Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:40:03.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - PTAs in services: friends or foes of the multilateral trading system?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Carsten Fink
Affiliation:
Groupe d'Economie Mondiale (Sciences Po)
Juan A. Marchetti
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Martin Roy
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Get access

Summary

Preferential trade agreements are proliferating around the globe. By the end of July 2007 380 PTAs had been notified to the WTO. Only 142 of these agreements were concluded between 1948 and 1994 – the period from the establishment of the GATT to the end of the Uruguay Round. The remaining agreements entered into force thereafter. To put it provocatively, it could be said that, just after WTO members pledged their commitment to a non-discriminatory trading system by concluding the most far-reaching of all multilateral trading rounds, they went off to sign a plethora of discriminatory trading pacts.

A fashionable feature of the “new generation” PTAs has been the inclusion of a trade in services component. By July 2007 fifty-eight such services PTAs were in force (they are counted separately by the WTO), of which only five pre-date the conclusion of the Uruguay Round (seefigure 3.1). The rising interest in services trade agreements reflects underlying technological and policy developments. Not too long ago, economic textbooks equated services with non-tradables. Rapid ICT advances have enabled cross-border trade in many service activities, however – from auditing accounts to educating people. In addition, many governments have transferred the provision of infrastructure services to the private sector, expanding the scope for foreign investment in services.

The proliferation of PTAs marks an important shift in the governance of world trade. Some economists view these agreements as inherently undermining the multilateral trading system and being ultimately harmful to the cause of free trade.

Type
Chapter
Information
Opening Markets for Trade in Services
Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations
, pp. 113 - 148
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlung, Rudolf. 2006. “Services Negotiations in the Doha Round: Lost in Flexibility?Journal of International Economic Law, 9(4): 865–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 1995. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism,” in Baldwin, Richard, Haaparanta, Pertti and Kiander, Jaakko (eds.), Expanding Membership of the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard 2006. “Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade,” World Economy, 29(11): 1451–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsten, Fred. 1998. Fifty Years of the GATT/WTO: Lessons from the Past for Strategies for the Future, paper presented to the symposium on the world trading system “Fifty Years: Looking Back, Looking Forward,” co-sponsored by the World Trade Organization and the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, April 30.
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2002. “The Unilateral Freeing of Trade versus Reciprocity,” in Bhagwati, Jagdish (ed.), Going Alone: The Case for Relaxed Reciprocity in Freeing Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–30.
Blonigen, Bruce. 2005. “A Review of the Empirical Literature on FDI Determinants,” Atlantic Economic Journal, 33(4): 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, Sumanta, Aaditya, Mattoo, and Richard, Self. 2004. “Moving People to Deliver Services: How Can the WTO Help?Journal of World Trade, 38(3): 363–93.Google Scholar
Crystal, Jennifer, Dages, B. Gerard, and Goldberg, Linda. 2001. Does Foreign Ownership Contribute to Sounder Banks in Emerging Markets? The Latin American Experience, Staff Report no. 137, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York.
Echandi, Roberto. 2006. The DR–CAFTA–US FTA Negotiations in Financial Services: The Experience of Costa Rica, background paper commissioned by the Finance, Private Sector and Infrastructure Department of the Latin America and the Caribbean Region, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Emch, Adrian. 2006. “Services Regionalism in the WTO: China's Trade Agreements with Hong Kong and Macao in the Light of Article V(6) GATS,” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 33(4): 351–78.Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon, and Michael, Meier. 2008. “An Interim Assessment of the US Trade Policy of ‘Competitive Liberalization,’ ” World Economy, 31(1): 31–66.
Fink, Carsten. 2005. “A Macroeconomic Perspective on China's Liberalization of Trade in Services,” in Henry, Gao and Donald, Lewis (eds.), China's Participation in the WTO, London: Cameron May, 161–80.Google Scholar
Fink, Carsten, and Martín, Molinuevo. 2007. East Asian Free Trade Agreements in Services: Roaring Tigers or Timid Pandas?, Report no. 40175, World Bank, Washington, DC; available at http://go.worldbank.org/5YFZ3TK4E0.
Fink, Carsten, and Deunden, Nikomborirak. 2008. “Rules of Origin in Services: A Case Study of Five ASEAN Countries,” in Panizzon, Marion, Pohl, Nicole and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), The GATS and the International Regulation of Trade in Services, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–38.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene, and Elhanan, Helpman. 1994. “Protection for Sale,” American Economic Review, 84(4): 833–50.Google Scholar
Hallward-Driemeier, Mary. 2003. Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract Foreign Direct Investment?, Policy Research Working Paper no. 3121, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard, and Winters, L. Alan. 2007. “Multilateralizing ‘Deep Regional Integration’: A Developing Country Perspective”, paper presented at the conference, “Multilateralizing Regionalism,” organized by the World Trade Organization and the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, September 11.Google Scholar
Houde, Marie-France, Akshay, Kolse-Patil, and Sébastian, Miroudot. 2007. The Interaction in Services Chapters in Selected Regional Trade Agreements, Trade Policy Working Paper no. 55, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
Krishna, Pravin. 1998. “Regionalism and Multilateralism: A Political Economy Approach,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1): 227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1997. “What Should Trade Negotiators Negotiate About?Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1): 113–20.Google Scholar
Levy, Philip. 1997. “A Political-Economic Analysis of Free-Trade Agreements,” American Economic Review, 87(4): 506–19.Google Scholar
Marconini, Mario. 2006. Services in Regional Agreements between Latin American and Developed Countries, Comercio Internacional Series no. 71, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago.Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya. 2005. “Services in a Development Round: Three Goals and Three Proposals,” Journal of World Trade, 39(6): 1223–38.Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya, and Carsten, Fink. 2004. “Regional Agreements and Trade in Services: Policy Issues,” Journal of Economic Integration. 19(4): 742–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya, and Sacha, Wunsch-Vincent. 2004. “Pre-Empting Protectionism in Services: The GATS and Outsourcing,” Journal of International Economic Law, 7(4): 765–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick. 2007. Assessing the EC Trade Policy in Goods, Jan Tumlir Policy Essay no. 1, Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy.
Neumayer, Eric, and Laura, Spess. 2005. “Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries?World Development, 33(10): 1567–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira Goncalves, Marilyne, and Constantinos, Stephanou. 2007. Financial Services and Trade Agreements in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Overview, Policy Research Working Paper no. 4181, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pomfret, Richard. 2007. Is Regionalism an Increasing Feature of the World Economy?, World Economy, 30(6): 923–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Jennifer, Tobin. 2005. Foreign Direct Investment and the Business Environment in Developing Countries: The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties, Research Paper no. 293, New Haven, CT: Yale Law School.Google Scholar
Roy, Martin. 2003. “Implications for the GATS of Negotiations on a Multilateral Investment Framework: Potential Synergies and Pitfalls,” Journal of World Investment, 4(6): 963–86.Google Scholar
Roy, Martin, Juan, Marchetti, and Lim, Hoe. 2007. “Services Liberalization in the New Generation of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs): How Much Further than the GATS?World Trade Review, 6(2): 155–92.Google Scholar
Sáez, Raúl. 2006. Trade in Financial Services: The Case of Chile, background paper commissioned by the Finance, Private Sector and Infrastructure Department of the Latin America and the Caribbean Region, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sáez, Sebastián. 2005. Trade in Services Negotiations: A Review of the Experience of the United States and the European Union in Latin America, Comercio Internacional series no. 61, Santiago: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
Sauvé, Pierre. 2005. “Adding Value at the Periphery: Elements of GATS + Regional Agreements in Services,” paper prepared for the seminar ‘Eyes Wide Shut? Beyond Market Access in North–South Regional Trade Arrangements’, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, February 17.
Schwartz, Warren, and Sykes, Alan. 1996. “Toward a Positive Theory of the Most Favoured Nation Obligation and Its Exceptions in the WTO/GATT System,” International Review of Law and Economics, 16: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Sherry. 2005. Examining APEC's Progress towards Reaching the Bogor Goals for Services Liberalization, draft paper prepared for the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council, Singapore.
,UNCTAD. 2004. The REIO Exception in MFN Treatment Clauses, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
,World Bank. 2004. Brazil: Trade Policies to Improve Efficiency, Increase Growth and Reduce Poverty, Report no. 2428–BR, Washington, DC: Worls Bank.Google Scholar
,World Bank 2005, Global Economic Prospects: Trade, Regionalism, and Development, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
,WTO. 2005. International Trade Statistics 2005, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×