Book contents
- Native Speakers, Interrupted
- Native Speakers, Interrupted
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 On Heritage Speakers as Native Speakers
- 2 Structural Changes in Heritage Language Grammars
- 3 Differential Object Marking
- 4 Language Change and the Acquisition of Differential Object Marking
- 5 The Vulnerability of Differential Object Marking in Three Heritage Languages
- 6 Differential Object Marking in Spanish as a Heritage Language
- 7 Differential Object Marking in Hindi as a Heritage Language
- 8 Differential Object Marking and Clitic Doubling in Romanian as a Heritage Language
- 9 Comparing the Three Heritage Languages
- 10 Intergenerational Transmission
- Implications
- References
- Index
10 - Intergenerational Transmission
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2022
- Native Speakers, Interrupted
- Native Speakers, Interrupted
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 On Heritage Speakers as Native Speakers
- 2 Structural Changes in Heritage Language Grammars
- 3 Differential Object Marking
- 4 Language Change and the Acquisition of Differential Object Marking
- 5 The Vulnerability of Differential Object Marking in Three Heritage Languages
- 6 Differential Object Marking in Spanish as a Heritage Language
- 7 Differential Object Marking in Hindi as a Heritage Language
- 8 Differential Object Marking and Clitic Doubling in Romanian as a Heritage Language
- 9 Comparing the Three Heritage Languages
- 10 Intergenerational Transmission
- Implications
- References
- Index
Summary
This chapter presents a more fine-grained analysis of why and how DOM vulnerability may have become more prevalent in Spanish than in Hindi and Romanian at the individual level. Specifically, linking language acquisition, language attrition and diachronic language change, it addresses the question of the potential relationship between the I-language of the heritage speakers and the E-language of the first-generation immigrants, who are often the heritage speakers’ main source of input. It presents follow-up studies of DOM in Spanish-speaking bilingual children and adults and their mothers and the results are not consistent with direct transmission of DOM omission from the first to the second-generation (the heritage speakers). It is suggested that that second-generation heritage speakers, who have as much difficulty mastering the morphology of their heritage language as typical L2 learners, can also change the grammars of the parental generation and be the innovators in the Spanish variety spoken in the United States.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Native Speakers, InterruptedDifferential Object Marking and Language Change in Heritage Languages, pp. 261 - 280Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022