Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court Rhetorical Neutrality and the Perpetuation of Inequality
Book contents
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Rhetorical Neutrality and Post-Racial Historicism
- 2 The Burger and Rehnquist Courts
- 3 The Roberts Court and Post-Racial Constitutionalism
- 4 Post-Racial Process Discourse
- 5 Fisher II
- 6 Ricci v. DeStefano
- 7 Texas Department of Housing Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
- 8 Voting Rights
- Conclusion
- Index
4 - Post-Racial Process Discourse
Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2022
Book contents
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Rhetorical Neutrality and Post-Racial Historicism
- 2 The Burger and Rehnquist Courts
- 3 The Roberts Court and Post-Racial Constitutionalism
- 4 Post-Racial Process Discourse
- 5 Fisher II
- 6 Ricci v. DeStefano
- 7 Texas Department of Housing Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
- 8 Voting Rights
- Conclusion
- Index
Summary
The Court consistently privileges the myth of a fair process over substantive equality to advance its post-racial constitutionalism.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts CourtRhetorical Neutrality and the Perpetuation of Inequality, pp. 107 - 127Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022