Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:44:46.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2019

William Selinger
William Selinger
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Parliamentarism
From Burke to Weber
 , pp. 207 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Aiken, Peter. A Comparative View of the Constitutions of Great Britain and the United States of America. London, 1842.Google Scholar
Anon. The Subjects Case: Or Advice to All Englishmen. London, 1701.Google Scholar
Anon. Officers Good Members: Or the Late Act of Settlement Consider’d. London, 1701.Google Scholar
Anon. An Enquiry into the Danger of Multiplying Incapacities on the Gentlemen of England to Sit in Parliament. London, 1739.Google Scholar
Anon. A Letter to a Member of Parliament: Concerning the Present State of Affairs at Home and Abroad. London, 1740.Google Scholar
Anon. A Second Letter to a Member of Parliament Concerning the Present State of Affairs. London, 1741.Google Scholar
Anon. A Dialogue on the Actual State of Parliament. London, 1783.Google Scholar
Anon. The Liverpool Tractate: An Eighteenth-Century Manual on the Procedure of the House of Commons. Edited by Stratham, Catherine. New York, 1937.Google Scholar
Archives Parlementaires: recueil complet des débats législatifs et politiques des chambres françaises, sér. 1. 82 volumes. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E.. Paris, 1879–1913.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York, 1973.Google Scholar
Bagehot, Walter. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. 15 volumes. Edited by St. John-Stevas, Norman. Cambridge, MA, 1965–1986.Google Scholar
Barante, Prosper de. Questions constitutionnelles. Paris, 1849.Google Scholar
Barrot, Odilon. Mémoires posthumes de Odilon Barrot. 4 volumes. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Bastiat, Frédéric. Collected Works of Frédéric Bastiat. 3 volumes. Edited by Guenin, Jacques. Indianapolis, 2011–2017.Google Scholar
Beaumont, Gustave de. De l’Intervention du pouvoir dans les élections. Paris, 1843.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England. 4 volumes. Edited by Sharswood, George. Philadelphia, 1893.Google Scholar
Bolingbroke, Henry. Political Writings. Edited by Armitage, David. Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
Boyer, Abel. An Essay towards the History of the Last Ministry and Parliament. London, 1710.Google Scholar
Brougham, Henry. “The State of the Parties.” Edinburgh Review 46, no. 92 (1827): 415–432.Google Scholar
Brougham, Henry. Contributions to the Edinburgh Review by Henry Lord Brougham. 3 volumes. London, 1856.Google Scholar
Brougham, Henry. The Works of Henry Lord Brougham. 11 volumes. Edinburgh, 1873.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. The American Commonwealth. 2 volumes. New York, 1908.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. Modern Democracies. 2 volumes. New York, 1921.Google Scholar
Burgh, James. Political Disquisitions. 3 volumes. Philadelphia, 1774–1775.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Debate in the Commons on the Regency Bill.” In The Parliamentary History of England, vol. 27, 1171–1177. London, 1816.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. The Correspondence of Edmund Burke. 10 volumes. Edited by Copeland, Thomas. Cambridge, 1959–1978.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Further Reflections on the Revolution in France. Edited by Ritchie, Daniel. Indianapolis, 1992.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke. 8 volumes. Edited by Langford, Paul. Oxford, 1970–2015.Google Scholar
Chateaubriand, François-René. La monarchie selon la charte. Paris, 1816.Google Scholar
Clermont-Tonnerre, Stanislas Marie Adélaïde. “Rapport par M. le comte Stanislas de Clermont-Tonnerre contenant le résumé des cahiers au point de vue de la Constitution.” Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 8. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 283–284. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. Oeuvres de Condorcet. 12 volumes. Edited by O’Connor, A. and Arago, M. F.. Paris, 1847–1849.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. De la liberté des brochures, des pamphlets et des journaux. Paris, 1814.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. Réflexions sur les constitutions, la distribution des pouvoirs, et les garanties, dans une monarchie constitutionnelle. Paris, 1814.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. De la responsabilité des ministres. Paris, 1815.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. Principes de politique applicables à tous les gouvernements représentatifs et particulièrement à la constitution actuelle de la France. Paris, 1815.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. Political Writings. Edited by Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. Recueil d’articles 1829–1830. Edited by Harpaz, Éphraïm. Paris, 1992.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. Oeuvres complètes. 18 volumes. Edited by Delbouille, Paul et al. Berlin, 1993–2013.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. Commentary on Filangieri. Edited by Kahan, Alan. Indianapolis, 2015.Google Scholar
Croly, Herbert. Progressive Democracy. New York, 1914.Google Scholar
de Lolme, Jean Louis. An Essay on Constitutional Liberty: Wherein the Necessity of Frequent Elections of Parliament Is Shewn to Be Superseded by the Unity of the Executive Power. London, 1780.Google Scholar
De Lolme, Jean Louis. The Constitution of England. Edited by Lieberman, David. Indianapolis, 2007.Google Scholar
de Mably, Gabriel Bonnot. Du gouvernement et des loix de la Pologne. Paris, 1781.Google Scholar
de Staël, Auguste. Lettres sur l’Angleterre. Paris, 1825.Google Scholar
de Staël, Germaine. Considérations sur les principaux événemens de la révolution Françoise. Paris, 1818.Google Scholar
De Staël, Germaine. Considerations on the Principal Events of the French Revolution. Edited by Craiutu, Aurelian. Indianapolis, 2008.Google Scholar
De Staël, Germaine. Oeuvres complètes. 7 volumes. Edited by Lotterie, Florence. Paris, 2000–2017.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. “Democracy in Switzerland.” Edinburgh Review 171, no. 349 (1890): 113–145.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. “Ought the Referendum to Be Introduced into England.” Contemporary Review 57 (1890): 489–511.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Edited by Wade, E. C. S.. London, 1961.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. Manuel de droit constitutionnel: théorie géneŕale de l’état – organisation politique. Paris, 1907.Google Scholar
Ellys, Anthony. The Spiritual and Temporal Liberty of Subjects in England. 2 volumes. London, 1765.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. Remarks on a Pamphlet Lately Published by Dr. Price. London, 1776.Google Scholar
Greg, William Rathbone. “Historical Painting – Macaulay.” North British Review 24, no. 49 (1856): 41–58.Google Scholar
Greg, William Rathbone. “Cabinets and Statesmen” North British Review 24, no. 49 (1856): 183–196.Google Scholar
Grey, Henry George. Parliamentary Government Considered with Reference to a Reform of Parliament. London, 1858.Google Scholar
Guizot, François. Du gouvernement représentatif et de l’état actuel de la France. Paris, 1816.Google Scholar
Guizot, FranDu gouvernement de la France depuis la restauration et du ministère actuel. Paris, 1820.Google Scholar
Guizot, FranSir Robert Peel: étude d’histoire contemporaine. Paris, 1858.Google Scholar
Guizot, FranMémoires pour servir à l’histoire de mon temps. 8 volumes. Paris, 1858–1867.Google Scholar
Guizot, FranHistoire parlementaire de France, recueil complet des discours prononcés dans les Chambres de 1819 à 1848. 5 volumes. Paris, 1863–1864.Google Scholar
Guizot, FranDes moyens de gouvernment et d’opposition dans l’état actuel de la France. Edited by Lefort, Claude. Paris, 1987.Google Scholar
Guizot, FranThe History of the Origins of Representative Government in Europe. Translated by Scoble, Andrew. Edited by Craiutu, Aurelian. Indianapolis, 2002.Google Scholar
Guizot, François, and George, Hamilton-Gordon, Aberdeen, Lord. “Guizot et Lord Aberdeen en 1852. Échange de vues sur la réforme électorale et la corruption.” Edited by Johnson, Douglas. Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 5, no. 1. 1958: 57–70.Google Scholar
Hare, Thomas. The Election of Representatives Parliamentary and Municipal, a Treatise by Thomas Hare. London, 1865.Google Scholar
Halifax, George Savile. The Works of George Savile, Marquess of Halifax. 3 volumes. Edited by Brown, Mark. Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Hauranne, Duvergier. De la réforme parlementaire et de la réforme électorale. Paris, 1847.Google Scholar
Hearn, William. The Government of England: Its Structure and Its Development. London, 1867.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by Nisbet, H. B.. Edited by Wood, Allen. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Herle, Charles. A Fuller Answer to a Treatise Written by Doctor Ferne. In The Struggle for Sovereignty: Seventeenth-Century English Political Tracts, vol. 2. Edited by Malcolm, Joyce, 223–261. Indianapolis, 1999.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Essays Moral and Political. Edited by Miller, Eugene. Indianapolis, 1985.Google Scholar
Jaucourt, Chevalier. “English Parliament.” In Encyclopedic Liberty: Political Articles in the Dictionary of Diderot and D’Alembert, 451–462. Translated by Clark, Henry and Henderson, Christine Dunn. Indianapolis, 2016.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis. “Cobbett’s Political Register.” Edinburgh Review 10, no. 20 (1807): 386–421.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis. “Parliamentary Reform.” Edinburgh Review 14, no. 28 (1809): 277–306.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis. “Mad. de Staël sur la Revolution Françoise.” Edinburgh Review 30, no. 60 (1818): 275–317.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis. “Madame de Staël.” Edinburgh Review 36, no. 71 (1822): 54–82.Google Scholar
Jenyns, Soame. Thoughts on a Parliamentary Reform. London, 1784.Google Scholar
Journal of the House of Commons. 277 volumes. London, 1802–2015.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. The Essence and Value of Democracy. Translated by Graf, Brian. Edited by Urbinati, Nadia and Accetti, Carlo Invernizzi. Lanham, 2013.Google Scholar
Laboulaye, Edouard. Considérations sur la Constitution. Paris, 1848.Google Scholar
Laboulaye, Edouard. Questions constitutionnelles. paris, 1872.Google Scholar
Laboulaye, Edouard. “Rapport fait, au nom de la commission des lois constitutionnelles (a) chargée d’examiner le projet de loi organique sur les rapports des pouvoirs publics.” Journal officiel de la République française 7, no. 157 (1875): 4160–4162.Google Scholar
Laboulaye, Edouard. L’ état et ses limites suivi d’essais politiques. Paris, 1886.Google Scholar
Lanjuinais, Jean-Denis. Oeuvres de J. D. Lanjuinais. 4 volumes. Paris, 1832.Google Scholar
Lanjuinais, Jean-Denis. “Suite de la discussion de la motion de M. comte de Mirabeau relative à l’entrée des ministres dans l’Assemblée.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 9. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 716. Paris, 1877.Google Scholar
Lanjuinais, Jean-Denis. “Suite de la discussion du projet de Constitution—Discussion de l’article 10.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 29. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 446–447. Paris, 1888.Google Scholar
Laveleye, Émile. Le gouvernement dans la démocratie. 2 volumes. Paris, 1891.Google Scholar
Lecky, William Edward. Democracy and Liberty. 2 volumes. Edited by Murchison, William. Indianapolis, 1981.Google Scholar
Lewis, George Cornewall. “Earl Grey on Parliamentary Government.” Edinburgh Review 108, no. 219 (1858): 271–297.Google Scholar
Low, Sydney. “If the House of Commons Were to Be Abolished.” Littel’s Living Age 204, no. 2636 (1895): 88–100.Google Scholar
Low, Sydney. “The Decline of the House of Commons.” Littel’s Living Age 205, no. 2654 (1895): 411–420.Google Scholar
Low, Sydney. The Governance of England. London, 1914.Google Scholar
Lowell, Abbott Lawrence. The Government of England. 2 volumes. New York, 1908.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Catherine. Observations on a Pamphlet Entitled Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents. London, 1770.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas. The Complete Writings of Thomas Babington Macaulay. 10 volumes. Boston and New York, 1900.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas. The History of England from the Accession of James II to the Present. 4 volumes. Philadelphia, 1856.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James. “France.” Edinburgh Review 24, no. 48 (1815): 505–536.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James. “Universal Suffrage.” Edinburgh Review 31, no. 61 (1818): 165–203.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James. “Parliamentary Reform,” Edinburgh Review 34, no. 68 (1820): 461–501.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James. Vindiciae Gallicae. Edited by Winch, Donald. Indianapolis, 2006.Google Scholar
Mackworth, Humphrey. A Vindication of Rights of the Commons of England. London, 1701.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry. Popular Government. Indianapolis, 1976.Google Scholar
Massey, William. “May’s Constitutional History of England: 1760–1860.” Edinburgh Review 115, no. 233 (1862): 211–242.Google Scholar
May, Thomas Erskine. A Practical Treatise on the Laws, Proceedings, and Usages of Parliament. London, 1851.Google Scholar
May, Thomas Erskine. A Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings, and Usage of Parliament. London, 1868.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. 33 volumes. Edited by Robinson, J. M.. Toronto, 1963–1991.Google Scholar
Millar, John. An Historical View of the English Government. Edited by Phillips, Mark and Smith, Dale. Indianapolis, 2006.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Political Writings. Edited by Dzelzainis, Martin and Gruzelier, Claire. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Mirabeau, Honoré Gabriel Riqueti. “Discussion de diverses motions relatives au renvoi des ministres et au rappel de M. Necker,” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 8, edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 242–243. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Mirabeau, Comte de. “Motion concernant : 1* les subistances; 2* la création d’une banque nationale; 3* l’entrée des ministres dans l’Assemblée.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 9, edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 706–11. Paris, 1888.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. The Spirit of the Laws. Edited by Cohler, Anne et al. Cambridge, 1989Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles-Louis. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu. 21 volumes. Edited by Ehrard, Jean et al. Paris and Oxford: 1998–2019.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles-Louis. My Thoughts (Mes Pensées). Translated by Clark, Henry. Indianapolis, 2012.Google Scholar
Mounier, Jean Joseph. Considérations sur les gouvernements et principalement sur celui qui convient à la France. Paris, 1789.Google Scholar
Mounier, Jean Joseph. Recherches sur les causes qui ont empêché les Français de devenir libres, et sur les moyens, qui leur restent pour acquérir la liberté. 2 volumes. Paris, 1792.Google Scholar
Mounier, Jean Joseph. “Discussion de diverses motions relatives au renvoi des ministres et au rappel de M. Necker.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 8. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 242. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Mounier, Jean Joseph. “Présentation par M. Mounier du projet contenant les premiers articles de la Constitution.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 8. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 285–287. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Mounier, Jean Joseph. “Rapport fait par M. Mounier contenant les articles concernant l’organisation du pouvoir législatif.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 8. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 522–527. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Mounier, Jean Joseph. “Suite de la discussion relative à la sanction royale. Rapport de M. Mounier sur la nécessité de cette sanction.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 8. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 554–564. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Necker, Jacques. Oeuvres complètes de M. Necker. 15 volumes. Edited by de Staël, Auguste. Paris, 1821.Google Scholar
Necker, Jacques. “Mémoire de M. Necker sur la sanction royale.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 8. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 612–615. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, Mosei. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. 2 volumes. Translated by Clarke, Frederick. New York, 1902.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. Political Writings. Edited by Kuklick, Bruce. Cambridge, 2000.Google Scholar
Paley, William. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. Indianapolis, 2002.Google Scholar
Park, J. J. The Dogmas of the Constitution. London, 1832.Google Scholar
Parker, Henry. “The Political Constitution of the Spanish Monarchy. Promulgated in Cadiz, the Nineteenth Day of March, 1812.” In Cobbett’s Political Register 26, (1814): 25–32.Google Scholar
Parker, Henry. The Case of Shipmony Briefly Discoursed. In The Struggle for Sovereignty: Seventeenth-Century English Political Tracts, vol. 1. Edited by Malcolm, Joyce, 93–125. Indianapolis, 1999.Google Scholar
Parker, Henry. Observations upon Some of His Majesties Late Answers and Expresses. In Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution, 1638–1647, vol. 2. Edited by Haller, William, 167–213. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Prévost-Paradol, Lucien Anatole. La France nouvelle. Paris, 1868.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. Political Writings. Edited by Thomas, D. O.. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
Rémusat, Charles. “Députés fonctionnaires publics.” In Annales du Parlement français, vol. 9. Edited by Fleury, M. T., 364–372. Paris, 1848.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. “Suite de la discussion du projet de Constitution – Discussion de l’article 10.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 29. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 445. Paris, 1888.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Translated. by Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
Royer-Collard, Pierre-Paul. La vie politique de M. Royer-Collard: ses discours et ses écrits. 2 volumes. Edited by de Barante, Prosper. Paris, 1861.Google Scholar
Royer-Collard, Paul Pierre. “Suite de la discussion du projet de loi relatif à l’organisation des colléges électoraux.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 2, t. 18. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 293. Paris, 1870.Google Scholar
Russell, John. An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution: From the Reign of Henry VII. to the Present Time. London, 1823.Google Scholar
Russell, John. An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution: From the Reign of Henry VII. to the Present Time. London, 1865.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated by Kennedy, Ellen. Cambridge, MA, 1985.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Translated by Seitzer, Jeffrey. Durham, 2008.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Guardian of the Constitution. In The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Translated by Vinx, Lars. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York, 1942.Google Scholar
Serre, Hercule de. “Discussion de project de loi sur les élections.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 2, t. 16. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 238–242. Paris, 1869.Google Scholar
Serre, Hercule de. “Suite de la discussion du projet de loi relatif à l’organisation des colléges électoraux.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 2, t. 18. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 90–91. Paris, 1870.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. “Reprise de la discussion sur l’organisation du pouvoir législatif et la sanction royale.” In Archives parlementaires, ser. 1, t. 8. Edited by Laurent, E. and Clavel, E., 592–597. Paris, 1875.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. “Bases de l’ordre social.” In Sieyès et l’invention de la constitution en France by Pasquino, Pasquale, 181–191. Paris, 1995.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. Political Writings. Edited by Sonenscher, Michael. Indianapolis, 2003.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. Emmanuel Sieyès: The Essential Political Writings. Edited by Lembcke, Oliver W. and Weber, Florian. Leiden and Boston, 2014.Google Scholar
Sismondi, Sismonde de. Examen de la constitution Française. Paris, 1815.Google Scholar
Sismondi, Sismonde Études sur les constitutions des peuples libres. Paris, 1836.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Edited by Meek, R. L. et al. Indianapolis, 1982.Google Scholar
Spelman, Edward. A Fragment out of the Sixth Book of Polybius. London, 1743.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. The Man versus the State: With Six Essays on Government, Society, and Freedom. Indianapolis, 1982.Google Scholar
Stewart, Dugald. Collected Works. 11 volumes. Edited by Hamilton, William. London, 1854–1860.Google Scholar
Sydney, Algernon. Discourses Concerning Government. New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Thiers, Adolphe. Études historiques sur la vie privée: politique et littéraire de M. A. Thiers. 2 volumes. Edited by Lava, Alexandra. Paris, 1846.Google Scholar
Thiers, Adolphe. Discours parlementaires de M. Thiers. 16 volumes. Edited by Calmon, M.. Paris, 1879–1889.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Memoirs, Letters, and Remains of Alexis de Tocqueville. 2 volumes. London, 1861.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Oeuvres complètes. 20 volumes. Edited by Mayer, J. P.. Paris, 1951–2003.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Recollections: The French Revolution of 1848. Edited by Mayer, J. P.. New Brunswick, 1987.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Lettres choisies; Souvenirs: 1814–1859. Edited by Mélonio, Françoise. Gallimard, 2003.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. 2 volumes. Edited by Nolla, Eduardo. Translated by Schleifer, James. Indianapolis, 2012.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de, and Senior, Nassau William. Correspondence & Conversations of Alexis de Tocqueville with Nassau William Senior from 1834 to 1859. 2 volumes. Edited by Simpson, M. C. M.. London, 1872.Google Scholar
Todd, Alpheus. On Parliamentary Government in England. 2 volumes. London, 1867.Google Scholar
Todd, Alpheus. Parliamentary Government in the British Colonies. Boston, 1880.Google Scholar
Trenchard, John, and Gordon, Thomas. Cato’s Letters, or Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and Other Important Subjects. 2 volumes. New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Vitrolles, Eugéne, d’Arnaud, Baron, de François Auguste. Du ministère dans le gouvernement représentatif. Paris, 1815.Google Scholar
Voltaire, François-Marie Arouet de. Lettres Philosophiques. Amsterdam, 1733.Google Scholar
Walpole, Robert. The Celebrated Speech of Sir Robert Walpole, against Short Parliaments; to Shew That a Parliamentary Reform Is Both Unnecessary and Dangerous. Edited by Dundas, Henry. London, 1793.Google Scholar
Walpole, Robert. “Debate in the Commons on the Place Bill.” In The Parliamentary History of England, vol. 11, 362–369. London, 1812.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Political Writings. Edited by Lassman, Peter and Speirs, Ronald. Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John Williams. “Parliamentary Government and Representation.” North British Review 28, no. 54 (1858): 437–464.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. Boston, 1885.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. Cabinet Government in the United States. Stamford, 1947.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. Vindication of the Rights of Men and a Vindication of the Rights of Women. Edited by Tomaselli, Sylvana. Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Alexander, Robert. Re-writing the French Revolutionary Tradition. Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
Alexander, Robert. “Benjamin Constant as a Second Restoration Politician.” In The Cambridge Companion to Constant. Edited by Rosenblatt, Helena, 146–170. Cambridge, 2009.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. “A Patriot for Whom? The Afterlives of Bolingbroke’s Patriot King.” Journal of British Studies 36, no. 4 (1997): 397–418.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge, 2013.Google Scholar
Austin, Granville. The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation. Oxford, 1966.Google Scholar
Baehr, Peter, and Richter, Melvin. “Introduction.” In Dictatorship in History and Theory: Bonapartism, Caesarism and Totalitarianism. Edited by Baehr, Peter and Richter, Melvin, 1–26. Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
Baranger, Denis. Parlementarisme des origins: Essai sur les conditions de formation d’un exécutif responsable en Angleterre (des années 1740 au début de l’âge victorien). Paris, 1999.Google Scholar
Bastid, Paul. Les institutions politiques de la monarchie parlementaire française (1814–1848). Paris, 1954.Google Scholar
Bastid, Paul. Benjamin Constant et sa doctrine. Two volumes. Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
Biefang, Andreas, and Schulze, Andreas. “From Monarchical Constitutionalism to a Parliamentary Republic: Concepts of Parliamentarism in Germany since 1818.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. Edited by Ihaleinen, Pasi et al., 62–80. New York, 2016.Google Scholar
Blaas, P. B. M. Continuity and Anachronism: Parliamentary and Constitutional Development in Whig Historiography and in the Anti-Whig Reaction between 1890 and 1930. The Hague, 1978.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Robert. “Laying the Foundations of the Modern Voting System: The Representation of the People Act 1918.” Parliamentary History 30, no. 1 (2011): 33–52.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. “Tocqueville and Le Commerce: A Newspaper Expressing His Unusual Liberalism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44, no. 2 (1983): 277–292.Google Scholar
Bouchet, Thomas. “French Parliamentary Discourse, 1789–1914.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. Edited by Ihaleinen, Pasi et al., 162–175. New York, 2016.Google Scholar
Bourke, Richard. Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke. Princeton, 2015.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. “The Misfortunes of Lord Bute: A Case-Study in Eighteenth-Century Political Argument and Public Opinion.” Historical Journal 16, no. 1 (1973): 3–43.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. Party, Ideology and Popular Politics in the Era of George III. Cambridge, 1976.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State. London, 1989.Google Scholar
Brogan, Hugh. “America and Walter Bagehot.” Journal of American Studies 11, no. 3 (1977): 335–356.Google Scholar
Brogan, Hugh. Alexis de Tocqueville: A Life. New Haven, 2006.Google Scholar
Bromwich, David. The Intellectual Life of Edmund Burke: From the Sublime and the Beautiful to American Independence. Cambridge, MA, 2014.Google Scholar
Burdeau, François, and Morabito, Marcel. “Les expériences étrangères et la première constitution française.” Pouvoirs 50, (1989): 97–112.Google Scholar
Burdiel, Isabel. “Myths of Failure; Myths of Success: New Perspectives on Nineteenth-Century Spanish Liberalism.” Journal of Modern History 70, no. 4 (1998): 892–912.Google Scholar
Burrow, John. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought. Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
Cannon, John. The Fox-North Coalition: Crisis of the Constitution, 1782–1784. Cambridge, 1970.Google Scholar
Cannon, John. Aristocratic Century: The Peerage of Eighteenth-Century England. Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
Chandaman, C. D. The English Public Revenue, 1660–1688. Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
Cherniss, Josh. “An Ethos of Politics between Realism and Idealism: Max Weber’s Enigmatic Political Ethics.” Journal of Politics 78, no. 3 (2016): 705–718.Google Scholar
Chubb, Basil. The Control of Public Expenditure: Financial Committees of the House of Commons. Oxford, 1952.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. The Dynamics of Change: The Crisis of the 1750s and English Party Systems. Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. English Society, 1688–1832: Ideology, Social Structure and Political Practice during the Ancien Regime. Cambridge, 1985.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. Revolution and Rebellion: State and Society in England in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. English Society, 1660-1832: Religion, Ideology and Politics during the Ancien Regime. Cambridge, 2000.Google Scholar
Collingham, H. A. C. The July Monarchy: A Political History of France, 1830–1848. Edited by Alexander, R. S.. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, et al. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History. Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar
Conniff, James. “Burke, Bristol, and the Concept of Representation.” Western Political Quarterly 30, no. 3 (1977): 329–341.Google Scholar
Conti, Gregory. Parliament the Mirror of the Nation: Deliberation, Representation, and Democracy in Victorian Britain. Cambridge, 2019.Google Scholar
Conac, Gérard, and Machelon, Jean-Pierre, eds. La Constitution de l’an III: Boissy d’Anglas et la naissance du libéralisme constitutionnel. Paris, 1999.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil Patrick. A Bibliography of Editions of the Writings of Benjamin Constant to 1833. Hudson, 1981.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian. “Tocqueville and the Political Thought of the Doctrinaires.” History of Political Thought 20, no. 3 (1999): 456–493.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian. “Guizot’s Elitist Theory of Representative Government.” Critical Review 15, nos. 3–4 (2003): 261–284.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian. Liberalism under Siege: The Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires. Lanham, 2003.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian. A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton, 2012.Google Scholar
de Dijn, Anelien de. French Political Thought from Montesquieu to Tocqueville: Liberty in a Levelled Society? Cambridge, 2008.Google Scholar
de Ruggiero, Guido. The History of European Liberalism. Translated by Collingwood, R. G.. London, 1927.Google Scholar
Dickinson, H. T. “George III and Parliament.” Parliamentary History 30, no. 3 (2011): 395–413.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Reginald, ed. Summary of the Constitutions and Procedures of Foreign Parliaments. London, 1890.Google Scholar
Dickson, P. G. M. The Financial Revolution in England: A Study in the Development of Public Credit, 1688–1756. London, 1967.Google Scholar
Dragnich, Alex. The Development of Parliamentary Government in Serbia. New York, 1978.Google Scholar
Drolet, Michael. “Carrying the Banner of the Bourgeoisie.” History of Political Thought 32, no. 4 (2011): 645–690.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon, and Monnier, Henry. Les constitutions et les principales lois politiques de la France depuis 1789: collationnées sur les textes officiels, précédées des notices historiques et suivies d’une table analytique détaillée. Paris, 1908.Google Scholar
Einzig, Paul. The Control of the Purse: Progress and Decline of Parliament’s Financial Control. London, 1959.Google Scholar
Elofson, W. M. The Rockingham Connection and the Second Founding of the Whig Party, 1768–1773. Montreal, 1996.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. “Early Theories of Parliamentarism.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 8, no. 1 (1942): 33–55.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. “Deliberation as Discussion.” In Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Elster, Jon, 44–68. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Fletcher, F. T. H. Montesquieu and English Politics: 1750–1800. London, 1939.Google Scholar
Flynn, Phillip. Francis Jeffrey. Camden, 1978.Google Scholar
Fontana, Biancamaria. Rethinking the Politics of Commercial Society. The Edinburgh Review, 1802–1832. Cambridge, 1985.Google Scholar
Fontana, Biancamaria. Benjamin Constant and the Post-Revolutionary Mind. New Haven, 1991.Google Scholar
Fontana, Biancamaria. Germaine de Staël: A Political Portrait. Princeton, 2016.Google Scholar
Foord, Archibald. His Majesty’s Opposition: 1714–1830. Oxford, 1964.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Klaus. The Emergence of Russian Constitutionalism, 1900–1904. The Hague, 1981.Google Scholar
Furet, François. Revolutionary France 1770–1880. Translated by Nevill, Antonia. Malden, 1995.Google Scholar
Furet, Francois. “The Intellectual Origins of Tocqueville’s Thought.” In Tocqueville et l’espirit de la Démocratie. Edited by Guellec, Laurence, 121–140. Paris, 2005.Google Scholar
Gannett, Robert. “Tocqueville and the Politics of Suffrage.” Tocqueville Review 27, no. 2 (2006): 209–226.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. “Representative Government and Popular Sovereignty.” In Political Representation. Edited by Shapiro, Ian, 90–110. Cambridge, 2009.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. “From Popular Sovereignty to Civil Society in Post-Revolutionary France.” In Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Edited by Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin, 236–269. Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar
Gash, Norman. Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830–1850. New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. La Révolution des droits de l’homme. Paris, 1989.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. La Révolution des pouvoirs. La souveraineté, le peuple et la représentation (1789–1799). Paris, 1995.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. La condition politique. Paris, 2005.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. L’avènement de la démocratie. Four volumes. Paris, 2007–2017.Google Scholar
Gerard, Christine. The Patriot Opposition to Walpole: Politics, Poetry, and National Myth, 1725–1742. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Gildea, Robert. Children of the Revolution: The French, 1799–1914 (Cambridge, MA: 2010), 246–260.Google Scholar
Girard, Louis. “La réélection des députés promus à des fonctions publiques, 1828–1831.” In La France au XIX siècle: Mélanges offerts à Charles Hippolyte Pouthas, 227–244. Paris, 1973.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark. “Situating Swift’s Politics in 1701.” In Politics and Literature in the Age of Swift. Edited by Rawson, Claudia, 31–51. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Craufurd D. Walter Lippmann: Public Economist. Cambridge, MA, 2014.Google Scholar
Grange, Henri. Les idées de Necker. Paris, 1974.Google Scholar
Grange, Henri. “Mme de Staël et la Constitution de l’an III: avant et après.” In La Constitution de l’an III: Boissy d’Anglas et la naissance du libéralisme constitutionnel. Edited by Conac, Gérard and Machelon, Jean-Pierre, 183–199. Paris, 1999.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. A. W. “Influence, Parties and the Constitution: Changing Attitudes, 1783–1832.” Historical Journal 17, no. 2 (1974): 301–328.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. A. W. Beyond Liberty and Property: The Process of Self-Recognition in Eighteenth-Century Political Thought. Montreal, 1983.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. A. W. When the French Tried to Be British: Party, Opposition, and the Quest for Civil Disagreement, 1814–1848. Montreal, 2009.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, MA, 1989.Google Scholar
Harling, Phillip. “Rethinking ‘Old Corruption.’” Past and Present 147, no. 1 (1995): 127–158.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Angus. Parliament, Party and the Art of Politics in Britain, 1855–59. London, 1987.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Angus. “Lord Derby and Victorian Conservatism: A Reappraisal.” Parliamentary History 6, no. 2 (1987): 280–302.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Angus. “‘Parliamentary Government’ and Victorian Political Parties, c. 1830–c. 1880.” English Historical Review 140, no. 412 (1989): 638–669.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Angus. British Party Politics: 1852–1886. London, 1998.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Angus. Victorian Political Culture: “Habits of Heart and Mind.” Oxford, 2015.Google Scholar
Hayton, David. “The Reorientation of Place Legislation in England in the 1690s.” Parliaments, Estates and Representation 5, no. 2 (1985): 103–108.Google Scholar
Heffernan, Richard, and Webb, Paul. “The British Prime Minister: Much More than ‘First among Equals.’” In The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Edited by Poguntke, Thomas and Webb, Paul, 26–52. Oxford, 2005.Google Scholar
Hewitson, Mark. “The Kaiserreich in Question: Constitutional Crisis in Germany before the First World War.” Journal of Modern History 73, no. 4: 725–780.Google Scholar
Holmes, Geoffrey. British Politics in the Age of Anne. London, 1987.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. Benjamin Constant and the Making of Modern Liberalism. New Haven, 1984.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. Politics in Commercial Society. Edited by Kapossy, Béla and Sonenscher, Michael. Cambridge, MA, 2015.Google Scholar
Hoppen, K. Theodore. The Mid-Victorian Generation, 1846–1886. Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
Hoppit, Julian. “Patterns of Parliamentary Legislation.” Historical Journal 39, no. 1 (1996): 109–131.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley, 1986.Google Scholar
Ihaleinen, Pasi, et al. “Parliament as Conceptual Nexus.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. Edited by Ihaleinen, Pasi et al., 1–16. New York, 2016.Google Scholar
Innes, Joanna. “Legislating for Three Kingdoms.” In Parliaments, Nations and Identities in Britain and Ireland: 1660–1860. Edited by Hoppit, Julian, 15–38. Manchester, 2003.Google Scholar
Jainchill, Andrew. Reimagining Politics after the Terror: The Republican Origins of French Liberalism. Ithaca, 2008.Google Scholar
Jardin, André. Tocqueville: A Biography. Translated by Davis, Lydia and Hemenway, Robert. Baltimore, 1988.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. L’Individu effacé ou le paradoxe du libéralisme français. Paris, 1997.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. “Le concept de ‘responsabilité des ministres’ chez Benjamin Constant.” Revue française de droit constitutionnel 42, (2002): 227–243.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. “La théorie de l'autorité chez Benjamin Constant.” Historical Reflections / Réflexions Historiques 28, no. 3 (2002): 455–470.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. “Tocqueville et le problème du pouvoir exécutif en 1848.” Revue française de science politique 41, no. 6 (1991): 739–755.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. “Necker: examen critique de la Constitution de l’an III.” In La Constitution de l’an III: Boissy d’Anglas et la naissance du libéralisme constitutionnel. Edited by Conac, Gérard and Machelon, Jean-Pierre, 167–182. Paris, 1999.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. A. Parliament, Party, and Politics in Victorian Britain. Manchester, 1996.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jeremy. “Conceptions of England and Its Constitution in Nineteenth-Century French Political Thought.” Historical Journal 29, no. 1 (1986): 65–85.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jeremy. “Constant’s Idea of Modern Liberty.” In The Cambridge Companion to Benjamin Constant. Edited by Rosenblatt, Helena, 69–91. Cambridge, 2009.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jeremy. “A Note on Freedom of the Press in Restoration France.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 17, no. 5 (2012): 568–573.Google Scholar
Jones, Emily. Edmund Burke and the Invention of Modern Conservatism, 1830–1914: An Intellectual History. Oxford, 2017.Google Scholar
Julien-Laferrière, Francois. Députés fonctionnaires sous la monarchie de Juillet. Paris, 1970.Google Scholar
Kahan, Alan. Liberalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Political Culture of Limited Suffrage. New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas, and Katznelson, Ira. Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns. Cambridge, 2008.Google Scholar
Kelley, Robert. “Midlothian: A Study in Politics and Ideas.” Victorian Studies 4, no. 2 (1960): 118–140.Google Scholar
Kelly, George Armstrong. The Humane Comedy: Constant, Tocqueville, and French Liberalism. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
Kelly, Paul. “Constituents’ Instructions to Members of Parliament in the Eighteenth Century.” In Party and Management in Parliament, 1660–1784. Edited by Jones, Clyde, 169–189. New York and Leicester, 1984.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu Hyun. The Age of Visions and Arguments: Parliamentarianism and the National Public Sphere in Early Meiji Japan. Cambridge, MA, 2007.Google Scholar
Kishlansky, Mark. Parliamentary Selection: Social and Political Choice in Early Modern England. Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
Kishlansky, Mark. A Monarchy Transformed: Britain, 1603–1714. London, 1996.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James. Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought. Oxford, 2016.Google Scholar
Koepke, Robert. “The Failure of Parliamentary Government in France, 1840–1848.” European Studies Review 9, no. 4 (1979): 433–455.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Isaac. Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole. Cambridge, MA, 1968.Google Scholar
Kwan, Jonathan. Liberalism and the Habsburg Monarchy, 1861–1895. Basingstroke, 2013.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, 2012.Google Scholar
Langford, Paul. The First Rockingham Administration, 1765–1766. Oxford, 1973.Google Scholar
Langford, Paul. A Polite and Commercial People: England, 1727–1783. Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Langford, Paul. “Swift and Walpole.” In Politics and Literature in the Age of Swift. Edited by Rawson, Claudia, 52–78. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Laquièze, Alain. “Adolphe Thiers, théoricien du régime parlamentaire. Ses articles dans Le National en 1830.” Revue française d’histoire des idées politiques 5 (1997): 59–88.Google Scholar
Laquièze, Alain. “Le modèle anglais et la responsabilité ministérielle selon le Groupe de Coppet.” In Coppet, creuset de l’esprit libéral: les idées politiques et constitutionnelles du Groupe de Madame de Staël. Edited by Jaume, Lucien, 157–174. Paris, 2000.Google Scholar
Laquièze, Alain. Les origines du régime parlementaire en France: 1814–1848. Paris, 2002.Google Scholar
Laquièze, Alain. “Benjamin Constant et l’Acte Additionnel aux Constitutions de l’Empire du 22 Avril 1815.” Historia Constitucional, no. 4 (2003): 197–234.Google Scholar
Laquièze, Alain. “La Charte de 1814 et la question du gouvernement parlementaire.” Jus Politicum 13 (2014): 1–13.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. “Liberal and Republican Conceptions of Freedom.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6, no. 1 (2001): 96–119.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold. The Rise of European Liberalism: An Essay in Interpretation. London, 1936.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold. Parliamentary Government in England. New York, 1938.Google Scholar
Lebovitz, Adam. The Colossus: Constitutional Theory in America and France, 1776–1799. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 2018.Google Scholar
Lembcke, Oliver, and Weber, Floria. “Introduction to Sieyès’ Political Theory.” In Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès: The Essential Political Writings. Edited by Lembcke, Oliver W. and Weber, Florian, 1–42. Leiden and Boston, 2014.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob. Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom. Oxford, 2014.Google Scholar
Leydet, Dominique. “Pluralism and the Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy.” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism. Edited by Dyzenhaus, David, 109–130. Durham, 1998.Google Scholar
Lieberman, David. “Codification, Consolidation, and Statute.” In Rethinking Leviathan: The Eighteenth-Century State in Britain and Germany. Edited by Brewer, John and Hellmuth, Eckhart, 359–390. Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar
Lindseth, Peter. Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State. Oxford, 2010.Google Scholar
Lock, F. P. Edmund Burke. Two Volumes: 1784–1797, vol. 2. Oxford, 1998–2006.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Karl. “The Balance between Legislative and Executive Power: A Study in Comparative Constitutional Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 5, no. 4 (1938): 566–608.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. “Two Roads to Serfdom: Liberalism, Conservatism, and Administrative Power.” American University Law Review 36 (1987): 295–322.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. South Bend, 2007.Google Scholar
Magalhães, Pedro T. “A Contingent Affinity: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and the Challenge of Modern Politics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 77, no. 2 (2016): 283–304.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey. “Party Government and the Settlement of 1688.” American Political Science Review 58, no. 4 (1964): 933–946.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey. Statesmanship and Party Government: A Study of Burke and Bolingbroke. Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark. Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century. New York, 1998.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Iain. “Jean-Louis De Lolme and the Political Science of the English Empire.” Historical Journal 55, no. 1 (2012): 21–44.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Iain. “Constantin Frantz and the Intellectual History of Bonapartism and Caesarism: A Reassessment,” Intellectual History Review, vol. 28, no. 2 (2018): 317–338.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich. Weltbürgertum und Nationalstaat. Munich, 1908.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich. Cosmopolitanism and the National State. Translated by Kimber, Robert. Princeton, 1970.Google Scholar
Milgate, Murray, and Stimson, Shannon. “The Figure of Smith: Dugald Stewart and the Propagation of Smithian Economics.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 3, no. 2 (1996): 225–253.Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig von. Liberalism. Translated by Ralph, Raico. San Francisco, 1985.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. J. The French Legislative Assembly of 1791. Leiden, 1988.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Wolfgang. Max Weber and German Politics 1890–1920. Translated by Michael, Steinberg. Chicago, 1990.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA, 2018.Google Scholar
Muel, Léon. Gouvernements, ministères et constitutions de la France depuis cent ans: Précis historique des révolutions, des crises ministérielles et gouvernementales, et des changements de constitutions de la France depuis 1789 jusqu’en 1890. Paris, 1891.Google Scholar
Mueller, Jan-Werner. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. New Haven, 2011.Google Scholar
Mueller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, 2016.Google Scholar
Namier, Lewis. England in the Age of the American Revolution. London, 1930.Google Scholar
Namier, Lewis. The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III. London, 1957.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding. Cambridge, MA, 2014.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. “Are We on the Verge of the Death Spiral That Produced the English Revolution of 1642–1649?” History News Network December 12, 2014.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, Frank. Edmund Burke: His Political Philosophy. Bloomington, 1973.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, Frank. Voters, Patrons, and Parties: The Unreformed Electoral System of Hanoverian England, 1734–1832. Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel. The Burke-Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy. University Park, 2007.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. The Policy State: An American Predicament. Cambridge, MA, 2017.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, Jurgen. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Translated by Patrick, Camiller. Princeton, 2014.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. The Politics of Parliamentary Procedure: The Formation of the Westminster Procedure as a Parliamentary Ideal Type. Opladen: 2014.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. “Parliamentarism as a European Type of Polity: Constructing the Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism Divide in Walter Bagehot’s English Constitution.” In The Meanings of Europe: Changes and Exchanges of a Contested Concept. Edited by Wiesner, Claudia and Schmidt-Gleim, Mieke, 74–90. New York, 2014.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. From Oratory to Debate: Parliamentarisation of Deliberative Rhetoric in Westminster. Baden-Baden, 2016.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. A Political Style of Thinking: Essays on Max Weber. Colchester, 2017.Google Scholar
Pares, Richard. King George III and the Politicians. Oxford, 1953.Google Scholar
Parsons, Floyd. Thomas Hare and Political Representation in Victorian Britain. Basingstroke, 2009.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale. “Sur la théorie constitutionelle de la monarchie de Juillet.” In François Guizot et la culture politique de son temps. Edited by Valensise, Marina, 110–128. Paris, 1991.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale. Sieyès et l’invention de la constitution en France. Paris: 1995.Google Scholar
Phillips, John. Electoral Behavior in Unreformed England: Plumpers, Splitters, and Straights. Princeton, 1982.Google Scholar
Phillips, John. The Great Reform Bill in the Boroughs: English Electoral Behaviour, 1818–1841. Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Pincus, Steven. 1688: The First Modern Revolution. New Haven, 2009.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, 1967.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, 2006.Google Scholar
Plumb, J. H. Sir Robert Walpole: The King’s Minister. Boston, 1961.Google Scholar
Plumb, J. H. The Growth of Political Stability in England. London, 1967.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, 2003.Google Scholar
Price, Don. “The Parliamentary and Presidential Systems.” Public Administration Review 3, no. 4 (1943): 317–334.Google Scholar
Prutsch, Markus. Making Sense of Constitutional Monarchism in Post-Napoleonic France and Germany. New York, 2013.Google Scholar
Rabb, Theodore. “The Role of the Commons.” Past and Present 92 (1981): 55–78.Google Scholar
Reid, Christopher. “Whose Parliament? Political Oratory and Print Culture in the Later 18th Century.” Language and Literature 9, no. 2 (2000): 122–134.Google Scholar
Reitan, Earl A. “The Civil List in Eighteenth-Century British Politics: Parliamentary Supremacy versus the Independence of the Crown.” Historical Journal 9, no. 3 (1966): 318–337.Google Scholar
Reitan, Earl A. Politics, Finance and the People: Economical Reform in England in the Age of the American Revolution, 1770–1792. Basingstroke, 2007.Google Scholar
Richards, P. G. Patronage in British Government. London, 1963.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “Tocqueville and Guizot on Democracy: From a Type of Society to a Political Regime.” History of European Ideas 30, no. 1 (2004): 61–82.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “A Family of Political Concepts: Tyranny, Despotism, Bonapartism, Caesarism, Dictatorship, 1750–1917.” European Journal of Political Theory 4, no. 3 (2005): 221–248.Google Scholar
Robbins, Caroline. “‘Discordant Parties’: A Study of the Acceptance of Party by Englishmen.” Political Science Quarterly 73, no. 4 (1958): 505–529.Google Scholar
Robbins, Caroline. The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies. Cambridge, MA, 1959.Google Scholar
Robbins, Caroline. “Edmund Burke’s Rationale of Cabinet Government.” Burke Newsletter 7, vol. 1 (1965): 457–465.Google Scholar
Roberts, Clayton. “The Constitutional Significance of the Financial Settlement of 1690.” Historical Journal 20, no. 1 (1977): 59–76.Google Scholar
Rosales, Jose Maria. “Parliamentarism in Spanish Politics in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: From Constitutional Liberalism to Democratic Parliamentarism.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. Edited by Ihaleinen, Pasi et al., 277–291. New York, 2016.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le moment Guizot. Paris, 1986.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le sacre du citoyen: Histoire du suffrage universel en France. Paris, 1992.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. La monarchie impossible: Les Chartes de 1814 et de 1830. Paris, 1994.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le peuple introuvable: Histoire de la representation démocratique en France. Paris, 1998.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. La démocratie inachevée: Histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France. Paris, 2000.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge, 2008.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton, 2011.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le bon gouvernement. Paris, 2015.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Helena, ed. “Why Constant? A Critical Overview of the Constant Revival.” Modern Intellectual History 1, no. 3 (2004): 439–453.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, 2018.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton, 2008.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Noah. The Tribe of the Eagle: Presidential Democracy in Thought and Practice, 1927–1952. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Roseveare, Henry. The Treasury: Evolution of a British Institution. London, 1969.Google Scholar
Roussellier, Nicolas. Le Parlement de l’éloquence: La souveraineté de la délibération au lendemain de la Grande Guerre. Paris, 1997.Google Scholar
Rubini, Dennis. Court and Country, 1688–1702. London, 1968.Google Scholar
Saunders, Robert. Democracy and the Vote in British Politics, 1848–1867: The Making of the Second Reform Act. Burlington, 2011.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Stephen. Demos Assembled: Democracy and the International Origins of the Modern States, 1840–1880. Chicago, 2018.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Romney. The House of Commons, 1715–1754. Oxford, 1970.Google Scholar
Seaward, Paul. “Parliament and the Idea of Political Accountability in Early Modern Britain.” In Realities of Representation: State Building in Early Modern Europe and European America. Edited by Jannson, Maija, 45–62. New York, 2007.Google Scholar
Selinger, William. “Schumpeter on Democratic Survival.” Tocqueville Review 36, no. 2 (2015): 127–157.Google Scholar
Selinger, William. “Le grand mal de l’époque: Tocqueville on French Political Corruption.” History of European Ideas 42, no. 1 (2016): 73–94.Google Scholar
Selinger, William. “The Politics of Arendtian Historiography: European Federation and The Origins of Totalitarianism.” Modern Intellectual History 13, no. 2 (2016): 417–446.Google Scholar
Selinger, William. “Fighting Electoral Corruption in the Victorian Era: An Overlooked Dimension of John Stuart Mill’s Political Thought.” European Journal of Political Theory, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Shackleton, Robert. Montesquieu: A Critical Biography. Oxford, 1961.Google Scholar
Silberman, Bernard. Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States and Great Britain. Chicago, 1993.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “A Third Concept of Liberty.” In Proceedings of the British Academy 115 (2002): 237–268.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Hobbes on Representation.” European Journal of Philosophy 13, no. 2 (2005): 155–184.Google Scholar
Smith, Paul. “Introduction.” In The English Constitution by Bagehot, Walter. Edited by Smith, Paul, vii–xxvii. Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael. Before the Deluge: Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution. Princeton, 2007.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael. Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem in the French Revolution. Princeton, 2008.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Alan. “Restoration Political Theory and the Debate over the Law of the Double Vote.” Journal of Modern History 55, no. 1 (1983): 54–70.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean. “The Pulpit, The Rostrum, and the Bar.” In Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, vol. 2: Traditions. Translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Edited by Nora, Pierre and Kritzman, Lawrence, 418–440. New York, 1997.Google Scholar
Stedman-Jones, Gareth, and Claeys, Gregory, eds. The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge, 2013.Google Scholar
Stockdale, Melissa. Paul Miliukov and the Quest for a Liberal Russia, 1880–1918. Ithaca, 1996.Google Scholar
Stoetzer, O. Carlos. “Benjamin Constant and the Doctrinaire Influence in Hispanic America.” Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America 11, no. 2 (1978): 145–165.Google Scholar
Swanson, Donald, and Trout, Andrew. “Alexander Hamilton, ‘The Celebrated Mr. Neckar,’ and Public Credit.” William and Mary Quarterly 47, no. 3 (1990): 422–430.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. D. G. “The Beginning of Parliamentary Reporting in Newspapers, 1768–1774.” English Historical Review 74, no. 293 (1953): 623–636.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. D. G. The House of Commons in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford, 1971.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh. “Lord Macaulay: The History of England.” In History and the Enlightenment. Edited by Robertson, John, 192–223. New Haven, 2010.Google Scholar
Troper, Michel. Terminer la Révolution: la Constitution de 1795. Paris, 2006.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Turkka, Tapani. The Origins of Parliamentarism: A Study of Sandys’ Motion. Baden-Baden, 2007.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. “Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism.” Cardozo Law Review 21 (2000): 1645–1651.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago, 2002.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, 2006.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and the People. Cambridge, MA, 2014.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia, and Ragazzoni, David. “Theories of Representative Government and Parliamentarism in Italy from the 1840s to the 1920s.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. Edited by Ihaleinen, Pasi et al., 243–261. New York, 2016.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, Georgios. “Guizot’s Historical Works and J. S. Mill’s Reception of Tocqueville.” History of Political Thought 20, no. 2 (1999): 292–312.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, Georgios. Victorian Political Thought on France and the French. Basingstroke, 2002.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, Georgios. “‘Negrophilist’ Crusader: John Stuart Mill on the American Civil War and Reconstruction.” History of European Ideas 39, no. 5 (2013): 729–754.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Indianapolis, 1998.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana. “The Legacy of Max Weber in Weimar Political and Social Theory.” In Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy. Edited by Gordon, Peter E. and McCormick, John, 73–100. Princeton, 2013.Google Scholar
Vincent, K. Steven. Benjamin Constant and the Birth of French Liberalism. New York, 2011.Google Scholar
Vovelle, Michel. The Fall of the French Monarchy: 1787–1792. Translated by Susan, Burke. Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Dignity of Legislation.” Maryland Law Review 54, no. 2 (1995): 633–665.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
Welch, Cheryl. De Tocqueville. Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar
Weston, Corrine. English Constitutional Theory and the House of Lords, 1556–1832. London, 2010.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard. Against War and Empire: Geneva, Britain, and France in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven, 2012.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, Diana. Ministers in Parliament: Accountability in Theory and Practice. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. “The Rationality of Hegel’s Concept of Monarchy.” American Political Science Review 74, no. 3 (1980): 709–720.Google Scholar
Zeldin, Theodore. The Political System of Napoleon III. London, 1958.Google Scholar
Zeldin, Theodore. “English Ideals in French Politics during the Nineteenth Century.” Historical Journal 2, no. 1 (1959): 40–58.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • William Selinger, University College London
  • Book: Parliamentarism
  • Online publication: 05 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108585330.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • William Selinger, University College London
  • Book: Parliamentarism
  • Online publication: 05 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108585330.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • William Selinger, University College London
  • Book: Parliamentarism
  • Online publication: 05 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108585330.009
Available formats
×