Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:40:13.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Prosodically Conditioned Variation

Rhotics in Brazilian Veneto

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2024

By
Natália Brambatti Guzzo
Edited by
Rajiv Rao
Rajiv Rao
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

Brazilian Veneto (BV), an understudied variety of Veneto spoken in several areas of Brazil, has only one rhotic phoneme, which has been described as alternating between [r] and [ɾ] (e.g., Frosi & Mioranza, 1983). I investigate whether rhotic variation in BV is conditioned by prosodic factors (i.e., position in the syllable, position in the word, and stress) through an analysis of rhotic duration based on data from a naming task. I hypothesize that stronger prosodic positions yield longer rhotics (i.e., trills). The results overall confirm this hypothesis, with longer rhotics favored in stressed, word-initial singleton onsets. Participants’ productions are also analyzed qualitatively, revealing that rhotic variation involves not only the production of trills and taps, but also approximants and fricatives. Potential effects of contact with Portuguese on BV rhotic variation are discussed.

Keywords

Brazilian VenetoBrazilian Portuguesedurationlanguage contactprosodic structurerhotictaptrill
Type
Chapter
Information
The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages , pp. 361 - 380
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azeredo, P. S. (2012). A troca da vibrante por tepe em onset silábico: Uma análise de variação e mudança linguística na comunidade bilíngue de Flores da Cunha (RS) [The use of the tap instead of the trill in syllable onsets: An analysis of language variation and change in the bilingual community of Flores da Cunha (RS)] [Master’s thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul].Google Scholar
Baltazani, M., & Nicolaidis, K. (2013). The many faces of /r/. In Spreafico, L. & Vietti, A. (Eds.), Rhotics: New data and perspectives (pp. 125–144). Bolzano University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battisti, E., & Bovo, N. M. P. (2004). Variação linguística como prática social: Análise quantitativa e qualitativa da realização da vibrante no português em contato com italiano [Language variation as social practice: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of vibrant sounds in Portuguese in contact with Italian dialects]. Lingua(gem), 1(2), 107–123.Google Scholar
Belloni, S. (2009). Grammatica Veneta [The grammar of Veneto]. Esedra.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M., & Loporcaro, M. (2005). The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.08. www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bonatti, M. (1974). Aculturação linguística numa colônia de imigrantes italianos de Santa Catarina, Brasil (1875–1974) [Linguistic acculturation in a region of Italian immigration in Santa Catarina, Brazil (1875–1974)]. Faculdade Salesiana de Lorena.Google Scholar
Celata, C., Meluzzi, C., & Ricci, I. (2016). The sociophonetics of rhotic variation in Sicilian dialects and Sicilian Italian: Corpus, methodology and first results. Loquens, 3(1), e025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celata, C., Vietti, A., & Spreafico, L. (2019). An articulatory account of rhotic variation in Tuscan Italian: Synchronized UTI and EPG data. In Gibson, M. & Gil, J. (Eds.), Romance phonetics and phonology (pp. 92–117). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dal Picol, G. (2013). A morfossintaxe na oralidade do vêneto sul-rio-grandense: Perfil dialetal de comunidades rurais da Região da 4ª Légua, Caxias do Sul/RS [Morphosyntax in oral productions in Brazilian Veneto: Dialectal profile of rural communities from 4ª Légua, Caxias do Sul/RS] [Master’s thesis, Universidade de Caxias do Sul].Google Scholar
Fougeron, C., & Keating, P. A. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(6), 3728–3740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frosi, V. M., & Mioranza, C. (1983). Dialetos italianos: Um perfil linguístico dos ítalo-brasileiros do Nordeste do Rio Grande do Sul. [Italian dialects: A linguistic profile of the Italian-Brazilians in the Northeast of Rio Grande do Sul] EDUCS.Google Scholar
Frosi, V. M., & Mioranza, C. (2009). Imigração italiana no nordeste do Rio Grande do Sul [Italian immigration in the northeast of Rio Grande do Sul] (2nd ed.). EDUCS.Google Scholar
Guzzo, N. B. (2022). Brazilian Veneto (Talian). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002510032200010X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzo, N. B., & Garcia, G. D. (2020). Phonological variation and prosodic representation: Clitics in Portuguese–Veneto contact. Journal of Language Contact, 13, 389–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014.) lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (1991). Spanish taps and trills: Toward a unified analysis. Folia Linguistica, 24, 153–174.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (1994). Latin American Spanish. Longman.Google Scholar
Luzzatto, D. L. (2000). Dissionàrio talian (véneto brasilian)–portoghese [Brazilian Veneto–Portuguese dictionary]. Sagra Luzzatto.Google Scholar
MacKay, C. J. (2002). Il dialetto veneto di Segusino e Chipilo [The dialects of Segusino and Chipilo Veneto]. Grafiche Antiga.Google Scholar
Massini-Cagliari, G., Cagliari, L. C., & Redenbarger, W. Y. (2016). A comparative study of the sounds of European and Brazilian Portuguese: Phonemes and allophones. In Wetzels, W. L., Costa, J., & Menuzzi, S. (Eds.), The handbook of Portuguese linguistics (pp. 56–68). Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateus, M. H., & d’Andrade, E. (2000). The phonology of Portuguese. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2016). The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nodari, R., & Meluzzi, C. (2020). Rhotic degemination in Rome Italian. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 68(2), 65–98.Google Scholar
Passino, D. (2013). A unified account of consonantal gemination in external sandhi in Italian: Raddoppiamento sintattico and related phenomena. The Linguistic Review, 30(2), 313–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Savu, C.-F. (2013). Another look at the structure of [r]: Constricted intervals and vocalic elements. In Spreafico, L. & Vietti, A. (Eds.), Rhotics: New data and perspectives (pp. 145–158). Bolzano University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, E. W. (2006). Trill variation in Dominican Spanish: An acoustic examination and comparative analysis. In Sagarra, N. & Toribio, A. J. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 121–131). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Zamboni, A. (1974). I dialetti del Veneto [The dialects of Veneto]. Pacini.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×