Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:40:39.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - By the People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Edited by
Ashley Weinberg
Ashley Weinberg
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Psychology of Democracy
Of the People, By the People, For the People
 , pp. 171 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Almond, G. A. and Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. (First edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bargsted, M., Somma, N. and Castillo, J. C. (2017). Dynamics of political trust in Latin America. In Zmerli, S. and van der Meer, T. W. G. (Eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 395–417). etc. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Carrasco, D., Banerjee, R., Treviño, E. and Villalobos, C. (2019). Civic knowledge and open classroom discussion: Explaining tolerance of corruption among 8th-grade students in Latin America. Educational Psychology, 40(2), 186–206.Google Scholar
Castillo, J. C., Miranda, D., Bonhomme, M., Cox, C. and Bascopé, M. (2015). Mitigating the political participation gap from the school: The roles of civic knowledge and classroom climate. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, J. C., Miranda, D., Bonhomme, M., Cox, C. and Bascopé, M. (2014). Social inequality and changes in students’ expected political participation in Chile. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 9(2), 140–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catterberg, G. and Moreno, A. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ching, B. H.-H., Xu, J. T., Chen, T. T. and Kong, K. H. C. (2020). Gender essentialism, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and filial piety as predictors for transprejudice in Chinese people. Sex Roles, 83(1), 426–441 doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01123-3Google Scholar
Citrin, J. and Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550Google Scholar
Cox, C. (2010). Informe de Referente Regional 2010. Oportunidades de aprendizaje escolar de la ciudadanía en América Latina: currículos comparados. Sistema Regional de Evaluación y Desarrollo de Competencias Ciudadanas (SREDECC), Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Bogotá: CERLALCGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. and Castillo, J. C. (Eds.). (2015). Aprendizaje de la ciudadanía: Contextos, experiencias y resultados (First). Santiago, Chile: Ediciones UC.Google Scholar
Dageförde, M. and Schindler, D. (2018). ‘Oh, that is a big word’. MPs’ and citizens’ perspectives on parliamentary representation. In Paterson, W. and Saalfeld, T. (Eds), Political Representation in France and Germany: Attitudes and Activities of Citizens and MPs. (pp. 197–226). Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
de Viteri Vázquez, A. S. and Bjørnskov, C. (2020). Constitutional power concentration and corruption: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean, Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, 31(4), 509–536.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1989). Freedom and culture. New York: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2015). Authoritarian personality. In Wright, J. D. (editor-in-chief), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences 2nd edition (Vol. 2) (pp. 255–261). Oxford, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14%2067-9221.2005.00415.xGoogle Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2007). Civic knowledge, civic education, and civic engagement: A summary of recent research. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(6–7), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701215888Google Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershtenson, J. and Plane, D. L. (2015). In government we distrust: Citizen skepticism and democracy in the United States. The Forum, 13(3). doi:10.1515/for-2015-0029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (2001). Norms of cooperativeness and networks of trust, (with Karen S. Cook). In Hechter, M. and Opp, K-D. (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 327–347). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hite, K. and Cesarini, P. (2004) (Eds.). Authoritarian legacies and democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Kirsten, W. (2020). Cold War archives and democratic aspirations in Latin America. In Mizruchi, S. L. (Ed), Cold War archives and democratic aspirations in Latin America (pp. 149–170). Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Köhler, H., Weber, S., Brese, F., Schulz, W. and Carstens, R. (2018). ICCS 2016 User Guide for the International Database: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 Latin American Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Latinobarometro. (2018). Informe 2018. Santiago, Chile: Corporación Latinobarometro.Google Scholar
Lauglo, J. (2013). Do more knowledgeable adolescents have more rationally based civic attitudes? Analysis of 38 countries. Educational Psychology, 33(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2%20013.772773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, S. and Quaranta, M. (2020). Political Support in Flux. In Martini, S. and Quaranta, M. (Eds.), Citizens and Democracy in Europe: Contexts, Changes and Political Support (pp. 1–20). Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm%3A978-3-030-21633-7%2F1.pdf.Google Scholar
Miranda, D., Castillo, J. C. and Cumsille, P. (2018). The political socialization of attitudes toward equal rights from a comparative perspective. In Sandoval-Hernández, A., Isac, M. and Miranda, D. (Eds), Teaching tolerance in a globalized world. IEA Research for Education. (A series of in-depth analyses based on data of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)), vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78692-6_7Google Scholar
Morales Quiroga, M. (2020). Estallido social en Chile 2019: participación, representación, confianza institucional y escándalos públicos. Análisis Político, 33(98), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v33n98.89407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In Warren, M. E. (Ed.), Democracy and Trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659959.003Google Scholar
Rapeli, L. (2013). The conception of citizen knowledge in democratic theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sandoval-Hernandez, A., Miranda, D., Treviño, E. and Schmelkes, S. (2019). Is democracy overrated? Latin American students’ support for dictatorships. IEA Compass: Briefs in education. Number 7. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Cox, C. and Friedman, T. (2018). Young People’s Views of Government, Peaceful Coexistence, and Diversity in Five Latin American Countries: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 Latin American Report. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95393-9Google Scholar
Schulz, W., Ainley, J. and Fraillon, J. (2011). ICCS 2009 Technical Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Schulz, W. and Sibberns, H. (2004). IEA Civic Education Study Technical Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Schyns, P. and Koop, C. (2009). Political distrust and social capital in Europe and the USA. Social Indicators Research, 96(1), 145–167. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9471-4Google Scholar
Segovia, C., Haye, A., González, R., Manzi, J. and Carvacho, H. (2008). Confianza en instituciones políticas en Chile: Un modelo de los componentes centrales de juicios de confianza. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 28(2), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718–090X2008000200002Google Scholar
Sochos, A. (2019). Authoritarianism, trauma, and insecure bonds during the Greek economic crisis. Current Psychology. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0111-5Google Scholar
Torney-Purta, J., Richardson, W. K. and Barber, C. H. (2004). Trust in Government-Related Institutions and Civic Engagement among Adolescents: Analysis of Five Countries from the IEA Civic Education Study. CIRCLE Working Paper 17. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. (2018). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Meer, T. and Hakhverdian, A. (2016). Political Trust as the Evaluation of Process and Performance: A Cross-National Study of 42 European Countries: Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715607514Google Scholar
Zmerli, S. and van der Meer, T. W. G. (2017). Handbook on political trust. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variations across speech and writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Church, R. B., Alibali, M. W. and Kelly, S. D. (Eds.). (2017). Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corballis, M. (2002). From hand to mouth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cartmill, E. A., Beilock, S. and Goldin-Meadow, S. A (2012). Word in the hand: Action, gesture, and mental representation in human evolutions. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society, Series B, 367, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: J. Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, E. and De Marco, D. (2019). Language, gesture, and emotional communication: An embodied view of social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dopson, W. G., Beckwith, B. E., Tucker, D. M. and Bullard-Bates, P. C. (1984). Asymmetry of facial expression in spontaneous emotion. Cortex, 20(2), 243–251.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (2003a). Emotions revealed: Understanding faces and feelings. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (2003b) Darwin, deception, and facial expression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1000, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fetzer, A. and Weizman, E. (2018). ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is…’: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse. Discourse & Society, 29(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770259Google Scholar
Fetzer, A, and Weizman, E. (2017). Panel on ‘Ordinariness and the Media’ at the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) Conference, hosted by Ulster University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Givens, D. B. and Whyte, J. (2020). The nonverbal dictionary of gestures, signs and body gestures cues. Spokane, Washington, DC: Center for Nonverbal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graddol, D. (2004). The future of language. Science, Special Issue: Evolution of Language, 303, 1329–1331.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hindustan Times (2017). From love jihad, conversion to SRK: 10 controversial comments by UP’s new CM Yogi Adityanath. 6 April.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E., Ginsburg, S. and Dor, D. (2012). The co-evolution of language and emotions. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2152–2159.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mandal, M. K. and Singh, S. K. (1990). Lateral asymmetry in identification and expression of facial emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 61–70.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. and Hwang, H. C. (2018). Microexpressions Differentiate Truths from Lies about Future Malicious Intent. Frontiers in Psychology, December. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02545Google Scholar
McNeill, J. (2002). Language and gesture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (2013). People watching: The Desmond Morris guide to body language (Revised Edition). London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2021). Language: Editor in Chief? Seminar, Special issue on ‘Editing history’, 743, 81–88. Available at: india-seminar.com/2021/743/743_rukmini_bhaya_nair.htmGoogle Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2020a). Figuring it out: Old modes and new codes for multimodality, technology and creative performativity in 21st century India. In Hidalgo Downing, L. and Kraljevic Mujic, B. (Eds.), Performing Metaphorical Creativity (pp. 311–342). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nair, R.B. (2020b). Keywords for India: A conceptual lexicon for the 21st century (Ed. with deSouza, P.) London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2019). Epithymetics: The psychology of desire. In Misra, G. (Ed.), Annual review of Indian psychology: Vol 1. Cognitive and affective processes (pp. 204–270). Oxford and New Delhi: Oxford University Press, supported by the Indian Council of Social Sciences Research (ICSSR).Google Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2018). Intending to mean, pretending to be: Reflections on the limits on genre. In Page, R., Busse, B. and Nørgaard, N. (Eds.), Rethinking language, text and context: Interdisciplinary research in stylistics in honour of Michael Toolan (pp. 147–163). New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351183222Google Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2017). Famous politicians, infamous progeny: Being ordinary onscreen when you are a dynastic heir apparent in the Indian context, Conference Paper (unpublished) at Panel ‘Constructing Ordinariness across Media Genres’, fifteenth International Pragmatics Conference, Belfast, July.Google Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2015). Virtue, virtuosity and the virtual: Experiments in the contemporary Indian English novel. In Anjaria, U. (Ed.), The history of the Indian novel in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2008). Language and youth culture. In Kachru, B. B., Kachru, Y. and Sridhar, S. N. (Eds.) Language in South Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2003). The Aesthetics of the ordinary: Evoking narrative wonder within the linear grammar of modernity. In Evam: Forum on Indian Representations 2, Vols. 1 & 2, January, pp. 266–288.Google Scholar
Nair, R. B. (2002). Narrative gravity: Conversation, cognition, culture. New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nakahashi, W. (2017). Cultural sexual selection in monogamous human populations. Royal Society Open Science. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noroozi, F., Kaminska, D., Corneanu, C., Sapinski, T., Escalera, S. and Anbarjafari, G. (2018). Survey on Emotional Body Gesture Recognition’. In IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, doi: 10.1109/TAFFC.2018.2874986Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2013). Political Emotions. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pascalis, O., de Martin de Viviés, X., Anzures, G., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Tanaka, J. W. and Lee, K. (2011). Development of face processing. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive science, 2(6), 666–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Translated and Edited by Anrep, G. V.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penfield, W. (1961). Activation of the record of human experience: Summary of the Lister oration delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 27th April 1961. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 29(2), 77–84.Google Scholar
Press Trust of India (2017). Dynasty in democracy is ‘nasty’: Venkaiah Naidu. 15 September. Accessed at: www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/dynasty-in-democracy-is-nasty-venkaiah-naidu/story-n7Ab7JnfHNm9aVEpfpjerM.html.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In Maxwell Atkinson, J. and Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis, (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Savalli, U. M. (1995). The evolution of bird coloration and plumage elaboration: A review of hypotheses. Current Ornithology, 141–190.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1947). ‘Superstition’ in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38 , 168–172.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2012). Language, gesture, skill: The co-evolutionary foundations of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences. Available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rstb.2012.0116Google Scholar
The Economic Times (2017). Rahul Gandhi is a failed politician: Smriti Irani. 13 September. Accessed at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/rahul-gandhi-is-a-failed-politician-smriti-irani/articleshow/60475468.cms?from=mdr.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E. and Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The Interdependence Hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53(6), 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, R. and Barthwal, A. (2020). The singular appeal of Narendra Modi explained in six charts. Mint, 9th November. Available at: www.livemint.com/news/india/the-singular-appeal-of-narendra-modi-explained-in-six-charts-11604678665561.html. Retrieved 15 November 2020.Google Scholar

References

Amazeen, M. A. (2015). Revisiting the epistemology of fact-checking. Critical Review, 27(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, D. J., Redlawsk, D. P. and Lau, R. R. (2019). The Dynamic Process Tracing Environment (DPTE) as a tool for studying political communication. Political Communication, 36(2), 303–314, doi: 10.1080/10584609.2019.1579771Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. and Gardner, W. (1999). Emotion. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 50, 191–214.Google Scholar
Calvert, R. L. (1985). The value of biased information: A Rational Choice Model of political advice. The Journal of Politics, 47(2), 530–555.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. and Shepsle, K. (1989). Is negative voting an artifact? American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 423–439.Google Scholar
Fraccaroli, N., Cantarella, M. and Volpe, R. (2019). Does fake news affect voting behaviour? SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3402913.Google Scholar
Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W., Winneg, K. M. and Jamieson, K. H. (2013). Did fact-checking matter in the 2012 presidential campaign? American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1558–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, L. and Amazeen, M. A. (2019). Fact-checking as idea and practice in journalism. In Nussbaum, J. (Ed.) Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guess, A., Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J. (2017). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council. www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/fake-news-2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, , Gardner, W. L. and Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 930–950.Google Scholar
Jarman, J. W. (2016). Influence of political affiliation and criticism on the effectiveness of political fact-checking. Communication Research Reports, 33(1), 9–15.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.Google Scholar
Kernell, S. (1977). Presidential popularity and negative voting: An alternative explanation of the midterm Congressional decline of the president’s party, American Political Science Review, 71(1), 44–66.Google Scholar
Kušen, E. and Strembeck, M. (2018). Politics, sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections. Online Social Networks and Media, 5. doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2017.12.002Google Scholar
Lau, R. R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 119–138.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., Lee, S., Heldman, and Babbit, C., P. (1999). The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytical assessment. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 851–876.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R. and Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge studies in public opinion and political psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., Lee, S. and Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytical reassessment. The Journal of Politics, 69(Nov), 1176–1209.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., Andersen, D. J., Ditonto, T. M., Kleinberg, M. S. and Redlawsk, D. P. (2017). Effect of media environment, diversity, and advertising tone on information search, selective exposure, and affective polarization. Political Behavior, 39(1), 231–255. doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9354-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N. and Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. [eng]. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 13(3), 106–131.Google Scholar
Lipsitz, K., Trost, C., Grossmann, M. and Sides, J. (2005). What voters want from political campaign communication. Political Communication, 22(3), 337–354.Google Scholar
Mattes, K. and Redlawsk, D. P. (2020). Voluntary exposure to fact-checks. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1077699020923603Google Scholar
Mattes, K. and Redlawsk, D. P. (2014). The positive case for negative campaigning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J. (2015). The effect of fact-checking on elites: A field experiment on U.S. State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 628–640.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J. (2012). Misinformation and fact-checking. Research Findings from Social Science. Media Policy Initiative, New America Foundation.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B., Reifler, J. and Ubel, P. A. (2013). The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform. [eng]. Medical care, 51(2), 127–132.Google Scholar
Pingree, R. J., Brossard, D. and McLeod, D. M. (2014). Effects of journalistic adjudication on factual beliefs, news evaluations, information seeking, and epistemic political efficacy. Mass Communication and Society, 17(5), 615–638.Google Scholar
Pratto, F. and John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration?: Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W. and Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever ‘Get it’? Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–593.Google Scholar
Shin, J. and Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S. and Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science, 4(3), 160802. doi:10.1098/rsos.160802Google Scholar
Taber, C. S. and Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P., Peebles, M. M., Grodner, D. J. and Durgin, F. H. (2013). The wished-for always wins until the winner was inevitable all along: Motivated reasoning and belief bias regulate emotion during elections, Political Psychology, 36(4), 431–448.Google Scholar
Thorson, E. (2015). Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication, 33(3), 460–480.Google Scholar
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. and Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.Google Scholar
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 12.Google Scholar
Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699–719.Google Scholar
Wood, T. and Porter, E. (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior, 41, 135–163.Google Scholar
Young, S. (2011). Television studies after TV: Understanding television in the post-broadcast era. Continuum, 25(1), 125–129, doi:10.1080/10304312.2010.506950Google Scholar

References

Alvarez, R. M. and Nagler, J. (2000). A new approach for modelling strategic voting in multiparty elections. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E. and Nevitte, N. (2001). Measuring strategic voting in multiparty plurality elections. Electoral Studies, 20(3), 343–352.Google Scholar
Bruter, M. (2005). Citizens of Europe?: The emergence of a mass European identity. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bruter, M. (2019). Electoral ergonomics: Three empirical examples of the interface between electoral psychology and design. Societies, 9(4), 82.Google Scholar
Bruter, M. and Harrison, S. (2020). Inside the mind of a voter: A new approach to electoral psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bruter, M. and Harrison, S. (2017). Understanding the emotional act of voting. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
Duverger, M. (1951). Les partis politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. and Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2020a). What is electoral psychology? Scope, concepts, and methodological challenges for studying conscious and subconscious patterns of electoral behavior, experience, and ergonomics. Societies, 10(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. (2020b). Democratic frustration: Concept, dimensions and behavioural consequences. Societies, 10(1), 19.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Bankert, A. and Davies, C. (2018). Expressive versus instrumental partisanship in multiparty European systems. Political Psychology, 39, 173–199.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. and Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1990). Economics and elections: The major Western democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2015). ‘I disrespectfully agree’: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145.Google Scholar
Reif, K. and Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European Election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.Google Scholar

References

Badie, B. (2013). Transnationalizing diplomacy and global governance. In Kerr, P. and Wiseman, G. (Eds.), Diplomacy in a globalising world, pp. 85–102. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beeson, M. (2014). Issues in Australian Foreign Policy: July to December 2013, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 60(2), 265–278.Google Scholar
Blind, P. K. (2010). Building trust in government: Linking theory with practice. In Cheema, G.S. and Popovski, V. (Eds.), Building trust in government: Innovations in governance reform in Asia, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Carlin, R. (2014). What’s not to trust? Rubrics of political party trustworthiness in Chile and Argentina. Party Politics, 20(1), 63–77.Google Scholar
Davies, S. E. (2017). Asylum-seekers and Australia’s security. In Beeson, M. and Hameiri, S. (Eds.), Navigating the new international disorder: Australia in world affairs 2011–2015, pp. 108–122. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eidenfalk, J. and Woodcock, S. (2019). ‘I’LL BE BACK…’: The chance of a political comeback as party leader, Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 402–422 doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i1.993Google Scholar
Elliott, L. (2017). The environment in Australia’s foreign policy. In M.Beeson and S.Hamerri (Eds.), Navigating the new international disorder: Australia in world affairs 2011–2015, pp. 176–191. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M., Halupka, M. and Stoker, G. (2019). Trust and democracy in Australia. In Evans, M., Grattan, M. and McCaffrie, B. (Eds.), From Turnbull to Morrison: The trust divide, pp. 17–35. Carlton Vic: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M. and McCaffrie, B. (2014). ‘Rudderless’ – perceptions of Julia Gillard’s domestic statecraft. In Aulich, C. (Ed.), The Gillard governments, pp. 303–321. Carlton Vic: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Foa, R. S. and Mounk, Y. (2016). The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–17. doi:10.1353/jod.2016.0049Google Scholar
Gyngell, A. (2017). Fear of abandonment: Australia in the world since 1942. Carlton Vic: LA Trobe University Press.Google Scholar
Harris Rimmer, S. (2019). Foreign policy under the coalition: Turbulent times, dwindling investments. In Evans, M., Gratton, M. and McCaffrie, B., From Turnbull to Morrison: The trust divide, pp. 59–74. Carlton Vic: Melbourne University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, P., Dirks, K., Cooper, C. and Ferrin, D. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 49–65.Google Scholar
Lees-Marshment, J. (2012). Political marketing and opinion leadership: Comparative perspectives and findings. In Helms, L. (Ed.), Comparative political leadership, pp. 165–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Linnane, K. (2015). Issues in Australian foreign policy: July to December 2015, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 62(2), 268–281.Google Scholar
Macintosh, A. and Denniss, R. (2014). Climate change. In Aulich, C. (Ed.) The Gillard governments, pp. 195–219. Carlton Vic: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
McCaffrie, B. (2019). Trust me, I’m the prime minister: Prime ministerial statecraft under Malcolm Turnbull and Scott Morrison. In Evans, M., Grattan, M. and McCaffrie, B. (Eds.), From Turnbull to Morrison: The Trust Divide, pp. 354–369. Carlton Vic: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
McCaffrie, B. (2016). Operation Sovereign Borders. In Aulich, C. (Ed.), From Abbott to Turnbull: A new direction?, pp. 197–220. West Geelong: Echo Books.Google Scholar
Miles, M., Huberman, M. and Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2019). Public Trust in Government: 1958–2019, www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/04/11/public-trust-in-government-1958-2019/.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. (2015). Asylum seekers and refugees: what are the facts?, Parliamentary Library Research Paper, Parliament of Australia, https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/library/prspub/HGNW6/upload_binary/HGNW6.pdf;fileType=application/pdf#search=%22asylum%20seekers%20and%20refugees%22.Google Scholar
Rudd, K. (2018). The PM years. Sydney: Pan McMillan Australia.Google Scholar
Sheridan, G. (2011). Gillard’s No-Fly Mess Exposes Her Frailty, The Australian, 12 March.Google Scholar
Steketee, M. (2015, 9 October). Four-year terms could be the key to political stability. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved from www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-09/steketee-four-year-terms-could-be-key-to-political-stability/6839864.Google Scholar
Sydney Morning Herald (2015). Tony Abbott leadership challenge: Transcript of Malcolm Turnbull’s blistering speech, (14 September 2015). Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/tony-abbott-leadership-challenge-transcript-of-malcolm-turnbullsblistering-speech-20150914-gjmace.html.Google Scholar
Talberg, A. (2016). The climate policy carousel. In Aulich, C.(Ed.), From Abbott to Turnbull: A new direction?, pp. 145–170. West Geelong: Echo Books.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, E. and Mayer, R. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. The Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 85–104.Google Scholar
Walsh, M. (2014). The Gillard Government, the Coalition and Asylum Seekers. In Aulich, C. (Ed.), The Gillard governments, pp. 125–140. Carlton Vic: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, P., Poguntke, T. and Kolodny, R. (2012). The presidentialization of party leadership? Evaluating party leadership and party government in the democratic world. In Helms, L. (Ed.), Comparative political leadership, pp. 77–98. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weller, P. (2014). The variability of prime ministers. In Rhodes, R. A. W. and ‘t Hart, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political leadership, pp. 489–502. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wile, R. (2013). Australia’s New Prime Minister Wants to Immediately Dismantle His Country’s Fight against Climate Change, Business Insider Australia, 13 September 2008, www.businessinsider.com.au/tony-abbott-climate-change-policy-2013-9?r=USandIR=T [Date accessed 12 April 2020].Google Scholar

References

Allen, P. and Cutts, D. (2018). An analysis of political ambition in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 89(1), 73–81.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1992). The Politics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Balls, E. (2016). Speaking out: Lessons in life and politics. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Baturo, A. (2017). Democracy, development, and career trajectories of former political leaders. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1023–1054.Google Scholar
Baturo, A. (2014). Democracy, dictatorship and term limits. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Beehr, T. A. (1986). The process of retirement: A review and recommendations for future investigation. Personnel Psychology, 39, 31–55.Google Scholar
Burt, A. (2019). The One with Alastair Burt. Political Thinking with Nick Robinson. Podcast, 5 September 2019.Google Scholar
Bush, S. (2019). Tory MPs may despise Boris Johnson but he is the man they think can win an election. New Statesman, 5 June 2019.Google Scholar
Bynander, F. and ‘t Hart, P. (2008). The art of handing over: (Mis)Managing party leadership successions. Government and Opposition, 43(3), 385–404.Google Scholar
Byrne, C. and Theakston, K. (2016). Leaving the House: The experience of former Members of Parliament who left the House of Commons in 2010. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(3), 686–707.Google Scholar
Caress, S. M. and Kunioka, T. T. (2012). Term limits and their consequences. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Cecić Erpič, S., Wylleman, P. and Zupancǐc, M. (2004). The effect of athletic and non-athletic factors on the sports career termination process. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 45–59.Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. (2017). What happened. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (2006). Our inner ape. London: Granta Publications.Google Scholar
Doherty, D. C. (2001). To run or not to run? Canadian Parliamentary Review, 24, 16–23.Google Scholar
Dowding, K. and Kang, W.-T. (1998). Ministerial resignations 1945–97. Public Administration, 76, 411–429.Google Scholar
Dowding, K. and McLeay, E. (2011). The firing line: When and why do Prime Ministers fire ministerial colleagues? In Hart, P.’t and Uhr, J. (Eds.) How power changes hands: Transition and succession in government, pp. 157–173. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ebaugh, H. R. F. (1988). Becoming an ex. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ennser-Jedenastik, L. and Muller, W. C. (2013). Intra-party democracy, political performance, and the survival of party leaders: Austria, 1945–2011. Party Politics, 21(6), 930–943.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and Tilley, J. (2017). The new politics of class. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia In Strachey, J. (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, pp. 243–258. Vol. XlV. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Y., Gray, D. E. and Goregaokar, H. (2013). Job loss and its aftermath among managers and professionals: Wounded, fragmented and flexible, Work, Employment and Society, 27(1), 56–72.Google Scholar
Hardman, I. (2018). Why we get the wrong politicians. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Hartley, J. (1987). Managerial unemployment: The wife’s perspective and role. In Fineman, S. (Ed.), Unemployment personal and social consequences, pp. 118–137. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Healey, D. (1989). The time of my life. London: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Heath, O. (2019). A growing class divide: MPs and voters. In (Eds.) Cowley, P. and Ford, R., Sex, lies and politics, chapter 27. London: Biteback.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (2013). Fire and ashes. Success and failure in politics. Canada: Random House Canada.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1982). Employment and unemployment: A socio-psychological analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, H. (2019). New Man in the chair. The Municipal Journal. 4 July 2019.Google Scholar
Jefferson, T. (1807). Letter to the Legislature of Vermont. 10 December 1807. Available at: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/letter-to-the-legislature-of-vermont/.Google Scholar
Jennings, W., Stoker, G. and Twyman, J. (2016). The dimensions and impact of political discontent in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 69, 876–900.Google Scholar
Just, P. D. (2004). United Kingdom: Life after number 10 – premiers emeritus and parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 10(2-3), 66–78.Google Scholar
Karol, D. (2012). Forcing their hands? Explaining trends in retirement announcement timing in the U.S. Congress. Paper prepared for presentation at the 2012 Annual Conference on Congress and History, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
Keane, J. (2009). Life after political death. In Kane, J., Patapan, H. and t’Hart, P. (Eds.), Dispersed democratic leadership, pp. 279–298. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kerby, J. and Blidook, K. (2011). It’s not you, it’s me: Determinants of voluntary legislative turnover in Canada. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36, 621–643.Google Scholar
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2003). The Retirement Syndrome: The psychology of letting go. European Management Journal, 21(6), 707–716.Google Scholar
King, A. (2015). Who governs Britain? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kitson, R. (2019). Rugby given warning over rising mental health issues. The Guardian, 21 August.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowski, R. (2015). Our House. The House, 37 (1513), 27 March.Google Scholar
Lally, P. (2007). Identity and athletic retirement: A prospective study, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 85–99.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. and Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die: What history reveals about our future. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1532/2009). The Prince. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of Western democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Manhire, T. (2016). Bloody hell, John Key just quit as prime minister. This is not how things happen! Available at: http://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/05-12-2016/bloody-hell-john-key-just-quit-as-prime-minister-this-is-not-how-things-happen/.Google Scholar
Marris, P. (1993). Loss and change, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Menke, D. J. and Germany, M.-L. (2018). Reconstructing athletic identity: College athletes and sport retirement. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 24(1), 17–30.Google Scholar
Murray Parkes, C. (1971). Psycho-social transitions: A field for study. Social Science and Medicine, 5, 101–115.Google Scholar
O’Neill, B., Pruysers, S. and Stewart, D. K. (2019). Glass cliffs or partisan pressure? Examining gender and party leader tenures and exits. Political Studies, 1–21, doi:10.1177/0032321719880316Google Scholar
Opik, L. (2015). Losing badly takes a heavy personal toll on MPs – I should know. The Guardian, 9 May.Google Scholar
Owen, D. (2006). Hubris and nemesis in heads of government. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 548–551.Google Scholar
Paikin, S. (2003). The dark side. Toronto: Viking.Google Scholar
Paxman, J. (2002). The political animal. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Petracca, M. (1992). Rotation in office: The history of an idea. In Benjamin, G. and Malbin, M. J. (Eds.) Limiting legislative terms, pp. 19–51. Congressional Quarterly Inc.Google Scholar
Pidd, H. (2017). The people’s Champion. The Guardian 10 February.Google Scholar
Pow, J. T. (2018). Amateurs versus professionals: Explaining the political (in)experience of Canadian Members of Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 71, 633–655.Google Scholar
Raymond, C. D. and Overby, M. (2019). Calling it quits: Legislative retirements in comparative perspective. Political Studies. doi: 10.1177/0032321719865111Google Scholar
Riddell, P. (2019). 15 minutes of power: The uncertain life of British Ministers. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Riddell, P. (1996). Honest opportunism: How we get the politicians we deserve. London: Indigo.Google Scholar
Richards, S. (2019). The Prime Ministers: Reflections on leadership from Wilson to May. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (2017). Losing political office. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. E. (2019). The underappreciated loss of political office. Journal of Loss and Trauma. doi: 10.108015325024.20191617995Google Scholar
Runciman, D. (2019). Where power stops: The making and unmaking of Presidents and Prime Ministers. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Ruscio, K. P. (2004). The leadership dilemma in modern democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shaffir, W. and Kleinknecht, S. (2005). Death at the polls. Experiencing and coping with political defeat. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(6), 707–738.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (2006). Why politics matters. Making democracy work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. and Ogilvie, B. C. (1994). A Conceptual Model of adaptation to retirement among athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 6, 1–20.Google Scholar
Theakston, K. (2010). After Number 10. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Theakston, K., and de Vries, J. (2012). Former leaders in modern democracies. Political sunsets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Theakston, K., Gouge, E. and Honeyman, V. (2007). Life after losing or leaving. The experience of former members of Parliament. A report for the Association of Former Members of Parliament. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Walter, J. (2016). Biographical analysis. In Rhodes, R. A. W. and ‘t Hart, P. (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of political leadership. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, M. (2013). Retirement: An introduction and overview of the handbook. In Wang, M. (Ed.), The Oxford textbook of retirement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, A. (2012). Should the job of national politicians carry a government health warning? The impact of psychological strain on politicians. In Weinberg, A. (Ed.), The psychology of politicians. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, L. M. (2011). The Queen’s Park after-party: Post-cabinet life in the legislature. Paper prepared for the Canadian Political Science Association Conference, Waterloo, Ontario.Google Scholar
Willumsen, D. M. and Goetz, K. H. (2017). Set free? Impending retirement and legislative behaviour in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 70, 254–279.Google Scholar
Wren, T. (2007). Inventing leadership: The challenge of democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • By the People
  • Edited by Ashley Weinberg, University of Salford
  • Book: Psychology of Democracy
  • Online publication: 24 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108774871.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • By the People
  • Edited by Ashley Weinberg, University of Salford
  • Book: Psychology of Democracy
  • Online publication: 24 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108774871.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • By the People
  • Edited by Ashley Weinberg, University of Salford
  • Book: Psychology of Democracy
  • Online publication: 24 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108774871.010
Available formats
×