Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:48:01.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Origins and Adaptations of English as a School Subject

from Part III - English in Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2019

Christopher J. Hall
Affiliation:
York St John University
Rachel Wicaksono
Affiliation:
York St John University
Get access

Summary

This chapter will consider the particular manifestation of English as a ‘school subject’, principally in the country called England and using some small space for significant international comparisons, and it will mainly focus on the secondary school version. We will call this phenomenon School Subject English (SSE). The chapter will argue that historically SSE has gone through phases of development and adaptation, some aspects of these changes inspired by new theories and concepts and by societal change, some others, especially more recently, entirely reactive to external impositions (for an analysis of the current position of SSE, see Roberts, this volume). This chapter considers SSE to have been ontologically ‘expanded’ between 1870 and (about) 1990, increasing the ambition and scope of the ‘subject’ and the emancipatory ideology of its teachers. This ontological expansion was principally a result of adding ‘models’ of SSE, models that each emphasise different epistemologies of what counts as significant knowledge, and can only exist in a dynamic tension. In relation to this volume, SSE has always incorporated close attention to language but only very briefly (1988–1992) has something akin to Applied Linguistics had any real influence in the secondary classroom. However, with varying emphasis historically, there has been attention (the Adult Needs/Skills model, see later) to the conventions of language, especially ‘secretarial’ issues of spelling and punctuation, some understanding of grammar, and a focus on notions of Standard English, in writing and in speech; but these have never been the driving ideology of SSE. Of the two conceptual giants ‘Language’ and ‘Literature’, it is the latter that has mattered most over those 120 years.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ontologies of English
Conceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment
, pp. 101 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, D. and Barnes, D. (1984) Versions of English. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Barnes, D., Britton, J., and Rosen, H. (1971). Language, the Learner and the School. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cox, B. (1991). Cox on Cox: An English Curriculum for the 1990s. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Cox, B. (1992). The Great Betrayal: Memoirs of a Life in Education. London: Chapmans.Google Scholar
Departmental Committee of the Board of Education. (1921). The Teaching of English in England (known as The Newbolt Report). London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (1975). A Language for Life (known as The Bullock Report). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (1984). English for Ages 5–16. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (1986). Responses to English for Ages 5–16. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (1988). Knowledge about Language. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (1989). English for ages 5–16. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Departmental Committee of the Board of Education. (1921). The Teaching of English in England (The Newbolt Report). London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. (1975). Growth through English: Set in the Perspective of the Seventies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (1975). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Gibbons, S. (2017). English and Its Teachers: A History of Policy, Pedagogy and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (1992a). Theoretical models of English teaching. English in Education, 26(3), 410.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (1992b). English Teaching and Media Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2003). Literacy or English: The struggle for the professional identity of English teachers in England. In Homer, D., Doecke, B., and Nixon, H., eds., English Teachers at Work: Narratives, Counter-Narratives and Arguments (pp. 123135). Kent Town, South Australia: Wakefield Press.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2004). Literacy versus English: A professional identity crisis. In Goodwyn, A. and Stables, A., eds., Learning to Read Critically in Language and Literacy Education (pp. 192205). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2010). The Expert Teacher of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2011a). The impact of the Framework for English: Teachers’ struggle against ‘informed prescription’. In Goodwyn, A. and Fuller, C., eds., The Great Literacy Debate (pp. 117135). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2011b). Becoming an English teacher: Identity, self knowledge and expertise. In Davison, J. and Moss, J., eds., Debates in English (pp. 1836). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2016). Still growing after all these years? The resilience of the ‘Personal Growth model of English’ in England and also internationally. English Teaching, Practice and Critique, 15(2), 721.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2017). From Personal Growth (1966) to Personal Growth and Social Agency – Proposing an invigorated model for the twenty-first century. English in Australia, 52(1), 6673.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2018). From personal growth [1966] to personal growth and social agency [2016] – Proposing an invigorated model for the twenty-first century. In Goodwyn, A., Durrant, C., Sawyer, W., and Scherff, L., eds., The Future of English Teaching Worldwide and Its Histories: Celebrating 50 Years from the Dartmouth Conference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. and Findlay, K. (1999). The Cox Models revisited: English teacher’s views of their subject and the National Curriculum. English in Education, 33(2), 1931.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. and Fuller, C., eds. (2011). The Great Literacy Debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A., Durrant, C., Sawyer, W., Zancanella, D., and Scherff, E., eds. (2018). The Future of English Teaching Worldwide and Its Histories: Celebrating 50 Years from the Dartmouth Conference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hilliard, C. (2012). English as a Vocation: The Scrutiny Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, I. (1987). Culture, education, English: Building “the principal scene of the real life of children”. Economy and Society, 16, 568588.Google Scholar
Hunter, I. (1988). Culture and Government: The Emergence of Literary Education. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J. et al. (2003). English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (1962). The Great Tradition. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. and Thompson, D. (1933). Culture and Environment. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. (2000). English Teachers – The Unofficial Guide: Researching the Philosophies of English Teachers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mathieson, M. (1975). The Preachers of Culture: A Study of English and Its Teachers. Oxford: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Myhill, D., Lines, H., Watson, A., and Jones, S. (2011). Rethinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 139166.Google Scholar
OECD. (2015). Excellence and Equity in Education. Vol. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1924). The Principles of Literary Criticism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1929). Practical Criticism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, L. (1938/1970). Literature as Exploration. New York: MLA.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1921). English for the English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 414.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 122.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×