Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:25:31.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - States, Parties, and Expertise

from II - Media Explosion, Knowledge as Power, and Demographic Reversals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2020

By
Stephanie L. Mudge
Edited by
Thomas Janoski ,
Cedric de Leon ,
Joya Misra  and
Isaac William Martin
Thomas Janoski
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Cedric de Leon
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Joya Misra
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Isaac William Martin
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

The first opinion that is formed of a ruler’s intelligence is based on the quality of the men he has around him. When they are competent and loyal he can always be considered wise … . But when they are otherwise, the prince is always open to adverse criticism. … [A]s for how a prince can assess his minister, here is an infallible guide: when you see a minister thinking more of himself than of you, and seeking his own profit in everything he does, such a one will never be a good minister, you will never be able to trust him.

Keywords

statespolitical partiesexpertisesociology of knowledgesocial science and technology studies (STS)framesclaimsarticulationwonks
Type
Chapter
Information
The New Handbook of Political Sociology , pp. 353 - 383
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. 2005. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, J., Clemens, E., and Orloff, A.. 2005. “Introduction: Social Theory, Modernity and the Three Waves of Historical Sociology” in Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Addams, J. 2002 [1915]. Democracy and Social Ethics. Chicago: Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E., and Su, Y.. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 287–307.Google Scholar
Beamish, T. 2015. Community at Risk? Biodefense and the Collective Search for Security. : Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A.. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.Google Scholar
Berezin, M. 1999. “Political Belonging: Emotion, Nation, and Identity in Fascist Italy” pp. 355–377 in Steinmetz, G. (ed.) State/Culture: State-formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Billington, J. H. 2007 [1980]. Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E.. 2007 [1999]. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E.. 2005. “The New Spirit of Capitalism.” International Journal of Political and Cultural Sociology 18: 161–188.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L.. 1983. “Finding One’s Way in Social Space: A Study Based on Games.” Social Science Information 22: 631–680.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L.. 2006 [1991]. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984 [1979]. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.. 1993 [1985]. “Principles for a Sociology of Cultural Works” in The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Edited and with an introduction by John Thompson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L., and Farage, S.. 1994 [1991]. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” Sociological Theory 12(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Brint, S. 1994. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M. 1998. “The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics” pp. 1–57 in Callon, M. (ed.) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Camic, C. 2011. “Bourdieu’s Cleft Sociology of Science.” Minerva 49: 275–293.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. and Pedersen, O. K.. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, S. D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Post-colonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Champagne, P. 2005. “‘Making the People Speak’: On the Social Uses of and Reactions to Public Opinion Polls” pp. 111–132 in Wacquant, Loïc (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Christin, O. 2005. “Ancien Régime Ballots: A Double Historicization of Electoral Practice” pp. 91–110 in Wacquant, Loïc (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Cohn, B. S. 1996. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. J. 1998 [1886–1930]. The Voice of Anna Julia Cooper: Including a Voice from the South and Other Important Essays, Papers, and Letters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Davies, W. 2014. The Limits of Neoliberalism. New York: SAGE.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 2011 [1922]. Human Nature and Conduct. Minneola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B.. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists and the Transformation of Latin-American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dulio, D. A. 2004. For Better or Worse?: How Political Consultants Are Changing Elections in the United States. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1992 [1890–1900]. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1995 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen Fields. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. and Mauss, M.. 1963 [1903]. Primitive Classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Emigh, R., Riley, D., and Ahmed, P.. 2016. Changes in Censuses from Imperialist to Welfare States: How Societies and States Count. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J.. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99(6): 1411–1454.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Espeland, W. and Stevens, N.. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology 49: 401–436.Google Scholar
Evans, P. B., Skocpol, T., and Rueschemeyer, D (eds.). 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eyal, G. 2006. The Disenchantment of the Orient: Expertise in Arab Affairs and the Israeli State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Eyal, G. and Buccholz, L.. 2010. “From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 117–137.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. and Mara-Drita, I.. 1996. “How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union.” American Journal of Sociology 102: 1–33.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. and Stone Sweet, A.. 2002. “Constructing Politics and Markets: An Institutionalist Account of European Integration.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 1206–1243.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.. 2009. Economists and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fourcade, M. 2011. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of ‘Nature’.” American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1721–1777.Google Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. 2001. “Politics, Institutional Structures, and the Rise of Economics: A Comparative Study.” Theory and Society 30: 397–447.Google Scholar
Franklin, B. 1970 [1751]. “Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 13(4): 469–475.Google Scholar
Geva, D. 2013. Conscription, Family, and the Modern State: A Comparative Study of France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geva, D.. 2015. “Selective Service, the Gender-Ordered Family, and the Rational Informality of the American State.” American Journal of Sociology 121(1): 171–204.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1987. Nation-State and Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Go, J. and Krause, M.. 2016. “Fielding Transnationalism: An Introduction.” Sociological Review Monographs 64(2): 6–30.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. (ed.). 2003. States, Parties, and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., and Polletta, F. (eds.). 2001. Passionate Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. L. 1997. Gender and the Politics of Welfare Reform: Mothers’ Pensions in Chicago, 1911–1929. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gorski, P. 2003. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1971 [1929–1935]. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Grossman, M. 2009. “Going Pro? Political Campaign Consulting and the Professional Model.” Journal of Political Marketing 8(2): 81–104.Google Scholar
Groves, J. M. 2001. “Animal Rights and the Politics of Emotion: Folk Constructs of Emotions in the Animal Rights Movement” pp. 212–229 in Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., and Polletta, F. (eds.) Passionate Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1970. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, D. and Berman, E.. 2014. “Do Economists Make Policies? On the Political Effects of Economists.” Socio-Economic Review 12(4): 1–33.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (ed.). 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jasper, J. M. 1997. The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, J. M.. 2005. “Culture, Knowledge, and Politics” pp. 115–134 in Janoski, T. and Misra, J. (eds.) Handbook of Political Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, J. M.. 2011. “Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 285–303.Google Scholar
Jung, M. and Kwon, Y.. 2013. “Theorizing the US Racial State: Sociology Since Racial Formation.” Sociology Compass 7(11): 927–940.Google Scholar
Karabel, J. 1996. “Towards a Theory of Intellectuals and Politics.” Theory and Society 25: 205–233.Google Scholar
Krause, M. 2016. “‘Western Hegemony’ in the Social Sciences: Fields and Model Systems.” Sociological Review Monographs 64(2): 194–211.Google Scholar
Lamont, M. 2012. “Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation.” Annual Review of Sociology 38: 201–221.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World” pp. 141–170 in Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkay, M. (eds.) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laurison, D. 2014. “Positions and Position-Takings among Political Producers: The Field of American Political Consultants” in Grenfell, M. and Lebaron, F. (eds.) Bourdieu and Data Analysis. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Laurison, D.. 2015a. “The Right to Speak: Differences in Political Engagement among the British Elite.” The Sociological Review 63(2): 349–372. DOI:10.1111/1467-954X.12294Google Scholar
Laurison, D.. 2015b. “The Willingness to State an Opinion: Inequality, Don’t Know Responses, and Political Participation.” Sociological Forum 30(4): 925–948. DOI:10.1111/socf.12202Google Scholar
Lee, C. W. 2015. Do-It-Yourself Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C. W., McQuarrie, M., and Walker, E. (eds.). 2015. Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, M. 2005. “The Modern State and the Primitive Accumulation of Symbolic Power.” American Journal of Sociology 110(6): 1651–1683.Google Scholar
Loveman, M.. 2014. National Colors: Racial Classification and the State in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. 1999 [1513]. The Prince. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. and Millo, Y.. 2003. “Constructing a Market, Performing a Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 107–145.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L.. 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. 1936 [1929–1931]. Ideology and Utopia. An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1978 [1843]. “For a Ruthless Criticism of Everything Existing” pp. 12–15 in Tucker, R. C. (ed.) The Marx–Engels Reader. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, K.. 1845. “Theses on Feuerbach” in Tucker (ed.) The Marx–Engels Reader.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1978 [1845–1846]. “The German Ideology” in Tucker (ed.) The Marx–Engels Reader.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1978 [1848]. “The Manifesto of the Communist Party” in Tucker (ed.) The Marx–Engels Reader.Google Scholar
Mayrl, D. and Quinn, S.. 2016. “Defining the State from within: Boundaries, Schemas, and Associational Policymaking.” Sociological Theory 34(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. and Tarrow, S.. 2010. “Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements.” Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 529–542.Google Scholar
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C.. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, M. 2013. “Community Organizations in the Foreclosure Crisis: The Failure of Neoliberal Civil Society.” Politics & Society 41: 73–99.Google Scholar
Medvetz, T. 2012. Think Tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. 1973 [1945]. “Paradigm for the Sociology of Knowledge” pp. 7–40 in Storer, N. W. (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Michels, R. 1962 [1911]. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. 1991. “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and their Critics.” American Political Science Review 85(1): 77–96.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T.. 1998. “Fixing the Economy.” Cultural Studies 12(1): 82–101.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T.. 1999. “Society, Economy, and the State Effect” pp. 76–97 in Steinmetz, G. (ed.) State/Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mora, C. 2014. “Cross-Field Effects and Ethnic Classification: The Institutionalization of Hispanic Panethnicity, 1965 to 1990.” American Sociological Review 79(2): 183–210.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. J. 2006. Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work-Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mudge, S. 2008. “What Is Neo-liberalism?” Socio-Economic Review 6(4): 703–731.Google Scholar
Mudge, S.. 2016. “Neoliberalism, Accomplished and Ongoing” pp. 93–104 in Springer, S., Birch, K., and MacLeavey, J. (eds.) Handbook of Neoliberalism. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mudge, S.. 2018. Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mudge, S. and Chen, A. S.. 2014. “Political Parties and the Sociological Imagination: Past, Present and Future Directions.” Annual Review of Sociology 40: 305–330.Google Scholar
Mudge, S. and Vauchez, A.. 2012. “Building Europe on a Weak Field: Law, Economics and Scholarly Avatars in Transnational Politics.” American Journal of Sociology 118(2): 449–492.Google Scholar
Norton, M. 2014. “Classification and Coercion: The Destruction of Piracy in the English Maritime System.” American Journal of Sociology 119(6): 1537–1575.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B. and Montgomery, J. M.. 2015. “Connecting the Candidates: Consultant Networks and the Diffusion of Campaign Strategy in American Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 292–308.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J., Orloff, A., and Shaver, S.. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Omi, M. and Winant, H.. 2015 [1986]. Racial Formation in the United States, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. 2001. “Ending Entitlements of Poor Single Mothers” pp. 133–59 in Hirschmann, N. J. and Liebert, U. (eds.) Women and Welfare: Theory and Practice in the United States and Europe. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, A.. 2003. “Markets Not States? The Weakness of State Social Provision for Breadwinning Men in the United States” pp. 217–245 in Haney, L. and Pollard, L. (eds.) Families of a New World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pacewicz, J. 2016. Partisans and Partners: The Politics of the Post-Keynesian Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, C. and Ansell, C.. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–1319.Google Scholar
Panofsky, A. 2014. Misbehaving Science: Controversy and the Development of Behavior Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paschel, T. S. 2016. Becoming Black Political Subjects: Movements and Ethno-Racial Rights in Colombia and Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Polletta, F. and Ho, M. K.. 2004. “Frames and Their Consequences” pp. 187–209 in Goodin, R. E. and Tilly, C. (eds.)The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, J. 1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, J.. 1990. “Race, Class, and Gender in the U.S. Welfare State: Nixon’s Failed Family Assistance Plan.” American Sociological Review 55(1): 11–28.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, D. and Skocpol, T.. 1996. States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. and Fiorina, M.. 1999. Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Snow, D. and Benford, R.. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Journal of Social Movement Research 1: 197–218.Google Scholar
Somers, M. and Block, F.. 2005. “From Poverty to Perversity: Ideas, Markets and Institutions over 200 Years of Welfare Debate.” American Sociological Review 70(2): 260–287.Google Scholar
Springer, S., Birch, K., and MacLeavey, J.. 2016. Handbook of Neoliberalism. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stampnitzky, L. 2011. “Disciplining an Unruly Field: Terrorism Experts and Theories of Scientific/Intellectual Production.” Qualitative Sociology 34(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Stampnitzky, L.. 2013. Disciplining Terror: How Experts Invented “Terrorism.” New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, G. 1993. Regulating the Social: The Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, G.. 1999. “Culture and the State” pp. 1–49 in Steinmetz, G. (ed.) State/Culture: Historical Studies of the State in the Social Sciences. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, G.. 2008. “The Colonial State as a Social Field.” American Sociological Review 73(4): 589–612.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, S. and Fligstein, N.. 2001. The Institutionalization of Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strange, S. 2015 [1988]. States and Markets. London: Bloomsbury Edition.Google Scholar
Thurber, J. A. and Nelson, C. J.. 2000. Campaign Warriors: Political Consultants in Elections. Washington. D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Vauchez, A. 2008. “The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of Europe.” International Political Sociology 2: 128–144.Google Scholar
Vauchez, A.. 2011. “Introducing a Weak Field Approach to the Study of Transnational Settings.” International Political Sociology 5(3): 340–345.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. 2005. “Pointers on Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics” pp. 10–28 in Wacquant, L. (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. and Akçaoğlu, A.. 2017. “Practice and Symbolic Power in Bourdieu: The View from Berkeley.” Journal of Classical Sociology 17(1): 55–69.Google Scholar
Walker, E. 2014. Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1958 [1918]. “Politics as a Vocation” pp. 77–128 in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. (eds.) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×