Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:35:12.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 21 - Latvia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2023

By
Otars Opermanis ,
Ilona Mendzina ,
Ainars Aunins  and
Inga Racinska
Edited by
Graham Tucker
Graham Tucker
Affiliation:
Nature Conservation Consulting
Get access

Summary

The chapter describes the main nature conservation challenges in Latvia, its main policy responses and actions, and their achievements and lessons, primarily over the last 40 years. This covers the country’s natural characteristics, habitats and species of particular importance; the status of nature and main pressures affecting it; nature conservation policies (including biodiversity strategies), legislation, governance and key actors; species measures; protected areas and networks; general conservation measures (e.g. development planning and impact assessment, and management and restoration of coastal habitats, rivers, grasslands, mires and forests); nature conservation costs, economic benefits and funding sources; and biodiversity monitoring. Likely future developments are also identified. Conclusions are drawn on what measures have been most effective and why, and what is needed to improve the implementation of existing measures and achieve future nature conservation goals.

Keywords

Latviabiodiversitynature conservationenvironmental policyenvironmental legislationEuropeEuropean UnionBirds DirectiveHabitats Directiveprotected areas
Type
Chapter
Information
Nature Conservation in Europe
Approaches and Lessons
 , pp. 434 - 450
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (1991) Particularly protected nature objects in the territory of the Latvian SSR. Gandrs. Riga: Environmental Protection Committee of Latvia.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2010) Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2017) Economic Valuation of Ecosystems and their Services for Pilot Implementation Areas. Riga: LIFE EcosystemServices.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2019) Natura 2000 newsletter. Number 46. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Auniņa, L. & Rove, I. (2013) Virsāju biotopi. In Eiropas Savienības Aizsargājamie Biotopi Latvijā. Noteikšanas rokasgrāmata, ed. Auniņš, A., pp. 63–103. Riga: Latvian Fund for Nature.Google Scholar
Auniņš, A. (ed.) (2008) Current Issues in Wildlife Management in Latvia [Aktuālā savvaļas sugu un biotopu apsaimniekošanas problemātika Latvijā]. Riga: Latvian Fund for Nature.Google Scholar
Auniņš, A. (2010) Bird Populations in Latvian Farmland: Patterns and Trends. Riga: University of Latvia.Google Scholar
Auniņš, A. (2018) Ligzdojošo putnu skaits turpina samazināties: visvairāk cieš Āfrikā ziemojošie un ar lauksaimniecības zemēm saistītie putni. Putni dabā, 81, 10–15.Google Scholar
Aunins, A. & Priednieks, J. (2009) Recent changes in agricultural landscape and bird populations in Latvia: impacts and prospects of EU agricultural policy. Avocetta, 33, 93–98.Google Scholar
Bagrade, G., Ruņģis, D. E., Ornicāns, A. et al. (2016) Status assessment of Eurasian lynx in Latvia linking genetics and demography – a growing population or a source-sink process? Mammal Research, 61, 337–352.Google Scholar
Bergmanis, U., Auniņš, A., Petriņš, A. et al. (2015) Population size, dynamics and reproduction success of the lesser spotted eagle (Aquila pomarina) in Latvia. Slovak Raptor Journal, 9, 45–54.Google Scholar
Bijlsma, R. J., Agrillo, E., Attore, F. et al. (2017) Defining and applying the concept of Favourable Reference Values. Draft technical report. Wageningen: Wageningen Environmental Research.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2017) Review of Illegal Killing and Taking of Birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Boruks, A. (2004) Dabas apstākļi un to ietekme uz agrovidi Latvijā. Rīga: Valsts Zemes Dienests.Google Scholar
Cinate, K., Larmanis, V. & Piksena, I. (eds.) (2016) Important Examples of Wild Species and Habitat Management in Latvia: Forests. Riga: Nature Conservation Agency.Google Scholar
CSB (2018a) CSB Database [WWW Document]. www.csb.gov.lv/en/statistika/dbGoogle Scholar
CSB (2018b) Farm Structure in Latvia 2016. Collection of Statistics. Riga: Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia.Google Scholar
European Commission (2001) Assessment of plans and projects significantly affecting Natura 2000 sites. A methodological guidance on the provisions of Article 6 (3) and (4) of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013) The Economic Benefits of the Natura 2000 network – Synthesis Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2012) Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nature Conservation, 1, 11–26.Google Scholar
Ikauniece, S. (ed.) (2017) Vadlīnijas aizsargājamo biotopu saglabāšanas vadlīnijas Latvijā. 4. sējums. Meži. Sigulda: Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde.Google Scholar
Kalniņa, L. (2008) Mire origin and development in Latvia. In Mire Conservation and Management in Especially Protected Nature Areas in Latvia, ed. Pakalne, M., pp. 21–25. Riga: Latvian Fund for Nature.Google Scholar
Keiss, O. (2005) Impact of changes in agricultural land use on the Corncrake Crex crex population in Latvia. Acta Universitatis Latviensis, 691, 93–109.Google Scholar
LAD (2016) Bioloģiskās daudzveidības uzturēšana zālājos. Riga: Lauku atbalsta dienests.Google Scholar
LAD (2018) LIZ apsekošanas rezultāti novadu griezumā (2017.gads). Riga: Lauku atbalsta dienests. www.lad.gov.lv/files/zva_17_gat_tabula.pdfGoogle Scholar
Laime, B. (ed.) (2017) Vadlīnijas aizsargājamo biotopu saglabāšanas vadlīnijas Latvijā. 1. sējums. Piejūra, smiltāji un virsāji. Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde, Sigulda, Latvia.Google Scholar
MoF (2019) Biotopu un sugu aizsardzības labvēlīga statusa atjaunošanas pasākumu sociāli ekonomiskais novērtējums. www.esfondi.lv/upload/izvertejumi/biotopu-novertejums-final.pdfGoogle Scholar
NCA (2017) National Natura 2000 protection and conservation programme. [Natura 2000 teritoriju nacionālā aizsardzības un apsaimniekošanas programma]. Sigulda, Latvia: Nature Conservation Agency of Latvia.Google Scholar
NCA (2021) Prioritised Action Framework (PAF) for NATURA 2000 in Latvia. For the Multiannual Financial Framework Period 2021–2027. Sigulda: Latvia: Nature Conservation Agency of Latvia.Google Scholar
Nikodemus, O., Bell, S., Grı̄ne, I. & Liepiņš, I. (2005) The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 57–67.Google Scholar
Nikodemus, O. & Brumelis, G. (2015) Dabas aizsardzība [Nature conservation]. Riga: Academic Press of the University of Latvia.Google Scholar
Nikodemus, O., Kļaviņš, M., Krišjāne, Z. & Zelčs, V. (eds.) (2018) Latvija. Zeme, daba, tauta, valsts. Riga: Latvijas Universitāte.Google Scholar
Nipers, A., Krievina, A. & Pilvere, I. (2018) Projecting productivity in agriculture in Latvia. Research for Rural Development, 2, 130–137.Google Scholar
OECD (2019) OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Latvia 2019. www.oecd.org/environment/country-reviews/oecd-environmental-performance-reviews-latvia-2019.htmGoogle Scholar
Olson, V. A., Davies, R. G., Orme, C. D. L. et al. (2009) Global biogeography and ecology of body size in birds. Ecology Letters, 12, 249–259.Google Scholar
Opermanis, O. (ed.) (2002) Important examples of wildlife management in Latvia. DANCEE. Riga: Ulma.Google Scholar
Opermanis, O. (2016) Accumulation of knowledge on management of Natura 2000 sites. In Important Examples of Wild Species and Habitat Management in Latvia: Forests, eds. Cinate, K., Larmanis, V. & Piksena, I., pp. 5–11. Riga: Nature Conservation Agency.Google Scholar
Opermanis, O., MacSharry, B., Aunins, A. & Sipkova, Z. (2012) Connectedness and connectivity of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas across country borders in the European Union. Biological Conservation, 153, 227–238.Google Scholar
Ozolins, J., Mannil, P., Balciauskas, L. & Ornicans, A. (2014) Ecological, social and economic justification of wolf population management in the Baltic region. Beitrage zur Jagd- und Wildforschung, 39, 215–224.Google Scholar
Racinska, I. (2002) Handbook for management planning in protected areas in Latvia [Rokasgrāmata īpaši aizsargājamo dabas teritoriju dabas aizsardzības plānu izstrādātājiem]. Riga: Ulma.Google Scholar
Racinskis, E. (2004) Important Bird Areas of European Union Importance in Latvia [Eiropas Savienības nozīmes putniem nozīmīgās vietas Latvijā]. Riga: Latvian Ornithological Society.Google Scholar
Rove, I. (2013) Piejūras un iekšzemes kāpu biotopi. In Eiropas Savienības AizsargāJamie Biotopi Latvijā. Noteikšanas Rokasgrāmata, ed. Auniņš, A., pp. 63–103. Riga: Latvijas dabas fonds.Google Scholar
Rūsiņa, S. (ed.) (2017) Vadlīnijas aizsargājamo biotopu saglabāšanas vadlīnijas Latvijā. 3. sējums. Dabiskās pļavas un ganības. Sigulda, Latvia: Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde.Google Scholar
Sabardina, G. S. (1957) Lugovaja rastitelnost Latvijskoi SSR. (In Russian.) Riga: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of Latvian SSR.Google Scholar
Saliņš, Z. (1999) Meža izmantošana Latvijā: vēsture, stāvoklis, perspektīvas. Jelgava, Latvia: LLU Meža izmantošanas katedra.Google Scholar
Skujenieks, M. (1927) Latvija. Zeme un iedzīvotāji. A.Gulbja apgādniecība. Rīga. 752 lpp.Google Scholar
Ssymank, A. (2005) Cross-border implementation and coherence of Natura 2000 in Germany. In Crossing Borders: Natura 2000 in the Light of EU Enlargement, eds. Leibenath, M., Rientjes, S., Lintz, G. & Kolbe-Weber, K., pp. 25–39. Proceedings of an International Workshop, Dresden. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Leibniz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development.Google Scholar
Strods, H., Zunde, M., Mugurēvičs, E. et al. (eds.) (1999) Latvijas mežu vēsture līdz 1940. gadam. Riga: WWF - Pasaules Dabas Fonds.Google Scholar
Urtāns, A. (ed.) (2017) Vadlīnijas aizsargājamo biotopu saglabāšanas vadlīnijas Latvijā. 2. sējums. Upes un ezeri. Sigulda, Latvia: Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde.Google Scholar
VARAM (2014) Information on the activities supported by the EU Structural funds. www.varam.gov.lv/lat/fondi/kohez/2014_2020/?doc=25728Google Scholar
VARAM (2017) Guidelines of sustainable peat use 2018–2050. [Kūdras ilgtspējīgas izmantošanas pamatnostādnes 2018. - 2050. Gadam.] Ministry of Environment Protection and Regional Development.Google Scholar
Viksne, J. (1994) Important Bird Areas in Latvia. Riga: Latvian Ornithological Society.Google Scholar
VMD (2018a) 2017.gada publiskais pārskats. Riga: Valsts meža dienests.Google Scholar
VMD (2018b) Ciršanas apjomi skaitļos un faktos. www.vmd.gov.lv/valsts-meza-dienests/statiskas-lapas/-meza-apsaimniekosana-/valsts-meza-dienests/statiskas-lapas/valsts-meza-dienests/statiskas-lapas/cirsanas-apjomi-skaitlos-un-faktos?id=2638 (Accessed 11 March 2018).Google Scholar
Zdanovskis, K. & Pilvere, I. (2015) Agricultural development in Latvia after joining the European Union. Research for Rural Development, 1, 161–168.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×