Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:13:58.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Beyond the main screen: audiovisual services in PTAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Martin Roy
Affiliation:
WTO Secretariat
Juan A. Marchetti
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Martin Roy
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Get access

Summary

Audiovisual services have long been a sensitive issue in the WTO, where key members have traditionally held very divergent views. It is not surprising therefore that this sector has failed to attract either a significant number of commitments under the GATS or offers in the Doha Round. Indeed, only twenty-nine members have commitments, while only eight had made offers by the end of 2007. In comparison, preferential trade agreements have provided for significant advances: audiovisual is one of the sectors in which the contrast between multilateral and preferential commitments is the greatest, especially in bilateral agreements where the United States is involved.

The audiovisual commitments undertaken in PTAs have a number of significant characteristics, which may result, on the one hand, from the lesser polarization that this topic attracts in bilateral negotiations compared to the WTO context and, on the other hand, from market and technological advances that have transformed the way in which audiovisual services are delivered and consumed. First, while GATS commitments tend to reflect an “all or nothing” approach whereby a number of members seek full discretion across the whole sector because of its cultural characteristics, PTA commitments have often been crafted so as to take into account policy objectives and sensitivities of both an economic and cultural nature; certain areas remain protected, but guarantees of access are given in other parts of the market.

Type
Chapter
Information
Opening Markets for Trade in Services
Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations
, pp. 340 - 377
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artopoulos, Alejandro, Friel, Daniel, and Hallak, Juan. 2007. Challenges of Exporting Differentiated Products to Developed Countries: The Case of SME-dominated Sectors in a Semi-industrialized Country, Working paper, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
,BEA. 2006. US International Services; Cross-border Trade in 2005 and Sales through Affiliates in 2004, Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis; available at www.bea.gov/bea/ARTICLES/2006/10October/1006_intlserv.pdf.Google Scholar
Bernier, Ivan. 2004. The Recent Free Trade Agreements of the United States as Illustration of their New Strategy Regarding the Audiovisual Sector, mimeo; available at www.suisseculture.ch/doss/unesco_ccd/bernier_us_ftas_and_av_sector1.pdf.
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2000. “Trade and Culture: America's Blind Spot,” in Bhagwati, Jagadish (ed.), The Wind of the Hundred Days: How Washington Mismanaged Globalization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Falkenheim, Chmielewski, Jaqui, B.. 2000. “Asymmetries Reconfigured: South American Television Flows in the 1990s,” Canadian Journal of Communication, 25(2): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocq, Emmanuel, and Messerlin, Patrick. 2003. The French Audiovisual Policy: Impact and Compatibility with Trade Negotiations, Report no. 233, Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Hamburg.Google Scholar
,European Audiovisual Observatory. 2007. Focus 2007: World Film Market Trends, Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
,European Commission. 1999. Principles and Guidelines for the Community's Audiovisual Policy in the Digital Age, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
,Eurostat. 2002. Statistics on Audiovisual Services, Lusembourg City: Eurostat.Google Scholar
,Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry and PriceWaterhouseCoopers. 2006. The Indian Entertainment and Media Industry; Unravelling the Potential, New Delhi: Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Gilles. 2005. “The World Television Market”, Communications and Strategies, 59, 3rd Quarter 2005.Google Scholar
Formentini, Silvia, and Lelio Iapadre, P.. 2007. Cultural Policies and Regional Trade Agreements: The Case of Audiovisual Services, Working Paper no. W-2007/4, Comparative Regional Integration Studies Unit, United Nations University, Bruges.Google Scholar
Graber, Christoph. 2006. “The New UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO?Journal of International Economic Law, 9(3): 553–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrieri, Paolo, Lelio Iapadre, P., and Koopman, Georg (eds.). 2005. Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration: The Global Governance of the Audio-visual Sector, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hahn, Michael. 2006. “A Clash of Cultures?” The UNESCO Diversity Convention and International Trade Law,” Journal of International Economic Law, 9(3): 515–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Gordon, and Xiang, Chong. forthcoming. “International Trade in Motion Picture Services,” in Reinsdorf, Marshall and Slaughter, Matthew (eds.), International Service Flows, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
,IFPI. 2007. Recording Industry in Numbers, 2007, London: International Federation of the Phonographic Industry.Google Scholar
Keane, Michael, and Albert, Moran. 2005. “(Re)Presenting Local Content: Programme Adaptation in Asia and the Pacific,” Media International Australia 116: 88–99; available at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00002432/01/2432.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalevée, Fabrice, and Lévy-Hartmann, Florence. 2007. The Support for the French Cinematographic Production: Who Benefits from the French ‘Cultural Exception’?, Working Paper no. GEMWP–2007–01, Groupe d'Economic Mondiale, Sciences Po, Paris.Google Scholar
,Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation. 2005. Film Industry Profile of California/Los Angeles County, November 29, 2005, Los Angeles: Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation; available at www.iatse728.org/home/FilmIndustryProfile.pdf.Google Scholar
Marvasti, Akbar. 2000. “Motion Pictures Industry: Economies of Scale and Trade,” International Journal of the Economics of Business, 7(1): 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvasti, Akbar, and Canterberry, E. Ray. 2005. “Cultural and Other Barriers to Motion Pictures Trade,” Economic Inquiry, 43(1): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maule, Christopher. 2006. “Cultural Policies, Trade Liberalization and Identity Politics: Testing the Limits of the State – Let Sleeping Dogs Lie,” paper presented to the conference on Trade and Culture at the University of Windsor, May 14.
Meisel, John. 2007. “The Emergence of the Internet to Deliver Video Programming: Economic and Regulatory Issues,” Info – The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, 9(1): 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,MPAA. 2007. International Theatrical Market, Washington, DC: Motion Picture Association of America.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Arpita. 2005. “Audio-visual Policies and International Trade: The Case of India,” in Guerrieri, Paolo, Iapadre, P. Lelio and Koopmann, Georg (eds.), Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration; The Global Governance of the Audio-visual Sector, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, chap. 8.Google Scholar
Murkherjee, Arpita, Gupta, Paramita Deb, and Ahuja, Prerna. 2007. Indo-US FTA: Prospects for Audiovisual Services, Working Paper no. 192, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Caroline, Loisen, Jan, and Donders, Karen. 2006. “Culture Inc. or Trade Revisited? How Interinstitutional Dialectics and Dynamic Actor Positions Affect the Outcome of the Debate on Cultural Trade and Diversity,” in Obuljen, Nina and Smiers, Joost (eds.), UNESCO's Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; Making It Work, Zagreb: Culturelink, 125–58.Google Scholar
Roy, Martin. 2005. “Audiovisual Services in the Doha Round: ‘Dialogue de Sourds, the Sequel,’” Journal of World Investment and Trade, 6(6): 923–952.Google Scholar
Roy, Martin, Marchetti, Juan, and Lim, Hoe. 2007. “Services Liberalization in the New Generation of Preferential Trade Agreements: How Much Further than the GATS?World Trade Review, 6(2): 155–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Screen, Digest. 2005a. “Asia-Pacific Cinema Markets: Markets are Dominated by the Key Multiplex Operators,” Screen Digest, November: 330–1.Google Scholar
Digest, Screen 2005b. The Global Trade in Television Formats, London: Screen Digest; available at www.screendigest.com/reports/gttf05/readmore/view.html.Google Scholar
Screen, Digest 2006. Newsletter, August, London: Screen Digest.Google Scholar
Siwek, Stephen. 2006. Copyright Industries in the US Economy; The 2006 Report, Washington, DC: Economists Incorporated; available at www.iipa.com/pdf/2006_siwek_full.pdf.Google Scholar
,Solon Consultants. 1998. Audiovisual Industry: Trade and Investment Barriers in Third Country Markets, London: Solon Consultants.Google Scholar
,Standard & Poor's. 2006. Movies & Home Entertainment, New York: Standard & Poor's.Google Scholar
,Television Research Partnership. 2005. Rights of Passage: British Television in the Global Market, Taunton: Television Research Partnership.Google Scholar
,UNESCO. 2003. Preliminary Draft Convention on the Protection of the Diversity of Cultural Contents and Artistic Expressions: Presentation of Comments and Amendments, CLT/CPD/2004/CONF.607/1, part 4, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
,UNESCO 2006. Trends in Audiovisual Markets; Regional Perspectives from the South, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
,USITC. 2007. Recent Trends in US Services Trade – 2007 Annual Report, June 2007, Publication no. 392–5, Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Grasstek, Craig. 2006. “Treatment of Cultural Goods and Services in International Trade Agreements,” in UNESCO, Trends in Audiovisual Markets; Regional Perspectives from the South, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, chap. 2.Google Scholar
Voon, Tania. 2006. “UNESCO and the WTO: A Clash of Cultures?International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(3): 635–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Claire. 2006. “Hollywood's Disappearing Act: International Trade Remedies to Bring Hollywood Home,” Akron Law Review, 39(3): 739–861.Google Scholar
Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha. 2003. “The Digital Trade Agenda of the US: Parallel Tracks of Bilateral, Regional and Multilateral Liberalization,” Aussenwirtschaft, 58: 7–46.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×