Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:15:35.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Shoulder Dystocia

from Part II - INTRAPARTUM AND POSTPARTUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

John Patrick O'Grady ,
Martin L. Gimovsky ,
Lucy A. Bayer-Zwirello  and
Kevin Giordano
By
James J. Nocon
John Patrick O'Grady
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
James J. Nocon
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, Indiana
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews and examines the best evidence available about the nature and scope of shoulder dystocia, including reasonable management options and the challenging ethical and legal aspects surrounding this common obstetric emergency. The range of injuries to the newborn following a shoulder dystocia typically include trauma to the brachial plexus or phrenic nerve, fractures of the clavicle or humerus, neonatal asphyxia, and even death. From a medicolegal perspective, any reasonable method to resolve the impacted anterior shoulder conforms to the level of care expected of the average competent physician. If the physician can articulate a reasonable basis for the clinical judgment, and that information is documented in the medical record, then the physician has the best defense against a medicolegal entanglement. Acute management of dystocia remains a major problem. Some practitioners, on encountering a shoulder dystocia, fail to approach the problem systematically and sometimes panic.

Keywords

anterior shoulderbrachial plexus palsyneonatal asphyxiatraumatic deliveryobstetric emergencyshoulder dystocia
Type
Chapter
Information
Operative Obstetrics , pp. 348 - 369
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gross, TL, Sokol, RJ, Williams, T, Thompson, T: Shoulder dystocia: A fetal-physician risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1408–1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nocon, JJ, McKenzie, DK, Thomas, LJ, Hansell, RS: Shoulder dystocia: An analysis of risks and obstetrical maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1732–1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R, Sorab, J, Gonik, B: Risk factors for shoulder dystocia: An engineering study of clinician-applied forces. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:352–355.Google ScholarPubMed
Christoffersson, M, Kannisto, P, Ryhdstroem, H, Stale, H, Walles, B: Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury: A case-controlled study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dignam, WJ: Difficulties in delivery, including shoulder dystocia and malpresentations of the fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1976;19:577–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resnik, R: Management of shoulder girdle dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980;23:559–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopwood, HG Jr: Shoulder dystocia: Fifteen years' experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gyneco- logists: Shoulder dystocia. Practice Bulletin No. 40, November 2002. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Boyd, ME, Usher, RH, McLean, FH: Fetal macrosomia—prediction, risks and proposed management. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:715–722.Google ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, GF, MacDonald, PC, Gant, NF, Leveno, KJ, Gillstrap, LC III: Williams Obstetrics, 19th ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1993; pp. 509–514.Google Scholar
Chez, R, Carlan, S, Greenberg, S, Spellacy, W: Fractured clavicle is an unavoidable event. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:797–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swaiman, KF, Wright, FS: The Practice of Pediatric Neurology, 2nd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1982; pp. 1178–1179.Google Scholar
Gilbert, WM, Nesbitt, TS, Danielsen, B: Associated factors in 1611 cases of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:536–540.Google ScholarPubMed
Eng, GD: Brachial plexus palsy in newborn infants. Pediatrics 1971;41:713–719.Google Scholar
Gurewitsch, ED, Johnson, E, Hamzehzadeh, S, Allen, RH: Risk factors for brachial plexus injury with and without shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:486–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brett, EM: Pediatric Neurology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1983.Google Scholar
Jennett, RJ, Tarby, TJ, Kreinick, CJ: Brachial plexus palsy: An old problem revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992:166:1673–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, EM, Forouzan, I, Morgan, MA: A retrospective analysis of Erb's palsy cases and their relation to birth weight and trauma at delivery. J. Matern Fetal Med 1997;6:1–5.Google ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gyneco- logists: Fetal macrosomia. Technical Bulletin No. 159. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1991.
Tamura, RK, Sabbagha, RE, Depp, R, Dooley, SL, Socl, ML: Diabetic macrosomia: Accuracy of third-trimester ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:828–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller JM Jr: Identification and delivery of the macrosomic infant. In: Plauché, WC, Morrison, JC, O'Sullivan, MJ (eds): Surgical Obstetrics. Philade- lphia: WB Saunders, 1992; pp. 313–323.Google Scholar
Modanlou, HD, Dorchester, WL, Thorosian, A, Freeman, RK: Macrosomia: Maternal, fetal, and neonatal implications. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:420–424.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, GD, Blinder, IN, MacClermont, S, Sinclair, JC: Determinant of size at birth in a Canadian population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;150:236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klebanoff, MA, Mills, JL, Berendes, HW: Mother's birth weight as a predictor of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:253–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidman, DS, Ever-Hadani P, , Gale, R: The effect of maternal weight gain in pregnancy on birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:240–246.Google ScholarPubMed
Klebanoff, MA, Yip, R: Influence of maternal birth weight on rate of growth and duration of gestation. J Pediatr 1987;111:287–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spellacy, WN, Miller, S, Winegar, A, Peterson, PQ: Macrosomia – maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:158–160. 22.Google ScholarPubMed
Elliot, JP, Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK, McQuown, DD, Patel, JM: Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:159–162.Google Scholar
Hirata, GI, Medearis, AL, Horenstein, J, Bear, MB, Platt, LD: Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:238–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delpapa, EH, Mueller-Heurbach E, : Pregnancy outcome following ultrasound diagnosis of macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:340–343.Google ScholarPubMed
Eden, RD, Seifert, LS, Winegar, A, Spellacy, WN: Perinatal characteristics of uncomplicated postdate pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:296–299.Google ScholarPubMed
Lazer, S, Biale, Y, Mazor, M, Lewenthal, H, Insler, V: Complications associated with the macrosomic fetus. J Reprod Med 1986;31:501–504.Google ScholarPubMed
Ouzounian, J, Naylor, CS, Gherman, R, Kamath, M, Johnson, M, DeLeon, J, Anguiano, H: Recurrent shoulder dystocia: How high is the risk?Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;1856:S108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acker, DB, Sachs, BP, Friedman, EA: Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:762–768.Google ScholarPubMed
Acker, DB, Sachs, BP, Friedman, EA: Risk factors for shoulder dystocia in the average-weight infant. Obstet Gynecol 1985;67:614–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, CB, Doubilet, PM, Saltzman, DH: Sonographic determination of fetal weights in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:441–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedetti, TJ, Gabbe, SG: A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with mid-pelvic delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:526–529.Google Scholar
Chelmow, D, Kilpatrick, SJ, Laros, RK: Maternal and neonatal outcomes after prolonged latent phase. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:486–491.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, EM: Labor: Clinical Evaluation and Management. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1978.Google Scholar
Gherman, RB, Ouzounian, JG, Satin, AJ, Goodwin, TM, Phelan, JP: A comparison of shoulder dystocia-associated transient and permanent brachial plexus palsies. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:544–548.Google ScholarPubMed
Swartz, DP: Shoulder girdle dystocia in vertex delivery – clinical study and review. Obstet Gynecol 1960; 15:194–206.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, JW: Obstetrics, 5th ed. New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1926.Google Scholar
Sandmire, HF, DeMott, RK: Erb's palsy: Concepts of causation. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:941–942.Google ScholarPubMed
Moir, JC, Myerscough, PR: Munro Kerr's Operative Obstetrics, 8th ed. London: Baillière-Tindall and Cassell, 1971; p. 66.Google Scholar
Gonik, B.Zhang, N, Grimm, MJ: Prediction of brachial plexus stretching during shoulder dystocia using a computer simulation model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1168–1172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, IS: Ch. 24 Peripheral nerve injuries. In Clinical Neurology, 9th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 1972.Google Scholar
Gross, SJ, Shime, J, Farine, D: Shoulder dystocia: Predictors and outcomes – A five-year review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:334–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskett, TF, Allen, AC: Perinatal Implications of Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:14–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gherman, RB, Ouzounian, JG, Goodwin, TM: Obstetrical maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178: 1126–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speert, H: Iconographia Gyniatrica: A Pictorial History of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1973.Google Scholar
Beer, E: History of extraction of the posterior arm to resolve shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol Survey 2006;61(3):149–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCormick, CO: Pathology of Labor, the Puerperium, and the Newborn, 2nd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1947.Google Scholar
Castallo, MA, Ullery, JC: Obstetric Mechanisms and Their Management. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1957.Google Scholar
Hibbard, LT: Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1969;34:424–429.Google ScholarPubMed
Gonik, B, Stringer, CA, Held, B: An alternate maneuver for management of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;145:882–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonik, B, Allen, R, Sorab, J: Objective evaluation of the shoulder dystocia phenomenon: Effect of maternal pelvic orientation on force reduction. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:44–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Poggi, SH, Allen, RH, Patel, CR, Ghidini, A, Pezzullo, JC, Spong, CY: Randomized trial of McRoberts versus lithotomy positioning to decrease force that is applied to the fetus during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1544–1549.Google Scholar
Beall, MH, Spong, CY, Ross, MG: A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic maneuvers to reduce head-to-body delivery time in patients at risk for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:31–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, CE: A principle of physics as applicable to shoulder delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1943;45: 796–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A: Management of shoulder dystocia. JAMA 1964;189:835–837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurewitsch, ED, Kim, EJ, Yang, JH, Outland, KE, McDonald, MK, Allen, RH: Comparing McRoberts' and Rubin's maneuvers for initial management of shoulder dystocia: An objective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:153–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, BC, Dixon, DM: Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1958;11:468–471.Google ScholarPubMed
Poggi, SH, Spong, CY, Allen, RH: Prioritizing posterior arm delivery during severe shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:1068–1072.Google ScholarPubMed
Gurewitsch, ED, Donithan, M, Stallings, SP, Moore, PL, Agarwal, S, Allen, LM, Allen, RH: Episiotomy versus fetal manipulation in managing severe shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:911–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, EC: The Zavanelli maneuver extended: Progression of a revolutionary concept. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1347–1353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, JM, Blanco, JD, Weu, T, Magee, KP: The Zavanelli maneuver: A different perspective. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:883–884.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Leary, JA, Leonetti, HB: Shoulder dystocia: Prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162:5–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarland, M, Hod, M, Piper, JM, Elly M-, JX, Langer, O: Are labor abnormalities more common in shoulder dystocia?Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173;1211–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poggi, SH, Stallings, SP, Ghidini, A, Spong, CY, Deering, SH, Allen, RH: Intrapartum risk factors for permanent brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:725–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acker, DB: A shoulder dystocia intervention form. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:150–151.Google ScholarPubMed
Deering, S, Poggi, S, Hodor, J, Macedonia, C, Satin, AJ: Evaluation of resident's delivery notes after a simulated shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:667–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeton, WP, Dobbs, DD, Keeton, RE, Owen, DG: Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, 5th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1984.Google Scholar
Dunne v. Somoano, 550 So. 2d 5 (Fla. App. 3 Dist. 1989).
Sutherland v. County of Nassau, 593 N. W. 2d 287 (1993).
James v. Woolley, 523 So. 2d 110 (Ala 1988).
Smith v. Nguyen, 855 S. W. 2d 263 (Tex App Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, writ denied).
O'Grady, JP: Modern Instrumental Delivery. Balti- more: Williams & Wilkins, 1988.Google Scholar
Reilly v. Straub, 282 N. W. 2d 688 (Iowa 1979).
Abbott v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical Center, 529 NYS 2d 352 (1988).
Minkin, MJ: A no-fault approach to shoulder dystocia. Contemporary OB/GYN 2004;49(12):48–50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×