., 1956)Google Scholar
Plunkett, J., The Duty of Care: A Comparative Common Law Analysis (DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015)Google Scholar
Porat, A. and Stein, A., Tort Liability under Uncertainty (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Posner, R. Economic Analysis of Law (4th edn., Boston, MA, Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Powell, F. J., Parent and Subsidiary Corporations: Liability of a Parent Corporation for the Obligations of its Subsidiary (Chicago, IL, Callaghan, 1931)Google Scholar
Prosser, WL., Handbook of the Law of Torts (St Paul, MN, West Publishing Co., 1941)Google Scholar
Rapakko, T., Unlimited Shareholder Liability in Multinationals (The Hague, Kluwer, 1997)Google Scholar
Reason, J., Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents (Burlington, VT, Ashgate Publishing Company, 1998)Google Scholar
Sappideen, C. and Vines, P. (eds.), Fleming’s The Law of Torts (10th edn., Pyrmont, NSW, Thomson Reuters, 2011)Google Scholar
Schütze, R., European Union Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Searle, J. R., Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Simester, A. P., Spencer, J. R., Sullivan, G. R., and Virgo, G. J., Simester and Sullivan’s Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine (5th edn., Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2013)Google Scholar
Skeel, D., Icarus in the Boardroom (New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Solomon, J. and Solomon, A., Corporate Governance and Accountability (Chichester, UK, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 2004)Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., Product Liability (London, Butterworths, 1994)Google Scholar
Steel, S., Proof of Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Risk and Reason (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Tabb, C. J. and Brubaker, R., Bankruptcy Law Principles, Policies, and Practice (3rd edn., New Providence, NJ, LexisNexis, Inc, 2010)Google Scholar
Teubner, G., Networks as Connected Contracts (ed. Collins, H; tr. Everson, M.) (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2011)Google Scholar
Tuomela, R., The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Turton, G., Evidential Uncertainty in Causation in Negligence (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2016)Google Scholar
Tweedale, G., Magic Mineral to Killer Dust: Turner and Newall and the Asbestos Hazard (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Weinrib, E., The Idea of Private Law (Boston, MA, Harvard University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Whittaker, S., Liability for Products: English Law, French Law, and European Harmonization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Whittington, R. and Mayer, M., The European Corporation: Strategy, Structure, and Social Science (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Wieser, R. T., Liability within Corporate Groups (Bad Frankenhausen, Societas Verlag, 2013)Google Scholar
Witting, C., Liability for Negligent Misstatements (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Witting, C., Street on Torts (14th edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Worthington, S., Sealy and Worthington’s Text, Cases and Materials in Company Law (11th edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Yoshino, M. Y. and Rangan, U. Srinivasa, Strategic Alliances: An Entrepreneurial Approach to Globalization (Boston, MA, Harvard University Business School Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Zerk, J., Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Adebola, B., ‘Proposed Feasibility Oversight for Pre-pack Administration in England and Wales: Window Dressing or Effective Reform?’ [2015] Journal of Business Law 591Google Scholar
Abraham, K. S., ‘Catastrophic Oil Spills and the Problem of Insurance’ (2011) 64 Vanderbilt Law Review 1770Google Scholar
Abraham, K. S., ‘Individual Action and Collective Responsibility: The Dilemma of Mass Tort Reform’ (1987) 73 Virginia Law Review 845Google Scholar
Admati, A. R., Conti-Brown, P., and Pfleiderer, P., ‘Liability Holding Companies’ (2012) 59 UCLA Law Review 852Google Scholar
Aldred, C., ‘UK Asbestos Exclusions Likely to Spread’ (2003) 37 Business Insurance 37Google Scholar
Anabtawi, I. and Stout, L., ‘Fiduciary Duties for Activist Shareholders’ (2008) 60 Stanford Law Review 1255Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., ‘Financing Asbestos Claims: Coverage Issues, Manville’s Bankruptcy and the Claims Facility’ (1987) 54 Journal of Risk and Insurance 429Google Scholar
Anderson, H., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility – The Case for Unsecured Creditors’ (2007) 7 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 93Google Scholar
Anderson, H., ‘Creditors’ Rights of Recovery: Economic Theory, Corporate Jurisprudence and the Role of Fairness’ (2006) 30 Melbourne University Law Review 1Google Scholar
Anderson, H., ‘Parent Company Liability for Asbestos Claims: Some International Insights’ (2011) 31 Legal Studies 547Google Scholar
Anderson, H., ‘Piercing the Veil on Corporate Groups in Australia: The Case for Reform’ (2009) 33 Melbourne University Law Review 333Google Scholar
Anderson, H., ‘Pressing the Right Buttons: Australian Case Studies in the Protection of Employee Entitlements against Corporate Insolvency’ (2014) 153 International Labour Review 117Google Scholar
Anderson, H., ‘Thinking outside the Square – Some Alternative Approaches to the Protection of Employee Entitlements’ (2014) 32 Company & Securities Law Journal 23Google Scholar
Anderson, H., ‘Veil Piercing and Corporate Groups – An Australian Perspective’ [2010] New Zealand Law Review 1Google Scholar
Angwin, H., ‘Merger and Acquisition Typologies: A Review’, in Faulkner, D., Teerikangas, S., and Joseph, R. J. (eds.), The Handbook of Mergers and Acquisitions (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012), ch. 3Google Scholar
Aristova, E., ‘Jurisdiction of the English Court over Overseas Human Rights Violation’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 468Google Scholar
Arlen, J. H. and Kraakman, R., ‘Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes’ (1997) 72 New York University Law Review 687Google Scholar
Arlen, J. H. and MacLeod, W. B., ‘Beyond Master-Servant: A Critique of Vicarious Liability’, in Madden, M. S. (ed.), Exploring Tort Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005), ch. 4Google Scholar
Arnold, D. G., ‘Corporate Moral Agency’, in French, P. A. and Wettstein, H. K. (eds.), Shared Intentions and Collective Responsibility (Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, Inc, 2006), ch. 17Google Scholar
Ashwin, A., ‘Tortious Liability of Company in Winding Up: An Analysis’ (2005) 26 Company Lawyer 163Google Scholar
Atanasov, V., Boone, A., and Haushalter, D., ‘Is There Shareholder Expropriation in the United States? An Analysis of Publicly Traded Subsidiaries’ (2010) 45 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1Google Scholar
Bagley, C. E. and Tvarnø, C. D., ‘Pharmaceutical Public-Private Partnerships: Moving from the Bench to the Bedside’ (2014) 4 Harvard Business Law Journal 373Google Scholar
Bailey, S., ‘Causation in Negligence: What Is a Material Contribution?’ (2010) 30 Legal Studies 167Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M., ‘Abolishing Veil Piercing’ (2001) 26 Journal of Corporation Law 479Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M., ‘Why a Board? Group Decisionmaking in Corporate Governance’ (2002) 55 Vanderbilt Law Review 1Google Scholar
Baird, D., ‘Substantive Consolidation Today’ (2005) 47 Boston College Law Review 5Google Scholar
Balganesh, S., ‘Foreseeability and Copyright Incentives’ (2009) 122 Harvard Law Review 1569Google Scholar
Ballantine, H. W., ‘Separate Entity of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations’ (1925–6) 14 California Law Review 12Google Scholar
Barliant, R., Karcazes, D. G., and Sherry, A. M., ‘From Free-Fall to Free-for-All: The Rise of Pre-packaged Asbestos Bankruptcies’ (2004) 12 American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review 441Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S., ‘Beyond the M-Form: Toward a Managerial Theory of the Firm’ (1993) 14 Strategic Management Journal 23Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S., ‘The Transnational Organization’, in Pugh, D. S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., London, Penguin Books Ltd, 2007), ch. 4Google Scholar
Bartrip, P., ‘Changing Attitudes to Risk? Managing Myxomatosis in Twentieth-Century Britain’, in Hutter, B. (ed.), Anticipating Risks and Organising Risk Regulation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010), ch. 4Google Scholar
Baughen, S., ‘Multinationals and the Export of Hazard’ (1995) 58 Modern Law Review 54Google Scholar
Ben-Ishai, S. and Lubben, S. J., ‘Involuntary Creditors and Corporate Bankruptcy’ (2012) University of British Columbia Law Review 253Google Scholar
Bergkamp, L., ‘The Environmental Liability Directive and Liability of Parent Companies for Damage Caused by Their Subsidiaries (“Enterprise Liability”)’ (2016) 13 European Company Law 183Google Scholar
Berle, A. A., ‘The Theory of Enterprise Entity’ (1947) 47 Columbia Law Review 343Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. and Pedersen, T., ‘Strategy and Management in MNE Subsidiaries’, in Rugman, A. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009), ch. 14Google Scholar
Blasses, W. C., ‘Redefining into Reality: Substantive Consolidation of Parent Corporations and Subsidiaries’ (2008) 24 Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal 469Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I., ‘Limited Liability and Corporate Groups’ (1986) 11 Journal of Corporation Law 573Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I., ‘The Transformation of Modern Corporation Law: The Law of Corporate Groups’ (2005) 37 Connecticut Law Review 605Google Scholar
Böckli, P., et al., ‘Shareholder Engagement and Identification’ (European Company Law Experts, 2015)Google Scholar
Boggio, A., ‘Linking Corporate Power to Corporate Structures: An Empirical Analysis’ (2012) 22 Social and Legal Studies 107Google Scholar
Bondi, B. J., ‘Dangerous Liaisons: Collective Scienter in SEC Enforcement Actions’ (2009) New York University Journal of Law & Business 1Google Scholar
Booth, R., ‘Limited Liability and the Efficient Allocation of Resources’ (1994) 89 Northwestern University Law Review 140Google Scholar
Bowmer, S., ‘To Pierce or Not to Pierce the Corporate Veil – Why Substantive Consolidation Is Not an Issue under English Law’ (2000) 15 Journal of International Banking Law 193Google Scholar
Boyd, C. L. and Hoffman, D. A., ‘Disputing Limited Liability’ (2010) 104 Northwestern University Law Review 853Google Scholar
Brady, R., ‘CERCLA Apportionment Following Burlington Northern: How Joint and Several Liability Still Thrives – To the Surprise of Many’ (2014) 4 Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 141Google Scholar
Briault, C., ‘Risk Society and Financial Risk’, in Hutter, B. M. (ed.), Anticipating Risks and Organising Risk Regulation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010), ch. 2Google Scholar
Buckley, P. J. and Casson, M., ‘Joint Ventures’, in Buckley, P. J. and Michie, J. (eds.), Firms, Organizations and Contracts: A Reader in Industrial Organization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996), ch. 15Google Scholar
Bull, S., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil – in England and Singapore’ [2014] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 24Google Scholar
Bullimore, T., ‘Sins of the Father, Sins of the Son’ (2012) 28 Professional Negligence 212Google Scholar
Burns, T., ‘Mechanistic and Organismic Structures’, in Pugh, D. S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., 2007), ch. 6Google Scholar
Cahn, A., ‘Equitable Subordination of Shareholder Loans?’ (2006) 7 European Business Organization Law Review 287Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Goold, M., and Alexander, M., ‘Corporate Strategy: The Quest for Parenting Advantage’ [1995] Harvard Business Review 120Google Scholar
Cane, P., ‘Reforming Tort Law in Australia: A Personal Perspective’ (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 649Google Scholar
Cane, P., ‘Rights in Private Law’, in Nolan, D. and Robertson, A. (eds.), Rights and Private Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2012), ch. 2Google Scholar
Cantu, C. E., ‘The Useful Life Defense: Embracing the Idea That All Products Eventually Grow Old and Die’ (2001) 80 Nebraska Law Review 1Google Scholar
Cardi, W. J., ‘Reconstructing Foreseeability’ (2005) 46 British Columbia Law Review 921Google Scholar
Carty, H., ‘The Tort of Conspiracy as a Can of Worms’, in Pitel, G. A., Neyers, J. W., and Chamberlain, E. (eds.), Tort Law: Challenging Orthodoxy (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2013), ch. 13Google Scholar
Casey, A. J., ‘The New Corporate Web: Tailored Entity Partitions and Creditors’ Selective Enforcement’ (2015) 124 Yale Law Journal 2680Google Scholar
Cassis, Y., ‘Big Business’, in Jones, G. and Zeitlin, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 8Google Scholar
Champion, W. T., ‘The Vioxx® Litigation Paradigm: The Search for Smoking Guns’ (2006) 31 Thurgood Marshall Law Review 157Google Scholar
Cheffins, B. R. and Armour, J., ‘The Past, Present, and Future of Shareholder Activism by Hedge Funds’ (2011) 37 Journal of Corporation Law 51Google Scholar
Cheifetz, D., ‘Causation in Negligence: Material Contribution and But-For after Clements’ (2012) 40 Advocates’ Quarterly 275Google Scholar
Chiappetta, F. and Tombari, U., ‘Perspectives on Group Corporate Governance and European Company Law’ (2012) 3 European Company and Financial Law Review 261Google Scholar
Coase, R. H., ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937) 4 Economica (NS) 386Google Scholar
Coase, R. H., ‘The Nature of the Firm: Influence’ (1988) 4 Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 33Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. ‘The Nature of the Firm: Meaning’ (1988) 4 Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 19Google Scholar
Coase, R. H., ‘The Nature of the Firm: Origin’ (1988) 4 Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 3Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Gottlieb, M., Linn, J., and Richardson, N., ‘Deepwater Drilling: Law, Policy, and Economics of Firm Organization and Safety’ (2011) 64 Vanderbilt Law Review 1853Google Scholar
Cole, M., ‘Limiting Liability through Bankruptcy’ (2002) 70 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1245Google Scholar
Collins, H. ‘Ascription of Legal Responsibility to Groups in Complex Patterns of Economic Integration’ (1990) 53 Modern Law Review 731Google Scholar
Colombo, M. G. and Delmastro, M., ‘Delegation of Authority in Business Organizations: An Empirical Test’ (2004) 52 Journal of Industrial Economics 53Google Scholar
Companies and Securities Advisory Committee, ‘Corporate Groups Final Report’ (Sydney, NSW, 2000)Google Scholar
Conti-Brown, P., ‘Elective Shareholder Liability’ (2012) 64 Stanford Law Review 409Google Scholar
Conway, M., ‘A New Duty of Care? Tort Liability from Voluntary Human Rights Due Diligence in Global Supply Chains’ (2015) 40 Queen’s Law Journal 741Google Scholar
Cork, K., ‘Report of the Review Committee on Insolvency Law and Practice’ (Cmnd 8558, June 1982)Google Scholar
Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee, ‘Long-Tail Liabilities: The Treatment of Unascertained Future Personal Injury Claims: Report’ (Sydney, NSW, 2008)Google Scholar
Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee, ‘Shareholder Claims against Insolvent Companies: Implications of the Sons of Gwalia’ (Sydney, NSW, Decision Discussion Paper, 2007)Google Scholar
Crowe, J., ‘Does Control Make a Difference? The Moral Foundations of Shareholder Liability for Corporate Wrongs’ (2012) 75 Modern Law Review 159Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, M., ‘Responsibility and the Boundaries of the Self’ (1992) 105 Harvard Law Review 959Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, M., ‘Sanctioning Corporations’ (2010) 19 Journal of Law and Policy 15Google Scholar
Day, W., ‘Negligence and the Corporate Veil: Parent Companies’ Duty of Care to Their Subsidiaries’ Employees’ [2014] Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 454Google Scholar
Day, W., ‘Skirting around the Issue: The Corporate Veil after Prest v Petrodel’ [2014] Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 269Google Scholar
Dearborn, M., ‘Enterprise Liability: Reviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups’ (2009) 97 California Law Review 195Google Scholar
De Blasi, M., ‘Liability of Parent Corporations, Officers, Directors, and Successors: When Can CERCLA Liability Extend beyond the Company?’ (2014) 46 Arizona State Law Review 481Google Scholar
Demsetz, H., ‘The Theory of the Firm Revisited’ (1988) 4 Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 141Google Scholar
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, ‘The Register of People with Significant Control’ (June 2015)Google Scholar
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, ‘Register of People with Significant Control: Guidance for Companies, Societates Europaeae and Limited Liability Partnerships’ (2016)Google Scholar
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, ‘Statutory Guidance on the Meaning of “Significant Influence or Control” over Companies in the Context of the Register of People with Significant Control’ (April 2016)Google Scholar
De Stefano, G., ‘General Court Rules on Successor Liability and Apportionment of Group Liability in the Gas Insulated Switchgear Cartel’ (2011) 2 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 344Google Scholar
Diamond, A., ‘Corporate Personality and Limited Liability’, in Orhnial, T. (ed.), Limited Liability and the Corporation (London, Croom Helm, 1982), ch. 2Google Scholar
Dickfos, J., Anderson, C., and Morrison, D., ‘The Insolvency Implications for Corporate Groups in Australia – Recent Events and Initiatives’ (2007) 16 International Insolvency Review 103Google Scholar
Dietrich, J., ‘The Liability of Accessories under Statute, in Equity, and in Criminal Law: Some Common Problems and (Perhaps) Some Common Solutions’ (2010) 34 Melbourne University Law Review 106Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W., ‘Institutional Isomorphism’, in Pugh, D. S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., London, Penguin Books Ltd, 2007), ch. 22Google Scholar
Dorfman, A., ‘Foreseeability as Re-cognition’ (2014) 59 American Journal of Jurisprudence 163Google Scholar
Douglas, W. O. and Shanks, C., ‘Insulation from Liability through Subsidiary Corporations’ (1929) 39 Yale Law Journal 193Google Scholar
Dunn, E., ‘James Hardie: No Soul to Be Damned and No Body to Be Kicked’ (2005) 27 Sydney Law Review 339Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., ‘The Key Literature on IB Activities 1960–2006’, in Rugman, A. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009), ch. 2Google Scholar
Dutta, M., ‘The Indian Government’s Complicity in the Asbestos Scandal’, in Allen, D. and Kazan-Allen, L. (eds.), India’s Asbestos Time Bomb (London, International Ban Asbestos Secretariat, 2008), ch. 2Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., ‘Limited Liability and the Corporation’ (1985) 52 University of Chicago Law Review 89Google Scholar
Edelman, P. H., Thomas, R. S., and Thompson, R. B., ‘Shareholder Voting in an Age of Intermediary Capitalism’ (2014) 87 Southern California Law Review 1359Google Scholar
Edmundson, P., ‘Conspiracy by Unlawful Means: Keeping the Tort Untangled’ (2008) 16 Torts Law Journal 189Google Scholar
Eisenberg, M. A., ‘Corporate Groups’, in Gillooly, M. (ed.), The Law Relating to Corporate Groups (Annandale, NSW, Federation Press, 1993), ch. 1Google Scholar
Eisenberg, M. A., ‘Corporate Law and Social Norms’ (1999) 99 Columbia Law Review 1253Google Scholar
Elson, S., ‘Legal Liability of Holding Companies for Acts of Subsidiary Companies’ [1930] Commercial Law Journal 680Google Scholar
Engel, S. and Martin, B., ‘Union Carbide and James Hardie: Lessons in Politics and Power’ (2006) 20 Global Society 475Google Scholar
Erens, B. B., Friedman, S. J., and Mayerfield, K. M., ‘Bankrupt Subsidiaries: The Challenges to the Parent of Legal Separation’ (2008) 25 Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal 65Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Alleged Aid to Amazon by Way of a Tax Ruling’ (COM (2014) 7156)Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Alleged Aid to Apple’, State Aid SA.38373 (2014/C)Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Commission Decides Selective Tax Advantages for Fiat in Luxembourg and Starbucks in the Netherlands Are Illegal under EU State Aid Rules’ (Press Release, 21 Oct 2015)Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2007/36/EC as Regards the Encouragement of Long-Term Shareholder Engagement and Directive 2013/34/EU as Regards Certain Elements of the Corporate Governance Statement’ (COM 2014/0121)Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Proposal for a Directive Amending Directive 2013/34/EU as Regards Disclosure of Income Tax Information by Certain Undertakings and Branches’ (COM (2016) 198)Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Proposal for a Directive Amending the Accounting Directive’ (COM (2016) 198)Google Scholar
Fairgrieve, D. and Howells, G., ‘Rethinking Product Liability: A Missing Element in the European Commission’s Third Review of the European Product Liability Directive’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review 962Google Scholar
Farrar, J. H., ‘Legal Issues Involving Corporate Groups’ (1998) 16 Company & Securities Law Journal 184Google Scholar
Faulkner, D., Teerikangas, S., and Joseph, R. J., ‘Introduction’, in Faulkner, D., Teerikangas, S., and Joseph, R. J. (eds.), The Handbook of Mergers and Acquisitions (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012), ch. 1Google Scholar
Feldman, H. L., ‘Pushing Drugs: Genomics and Genetics, the Pharmaceutical Industry, and the Law of Negligence’ (2003) 42 Washburn Law Journal 575Google Scholar
Finch, V., ‘Security, Insolvency and Risk: Who Pays the Price?’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 633Google Scholar
Finnis, J., ‘Intention in Tort Law’, in Owen, D. G. (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995), ch. 10Google Scholar
Flannigan, R., ‘Enterprise Control: The Servant-Independent Contractor Distinction’ (1987) 37 University of Toronto Law Journal 25Google Scholar
Flannigan, R., ‘The Personal Tort Liability of Directors’ (2002) 81 Canadian Bar Review 247Google Scholar
Fletcher, I. and Squires, G., ‘Pensions Again – “Just When You Thought it Was Safe to Go into Administration”’ (2014) 27 Insolvency International 59Google Scholar
Freedland, F., ‘History of Holding Company Legislation in New York State: Some Doubts as to the “New Jersey First” Tradition’ (1955) 24 Fordham Law Review 369Google Scholar
Freedman, J., ‘Limited Liability: Large Company Theory and Small Firms’ (2000) 63 Modern Law Review 317Google Scholar
Fruin, W. M., ‘Business Groups and Interfirm Networks’, in Jones, G. and Zeitlin, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 11Google Scholar
Garoupa, N. and Ulen, T. S., ‘The Economics of Activity Levels in Tort Liability and Regulation’, in Miceli, T. J. and Baker, M. J. (eds.), Research Handbook on Economic Models of Law (Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2014), ch. 2Google Scholar
Garrett, B. L., ‘The Corporate Criminal as Scapegoat’ (2015) 101 Virginia Law Review 1789Google Scholar
Geis, G. S., ‘The Space between Markets and Hierarchies’ (2009) 95 Virginia Law Review 99Google Scholar
Gershonowitz, A., ‘The End of Joint and Several Liability in Superfund Litigation: From Chem-Dyne to Burlington Northern’ (2012) 50 Duquesne Law Review 83Google Scholar
Gilhooley, M., ‘Vioxx’s History and the Need for Better Procedure and Better Testing’ (2007) 37 Seton Hall Law Review 941Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J., Sabel, C. E., and Scott, R. E., ‘Contracting for Innovation: Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration’ (2009) 109 Columbia Law Review 431Google Scholar
Glickman, S.W., et al., ‘Ethical and Scientific Implications of Globalization of Clinical Research’ (2009) 360 New England Journal of Medicine 816Google Scholar
Glynn, T. P., ‘Beyond “Unlimiting” Shareholder Liability: Vicarious Tort Liability for Corporate Officers’ (2004) 57 Vanderbilt Law Review 329Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. C. P., ‘Twentieth-Century Tort Theory’ (2003) 91 Georgetown Law Journal 513Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. C. P. and Zipursky, B. C., ‘The Easy Case for Products Liability Law: A Response to Professors Polinsky and Shavell’ (2010) 123 Harvard Law Review 1919Google Scholar
Gormley, T. A. and Matsa, D. A., ‘Growing Out of Trouble? Corporate Responses to Liability Risk’ (2011) 24 Review of Financial Studies 2781Google Scholar
Grabill, J. T., ‘Judicial Review of Private Mass Tort Settlements’ (2012) 42 Seton Hall Law Review 123Google Scholar
Graham, K., ‘Strict Products Liability at 50: Four Histories’ (2014) 98 Marquette Law Review 555Google Scholar
Graulich, T. E., ‘Substantive Consolidation – A Post-modern Trend’ (2006) 14 American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review 527Google Scholar
Greenfield, K., ‘The Disaster at Bhopal: Lessons for Corporate Law?’ (2008) 42 New England Law Review 755Google Scholar
Grundfest, J., ‘The Limited Future of Unlimited Liability: A Capital Markets Perspective’ (1992) 102 Yale Law Journal 387Google Scholar
Gulati, G. M., Klein, W. A., and Zolt, E. M., ‘Connected Contracts’ (2000) 47 UCLA Law Review 887Google Scholar
Hadden, T., ‘Regulating Corporate Groups: An International Perspective’, in McCahery, J., Picciotto, S., and Scott, C. (eds.), Corporate Control and Accountability: Changing Structures and Dynamics of Regulation (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993), ch. 18Google Scholar
Haddy, S., ‘A Comparative Analysis of Directors’ Duties in a Range of Corporate Group Structures’ (2002) 20 Company & Securities Law Journal 138Google Scholar
Hall, M. I., ‘Theorizing the Institutional Tortfeasor’ (2016) 53 Alberta Law Review 995Google Scholar
Halpern, P., Trebilcock, M., and Turnbull, S., ‘An Economic Analysis of Limited Liability’ (1980) 30 University of Toronto Law Journal 117Google Scholar
Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J., ‘The Population Ecology of Organizations’, in Pugh, D. S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., London, Penguin Books Ltd, 2007), ch. 10Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘Do the Capital Markets Compel Limited Liability? A Response to Professor Grundfest’ (1992) 102 Yale Law Journal 427Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘The Essential Role of Organizational Law’ (2000) 110 Yale Law Journal 387Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 1879Google Scholar
Hanson, J. D. and Logue, K. D., ‘The First-Party Insurance Externality: An Economic Justification for Enterprise Liability’ (1990) 76 Cornell Law Review 129Google Scholar
Harland, D., ‘The Influence of European Law on Product Liability in Australia’ (1995) 17 Sydney Law Review 336Google Scholar
Harper Ho, V., ‘Theories of Corporate Groups: Corporate Identity Reconceived’ (2012) 42 Seton Hall Law Review 879Google Scholar
Harris, J., ‘Corporate Group Insolvencies: Charting the Past, Present and Future of “Pooling” Arrangements’ (2007) 15 Insolvency Law Journal 78Google Scholar
Harris, J. and Hargovan, A., ‘Cutting the Gordian Knot of Corporate Law: Revisiting Veil Piercing in Corporate Groups’ (2011) 26 Australian Journal of Corporate Law 39Google Scholar
Hennart, J.-F., ‘Theories of the Multinational Enterprise’, in Rugman, A. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009), ch. 5Google Scholar
Hensler, D. and Peterson, M., ‘Understanding Mass Personal Injury Litigation: A Socio-legal Analysis’ (1993) 59 Brooklyn Law Review 961Google Scholar
Hill, C. W. L., ‘Oliver Williamson and the M-Form Firm: A Critical Review’ (1985) 19 Journal of Economic Issues 731Google Scholar
Hill, J., ‘Changes in the Role of the Shareholder’, in Grantham, R. and Rickett, C. (eds.), Corporate Personality in the 20th Century (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 1998), ch. 10Google Scholar
Hill, J., ‘Corporate Groups, Creditor Protection and Cross Guarantees: Australian Perspectives’ (1995) 24 Canadian Business Law Journal 321Google Scholar
HMRC, ‘Tackling Tax Evasion: Government Guidance for the Corporate Offence of Failure to Prevent the Criminal Facilitation of Tax Evasion’ (Draft Guidance, October 2016)Google Scholar
HMRC, ‘Tackling Tax Evasion: Legislation and Guidance for a Corporate Offence of Failure to Prevent the Criminal Facilitation of Tax Evasion’ (July 2016)Google Scholar
HMRC, ‘Tax Administration: Large Businesses Transparency Strategy’ (2015)Google Scholar
Hopt, K. J., ‘Groups of Companies: A Comparative Study on the Economics, Law and Regulation of Corporate Groups’ (ECGI Law Working Paper 286/2015)Google Scholar
House of Commons Library, ‘Pre-pack Administrations’ (CBP5035, January 2016)Google Scholar
Howard, S. E., ‘Stockholders’ Liability under the New York Act of March 22, 1811’ (1938) 46 Journal of Political Economy 499Google Scholar
Hughes, P., ‘Competition Law Enforcement and Corporate Group Liability – Adjusting the Veil’ (2014) 35 European Competition Law Review 68Google Scholar
Hutchinson, A. C., ‘Out of the Black Hole: Toward a Fresh Approach to Tort Causation’ (2016) 39 Dalhousie Law Journal 651Google Scholar
Inkpen, A. C., ‘Strategic Alliances’, in Rugman, A. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009), ch. 15Google Scholar
International Organisation of Securities Commissions, ‘The Role of Credit Rating Agencies in Structured Finance Markets: Final Report’ (May, 2008)Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S. and Rave, D. T., ‘The BP Oil Spill Settlement and the Paradox of Public Litigation’ (2014) 74 Louisiana Law Review 397Google Scholar
Jackson, D. S. QC, ‘Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry into the Medical Research and Compensation Fund’ (Sydney, NSW, 2004)Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T. and Wertheimer, A., ‘Future Industry Trends’, in Jacobsen, T. M. and Wertheimer, A. I. (eds.), Modern Pharmaceutical Industry: A Primer (2010), ch. 17Google Scholar
Jaeger, K., ‘Generic Drugs’, in Jacobsen, T. M. and Wertheimer, A. I. (eds.), Modern Pharmaceutical Industry: A Primer (Sudbury, MA, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2010), ch. 15Google Scholar
James, F. Jr, ‘Products Liability’ (1955) 34 Texas Law Review 192Google Scholar
James, F. Jr, ‘Social Insurance and Tort law: The Problem of Alternative Remedies’ (1952) 27 New York University Law Review 537Google Scholar
Jennejohn, M., ‘The Private Order of Innovation Networks’ (2016) 68 Stanford Law Review 281Google Scholar
Jones, G., ‘Multinationals from the 1930s to the 1980s’, in Chandler, A. D. and Mazlish, B. (eds.), Leviathans: Multinational Corporations and the New Global History (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005), ch. 3Google Scholar
Joskow, P., ‘Vertical Integration’, in Menard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (2005), ch. 13Google Scholar
Kaisanlahti, T., ‘Extended Liability of Shareholders?’ (2006) 6 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 139Google Scholar
Katyal, N. K., ‘Conspiracy Theory’ (2003) 112 Yale Law Journal 1307Google Scholar
Keating, G. C., ‘The Idea of Fairness in the Law of Enterprise Liability’ (1997) 95 Michigan Law Review 1266Google Scholar
Keating, G. C., ‘Is the Role of Tort to Repair Wrongful Losses?’, in Nolan, D. and Robertson, A. (eds.), Rights and Private Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2012), ch. 13Google Scholar
Keating, G. C., ‘The Theory of Enterprise Liability and Common Law Strict Liability’ (2001) 54 Vanderbilt Law Review 1285Google Scholar
Keay, A., ‘Wrongful Trading and the Liability of Company Directors: A Theoretical Perspective’ (2005) 25 Legal Studies 431Google Scholar
Keay, A. R., ‘Wrongful Trading: Problems and Proposals’ [2014] Northern Ireland Law Quarterly 63Google Scholar
Keay, A. R. and Murray, M., ‘Making Company Directors Liable: A Comparative Analysis of Wrongful Trading in the United Kingdom and Insolvent Trading in Australia’ (2005) 14 International Insolvency Review 27Google Scholar
Kettering, K. C., ‘The Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or, the 2014 Amendments to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act’ (2015) 70 Business Lawyer 777Google Scholar
Khimji, M. F. and Nicholls, C. C., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil in the Canadian Common Law Courts – An Empirical Study’ (2015) 41 Queen’s Law Journal 207Google Scholar
Khimji, M. F. and Nicholls, C. C., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil Reframed as Evasion and Concealment’ (2015) 48 University of British Columbia Law Review 401Google Scholar
Kiel, G. C., Hendry, K., and Nicholson, G. J., ‘Corporate Governance Options for the Local Subsidiaries of Multinational Enterprises’ (2006) 14 Corporate Governance 568Google Scholar
Kiern, L. I., ‘Liability, Compensation, and Financial Responsibility under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990: A Review of the Second Decade’ (2011) 36 Tulane Maritime Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Kim, I., ‘Financial Responsibility Rules under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990’ (2002) 42 Natural Resources Law Journal 565Google Scholar
Klass, A. B., ‘CERCLA, State Law, and Federalism in the 21st Century’ (2012) 41 Southwestern Law Review 679Google Scholar
Koenig, T. H. and Rusted, M. L., ‘Reconceptualizing the BP Oil Spill as Parens Patriae Products Liability’ (2012) 49 Houston Law Review 291Google Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A., ‘An Economic Analysis of the Choice between Enterprise and Personal Liability for Accidents’ (1982) 70 California Law Review 1345Google Scholar
Kors, M. E., ‘Altered Egos: Deciphering Substantive Consolidation’ (1998) 59 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 381Google Scholar
Kraakman, R., ‘Corporate Liability Strategies and the Costs of Legal Controls’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Journal 857Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, N. R., Raff, D. M. G., and Temin, P., ‘Economic Theory and Business History’, in Jones, G. and Zeitlin, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 3Google Scholar
La Rocca, L., ‘The Controversial Issue of the Parent Company Liability for the Violation of EC Competition Rules by the Subsidiary’ (2011) 32 European Competition Law Review 68Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. W., ‘High-Performing Organizations in Three Environments’ in Pugh, D. S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., London, Penguin Books Ltd, 2007), ch. 7Google Scholar
Lazonick, W., ‘Business History and Economic Development’, in Jones, G. and Zeitlin, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 4Google Scholar
Leach, T. J., ‘Civil Conspiracy: What’s the Use?’ (1999) 54 University of Miami Law Review 1Google Scholar
Lee, P. W., ‘Accessory Liability in Tort and Equity’ (2015) 27 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 853Google Scholar
Lee, P. W., ‘Civil Conspiracy in the Corporate Context’ (2016) 23 Torts Law Journal 257Google Scholar
Lee, P. W., ‘The Enigma of Veil-Piercing’ (2015) 26 International Company and Commercial Law Review 28Google Scholar
Leebron, D., ‘Limited Liability, Tort Victims, and Creditors’ (1991) 91 Columbia Law Review 1565Google Scholar
Lenckus, D., ‘Asbestos Still No 1 among Mass Tort Risks’ (2007) 41 Business Insurance 11Google Scholar
Levin, J., ‘Functionalism’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Stanford, CA, Stanford University, 2004)Google Scholar
Lewis, R., ‘Economic Torts: Where Are We Now?’ [2008] Business Law Review 216Google Scholar
Lexchin, J., et al., ‘Pharmaceutical Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome Quality: Systematic Review’ (2003) 326 British Medical Journal 1167Google Scholar
Light, A. R., ‘The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Trust and the Gulf Coast Claims Facility: The “Superfund” Myth and the Law of Unintended Consequences’ (2011) 5 Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal 87Google Scholar
Lipton, P., ‘The Mythology of Salomon’s Case and the Law Dealing with the Tort Liabilities of Corporate Groups: An Historical Perspective’ (2014) 40 Monash University Law Review 452Google Scholar
Listokin, Y. and Ayotte, K., ‘Protecting Future Claimants in Mass Tort Bankruptcies’ (2004) 98 Northwestern University Law Review 1435Google Scholar
Liu, C., ‘Leaving the FDA Behind: Pharmaceutical Outsourcing and Drug Safety’ (2012) 48 Texas International Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Lo, S. H. C., ‘Liability of Directors as Joint Tortfeasors’ [2009] Journal of Business Law 109Google Scholar
Lo, S. H. C., ‘A Parent Company’s Tort Liability to Employees of a Subsidiary’ (2014) 1 Journal of International and Comparative Law 117Google Scholar
LoPucki, L. M., ‘The Death of Liability’ (1996) 106 Yale Law Journal 1Google Scholar
LoPucki, L. M., ‘The Essential Structure of Judgment Proofing’ (1998) 51 Stanford Law Review 147Google Scholar
Lyle, M., ‘Mass Tort Claims and the Corporate Tortfeasor: Bankruptcy Reorganization and Legislative Compensation versus the Common-Law Tort System’ (1983) 61 Texas Law Review 1297Google Scholar
Macey, J. and Mitts, J., ‘Finding Order in the Morass: The Three Real Justifications for Piercing the Corporate Veil’ (2014) 100 Cornell Law Review 99Google Scholar
Macrae, C., ‘Regulating Resilience? Regulatory Work in High-Risk Arenas’, in Hutter, B. (ed.), Anticipating Risks and Organising Risk Regulation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010), ch. 7Google Scholar
Mangano, R., ‘The Role of Fraudulent Transfer Rules in Corporate Insolvency’ (2008) 5 European Company and Financial Law Review 193Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. M., ‘Portfolio Selection’ (1952) 7 Journal of Finance 77Google Scholar
Matheson, J. H., ‘The Modern Law of Corporate Groups: An Empirical Study of Piercing the Corporate Veil in the Parent-Subsidiary Context’ (2009) 87 North Carolina Law Review 1091Google Scholar
Matheson, J. H., ‘Successor Liability’ (2011) 96 Minnesota Law Review 371Google Scholar
Mattock, B., Sackett, A., and Shipp, J., ‘Clearing Up the False Premises Underlying the Push for Asbestos Trust “Transparency”’ (2014) 23 Widener Law Journal 725Google Scholar
Mazars, , ‘Transparency Directive Assessment Report’ (2009)Google Scholar
McBride, N. J., ‘Tort Law and Human Flourishing’, in Pitel, S. G. A., Neyers, J. W., and Chamberlain, E. (eds.), Tort Law: Challenging Orthodoxy (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2013), ch. 2Google Scholar
McDonell, C., ‘The Gulf Coast Claims Facility and the Deepwater Horizon Litigation: Judicial Regulation of Private Compensation Schemes’ (2012) 64 Stanford Law Review 765Google Scholar
McDonnell, P., ‘Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance’, in Jacobsen, T. M. and Wertheimer, A. I. (eds.), Modern Pharmaceutical Industry: A Primer (Sudbury, MA, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2010), ch. 9Google Scholar
McGaughey, E., ‘Donoghue v Salomon in the High Court’ (2011) 4 Journal of Personal Injury Law 249Google Scholar
McKenna, A., ‘An Overview of the Legal Landscape of Negligently-Inflicted Asbestos Related Conditions’ [2011] Journal of Personal Injury Law 205Google Scholar
McNamee, S., ‘The Regulatory and Liability Implications of Nanoscale Drug Delivery in the Human Body’ (2014) 11 Nanotechnology Law & Business 48Google Scholar
Menell, N. G., ‘The Copperweld Question: Drawing the Line between the Corporate Family and Cartel’ (2016) 101 Cornell Law Review 467Google Scholar
Merkin, R. and Steele, J., ‘Historic Asbestos Exposure and Liability Insurance: Issues of Aggregation and Reinsurance’, in Steele, J. and van Boom, W. H. (eds.), Mass Justice: Challenges of Representation and Distribution (Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2011), ch. 10Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Drori, G. S., and Hwang, H., ‘World Society and the Proliferation of Formal Organization’, in Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., and Hwang, H. (eds.), Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006), ch. 1Google Scholar
Miles, R. E. and Snow, C. C., ‘Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms’, in Buckley, P. J. and Michie, J. (eds.), Firms, Organizations and Contracts: A Reader in Industrial Organization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996), ch. 16Google Scholar
Miller, C., J. ‘Causation in Personal Injury after (and before) Sienkiewicz’ (2012) 32 Legal Studies 396Google Scholar
Millon, D., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil, Financial Responsibility, and the Limits of Limited Liability’ (2007) 56 Emory Law Journal 1304Google Scholar
Milman, D., ‘Promoting Distributional Justice on Corporate Insolvency in the 21st Century’, in Steele, J. and van Boom, W. H. (eds.), Mass Justice: Challenges of Representation and Distribution (Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2011), ch. 8Google Scholar
Mitchell, C., ‘Lifting the Corporate Veil in the English Courts: An Empirical Study’ (1999) 3 Company Financial and Insolvency Law Review 22Google Scholar
Mobley, S., Mourkas, D., and Murray, G., ‘Parent Liability for Joint Venture Parents’ (2014) 35 European Competition Law Review 499Google Scholar
Mohrbutter, J., ‘Harrington v Dow Corning Corp and Social Utility: Unfit for Their Purpose within Product Liability Negligence Law’ (2012) 75 Saskatchewan Law Review 269Google Scholar
Mokal, R. J., ‘What Liquidation Does for Secured Creditors, and What it Does for You’ (2008) 71 Modern Law Review 699Google Scholar
Monihan, R., et al., ‘Selling Sickness: The Pharmaceutical Industry and Disease Mongering’ (2002) 324 British Medical Journal 886Google Scholar
Morgan, G., ‘Imaginization: On Spider Plants’, in Pugh, D. S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., London, Penguin Books Ltd, 2007), ch. 25Google Scholar
Morgan, J., ‘Causation, Politics, and Law: The English – and Scottish – Asbestos Saga’, in Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2011), ch. 4Google Scholar
Morgan, J., ‘Vicarious Liability for Independent Contractors?’ [2015] Professional Negligence 235Google Scholar
Morgan, J. D., ‘The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: A Look at its Impact on the Oil Industry’ (1994) 6 Fordham International Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Morgan, P., ‘Vicarious Liability for Group Companies: The Final Frontier of Vicarious Liability?’ (2015) 31 Professional Negligence 276Google Scholar
Morgan, P., ‘Vicarious Liability on the Move’ (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review 139Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P., ‘Limited Liability and Multinational Enterprises: A Case for Reform?’ (2010) 34 Cambridge Journal of Economics 915Google Scholar
Nagareda, R. A., ‘Mass Resolution of Mass Torts: Emerging Issues in the United States and the Global Future’, in Steele, J. and van Boom, W. H. (eds.), Mass Justice: Challenges of Representation and Distribution (Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2011), ch. 2Google Scholar
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, ‘Macondo Well Deepwater Horizon Blowout: Lessons for Improving Offshore Drilling Safety’ (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Nelson, J. S., ‘The Intracorporate Conspiracy Trap’ (2015) 36 Cardozo Law Review 969Google Scholar
Neyers, J. W., ‘Canadian Corporate Law, Veil-Piercing, and the Private Law Model Corporation’ (2000) 50 University of Toronto Law Journal 173Google Scholar
Neyers, J. W., ‘Explaining the Inexplicable? Four Manifestations of Abuse of Rights in English Law’, in Nolan, D. and Robertson, A. (eds.), Rights and Private Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2012), ch. 11Google Scholar
Nolan, A., ‘The Position of Unsecured Creditors of Corporate Groups: Towards a Group Responsibility Solution which Gives Fairness and Equity a Role’ (1993) 11 Company & Securities Law Journal 461Google Scholar
Nygh, P., ‘The Liability of Multi-national Corporations for the Torts of Their Subsidiaries’ (2002) 3 European Business Organization Law Review 51Google Scholar
OECD, ‘Articles of the Model Convention with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital’ (2003)Google Scholar
OECD, ‘Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting, Action 13 – 2015 Final Report’ (2015)Google Scholar
OECD, ‘Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations’ (2010)Google Scholar
Oh, P. B., ‘Veil-Piercing’ (2010) 89 Texas Law Review 81Google Scholar
Oh, P. B., ‘Veil Piercing Unbound’ (2013) 93 Boston University Law Review 89Google Scholar
Osofsky, H. M., ‘Multidimensional Governance and the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill’ (2011) 63 Florida Law Review 1077Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, J., ‘The Sins of the Father – Vicarious Liability Extended’ (2012) 71 Cambridge Law Journal 485Google Scholar
Owen, D. G., ‘The Evolution of Products Liability Law’ (2007) 26 Review of Litigation 955Google Scholar
Owen, D. G., ‘Special Defenses in Modern Products Liability Law’ (2005) 70 Missouri Law Review 1Google Scholar
Painter, C. M. E., ‘Tort Creditor Priority in the Secured Credit System: Asbestos Times, the Worst of Times’ (1984) 36 Stanford Law Review 1045Google Scholar
Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., and Zhou, X., ‘Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Larger US Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts’ (1993) 38 Administrative Science Quarterly 100Google Scholar
Panel of Eminent Persons, ‘Review of the Law of Negligence: Final Report’ (Canberra, ACT, Commonwealth of Australia, 2002)Google Scholar
Patterson, M. K., ‘Is Unlimited Liability Really Attainable? Of Long Arms and Short Sales’ (1995) 56 Ohio State Law Journal 815Google Scholar
Paz-Varga, R., ‘International Transfer Pricing and Subsidiary Performance: The Role of Organizational Justice’ (2009) 51 Thunderbird International Business Review 219Google Scholar
Perry, S. R., ‘The Moral Foundations of Tort Law’ (1992) 77 Iowa Law Review 449Google Scholar
Perry, S. R., ‘Responsibility for Outcomes, Risk, and the Law of Torts’, in Owen, D. G. (ed.), Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001), ch. 11Google Scholar
Petrin, M., ‘Assumption of Responsibility in Corporate Groups: Chandler v Cape plc’ (2013) 76 Modern Law Review 603Google Scholar
Pettet, B., ‘Limited Liability – A Principle for the 21st Century?’ (1995) 48 Current Legal Problems 125Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Nowak, P., ‘Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence’, in Buckley, P. J. and Michie, J., Firms, Organizations and Contracts: A Reader in Industrial Organization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996), ch. 14Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R., ‘The Design and Management of Externally Controlled Organizations’, in Pugh, D. S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., London, Penguin Books Ltd, 2007), ch. 8Google Scholar
Phua, S., ‘Convergence in Global Tax Compliance’ [2015] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 77Google Scholar
Pickering, M. A., ‘The Company as a Separate Legal Entity’ (1968) 31 Modern Law Review 481Google Scholar
Pollard, D., ‘Who Is “Connected” or “Associated” within the Meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986’ (2009) 22 Insolvency Intelligence 33Google Scholar
Pollock, Hon S. G., ‘Introductory Remark’ (1999) 30 Seton Hall Law Review 202Google Scholar
Prentice, D. D., ‘Some Aspects of the Law Relating to Corporate Groups in the United Kingdom’ (1999) 13 Connecticut Journal of International Law 305Google Scholar
Presser, S. B., ‘The Bogalusa Explosion: “Single Business Enterprise”, “Alter Ego”, and Other Errors: Academics, Economics, Democracy, and Shareholder Limited Liability: Back towards a Unitary “Abuse” Theory of Piercing the Corporate Veil’ (2006) 100 Northwestern University Law Review 405Google Scholar
Presser, S. B., ‘Thwarting the Killing of the Corporation: Limited Liability, Democracy, and Economics’ (1992) 87 Northwestern University Law Review 148Google Scholar
Priest, G. L., ‘The Invention of Enterprise Liability: A Critical History of the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Tort Law’ (1985) 14 Journal of Legal Studies 461Google Scholar
Priest, G. L., ‘Strict Products Liability: The Original Intent’ (1989) 10 Cardozo Law Review 2301Google Scholar
Pugh, D. S., ‘Does Context Determine Form?’, in Pugh, D. S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., London, Penguin Books Ltd, 2007), ch. 2Google Scholar
Qu, C. Z., ‘Recent German Developments in Company Controllers’ Liability in Rescue Situations: A Comparative Evaluation’ [2011] Journal of Business Law 330Google Scholar
R3, ‘Pre-packaged Sales (“Pre-packs”): A Survey of R3 Members’ (May 2009)Google Scholar
Rahman, S. Z., et al, ‘Lifestyle Drugs: Concept and Impact on Society’ (2010) Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 409Google Scholar
Ramsay, I. M., ‘Allocating Liability in Corporate Groups: An Australian Perspective’ (1999) 13 Connecticut Journal of International Law 329Google Scholar
Ramsay, I. M., ‘Holding Company Liability for the Debts of an Insolvent Subsidiary: A Law and Economics Perspective’ (1994) 17 University of New South Wales Law Journal 520Google Scholar
Ramsay, I. M. and Noakes, D. B., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil in Australia’ (2001) 19 Company and Securities Law Journal 250Google Scholar
Ramsay, I. M. and Stapledon, G. P., ‘Corporate Groups in Australia’ (2001) 19 Company & Securities Law Journal 7Google Scholar
Ray, J., ‘Offshore Safety and Environmental Regimes: A Post-Macondo Comparative Analysis of the United States and the United Kingdom’ (2014) 33 Mississippi College Law Review 11Google Scholar
Reimann, M., ‘Product Liability in a Global Context: The Hollow Victory of the European Model’ (2003) 7 European Review of Private Law 128Google Scholar
Reinschmidt, B., ‘The Law of Tort: A Useful Tool to Further Corporate Social Responsibility?’ (2013) 34 Company Law 103Google Scholar
Reynisson, K., ‘Related Party Transactions: Analysis of Proposed Article 9c of Shareholders’ Rights Directive’ (2016) 13 European Company Law 175Google Scholar
Ribstein, L. E., ‘Limited Liability and Theories of the Corporation’ (1991) 50 Maryland Law Review 80Google Scholar
Richardson, G. B., ‘The Organization of Industry’, in Buckley, P. J. and Michie, J. (eds.), Firms Organizations and Contracts: A Reader in Industrial Organization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996), ch. 3Google Scholar
Riley, C., ‘Shareholder Liability for Company Torts: Should it Be Vicarious or Fault Based?’ (paper presented at SLS Conference, Oxford, 7 September 2016)Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. and Zipursky, B. C., ‘Corrective Justice in an Age of Mass Torts’, in Postema, G. J. (ed.), Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001), ch. 6Google Scholar
Roach, B., ‘A Primer on Multinational Corporations’, in Chandler, A. D. and Mazlish, B. (eds.), Leviathans: Multinational Corporations and the New Global History (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005), ch. 1Google Scholar
Robertson, A., ‘Constraints on Policy-Based Reasoning in Private Law’, in Robertson, A. and Tang, H. W. (eds.), The Goals of Private Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2009), ch. 11Google Scholar
Roe, M., ‘Corporate Strategic Reaction to Mass Tort’ (1986) 72 Virginia Law Review 1Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D., ‘The Dusting of America: A Story of Asbestos – Carnage, Cover-Up, and Litigation’ (1986) 99 Harvard Law Review 1693Google Scholar
Ruhl, J. B., ‘Managing Systemic Risk in Legal Systems’ (2014) 89 Indiana Law Journal 559Google Scholar
Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A., and Nguyen, Q. T. K., ‘Fifty Years of International Business Theory and Beyond’ (2011) 51 Management International Review 755Google Scholar
Sanchez Brigido, R., ‘Collective Intentional Activities and the Law’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 305Google Scholar
Sanders, J., ‘Risky Business: Causation in Asbestos Cancer Cases (and Beyond?)’, in Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2011), ch. 2Google Scholar
Santella, P., Baffi, E., Drago, C., and Lattuca, D., ‘Legal Obstacles to Institutional Investor Activism in the EU and US’ [2012] European Business Law Review 257Google Scholar
Schipani, C. A., ‘The Changing Face of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations: Enterprise Theory and Federal Regulation’ (2005) 37 Connecticut Law Review 691Google Scholar
Schwarcz, S., ‘The Inherent Irrationality of Judgment Proofing’ (1999) 52 Stanford Law Review 1Google Scholar
Schwartz, T. M., ‘The Impact of the New Products Liability Restatement on Prescription Products’ (1995) 50 Food & Drug Law Journal 399Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. III, ‘After Bhopal: Implications for Parent Company Liability’ (1987) 21 International Lawyer 695Google Scholar
Sharkey, C. M., ‘The BP Oil Spill Settlements, Classwide Punitive Damages, and Societal Deterrence’ (2015) 64 DePaul Law Review 681Google Scholar
Sheiner, N., ‘DES and a Proposed Theory of Enterprise Liability’ (1978) 46 Fordham Law Review 963Google Scholar
Sherman, E. F., ‘The Evolution of Asbestos Litigation’ (2014) 88 Tulane Law Review 1021Google Scholar
Shetterly, D., ‘Starving the Terrorists of Funding: How the United States Treasury Is Fighting the War on Terrorism’ (2006) 18 Regent Law Review 327Google Scholar
Siegel, J. M., ‘Reconciling Shareholder Limited Liability with Vicarious Copyright Liability: Holding Parent Corporations Liable for the Copyright Infringements of Subsidiaries’ (2007) 41 University of Richmond Law Review 535Google Scholar
Silecchia, L. A., ‘Pinning the Blame & Piercing the Veil in the Mists of Metaphor: The Supreme Court’s New Standards for the CERCLA Liability of Parent Companies and a Proposal for Legislative Reform’ (1998) 67 Fordham Law Review 115Google Scholar
Simester, A., ‘The Mental Element in Complicity’ (2006) 122 Law Quarterly Review 578Google Scholar
Skeel, D. A. and Krause-Vilmar, G., ‘Recharacterization and the Nonhindrance of Creditors’ (2006) 7 European Business Organization Law Review 259Google Scholar
Skinner, G., ‘Rethinking Limited Liability of Parent Corporations for Foreign Subsidiaries’ Violations of International Human Rights’ (2015) 72 Washington & Lee Law Review 1769Google Scholar
Slavny, A., ‘Nonreciprocity and the Moral Basis of Liability to Compensate’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar
Smith, S. A., ‘The Normativity of Private Law’ (2011) 31 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar
Smith, Y. B., ‘Frolic and Detour’ (1923) 23 Columbia Law Review 444Google Scholar
Spender, P., ‘Blue Asbestos and Golden Eggs: Evaluating Bankruptcy and Class Actions as Just Responses to Mass Tort Liability’ (2003) 25 Sydney Law Review 223Google Scholar
Squire, R., ‘Strategic Liability in the Corporate Group’ (2011) 78 University of Chicago Law Review 605Google Scholar
Stacy, T., ‘The “Material Support” Offense: The Use of Strict Liability in the War against Terror’ (2005) 14 Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy 461Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘“Cause-in-Fact” and the Scope of Liability for Consequences’ (2003) 119 Law Quarterly Review 388Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Factual Causation’ (2010) 38 Federal Law Review 467Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Lords A’Leaping Evidentiary Gaps’ (2002) 10 Torts Law Journal 276Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Products Liability in the United Kingdom: The Myths of Reform’ (1999) 34 Texas International Law Journal 45Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability, an Anglo-Australian Perspective’ (2000) 39 Washburn Law Journal 363Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Two Causal Fictions at the Heart of US Asbestos Doctrine’ (2006) 122 Law Quarterly Review 189Google Scholar
Stephens, K., ‘Regulatory Affairs’, in Jacobsen, T. M. and Wertheimer, A. I. (eds.), Modern Pharmaceutical Industry: A Primer (Sudbury, MA, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2010), ch. 7Google Scholar
Stone, C., ‘The Place of Enterprise Liability in the Control of Corporate Conduct’ (1980) 90 Yale Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Strasser, K. A., ‘Piercing the Veil in Corporate Groups’ (2005) 37 Connecticut Law Review 637Google Scholar
Stuby, D. E., ‘Status and Trends in State Product Liability Law: State of the Art Evidence’ (1987) 14 Journal of Legislation 261Google Scholar
Tallman, S. B. and Yip, G. S., ‘Strategy and the Multinational Enterprise’, in Rugman, A. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009), ch. 12Google Scholar
Tan, C-H., ‘Piercing the Separate Personality of the Company: A Matter of Policy?’ [1999] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 531Google Scholar
Tan, C-H., ‘Veil-Piercing – a Fresh Start’ [2015] Journal of Business Law 20Google Scholar
Tan, D., ‘Internalising Externalities: An Enterprise Risk Approach to Vicarious Liability in the 21st Century’ (2015) 27 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 822Google Scholar
Tan, D., ‘The Salient Features of Proximity: Examining the Spandeck Formulation for Establishing a Duty of Care’ [2010] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 459Google Scholar
Teff, H., ‘Products Liability in the Pharmaceutical Industry at Common Law’ (1974) 20 McGill Law Journal 102Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Unitas Multiplex: Corporate Governance in Group Enterprises’, in Sugarman, D. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Regulating Corporate Groups in Europe (Baden Baden, Nomos, 1990), ch. 5Google Scholar
Tham, C. H., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil: Searching for Appropriate Choice of Law Rules’ [2007] Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 22Google Scholar
Thomas, C. D., ‘Tomorrow’s News Today: The Future of Superfund Litigation’ (2014) 46 Arizona State Law Journal 537Google Scholar
Thomas, W. J., ‘The Vioxx Story: Would it Have Ended Differently in the European Union?’ (2006) 32 American Journal of Law and Medicine 365Google Scholar
Thompson, R. B., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil: An Empirical Study’ (1991) 76 Cornell Law Review 1036Google Scholar
Thompson, R. B., ‘Piercing the Veil within Corporate Groups: Corporate Shareholders as Mere Investors’ (1999) 13 Connecticut Journal of International Law 379Google Scholar
TNS BMRB, ‘Exploring Large Business Tax Strategy Behaviour’ (2015)Google Scholar
Townsend, J., ‘Schemes of Arrangement and Asbestos Litigation: In re Cape plc’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review 837Google Scholar
Treadaway, L., ‘Big Pharma’s Heart of Darkness: The Alien Tort Statute and Preventing Clinical Trial Colonialism’ (2012) 43 Georgetown International Law Journal 1419Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R., ‘On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change’ (2002) 13 Organization Science 567Google Scholar
Tully, J., ‘Plumbing the Depths of Corporate Litigation: Reforming the Deepening Insolvency Theory’ [2013] University of Illinois Law Review 2087Google Scholar
Turner, P. J., ‘Revisiting the Direct Liability of Parent Companies Following Chandler v Cape Plc’ (2015) 33 Company & Securities Law Journal 45Google Scholar
Tweedale, G. and Flynn, L., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil: Cape Industries and Multinational Corporate Liability for a Toxic Hazard, 1950-2004’ (2007) 8 Enterprise and Society 268Google Scholar
Ulbeck, V. and Ehlers, A., ‘Tort Law, Corporate Groups and Supply Chain Liability for Workers’ Injuries: The Concept of Vicarious Liability’ (2016) 13 European Company Law 167Google Scholar
UNCITRAL, ‘Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law’ (United Nations, 2005)Google Scholar
UNCITRAL, ‘Legislative Guide on Insolvency, Part Three: Treatment of Enterprise Groups in Insolvency’ (United Nations, 2012)Google Scholar
US Coast Guard, ‘Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA)’ (2016)Google Scholar
US Coast Guard, ‘Oil Pollution Act Liability Limits in 2015: Report to Congress’ (October 2015)Google Scholar
US Coast Guard, ‘Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (OSLTF) Funding for Oil Spills’ (January 2006)Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office, ‘Asbestos Injury Compensation: The Role and Administration of Asbestos Trusts’ (2011)Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office, ‘New Drug Approval’ (2009)Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office, ‘Superfund: Funding and Reported Costs of Enforcement and Administration Activities’ (July 2008)Google Scholar
US Senate, ‘Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Offshore Profit Shifting and the US Tax Code – Part 2 (Apple Inc)’ (21 May 2013)Google Scholar
Vairo, G., ‘Mass Torts Bankruptcies: The Who, the Why and the How’ (2004) 78 American Bankruptcy Law Journal 93Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K., ‘A History of Prima Facie Tort: The Origins of a General Theory of Intentional Tort’ (1990) 19 Hofstra Law Review 447Google Scholar
Vanneste, K., ‘Decoupling Economic Rights from Voting Rights: A Threat to the Traditional Corporate Governance Paradigm’ (2014) 15 European Business Organization Law Review 59Google Scholar
Varuhas, J., ‘The Concept of “Vindication” in the Law of Torts: Rights, Interests, and Damages’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 253Google Scholar
de Villiers, M., ‘Foreseeability Decoded’ (2015) 16 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 343Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K., ‘Pricing Lives for Corporate Risk Decisions’ (2015) 68 Vanderbilt Law Review 1117Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K. and Zeckhauser, R. J., ‘Deterring and Compensating Oil-Spill Catastrophes: The Need for Strict Two-Tier Liability’ (2011) 64 Vanderbilt Law Review 1717Google Scholar
Waddams, S. M., ‘The Canadian Law of Products Liability’ (1999) 34 Texas International Law Journal 119Google Scholar
Warren, R. C., ‘The Enforcement of Social Accountability – Turner and Newall and the Asbestos Crisis’ (1997) 5 Corporate Governance 52Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., ‘Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situations’, in Pugh, D.S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5th edn., London, Penguin Books Ltd, 2007), ch. 20Google Scholar
Weigand, J. M., ‘Vioxx: How Strong Is the Case against Merck?’ (2007) 11 Michigan State University Journal of Medicine and Law 145Google Scholar
Weingarten, M. P., ‘Asbestos Litigation from an American Perspective’ [2009] Journal of Personal Injury Law 253Google Scholar
Westney, D. E. and Zaheer, S., ‘The Multinational Enterprise as an Organization’, in Rugman, A.M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business (2nd edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009), ch. 13Google Scholar
Whincop, M., ‘Overcoming Corporate Law: Instrumentalism, Pragmatism and the Separate Legal Entity Concept’ (1997) 15 Company & Securities Law Journal 411Google Scholar
White, J. J., ‘Corporate Judgment Proofing: A Response to Lynn LoPucki’s The Death of Liability’ (1998) 107 Yale Law Journal 1363Google Scholar
White, M. J., ‘Asbestos and the Future of Mass Torts’ (2004) 18 Journal of Economic Perspectives 183Google Scholar
Widen, W. H., ‘Corporate Form and Substantive Consolidation’ (2007) 75 George Washington Law Review 237Google Scholar
Williams, R., ‘What Can We Expect to Gain from Reforming the Insolvent Trading Remedy?’ (2015) 78 Modern Law Review 55Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., ‘The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes’ (1981) 19 Journal of Economic Literature 1537Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., ‘Transaction Cost Economics and Business Administration’ (2005) 21 Scandinavian Journal of Management 19Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., ‘Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations’, in Buckley, P. J. and Michie, J. (eds.), Firms Organizations and Contracts: A Reader in Industrial Organization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996), ch. 6Google Scholar
Winfield, P., ‘The Foundation of Liability in Tort’ (1927) 27 Columbia Law Review 1Google Scholar
Winkelmolen, R. and Buss, W. C., ‘Developments of Strategic Parenting Models in Small Holding Companies: A Research Agenda’ (2013) 8 Global Conference on Business and Finance Proceedings 236Google Scholar
Witting, C., ‘Distinguishing between Property Damage and Pure Economic Loss in Negligence: A Personality Thesis’ (2001) 21 Legal Studies 481Google Scholar
Witting, C., ‘Duty of Care: An Analytical Approach’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33Google Scholar
Witting, C., ‘Liability for Corporate Wrongs’ (2009) 28 University of Queensland Law Journal 113Google Scholar
Witting, C., ‘Non-delegable Duties and Roads Authorities’ (2008) 32 Melbourne University Law Review 332Google Scholar
Witting, C., ‘Of Principle and Prima Facie Tort’ (1999) 25 Monash University Law Review 295Google Scholar
Witting, C., ‘What Are We Doing Here? The Relationship between Negligence in General and Misstatements in English Law’, in Barker, K., Grantham, R., and Swain, W. (eds.), The Law of Misstatements: 50 Years on from Hedley Byrne v. Heller (Oxford, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2015), ch. 9Google Scholar
Witting, C. and Rankin, J., ‘Tortious Liability of Corporate Groups: From Control to Coordination’ (2014) 22 Tort Law Review 91Google Scholar
Wolff, L-C., ‘Offshore Holdings for Global Investments of Multinational Enterprises: Just Evil?’ [2015] Journal of Business Law 445Google Scholar
Wyburn, M., ‘Pooling as a Response to the Competing Interests in Corporate Group Collapse in Australia’ (2010) 19 International Insolvency Review 65Google Scholar
Yeung, K., ‘Corporate Groups: Legal Aspects of the Management Dilemma’ [1997] Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 208Google Scholar
Zeitlin, J., ‘The Historical Alternatives Approach’, in Jones, G. and Zeitlin, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 10Google Scholar
Zipes, G., ‘After Amchem and Ahern: The Rise of Bankruptcy over the Class Action Option for Resolving Mass Torts on a Nationwide Basis, and the Fall of Finality?’ [1998] Detroit College of Law at Michigan State University Law Review 7Google Scholar
Zipursky, B. C., ‘Foreseeability in Breach, Duty, and Proximate Cause’ (2009) 44 Wake Forest Law Review 1247Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Christian A. Witting, National University of Singapore
  • Book: Liability of Corporate Groups and Networks
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626828.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Christian A. Witting, National University of Singapore
  • Book: Liability of Corporate Groups and Networks
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626828.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Christian A. Witting, National University of Singapore
  • Book: Liability of Corporate Groups and Networks
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626828.014
Available formats
×