Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:47:57.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2012

Jean Marie Schultz
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Mark Warschauer
Affiliation:
America-Mideast Educational and Training Services
Richard Kern
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Not long ago, as the technological revolution began accelerating at an astounding rate, a number of humanists admonished their more reticent colleagues to put aside their misgivings about the educational potential of the computer and to begin integrating technology into their approaches to teaching. Some scholars argued that the humanities, by not implementing new technologies, ran the risk of increasing obsolescence (see Herron & Moos, 1993, p. 479). Partially on this basis, Richard Lanham (1993) argues strenuously for the integration of computers into the humanities, and particularly into the writing curriculum, noting that “The students we teach are going to do most of their writing and much of their reading on an electronic screen. They are going to live they live now in a world of electronic text” (p. 121).

As Lanham suggests, one of the most compelling areas of exploration for computer use is in the field of foreign language writing. Part of this attention derives quite naturally from the English composition curricula from which the teaching of foreign language writing takes its cue. With the advent of the word processor, the teaching of writing has drastically changed, making the radical revision of a text possible with a few keystrokes. This technological ease of revision has in turn served to bolster the parallel shift in the teaching of writing from an end-product approach, where the teacher alone reads and comments on papers students have written without the benefit of feedback on a rough draft, to a process approach, where students work in small groups of peers for suggestions for multiple drafts, subsequently revising their papers before finally handing them in to the teacher.

Type
Chapter
Information
Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice
Concepts and Practice
, pp. 121 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×