Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:05:12.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The multidisciplinary memory clinic approach

from Part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

German E. Berrios
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
John R. Hodges
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

The aim of this chapter is to describe briefly the origins, principles and organization of the Cambridge Memory Clinic (CMC) which was started by the editors in 1990. Memory clinics vary a great deal in scope and services. In their useful paper on memory clinics in the British Isles, Wright and Lindesay (1995) surveyed 20 such facilities, reporting that in only 45% a psychiatric instrument was used as a routine to measure ‘affective state’; and although psychiatrists seemed to participate in about 75% of clinics, their role and the comprehensiveness of their psychiatric assessment were unclear. Some clinics seem to have a wide scope: for example, in an excellent study, Verhey et al. (1995) assessed the DSM-III-R psychiatric status of 430 consecutive patients and in 61 subjects found depression, 39 dysthymia, 23 adjustment disorder, 18 personality disorder, 6 anxiety disorder and 2 somatoform disorder; the authors made the important point that the low rates of non-affective psychiatric disorder reported by some clinics is likely to result from a perfunctory psychiatric examination or the use of insensitive instruments. On the other hand, many such clinics do not include a routine neurological or formal neuropsychological assessment.

The Cambridge Memory Clinic

The objective when founding this clinic was to establish a truly multidisciplinary service which combined behavioural neurology, neuropsychiatry and neuropsychology. From the start its main objective was to assess patients complaining of memory impairment and patients whose memory is considered as impaired by others, even when the patient has no awareness of deficit.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×