Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:00:23.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

39 - The Qurʾān and the Bible

from Part IV - The Bible in Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2012

Richard Marsden
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
E. Ann Matter
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

The Qurʾānic text transmitted to us betrays a peculiar composition, essentially different from that of both the Hebrew Bible – which relates salvation history through a roughly chronological sequence of events – and the Gospels, which narrate the life of Christ and the emergence of the earliest Christian community. The Qurʾān does not present a continuous narrative of the past, but, in its early texts, conjures the future (the imminent day of judgement), while later entering into a debate with various interlocutors about the implementation of monotheist scripture in the present. It consists of 114 text units, known as suras, which vary in length from two-sentence statements to lengthy polythematic communications. These suras are arranged roughly according to their length; the longest suras are placed first, with the shorter ones generally following in order of decreasing length.

Though we possess manuscript evidence only from the last third of the seventh century, the most plausible hypothesis is that the texts in the transmitted Qurʾānic corpus do reflect, more or less faithfully, the wording of communications that were actually pronounced by the Prophet during his ministry in Mecca (610–22 ce) and subsequently Medina (622–32). The strikingly mechanical composition of the corpus betrays both a conservative and a theologically disinterested attitude on the part of the redactors, which fits best with a very early date of redaction. Though the view upheld in Islamic tradition – that the Prophet's recitations were fixed already some twenty-five years after his death by the third caliph, ʿUthmān (644–56), thereby forming the corpus we have before us – cannot be positively proven, there is no evidence to contradict it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rippin, A. (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to the Qurʾān (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006) and A. Neuwirth, Der Koran als Text der Spätantike. Ein europäischer Zugang (Berlin: Verlag der Weltreligionen, 2010)Google Scholar
A most successful modern translation has been provided by Khalidi, T., The Qurʾān (London: Penguin, 2008)Google Scholar
Kugel, J. L., The Bible as it Was, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1998), p. 17Google Scholar
Geiger, A., Was hat Mohammed aus dem Judenthume aufgenommen?, repr. of 2nd edn of 1833 with introduction by F. Niewöhner (Berlin: Parerga, 2005)Google Scholar
Wilken, R. L., ‘In Defense of Allegory’, Modern Theology 14 (1998), 197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A., ‘Contextualizing Contexts, Loss of Focus. Orientalism and Geiger's Was hat Mohammed aus dem Judenthume aufgenommen Reconsidered’, in D. Hartwig, W. Homolka, M. Marx and A. Neuwirth (eds.), ‘Im vollen Licht der Geschichte’. Die Wissenschaft des Judentums und die Anfänge der Koranforschung (Würzburg: Ergon, 2008), pp. 87–98Google Scholar
Nöldeke, T., Geschichte des Qorans (Göttingen: Dieterich, 1860)Google Scholar
Marx, M., ‘Ein Koranforschungsprojekt in der Tradition der Wissenschaft des Judentums. Zur Programmatik des Akademienvorhabens Corpus Coranicum’, in Hartwig et al. (eds.), ‘Im vollen Licht der Geschichte’, pp. 41–54
Neuwirth, A., ‘Qurʾānic Readings of the Psalms’, in A. Neuwirth, N. Sinai and M. Marx (eds.), The Qurʾān in Context. Historical and Literary Investigations in the Milieu of the Genesis of the Qurʾān (Leiden: Brill, 2009), pp. 733–78, and A. Neuwirth, Der Koran. Vol. : Frühmekkanischen Suren (Berlin: Verlag der Weltreligionen, 2011).Google Scholar
Speyer, H., Die biblischen Erzählungen im Qoran, 2nd edn (Hildesheim: Olms, 1961)Google Scholar
Griffith, S. H., ‘Christians and Christianity’, in J. D. McAuliffe (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, vol. i (Leiden: Brill, 2001), pp. 307–16Google Scholar
Brockelmann, C., Lexicon Syriacum (Halle: Olms, 1928), p. 488Google Scholar
Neuwirth, A., ‘Vom Rezitationstext über die Liturgie zum Kanon. Zur Entstehung und Wiederauflösung der Surenkomposition im Verlauf der Entwicklung eines islamischen Kultus’, in S. Wild (ed.), The Qurʾān as Text (Leiden: Brill, 1996), pp. 69–107Google Scholar
Najman, Hindy, ‘Interpretation as Primordial Writing. Jubilees and its Authority Conferring Strategies’, Journal for the Study of Judaism 30 (1999), 379–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. H., Fear of God and the Beginning of Wisdom. The School of Nisibis and Christian Scholastic Culture in Late Antique Mesopotamia (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Rubin, U., ‘Morning and Evening Prayers in Early Islam’, Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 10 (1987), 40–67Google Scholar
Hawting, G. R. (ed.), The Development of Islamic Ritual (Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Variorum, 2006), pp. 105–29Google Scholar
Neuwirth, A. and Neuwirth, K., ‘Surat al-Fatiha – “Eröffnung” des Text-Corpus Koran oder “Introitus” der Gebetsliturgie?’, in W. Gross, H. Irsigler and T. Seidl (eds.), Text, Methode und Grammatik. Wolfgang Richter zum 65. Geburtstag (St Ottilien: EOS-Verlag, 1991), pp. 331–7Google Scholar
Neuwirth, A., ‘Referentiality and Textuality in Surat al-Hijr. Some Observations on the Qurʾānic “Canonical Process” and the Emergence of a Community’, in I. J. Boullata (ed.), Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qurʾān (London: Curzon, 2000), pp. 143–72Google Scholar
Neuwirth, A., ‘The Qurʾān, Crisis and Memory. The Qurʾānic Path towards Canonization as Reflected in the Anthropogonic Accounts’, in A. Neuwirth and A. Pflitsch (eds.), Crisis and Memory in Islamic Societies (Beirut and Würzburg: Ergon, 2001), pp. 113–52Google Scholar
Neuwirth, A., ‘The Spiritual Meaning of Jerusalem in Islam’, in N. Rosovsky (ed.), City of the Great King. Jerusalem from David to the Present (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), pp. 94–129Google Scholar
Neuwirth, A., ‘Structure and the Emergence of Community’, in Rippin (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to the Qurʾān, pp. 140–58
Riffaterre, M., Semiotics of Poetry (Bloomington, IN, and London: Indiana University Press, 1978), p. 92Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×