Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:50:06.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Distributional Effects of Climate Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

Grégory Claeys
Affiliation:
Bruegel
Marie Le Mouel
Affiliation:
Bruegel
Simone Tagliapietra
Affiliation:
Bruegel
Guntram B. Wolff
Affiliation:
German Council on Foreign Relations
Georg Zachmann
Affiliation:
Bruegel
Get access

Summary

This chapter first illustrates the risk of decarbonisation impacting low-income households more than high-income ones, as they devote a larger share of their income to energy consumption and as they face more difficulties in switching to green alternatives. It then discusses which kind of policies can be adopted in order to avoid such risks and to ensure a fair transition with no social and political backlash.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Macroeconomics of Decarbonisation
Implications and Policies
, pp. 71 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., and Yucman, G. (2017) ‘Global Inequality Dynamics: New Findings from WID.world’, American Economic Review, 107:5, 404–09.Google Scholar
Auclert, A., Rognlie, M., and Straub, L. (2020) ‘Micro Jumps, Macro Humps: Monetary Policy and Business Cycles in an Estimated HANK Model’, Working Paper No. 26647, National Bureau of Economic Research, www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26647/w26647.pdfGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (December 2022) Australian National Accounts: Distribution of Household Income, Consumption and Wealth, www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/national-accounts/australian-national-accounts-distribution-household-income-consumption-and-wealth/latest-releaseGoogle Scholar
Balestra, C., and Tonkin, R. (2018) ‘Inequalities in Household Wealth across OECD Countries: Evidence from the OECD Wealth Distribution Database’, OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2018/01, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Bilbiie, F., Primiceri, G. E., and Tambalotti, A. (2022) ‘Inequality and Business Cycles’, PSE Working Paper, http://pseweb.eu/ydepot/seance/515181_Inequality&BC1-10.pdfGoogle Scholar
Borusyak, K., and Jaravel, X. (2021) ‘The Distributional Effects of Trade: Theory and Evidence from the United States’, Working Paper No. 28957, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Brannlund, R., and Nordström, J. (2004) ‘Carbon Tax Simulations Using a Household Demand Model’, European Economic Review, 48:1, 211–33.Google Scholar
Brannlund, R., and Persson, L. (2012) ‘To Tax, or Not to Tax: Preferences for Climate Policy Attributes’, Climate Policy, 12:6, 704–21.Google Scholar
Cahen-Fourot, L., Campiglio, E., Godin, A., Kemp-Benedict, E., and Trsek, S. (2021) ‘Capital Stranding Cascades: The Impact of Decarbonisation on Productive Asset Utilisation’, Energy Economics, 103, 105581.Google Scholar
Calderón, C., and Servén, L. (2004) ‘The Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Distribution’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 3400, World Bank.Google Scholar
Cames, M., Graichen, J., Siemons, A., and Cook, V. (2015) ‘Emission Reduction Targets for International Aviation and Shipping’, European Parliament IPOL, Study PE 569.964, www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2015)569964Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., and Turnovsky, S. J. (2012) ‘Infrastructure and Inequality’, European Economic Review, 56:8, 1730–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, C., and Crawford, A. (2018) ‘Green Conflict Minerals: The Fuels of Conflict in the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy’, International Institute for Sustainable Development Report.Google Scholar
Cingano, F. (2014) ‘Trends in Income Inequality and Its Impact on Economic Growth’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 163, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kudlyak, M., and Mondragon, J. (2014) ‘Does Greater Inequality Lead to More Household Borrowing? New Evidence from Household Data’, Working Paper No. 19850, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Cramton, P., MacKay, D. J. C., Ockenfels, A., and Stoft, S. (2017) Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, J. A., Fullerton, D., and Sexton, S. (2019) ‘Vertical and Horizontal Redistributions from a Carbon Tax and Rebate’, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6:S1, S169–208.Google Scholar
Curran, L. (2015) ‘The Impact of Trade Policy on Global Production Networks: The Solar Panel Case’, Review of International Political Economy, 22:5, 1025–54.Google Scholar
Darvas, Z. (2019) ‘Global Interpersonal Income Inequality Decline: The Role of China and India’, World Development, 121:C, 1632.Google Scholar
Davis, L. W., and Knittel, C. R. (2019) ‘Are Fuel Economy Standards Regressive?’, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6:S1, S37–63.Google Scholar
De Ferranti, D., Perry, G. E., Ferreira, F. H., and Walton, M. (2004) Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with History? World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies (Washington, DC: World Bank).Google Scholar
Dechezlepretre, A., Fabre, A., Kruse, T., Planterose, B., Chico, A. S., and Stantcheva, S. (2022) ‘Fighting Climate Change: International Attitudes toward Climate Policies’, Working Paper No. 30265, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Dercon, S. (2014) ‘Is Green Growth Good for the Poor?’, The World Bank Research Observer, 29:2, 163–85.Google Scholar
Dietz, S., and Atkinson, G. (2010) ‘The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences’, Land Economics, 86:3, 423–43.Google Scholar
Dogan, E., Madaleno, M., Inglesi-Lotz, R., and Taskin, D. (2022) ‘Race and Energy Poverty: Evidence from African-American Households’, Energy Economics, 108, 105908.Google Scholar
Dumagan, J. C., and Mount, T. D. (1992) ‘Measuring the Consumer Welfare Effects of Carbon Penalties: Theory and Applications to Household Energy Demand’, Energy Economics, 14:2, 8293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fajgelbaum, P. D., and Khandelwal, A. K. (2016) ‘Measuring the Unequal Gains from Trade’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131:3, 1113–80.Google Scholar
Fan, S., and Zhang, X. (2004) ‘Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development in Rural China’, China Economic Review, 15:2, 203–14.Google Scholar
Flues, F., and Thomas, A. (2015) ‘The Distributional Effects of Energy Taxes’, OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 23, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Furceri, D., and Li, G. B. (2017) ‘The Macroeconomic (and Distributional) Effects of Public Investment in Developing Economies’, IMF Working Papers, No. 2017/217, A001.Google Scholar
Gagnebin, M., Graichen, P., and Lenck, T. (2019) ‘Die Gelbwesten-Proteste: Eine (Fehler-) Analyse der französischen CO2-Preispolitik’, Agora Energiewende, https://static.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin/Projekte/2018/CO2-Steuer_FR-DE_Paper/Agora-Energiewende_Paper_CO2_Steuer_FR-DE.pdfGoogle Scholar
Global Carbon Project (2022) Global Carbon Atlas, https://globalcarbonatlas.org/Google Scholar
Goldthau, A., Eicke, L., and Weko, S. (2020) ‘The Global Energy Transition and the Global South’, in Hafner, M. and Tagliapietra, S. (Eds.),The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition, pp. 319–39 (Cham: Springer Nature).Google Scholar
Goldthau, A., and Westphal, K. (2019) ‘Why the Global Energy Transition Does Not Mean the End of the Petrostate’, Global Policy, 10:2, 279–83.Google Scholar
Gornemann, N., Kuester, K., and Nakajima, M. (2016) ‘Doves for the Rich, Hawks for the Poor? Distributional Consequences of Monetary Policy’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP11233, April.Google Scholar
Gosens, J., and Lu, Y. (2013) ‘From Lagging to Leading? Technological Innovation Systems in Emerging Economies and the Case of Chinese Wind Power’, Energy Policy, 60, 234–50.Google Scholar
Government of the United Kingdom (2018) Family Food 2016/17, www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/family-food-datasetsGoogle Scholar
Grösche, P., and Schröder, C. (2014) ‘On the Redistributive Effects of Germany’s Feed-in Tariff’, Empirical Economics, 46:4, 1339–83.Google Scholar
Hafner, M., and Tagliapietra, S. (2020) ‘The Global Energy Transition: A Review of the Existing Literature’, in Hafner, M. and Tagliapietra, S. (Eds.), The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition, pp. 124 (Cham: Springer Nature).Google Scholar
Hafner, M., and Wochner, A. (2020) ‘How Tectonic Shifts in Global Energy Are Affecting Global Governance’, in Hafner, M. and Tagliapietra, S. (Eds.), Global Governance in Transformation, pp. 147–62 (Cham: Springer Nature).Google Scholar
Hänsel, M. C., Franks, M., Kalkuhl, M., and Edenhofer, O. (2022) ‘Optimal Carbon Taxation and Horizontal Equity: A Welfare-Theoretic Approach with Application to German Household Data’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 116, 102730.Google Scholar
IEA (2018) Outlook for Producer Economies 2018 (Paris: International Energy Agency).Google Scholar
IEA (2021) Report: The Cost Of Capital In Clean Energy Transitions, www.iea.org/articles/the-cost-of-capital-in-clean-energy-transitionsGoogle Scholar
IEA IMF (2022) Global Financial Stability Report (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).Google Scholar
IRENA (2019) A New World. The Geopolitics of the Energy Transformation (Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency).Google Scholar
Italian National Institute of Statistics (2022) Household Budget Survey, www.istat.it/en/archivio/180353Google Scholar
Jacobsen, M. R. (2013) ‘Evaluating US Fuel Economy Standards in a Model with Producer and Household Heterogeneity’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5:2, 148–87.Google Scholar
Jaumotte, F., and Osorio, C. (2015) Inequality and Labor Market Institutions (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).Google Scholar
Jetten, J., Mols, F., and Selvanathan, H. P. (2020) ‘How Economic Inequality Fuels the Rise and Persistence of the Yellow Vest Movement’, International Review of Social Psychology, 33:1, 2.Google Scholar
Johnson, O. (2016) ‘Promoting Green Industrial Development through Local Content Requirements: India’s National Solar Mission’, Climate Policy, 16:2, 178–95.Google Scholar
Kaplan, G., Moll, B., and Violante, G. L. (2018) ‘Monetary Policy According to HANK’, American Economic Review, 108:3, 697743.Google Scholar
Khandker, S., and Koolwal, G. (2007) ‘Are Pro-growth Policies Pro-poor? Evidence from Bangladesh’, mimeo, The World Bank.Google Scholar
Kirchherr, J., and Urban, F. (2018) ‘Technology Transfer and Cooperation for Low Carbon Energy Technology: Analysing 30 Years of Scholarship and Proposing a Research Agenda’, Energy Policy, 119, 600–09.Google Scholar
Kollamthodi, S., Pueyo, A., Gibson, G., Narkeviciute, R., Hawkes, A., Cesbron, S., et al. (2013) ‘Support for the Impact Assessment of a Proposal to Address Maritime Transport Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, Report for European Commission – DG Climate Action, Ricardo-AEA/R/ED56985.Google Scholar
Leonard, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Shapiro, J., Tagliapietra, T., and Wolff, G. (2021) ‘The Geopolitics of the European Green Deal’, Policy Contribution No. 04/2021, Bruegel.Google Scholar
Levinson, A. (2019) ‘Energy Efficiency Standards Are More Regressive than Energy Taxes: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6:S1, S7–36.Google Scholar
Luciani, G. (2020) ‘The Impacts of the Energy Transition on Growth and Income Distribution’, in Hafner, M. and Tagliapietra, S. (Eds.), The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 73. (Cham: Springer).Google Scholar
Makarov, I., Chen, Y. H. H., and Paltsev, S. (2017) ‘Finding Itself in the Post-Paris World: Russia in the New Global Energy Landscape’, MIT Joint Program Report Series, Report 324.Google Scholar
Mercure, J. F., Pollitt, H., Edwards, N. R., Holden, P. B., Chewpreecha, U., Salas, P., et al. (2018) ‘Environmental Impact Assessment for Climate Change Policy with the Simulation-Based Integrated Assessment Model E3ME-FTT-GENIE’, Energy Strategy Reviews, 20, 195208.Google Scholar
Mercure, J. F., Salas, P., Vercoulen, P., Semieniuk, G., Lam, A., Pollitt, H., et al. (2021) ‘Reframing Incentives for Climate Policy Action’, Nature Energy, 6:12, 1133–43.Google Scholar
Nahm, J. (2017) ‘Renewable Futures and Industrial Legacies: Wind and Solar Sectors in China, Germany, and the United States’, Business and Politics, 19:1, 68106.Google Scholar
Ohlendorf, N., Jakob, M., Minx, J. C., Schröder, C., and Steckel, J. C. (2021) ‘Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A Meta-Analysis’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 78:1, 142.Google Scholar
Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., and Tsangarides, C. G. (2014) Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).Google Scholar
Peters, G. P., Davis, S. J., and Andrew, R. M. (2012) ‘A Synthesis of Carbon in International Trade’, Biogeosciences Discussions, 9:3, 39494023.Google Scholar
Pizer, W. A., and Sexton, S. (2020) ‘The Distributional Impacts of Energy Taxes’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13:1, 104–23.Google Scholar
Poore, J., and Nemecek, T. (2018) ‘Reducing Food’s Environmental Impacts through Producers and Consumers’, Science, 360:6392, 987–92.Google Scholar
Poterba, J. M. (2017) ‘Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive?’, in Distributional Effects of Environmental and Energy Policy, pp. 3150 (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Rausch, S., Metcalf, G. E., and Reilly, J. M. (2011) ‘Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A General Equilibrium Approach with Micro-data for Households’, Energy Economics, 33, S20–33.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H., and Lema, R. (2015) ‘The Global Green Economy’, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S. and Martin, B. R. (Eds.), The Triple Challenge for Europe, 1st ed., pp. 119–42 (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sommer, S., Mattauch, L., and Pahle, M. (2022) ‘Supporting Carbon Taxes: The Role of Fairness’, Ecological Economics, 195, 107359.Google Scholar
Steckel, J. C., Dorband, I. I., Montrone, L., Ward, H., Missbach, L., Hafner, F., and Renner, S. (2021) ‘Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing in Developing Asia’, Nature Sustainability, 4:11, 10051014.Google Scholar
Tagliapietra, S. (2019) ‘The Impact of the Global Energy Transition on MENA Oil and Gas Producers’, Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100397.Google Scholar
Tiezzi, S. (2005) ‘The Welfare Effects and the Distributive Impact of Carbon Taxation on Italian Households’, Energy Policy, 33:12, 1597–612.Google Scholar
Tovar Reaños, M. A., and Sommerfeld, K. (2018) ‘Fuel for Inequality: Distributional Effects of Environmental Reforms on Private Transport’, Resource and Energy Economics, 51, 2843.Google Scholar
Tovar Reaños, M. A., and Wölfing, N. M. (2018) ‘Household Energy Prices and Inequality: Evidence from German Microdata Based on the EASI Demand System’, Energy Economics, 70, 8497.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2022) Review of Maritime Transport 2022 (Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development).Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau (September 2022) Income in the United States: 2021, www.census.gov/library/publications/2022/demo/p60-276.html#:~:text=Highlights,and%20Table%20A%2D1Google Scholar
Unruh, G. C. (2000) ‘Understanding Carbon Lock-in’, Energy Policy, 28:12, 817–30.Google Scholar
Unruh, G. C., and Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2006) ‘Globalizing Carbon Lock-in’, Energy Policy, 34:10, 1185–97.Google Scholar
Vona, F. (2019) ‘Job Losses and Political Acceptability of Climate Policies: Why the “Job-Killing” Argument Is So Persistent and How to Overturn It’, Climate Policy, 19:4, 524–32.Google Scholar
West, S. E. (2004) ‘Distributional Effects of Alternative Vehicle Pollution Control Policies’, Journal of Public Economics, 88:3–4, 735–57.Google Scholar
West, S. E., and Williams, R. C. (2017) ‘Estimates from a Consumer Demand System: Implications for the Incidence of Environmental Taxes’, in Fullerton, D. (Ed.), Distributional Effects of Environmental and Energy Policy, pp. 117–40 (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
World Bank (2017) The Growing Role of Minerals and Metals for a Low Carbon Future (Washington, DC: World Bank).Google Scholar
World Bank (2022a) World Bank national accounts data: GDP (current US$), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CDGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2022b) World Bank staff estimates: Natural gas rents (% of GDP), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.NGAS.RT.ZSGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2022c) World Bank staff estimates: Oil rents (% of GDP), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PETR.RT.ZSGoogle Scholar
Zachmann, G., Fredriksson, G., and Claeys, G. (2018) ‘The Distributional Effects of Climate Policies’, Blueprint Series 28, Bruegel.Google Scholar
Zhang, F., and Gallagher, K. S. (2016) ‘Innovation and Technology Transfer through Global Value Chains: Evidence from China’s PV Industry’, Energy Policy, 94, 191203.Google Scholar
Zhou, L., Gilbert, S., Wang, Y., Cabré, M. M., and Gallagher, K. P. (2018) ‘Moving the Green Belt and Road Initiative: From Words to Actions’, World Resource Institute Working Paper, 08-18, www.wri.org/research/moving-green-belt-and-road-initiative-words-actionsGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×