Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:18:51.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2019

Irene Peirano Garrison
Irene Peirano Garrison
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Persuasion, Rhetoric and Roman Poetry , pp. 244 - 262
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamietz, J. (1966) M.F. Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Liber III. Munich.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1976) Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (2010) “Quintilian and Lucan,” in Lucan’s Bellum Civile: Between Epic Tradition and Aesthetic Innovation, ed. Hömke, N. and Reitz, C.. New York, NY: 1–16.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2012) Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2013) “The Orator and his audience: the rhetorical perspective in the art of deliberation,” in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, ed. Steel, C. and van der Bloom., H. Oxford: 195–209.Google Scholar
Ariemma, E. M. (2009) “Fons cuncti Varro mali: the demagogue Varro in Punica 8–10,” in Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus, ed. Augoustakis, A.. Leiden: 241–76.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1992) “Neoptolemus and the classification of poetry,” CP 87: 206–31.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2005) “A new kind of model: Cicero’s Roman constitution in De Republica,” AJP 126: 377–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assfahl, G. (1932) Vergleich und Metapher bei Quintilian. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2007) “Rhetoric and Ovid,” in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Malden, MA: 413–24.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1944) “Quintilian on painting and statuary,” CQ 38: 17–26.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1954) Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Liber XII. Oxford.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1964) Aeneidos: Liber Secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (2011) Quintilians Grammatik (Inst. Orat. 1,4–8). Berlin.Google Scholar
Axelson, B. (1945) Unpoetische Wörter: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Lateinischen Dichtersprache. Lund.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. (1988) “Four problems with Florus,” Latomus 47: 134–42.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2009a) “Exemplarity: between practice and text,” in Latinitas Perennis, vol. 2: Appropriation and Latin Literature, ed. Maes, Y., Papy, J. and Verbaal, W.. Leiden: 41–62.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2009b) “Senatus Consultum de Lycaone: concili degli dèi e immaginazione politica nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio,” MD 61, Callida Musa: Papers on Latin Literature in Honor of Elaine Fantham: 117–45.Google Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. (2009) Entering the Agon: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography and Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1988) The Semiotic Challenge. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Barwick, K. (1922) “Die Gliederung der rhetorischen Techne und die Horazische Epistula ad Pisones,” Hermes 57: 1–62.Google Scholar
Bender, J. B. and Wellbery, D. E. (1990) The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Bennett, B. (2007) “Spanish Declaimers in the Elder Seneca,” Advances in the History of Rhetoric 10: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A. (2002) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Union, NJ.Google Scholar
Bers, V. (1984) Greek Poetic Syntax in the Classical Age. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (2007) Scholasticorum Studia: Seneca il Vecchio e la Cultura Retorica e Letteraria della Prima Età Imperiale. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bestul, T. H. (1975) “The Saturnalia of Macrobius and the Praecepta Artis Rhetoricae of Julius Severianus,” CJ 70: 10–16.Google Scholar
Billmayer, K. (1932) Rhetorische Studien zu den Reden in Vergils Aeneis. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (1997a) Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (1997b) “Schooling in persona: imagination and subordination in Roman education,” CA 16: 57–78.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1966) “Lucan and the declamation schools,” AJP 87: 257–89.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. London.Google Scholar
Booth, W. (1983) The Rhetoric of Fiction, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Bornecque, H. (1902) Les Déclamations et les Déclamateurs d’après Sénèque Le Père. Lille.Google Scholar
Botsford, G. W. (1909) The Roman Assemblies from their Origin to the End of the Republic. New York.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1965) Augustus and the Greek World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1963) Horace on Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1971) Horace on Poetry: The Ars Poetica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1989) “Quintilian’s De Causis Corruptae Eloquentiae and Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus,” CQ 39: 472–503.Google Scholar
Brogan, T. V. F. and Burris, S. (1993) “Poetic license,” in Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, ed. Preminger, A. and Brogan, T. V. F.. Princeton, NJ: 928.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. (1947) The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Bruère, R. T. (1971) “Some recollections of Virgil’s Drances in later epic,” CP 66: 30–4.Google Scholar
Burgess, T. C. (1902) Epideictic Literature. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1950) A Rhetoric of Motives. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1989) Virgil’s Augustan Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2007) Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry, rev. ed. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1987) “Oratores,” in Enciclopedia Virgiliana III. Rome: 869–72.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1995) “Quintilian and Horace,” Scholia 4: 79–100.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1998) “From Aristotelian lexis to elocutio,” Rhetorica 16: 47–80.Google Scholar
Calboli Montefusco, L. (1986) La Dottrina degli “Status” nella Retorica Greca e Romana. Hildesheim and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (2011) The Last Pagans of Rome. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (2013) “Rhetoric in the (other) Menander,” in Hellenistic Oratory, ed. Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K.. Oxford: 93–107.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (1997) “Qvaerenti Plvra Legendvm: on the necessity of ‘reading more’ in Ovid’s exile poetry,” Ramus 26: 80–112.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (2010) “The Bellum Civile as an anti-Aeneid,” in Brill’s Companion to Lucan, ed. Asso, P.. Leiden: 81–110.Google Scholar
Chin, C. M. (2008) Grammar and Christianity in the Late Roman World. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Christes, J. (1979) Sklaven und Freigelassene als Grammatiker und Philologen im Antiken Rom. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1949) “Rhetorical influences in the Aeneid,” G&R 18: 14–27.Google Scholar
Clément-Tarantino, S. (2011) “Éloge et Défense dans le commentaire de Servius à l’Énéide,” in Servius et sa Re´ception de l’Antiquite´ à la Renaissance, ed. Bouquet, M. and Méniel, B.. Rennes: 101–20.Google Scholar
Cole, C. N. (1906) “Quintilian’s quotations from the Latin Poets,” CR 20: 47–51.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1991) The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. G. G. (1999) “Poetic diction, poetic discourse and the poetic register,” in Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry, ed. Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R.. Oxford: 21–96.Google Scholar
Colson, F. H. (1924) M. Fabii Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Liber I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Comparetti, D. (1967) Virgilio nel Medio Evo. Florence.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007a) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007b) “Virile tongues: rhetoric and masculinity,” A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Domink, W. and Hall, J.. Malden, MA: 83–97.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (1997) “Field and forum: culture and agriculture in Roman rhetoric,” in Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. Dominik, W. J.. New York, NY: 71–89.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (1998) Petronius the Poet: Verse and Literary Tradition in the Satyricon. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (2001) A Companion to Petronius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cousin, J. (1967) Études sur Quintilien. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. (2015) “On the weak king according to Vergil: Aeolus, Latinus, and political allegoresis in the Aeneid,” Vergilius 61: 97–124.Google Scholar
Culler, J. D. (1982) On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. (1953) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. New York, NY.Google Scholar
D’Anna, G. (1958) “La tragedia latina arcaica nelle Metamorfosi,” Atti del Convegno Internazionale Ovidiano 2: 217–34.Google Scholar
De Man, P. (1979) Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
De Man, P. (1984) The Rhetoric of Romanticism. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Decker, J. de (1913) Juvenalis Declamans, Étude sur la Rhétorique Declamatoire dans les Satires de Juvénal. Ghent.Google Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (2003) “Ritratto di famiglia: Seneca e i suoi nella Consolatio Ad Helviam,” in Gli Annei: Una Famiglia nella Storia e nella Cultura di Roma Imperiale, ed. Gualandri, I. and Mazzoli, G.. Como: 339–56.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. (1952) Greek Prose Style. Oxford.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1982) Margins of Philosophy, trans. A. Bass. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, L. (1975) Scholia Vetera in Hesiodi Theogoniam. Milan.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. (2005) “Epic and epigram: minor heroes in Virgil’s Aeneid,” CQ 55: 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominik, W. J. (1994) Speech and Rhetoric in Statius’ Thebaid. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1956) “Cicero, Quintilian, and the canon of Ten Attic Orators,” Mnemosyne 9: 30–40.Google Scholar
Dozier, C. (2012) “Poetry, politics, and pleasure in Quintilian,” in Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity, ed. Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I.. Leiden: 345–62.Google Scholar
Duban, J. M. (1980) “Poets and kings in the Theogony invocation,” QUCC 4: 7–21.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (1983) Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis, MN and London.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. (1961) The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edward, W. A. (1996) Seneca the Elder: Suasoriae. London and Newburyport, MA.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (2009) “Ennius Cunctator and the history of a gerund in the Roman historiographical tradition,” CQ 59: 532–42.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (2013) Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elmer, D. F. (2013) The Poetics of Consent: Collective Decision Making and the Iliad. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Meyer, M. (2014) Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Enterline, L. (2012) Shakespeare’s Schoolroom: Rhetoric, Discipline, Emotion. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Evans, H. B. (1976) “Ovid’s apology for Ex Ponto 1–3,” Hermes 104: 103–12.Google Scholar
Fairweather, J. (1981) Seneca the Elder. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1972) Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1978) “Imitation and decline: rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ,” CP 73: 102–16.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1985) “Caesar and the mutiny: Lucan’s reshaping of the historical tradition in De Bello Civili 5. 237–373,” CP 80: 119–31.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1992) “Lucan’s Medusa-excursus: its design and purpose,” MD 29: 95–119.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1995) “The concept of nature and human nature in Quintilian’s psychology and theory of instruction,” Rhetorica 13: 125–36.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1996) Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1997) “The contexts and occasions of Roman public rhetoric,” in Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. Dominik, W. J.. London and New York, NY: 111–28.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1999) “Fighting words: Turnus at bay in the Latin council (Aen. 11.234–466),” AJP 120: 259–80.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2002) “Orator and/et Actor,” in Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession, ed. Easterling, P. and Hall, E.. Cambridge: 362–76.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2010) “Caesar’s voice and Caesarian voices,” in Lucan’s Bellum ciuile: Between Epic Tradition and Aesthetic Innovation, ed. Hömke, N. and Reitz, C. Berlin and New York, NY: 53–70.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1997) “Towards a rhetoric of (Roman?) epic,” in Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. Dominik, W. J.. London and New York, NY: 131–46.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2002) “Greek lives and Roman careers in the classical vita tradition,” in European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance, ed. Cheney, P. and de Armas., F. Toronto, ON: 24–46.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2008) “Servius and the Homeric scholia,” in Servio: Stratificazioni Esegetiche e Modelli Culturali/Servius: Exegetical Stratifications and Cultural Models, ed. Casali, S. and Stok, F.. Brussels: 112–31.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1983) “The taciturnity of Aeneas,” CQ 33: 204–19.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1995) “Criticism ancient and modern,” in Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-fifth Birthday, ed. Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C.. Oxford and New York, NY: 301–12.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2014) “First similes in epic,” TAPA 144: 189–228.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2013) “Free spirits: Sallust and the citation of Catiline,” AJP 134: 49–66.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M. W. (1983) Trials of Desire: Renaissance Defenses of Poetry. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Fish, S. E. (1980) Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. (2016) “Philosophy in the expanded field: Ciceronian dialogue in Pollio’s letters from Spain (Fam. 10.31–33),” Arethusa 49, 549–73.Google Scholar
Flower, H. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2002) The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2007) “Towards an aesthetic paradigm of late antiquity,” Antiquité Tardive 15: 277–84.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2007) “Rhetoric and literature at Rome,” in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Dominik, W. J. and Hall, J.. Malden, MA: 369–81.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1945) Ovid: A Poet between Two Worlds. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. and Smith, R. A. (2015) Aeneid 5: Text, Translation and Commentary. Boston, MA and Leiden.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2013) “The afterlife of Varro in Horace’s Sermones,” in Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations, ed. Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J. and Frangoulidis., S. Berlin and Boston, MA: 297–336.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2018) “Epic anger, and the state of the (Roman) soul in Virgil’s first simile,” in Augustan Poetry: New Trends and Revaluations, ed. Martins., P. São Paulo: 287–311.Google Scholar
Frye, N. (2000) Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, rev. ed. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Fucecchi, M. (1999) “La vigilia di Canne nei Punica e un contributo allo studio dei rapporti fra Silio Italico e Lucano,” in Interpretare Lucano: Miscellanea di Studi, ed. Esposito, P. and Nicastri, L.. Naples: 305–42.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. (2005) Epistulae Ex Ponto, Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Galasso, L. (1995) P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistularum Ex Ponto Liber II. Florence.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Gebhard, V. (1934) “Thersites,” RE 5:2455–71.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1982) Figures of Literary Discourse. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2003) Ovid: Ars Amatoria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Godzich, W. and Kittay, J. (1987) The Emergence of Prose: An Essay in Prosaics. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Goebel, G. H. (1981) “Rhetorical and poetical thinking in Lucan’s harangues (7.250–382),” TAPA 111: 79–94.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1999) “Appreciating Aper: the defence of modernity in Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus,” CQ 49: 224–37.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991) The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1994) “The failure of exemplarity,” in Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature, ed. de Jong, I. and Sullivan, J. P.. Boston, MA and Leiden: 51–73.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002) The Invention of Prose. Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2009) Review of R. Webb, Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2009.10.03 [online], http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009-10-03.html.Google Scholar
Goldlust, B. (2010) Rhétorique et Poétique de Macrobe dans les Saturnales. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Gómez-Pantoja, J. (1987) “Another rhetor from Calagurris,” Faventia 9: 79–84.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1987) “Obtrectatores,” in Enciclopedia Virgiliana III. Rome: 807–13.Google Scholar
Graff, R. (2005) “Prose versus poetry in early Greek theories of style,” Rhetorica 23: 303–35.Google Scholar
Granatelli, R. (1994) “Le definizioni di figura in Quintiliano Inst. ix.1.10–14 e il loro rapporto con la grammatica e le controversiae figuratae,” Rhetorica 12: 383–425.Google Scholar
Grant, M. A. and Fiske, G. C. (1924) “Cicero’s Orator and Horace’s Ars Poetica,” HSCP 35: 1–74.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1972) “The Elder Seneca and Spain,” JRS 62: 1–19.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (2015) Cicero’s De Provinciis Consularibus Oratio. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1990) Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Gudeman, A. (1914) P. Cornelii Taciti Dialogus de Oratoribus, 2 vols. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2000) Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2003) Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity: Authority and the Rhetorical Self. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2009) “The rhetoric of rhetorical theory,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, ed. Gunderson, E.. Cambridge: 109–25.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (1998) “Singing, speaking, making, writing: classical alternatives to literature and literary studies,” Stanford Humanities Review 6: 65–75.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1986) Aristotle’s Poetics. London.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (2002) The Iliad as Politics: The Performance of Political Thought. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (1983) Statius and the Silvae: Poets, Patrons, and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2002) “Poetry and politics at the Games of Domitian,” in Flavian Rome: Culture, Image and Text, ed. Boyle, A. and Dominik, W.. Leiden and Boston, MA: 125–47.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1986) Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1994) Aeneid. Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2004) Ovidio: Metamorfosi. Volume VI: Libri XIII–XV. Milan.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2007) “Warring words: Ovid’s ‘Contest for the Arms of Achilles’ (Met. 13.1–398),” in Contests and Rewards in the Homeric Epics (Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on the Odyssey, Centre for Odyssean Studies), ed. Paizi-Apostopolou, M., Rengakos, A. and Tsagalis, C.. Ithaca, NY: 389–98.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2016) The Last Trojan Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1988) “Vergil on kingship: the first simile of the Aeneid,” Cambridge Classical Journal 34, 55–9.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1997) Vergil, Aeneid 10. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2007) Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Haverling, G. (1990) “Symmachus and the genus pingue et floridum in Macr. Sat. 5.1.7,” Eranos 88: 107–20.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2003) “Pseudo-Dionysius Art of Rhetoric 8–11: figured speech, declamation, and criticism,” AJP 124: 81–105.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1993) Virgil’s Epic Technique. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Helzle, M. (1994) “Indocilis Privata Loqui: the characterization of Lucan’s Caesar,” Symbolae Osloenses 69: 121–36.Google Scholar
Helzle, M. (1996) Der Stil ist der Mensch: Redner und Reden im römischen Epos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1998a) Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History, and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1998b) A Roman Life: Rutilius Gallicus on Paper and in Stone. Exeter.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1904) “The peripatetic mean of style and the three stylistic characters,” AJP 25: 125–46.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1905) “The origin and meaning of the ancient characters of style,” AJP 26: 249–376.Google Scholar
Herrick, M. (1948) “The place of rhetoric in poetic theory,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 34: 1–22.Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. (1998) The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. (2000) Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Higham, T. F. (1958) “Ovid and rhetoric,” in Ovidiana: recherches sur Ovide, ed. Herescu, N.. Paris: 32–48.Google Scholar
Highet, G. (1972) The Speeches in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (1987) “Aeneas and the arts (Vergil, Aeneid 6.847–50),” in Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, ed. Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M.. Bristol: 173–83.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (2005) “Poetic influence on prose: the case of the younger Seneca,” in Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, ed. Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N.. Oxford: 211–37.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1997) “Agorai bei Homer,” in Volk und Verfassung im Vorhellenistischen Griechenland, ed. Eder, W. and Hölkeskamp, K-J.. Stuttgart: 1–19.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2004) Senatus Populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik: Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1970) Ovid: Metamorphoses, Book 8. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, N. (2000) Metamorphoses. Book XIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hornsby, R. A. (1970) Patterns of Action in the Aeneid: An Interpretation of Vergil’s Epic Similes. Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1979) “Some problems in the Aeneas legend,” CQ 29: 372–90.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1995) “Style, language and meter,” in A Companion to the Study of Virgil, ed. Horsfall, N.. Mnemosyne Suppl. 151. Leiden and New York, NY: 217–48.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2000) Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2003) Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2008) Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2009) “Dictys’s Ephemeris and the parody of scholarship,” Illinois Classical Studies, 33–34: 41–63.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2013a) “Poets and poetry in Virgil’s underworld,” Vergilius 59: 23–8.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2013b) Virgil, Aeneid 6: A Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar
Howell, W. S. (1975) Poetics, Rhetoric, and Logic: Studies in the Basic Disciplines of Criticism. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Hübner, U. (1972) “Hypallage in Lucans Pharsalia,” Hermes 100: 577–600.Google Scholar
Hübner, U. (1975) “Studien zur Pointentechnik in Lucans Pharsalia,” Hermes 103: 200–11.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, B. (2011) “Seneca Contr. 2.2.8 and 2.2.1: the rhetor Arellius Fuscus and Latin literary history,” MD 66: 175–94.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, B. (2018) Figures in the Shadows: Identities in Artistic Prose from the Anthology of the Elder Seneca. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2008) Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2009) “Read the instructions: didactic poetry and didactic prose,” CQ 59: 196–211.Google Scholar
Huxley, H. (1952) “Storm and shipwreck in Roman literature,” G&R 21: 117–24.Google Scholar
Huyck, J. (1991) “A commentary on Ovid’s Armorum Iudicium, Metamorphoses 12.612–13.398.” PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (2006) “Ovid, Tristia 1.2: high drama on the high seas,” G&R 53: 73–91.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (2010) A Commentary on Ovid, Tristia, Book 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (1985) “Theophrastus and the theory of style,” in Theophrastus of Eresus. On His Life and Work, ed. Fortenbaugh, W.. New Brunswick, NJ: 251–67.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (1988) “Cicero on tropes,” Rhetorica 6: 307–25.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (1989) “Augustan critics,” The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism 1: 245–73.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (1994) “Period and colon: theory and example in Demetrius and Longinus,” in Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. and Mirhady., D. New Brunswick, NJ: 36–53.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (2002) “Longinus and Caecilius: models of the sublime,” Mnemosyne 55: 259–84.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (2011) “The Panegyricus and rhetorical theory,” in Pliny’s Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World, ed. Roche, P.. Cambridge: 67–84.Google Scholar
Jacobson, H. (1974) Ovid’s Heroides. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960) “Linguistics and poetics,” in Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, T.. Cambridge, MA: 350–77.Google Scholar
Jal, P. (1967) Florus: Oeuvres. Paris.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2000) Philodemus: On Poems, Book One. Oxford.Google Scholar
Janson, T. (1964) Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Javitch, D. (1978) Poetry and Courtliness in Renaissance England. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. (1964) “Ancient scholarship and Virgil’s use of republican Latin poetry. I,” CQ 14: 280–95.Google Scholar
Joly, D. (1979) “Rhétorique et poésie d’après l’Institution Oratoire,” in Colloque sur la Rhétorique: Calliope I, ed. Chevallier, R.. Paris: 101–13.Google Scholar
Jones, H. (2001) Strabo, Geography, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jonge, C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Joseph, M. (1947) Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Jullien, E. (1885) Les Professeurs de Littérature dans L’Ancienne Rome et leur Enseignement depuis l’Origine jusqu’à la Mort d’Auguste. Paris.Google Scholar
Kallendorf, C. (1989) In Praise of Aeneas: Virgil and Epideictic Rhetoric in the Early Italian Renaissance. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kant, E. (1911) The Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, trans. J. Creed Meredith. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1980) “Macrobius and Servius: Verecundia and the grammarian’s function,” HSCP 84: 220–62.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1988) Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1995) Suetonius, De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2011a) “Honor culture, praise, and Servius’ Aeneid,” Reception and the Classics: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Classical Tradition, ed. Brockliss, W., Haimson Lushkov, A. and Wasdin, K.. Cambridge: 45–56.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2011b) Macrobius, Saturnalia, 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Keaney, J. J. and Lamberton, R. (1996) Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Keay, S. J. (1988) Roman Spain. Berkeley, CA and London.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (2000) Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1957) “The ancient dispute over rhetoric in Homer,” AJP 78: 23–35.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A.D. 300. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1978) “Encolpius and Agamemnon in Petronius,” AJP 99: 171–8.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (2002) “Ovid’s language and style,” in Brill’s Companion to Ovid, ed. Boyd, B. W.. Leiden: 27–89.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (1982) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. 2: Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. (1997) “Aristotle on metaphor,” AJP 118: 517–54.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1985) The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. 1: Books 1–4. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Knauer, G. (1964) Die Aeneis und Homer; Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils, mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1964) M. Tulii Ciceronis Orator. Zurich and Berlin.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. (1976) “Fra Tersite e Drance. note sulla fortuna di un personaggio virgiliano,” in Présence de Virgile, ed. Chevalier, R.. Paris: 347–65.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1999) Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation and Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lanham, R. A. (1974) Style: an Anti-Textbook. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Lanham, R. A. (1991) A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms: A Guide for Students of English Literature, 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Lapidge, M. (1979) “Lucan’s imagery of cosmic dissolution,” Hermes 107: 344–70.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1998) Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study, trans. M. T. Bliss, A. Jansen and D. E. Orton and ed. Orton, D. E. and R. Dean Anderson. Boston, MA and Leiden.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians and Philosophers. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lehnert, G. (1896) De scholiis ad Homerum rhetoricis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (1997) Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2004) “The Pro Caelio and comedy,” CP 99: 300–35.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (2010) Livy on the Hannibalic War. Oxford.Google Scholar
Littlewood, R. J. (2011) A Commentary on Silius Italicus’ Punica 7. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (2003) “Dionysios von Halikarnassos zwischen Griechen und Römern,” in Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius, ed. Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U.. Darmstadt: 268–86.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. (2011) Shakespeare, Rhetoric and Cognition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. (1998) The Shadows of Poetry: Vergil in the Mind of Augustine. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. S. (1996) Talking Trojan: Speech and Community in the Iliad. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Malcovati, E. (1953) “Lucano e Cicerone,” Athenaeum 31: 288–97.Google Scholar
Mangoni, C. (1993) Filodemo: Il quinto libro della Poetica. Naples.Google Scholar
Manolaraki, E. (2008) “Political and rhetorical seascapes in Pliny’s Panegyricus,” CP 103: 374–94.Google Scholar
March, J. R. (1993) “Sophocles’ Ajax: the death and burial of a hero,” BICS 38, 1–36.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marinone, N. (1946) Elio Donato, Macrobio e Servio Commentatori di Vergilio. Vercelli.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1984) “Hesiod, Odysseus, and the instruction of princes,” TAPA 114: 29–48.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1989) The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1976) “Paradox, hyperbole and literary novelty in Lucan’s De Bello Civili,” BICS 23: 45–54.Google Scholar
Masters, J. (1992) Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mastrorosa, I. (2000) “Similitudini, metafore e lessico militari nella trattatistica retorica latina: Cicerone e Quintiliano,” in Lingue tecniche del greco e del latino III, ed. Sconocchia, S. and Toneatto, L.. Bologna: 277–310.Google Scholar
Matthews, M. (2008) Caesar and the Storm: A Commentary on Lucan, De Bello Civili, Book 5, Lines 476–721. Oxford.Google Scholar
May, J. M. and Wisse, J. (2001) Cicero: On the Ideal Orator. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2001) Tacitus: Dialogus de Oratoribus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mayor, J. E. B. and Henderson, J. (2007) Mayor’s Juvenal Thirteen Satires. Bristol.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2003) “Other Aeneids: rewriting three passages of the Aeneid in the Codex Salmasianus,” Vergilius 49: 84–113.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2013) Plagiarism in Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McNelis, C. (2007) “Grammarians and rhetoricians,” in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Dominik, W. J. and Hall, J.. Malden, MA: 285–96.Google Scholar
Meijering, R. (1987) Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia. Groningen.Google Scholar
Milanese, G. (1985) “Ilioneo,” in Enciclopedia Virgiliana II, Rome: 913–14.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1998) The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Miller, R. (2015) “The Roman Odysseus.” PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Mirmont, H. de (1910) “Les Déclamateurs Espagnols au temps d’Auguste et de Tibère,” Bulletin Hispanique 12, 1–22.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Blank, D. L. and Dyck, A. R. (1988) I Frammenti dei Grammatici Agathokles, Hellanikos, Ptolemaios Epithetes. In Appendice i Grammatici Theophilos, Anaxagoras, Xenon. Berlin and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Moore, J. L. (1891a) “Servius on the tropes and figures of Vergil,” AJP 12: 157–92.Google Scholar
Moore, J. L. (1891b) “Servius on the tropes and figures of Vergil: second paper,” AJP 12: 267–92.Google Scholar
Morales, H. (1996) “The torturer’s apprentice: Parrhasius and the limits of art,” in Art and Text in Roman Culture, ed. Elsner, J. Cambridge: 182–209.Google Scholar
Moretti, G. (1997) “The poet in court. Judiciary model in literary criticism: the case of Tiberius Claudius Donatus,” in Studi di Retorica oggi in Italia, ed. Pennacini, A.. Rome: 59–71.Google Scholar
Morford, M. P. O. (1967a) The Poet Lucan: Studies in Rhetorical Epic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morford, M. P. O. (1967b) “The purpose of Lucan’s ninth book,” Latomus 26: 123–9.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morton Braund, S. (1998) “Praise and protreptic in early imperial panegyric: Cicero, Seneca and Pliny,” in The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity, ed. Whitby, M.. Leiden: 53–76.Google Scholar
Morton Braund, S. (2004) “Libertas or Licentia? Freedom and criticism in Roman satire,” in Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, ed. Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I.. Leiden: 409–27.Google Scholar
Morwood, J. (1998) “Virgil’s pious man and Menenius Agrippa: a note on Aeneid 1. 148–53,” G&R 45: 195–8.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1985) The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2006) Hesiod: Theogony, Works and Days and Testimonia. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2001) Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2017) Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979) The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (2003) “Cicerone nella Pharsalia di Lucano,” in Aspetti della Fortuna di Cicerone nella Cultura Latina, ed. Narducci, E.. Florence: 78–91.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (2007) “Rhetoric and epic: Vergil’s Aeneid and Lucan’s Bellum Civile,” in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Dominik, W. J. and Hall, J.. Malden, MA: 382–95.Google Scholar
Neuhauser, W. (1958) Patronus und Orator: eine Geschichte der Begriffe von ihren Anfängen bis in die augusteische Zeit. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. (1958) “The Invectiva in Ciceronem and Epistula Secunda of Pseudo-Sallust,” JRS 48: 30–2.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1978) A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N. (2004) A Commentary on Horace, Odes 3. Oxford.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1898) Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1905) “Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der Horazischen Epistula Ad Pisones,” Hermes 40: 481–528.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1957) Aeneis Buch VI. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Norlin, G. (2000) Isocrates, 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Norris, C. (1988) Paul De Man, Deconstruction and the Critique of Aesthetic Ideology. New York.Google Scholar
North, H. (1952) “The use of poetry in the training of the ancient orator,” Traditio 8: 1–33.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Odgers, M. M. (1933) “Quintilian’s use of earlier literature,” CP 28: 182–8.Google Scholar
Olmos, P. (2012) “Euge, Graeculi Nostri! Greek scholars among Latin connoisseurs in Macrobius’ Saturnalia,” in Greek Science in the Long Run: Essays on the Greek Scientific Tradition (4th C. BCE–17th C. CE), ed. Olmos., P. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: 96–126.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J. (1942) “The province of rhetoric and poetic,” The Modern Schoolman 19: 24–7.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (2007) Redesigning Achilles: “Recycling” the Epic Cycle in the “Little Iliad”: (Ovid, Metamorphoses 12.1–13.622). Berlin and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M. (1997) Virgil’s Aeneid: Semantic Relations and Proper Names. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pavlock, B. (2009) The Image of the Poet in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2012) The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2013) “Non subripiendi causa sed palam mutuandi: intertextuality and literary deviancy between law, rhetoric, and literature in roman imperial culture,” AJP 134: 83–100.Google Scholar
Pellizzari, A. (2003) Servio. Storia, Cultura e Istituzioni nell’Opera di un Grammatico Tardoantico. Florence.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. (2014) The Space that Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (1993) La Rhètorique de l’Èloge dans le Monde Grèco-Romain. Paris.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2005) Rhetoric in Antiquity. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Peterson, W. (1981) Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Liber X. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Pinney, G. F. and Hamilton, R. (1982) “Secret Ballot,” American Journal of Archeology 86: 581–4.Google Scholar
Pirovano, L. (2004) “Tiziano, Calvo ei Themata Virgiliani (Servio ad Aen. 10.18),” in Il Dilettoso Monte: Raccolta di Saggi di Filologia e Tradizione Classica, ed. Gioseffi, M.. Milan: 139–66.Google Scholar
Pirovano, L. (2006) Le Interpretationes Vergilianae di Tiberio Claudio Donato: problemi di retorica. Rome.Google Scholar
Pirovano, L. (2010) “La Dictio 28 di Ennodio. Un’etopea parafrastica,” in Uso, riuso e abuso dei testi classici, ed. Gioseffi, M.. Milan: 15–52.Google Scholar
Plett, H. F. (2004) Rhetoric and Renaissance Culture. Berlin and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. (2007) Scholia Graeca in Odysseam. Rome.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2016) The Sublime in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1962) The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Puccioni, G. (1985) Saggi Virgiliani. Bologna.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. (1992) “Umbro, Nireus and love’s threnody,” Vergilius 38: 12–23.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (2011) “Virgil’s double cross: chiasmus and the Aeneid,” AJP 132: 273–300.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2004) “Aristocracy and freedom of speech in the Greco-Roman world,” in Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, ed. Sluiter, I and Rosen, R.. Boston, MA and Leiden: 41–61.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1951) Artium Scriptores; Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Philosophisch-Historische Klasse Sitzungsberichte, 227 vol. 3 Abhandlungen. Vienna.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar
Rebhorn, W. A. (1995) The Emperor of Men’s Minds: Literature and the Renaissance Discourse of Rhetoric. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2006) “Propertius and rhetoric,” in Brills’ Companion to Propertius, ed. Günther, H.-C.. Leiden: 199–216.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2013) “The Ars Poetica,” in Brill’s Companion to Horace, ed. Günther, H.-C.. Leiden: 499–526.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. and Winterbottom, M. (2006) Institutio Oratoria: Book 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. (1897) Scaenicae Romanorum Poesis Fragmenta, Vol. 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (2004) Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment, rev. ed. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Richards, J. (2008) Rhetoric. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1980) “Literary criticism in the exegetical scholia to the Iliad: a sketch,” CQ 30: 265–87.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1997) “Gender and rhetoric: producing manhood in the schools,” in Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. Dominik, W. J.. New York, NY: 90–110.Google Scholar
Rochette, B. (1997) Le Latin dans le Monde Grec: Recherches sur la Diffusion de la Langue et des Lettres Latines dans les Provinces Hellénophones de l’Empire Romain. Brussels.Google Scholar
Romilly, J. d. (1975) Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. (1980) “Latinus’ genealogy and the palace of Picus (Aeneid 7. 45–9, 170–91),” CQ 30: 140–52.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2004) “Parallel lives: Hannibal and Scipio in Livy’s third Decade,” TAPA 134: 359–81.Google Scholar
Rowe, G. O. (1997) “Style,” in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 BC–AD, ed. Porter., S. Leiden and New York, NY: 124–50.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1967) “Rhetoric and criticism,” G&R 14, 130–44.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1979) “De Imitatione,” in Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, ed. West, D. A. and Woodman, A. J.. Cambridge: 1–16.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1979) “Rhetors at the Wedding,” PCPS 25: 104–17.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1981) Criticism in Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1983) Greek Declamation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1998) “The panegyrists and their teachers,” in The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity, ed. Whitby, M.. Leiden: 17–52.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (2001a) “Figured speeches: Dionysius Art of Rhetoric VIII–IX,” in The Orator in Theory and Action in Greece and Rome, ed. Wooten, C. W.. Leiden: 156–68.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (2001b) Quintilian, The Orator’s Education, 5 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. and Wilson, N. G. (1981) Menander Rhetor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M. (ed.) (1972) Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1992) “Inverting the canon: Hermogenes on literature,” HSCP 94: 355–78.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1998) Canons of Style in the Antonine Age: Idea-Theory in Its Literary Context. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. H. (2001) Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Rutz, W. (1970) “Lucan und die Rhetorik,” in Lucain, ed. Durry, M.. Geneva: 235–65.Google Scholar
Sandys, J. E. (1979) M. Tulli Ciceronis ad M. Brutum Orator: A Revised Text. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Sansone, D. (2012) Greek Drama and the Invention of Rhetoric. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Scaliger, G. C. (1905) Select Translations from Scaliger’s Poetics, trans. F. M. Padelford. New York.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1991) “Figures and tropes: a border-case between grammar and rhetoric,” in Rhetorik zwischen den Wissenschaften: Geschichte, System, Praxis als Probleme des “Historischen Wörterbuchs der Rhetorik,” ed. Ueding, G.. Tübingen: 149–60.Google Scholar
Schiappa, E. (1999) The Beginnings of Rhetorical Theory in Classical Greece. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2002) “Ovid and the professional discourses of scholarship, religion, rhetoric,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, ed. Hardie, P.. Cambridge: 62–75.Google Scholar
Schlunk, R. (1974) The Homeric Scholia and the Aeneid: A Study of the Influence of Ancient Homeric Literary Criticism on Vergil. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (1983) “Die Stellung des zehnten Buches im Gesamtplan der Institutio Oratoria des Quintilian,” Wiener Studien 17: 109–25.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1986) “Euboulia in the Iliad,” CQ 36: 6–31.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2011) Cato the Censor and the Beginnings of Latin Prose: From Poetic Translation to Elite Transcription. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Seel, O. (1977) Quintilian oder Die Kunst des Redens und Schweigens. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1987) “Writer as hero: the heroic ethos in Longinus, On the Sublime,” in Stemmata: Mélanges de Philologie, d’Histoire et d’Archéologie Grecques offerts à Jules Labarbe, ed. Servais, J., Hackens, T., Servais-Soyez, B. and Labarbe, J.. Liège: 207–29.Google Scholar
Severyns, A. (1928) Le Cycle Épique dans l’École d’Aristarque. Liège.Google Scholar
Seymour, T. D. (1914) Life in the Homeric Age. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965) Cicero’s Letters to Atticus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2003) Statius, Siluae. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1974) Interaction in Poetic Imagery: With Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (2003) “Metaphor and metonymy: Aristotle, Jakobson, Ricoeur, and others,” in Metaphor, Analogy and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions, ed. Boys-Stones, G. R.. Oxford: 115–47.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. (1999) “Commentaries and the didactic tradition,” in Commentaries: Kommentare, ed. Most, G. W.. Göttingen: 173–205.Google Scholar
Solimano, G. (1988) Epistula Didonis ad Aeneam: Introduzione, Testo, Traduzione e Commento. Genoa.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1932) “Drei Rekonstruktionen zur antiken Rhetorik und Poetik,” Hermes 67: 133–54.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941) “The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric,” AJP 62: 35–50.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1954) “The gift of speech in Homer and Hesiod,” TAPA 85: 1–15.Google Scholar
Spence, S. (1988) Rhetorics of Reason and Desire: Vergil, Augustine, and the Troubadours. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Spengel, L. (1856) Rhetores Graeci, Vol. 3. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Spina, L. (1984) “Tersite a Roma,” Vichiana 13: 350–63.Google Scholar
Stanford, W. B. (1968) The Ulysses Theme: A Study in the Adaptability of a Traditional Hero. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Starr, R. J. (1992) “An epic of praise: Tiberius Claudius Donatus and Vergil’s Aeneid,” CA 11, 159–74.Google Scholar
Stem, R. (2005) “The first eloquent Stoic: Cicero on Cato the Younger,” CJ 101, 37–49.Google Scholar
Stoddard, K. (2003) “The programmatic message of the kings and singers passage: Hesiod, Theogony 80–103,” TAPA 133: 1–16.Google Scholar
Stover, T. (2012) Epic and Empire in Vespasianic Rome: A New Reading of Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica. Oxford.Google Scholar
Summers, W. C. (1910) Select Letters of Seneca. London.Google Scholar
Sussman, L. A. (1977) “Arellius Fuscus and the unity of the Elder Seneca’s Suasoriae,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 120: 303–23.Google Scholar
Sussman, L. A. (1978) The Elder Seneca. Leiden.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1969) “Pliny the Procurator,” HSCP 73: 201–36.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1978) History in Ovid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1982) “The marriage of Rubellius Blandus,” AJP 103: 62–85.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1986) The Augustan Aristocracy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Taoka, Y. (2011) “Quintilian, Seneca, imitatio: re-reading Institutio Oratoria 10.1.125–31,” Arethusa 44: 123–37.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. (1976) Agamemnon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. (1995) “Ovid and the failure of rhetoric,” in Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday, ed. Innes, D., Hine, H. M. and Pelling, C. B. R.. Oxford: 63–74.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. (2002) “Chaos in Ovid’s Metamorphoses and its Neronian influence,” Arethusa 35: 349–60.Google Scholar
Tartari Chersoni, M. (1988) “raucus,” in Enciclopedia Virgiliana IV. Rome: 406.Google Scholar
Tateo, F. (1960) Retorica e Poetica fra Medioevo e Rinascimento. Bari.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1966) Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982) Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil: Georgics 1–2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2001) Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. and Bruere, R. T. (1968) “Lucan’s use of Virgilian reminiscence,” CP 63: 1–21.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. and Bruere, R. T. (1970) “The Virgilian background of Lucan’s Fourth Book,” CP 65: 152–72.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. (1982) Theories of the Symbol. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. (1995) The Rhetoric of Identity in Isocrates: Text, Power, Pedagogy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Torres-Murciano, A. R. (2014) “Mauors in Lingua. Hombres de Acción y hombres de Palabras en la épica romana,” Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Latinos 34: 195–223.Google Scholar
Torzi, I. (2000) Ratio et Usus: Dibattiti Antichi sulla Dottrina delle Figure. Milan.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1969) Roman Freedmen during the Late Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, C. (2014) The World of Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus: Aesthetics and Empire in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van Der Blom, H. (2011) “Pompey in the Contio,” CQ 61: 553–73.Google Scholar
Van Hook, L. (1905) The Metaphorical Terminology of Greek Rhetoric and Literary Criticism. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Varwig, F. R. (1976) Der rhetorische Naturbegriff bei Quintilian: Studien zu einem Argumentationstopos in der rhetorischen Bildung der Antike. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Verweij, M. (2015) “Florus and his ‘Vergilius orator an poeta’: the Brussels manuscript revisited”, WS 128, 83–105.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1968) The Artistry of Shakespeare’s Prose. London.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (ed.) (1982) Rhetoric Revalued: Papers from the International Society for the History of Rhetoric. Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1983) “Epideictic and epic in the Renaissance,” New Literary History 14: 497–537.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1988a) In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1988b) “Rhetoric and poetics,” in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Schmitt, C. B., Skinner, Q. and Kessler, E.. Cambridge: 715–45.Google Scholar
Vietti, M. (1979) “Pathos virgiliano e retorica in Macrobio,” Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino. Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 113: 219–43.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2000) Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Wallace‐Hadrill, A. (1998) “To be Roman go Greek: thoughts on Hellenization at Rome,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement 71: 79–91.Google Scholar
Ward, J. O. (1995) “Quintilian and the rhetorical revolution of the Middle Ages,” Rhetorica 13: 231–84.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1996) The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato, and their Successors. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. (1982) Remains of Old Latin: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Pacuvius and Accius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Weaire, G. (2005) “Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ professional situation and the De Thucydide,” Phoenix 59: 246–66.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (1997) “Poetry and rhetoric,” in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, ed. Porter, S.. Boston: 339–69.Google Scholar
Weinberg, B. (1961) A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissance. Chicago.Google Scholar
Wellbery, D. E. (2000) “The transformation of rhetoric: Romanticism,” in Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 5: Romanticism, ed. Brown, M.. Cambridge: 185–202.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1965) “Tryphon De Tropis,” CQ 15: 230–48.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1966) Theogony. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2003) Greek Epic Fragments from the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries BC. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2013) The Epic Cycle: A Commentary on the Lost Troy Epics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. (2002) “Lucan’s reception of Ovid’s Metamorphoses,” Arethusa 35: 361–80.Google Scholar
White, P. (1977) “Horace A.P. 128–30: the intent of the wording,” CQ 27: 191–201.Google Scholar
White, P. (2010) Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whittington, L. (2016) Renaissance Suppliants: Poetry, Antiquity, Reconciliation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wick, C. (2004) M. Annaeus Lucanus, Bellum Civile, Liber IX. Munich.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (1980) Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1964) “Quintilian and the Vir Bonus,” JRS 54: 90–7.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1974) The Elder Seneca, Declamations, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1979) “Review of Lewis A. Sussman: The Elder Seneca,” CR 29: 231–2.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1982) “Schoolroom and courtroom,” in Rhetoric Revalued: Papers from the International Society for the History of Rhetoric, ed. Vickers, B.. Binghamton, NY: 59–70.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1983) “Quintilian and declamation,” in Hommages à Jean Cousin: Rencontres avec l’ Antiquite´ Classique, Paris: 225–35.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1979) Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Leicester.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1988) Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. London.Google Scholar
Woods, M. (2009) “The classroom as courtroom: Cicero’s attributes of persons and the interpretation of classical literary characters in the Renaissance,” Ciceroniana: Atti del XIII Colloquium Tullianum, Milano 27–29 marzo 2008. Rome: 203–15.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2011) Tales of the Barbarians: Ethnography and Empire in the Roman West. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. (1987) Hermogenes, On Types of Style. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Worman, N. (1999) “Odysseus Panourgos: the liar’s style in oratory and tragedy,” Helios 26: 35–68.Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2002). The Cast of Character: Style in Greek Literature. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Yeats, W. B. (1918) Per Amica Silentia Lunae. London.Google Scholar
Zaffagno, E. (1988) “fulgor/fulgeo/fulmen,” in Enciclopedia Virgiliana II. Rome: 605–6.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. (1999) Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. M. and Putnam, M. C. J. (2008) The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Zundel, E. (1981) Lehrstil und rhetorischer Stil in Quintilians Institutio Oratoria. Frankfurt Main.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Irene Peirano Garrison, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: Persuasion, Rhetoric and Roman Poetry
  • Online publication: 08 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316219355.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Irene Peirano Garrison, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: Persuasion, Rhetoric and Roman Poetry
  • Online publication: 08 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316219355.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Irene Peirano Garrison, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: Persuasion, Rhetoric and Roman Poetry
  • Online publication: 08 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316219355.008
Available formats
×