Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:46:13.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Personality, Politics and Strong Democracy

A Review of Research and Future Directions

from Part I - Of the People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

By
Jo Silvester  and
Madeleine Wyatt
Edited by
Ashley Weinberg
Ashley Weinberg
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines how the personality of political leaders shapes their ability to campaign effectively, win votes and achieve success once in political office. We begin by examining how personality has been conceptualised in politics and why it is considered important. In our discussion of personality, we include psychological traits, such as the ‘big five’ (e.g., Extroversion, Conscientiousness), and Machiavellianism or charisma, but also individual characteristics including motivation, intelligence and traits ascribed to individuals based on their biological features, such as height. Next, we review existing research to examine the relevance of personality for leadership emergence (i.e. how personality contributes to individuals becoming political leaders), and leadership effectiveness (i.e. how personality may contribute to successful performance in political office). Finally, we examine the methods that researchers have used to examine personality and political leadership and consider future directions for research. The use of relevant measures of personality is considered as well as enhanced approaches to their analysis.

Keywords

PersonalityLeadershipPoliticianCandidatesMeasurementPersonalisation
Type
Chapter
Information
Psychology of Democracy
Of the People, By the People, For the People
 , pp. 25 - 51
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaldering, L. and Van Der Pas, D. J. (2018). Political leadership in the media: Gender bias in leader stereotypes during campaign and routine times. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 1–21.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, N. J. (1950). Types and syndromes. In The authoritarian personality (Studies in Prejudice Series, American Jewish Committee). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Allen, N., Magni, G., Searing, D. and Warncke, P. (2020). What is a career politician? Theories, concepts, and measures. European Political Science Review, 12(2), 199–217.Google Scholar
Allen, P. and Cairney, P. (2017). What do we mean when we talk about the ‘political class’? Political Studies Review, 15(1), 18–27.Google Scholar
Antonakis, J. (2011). Predictors of leadership: The usual suspects and the suspect traits. In Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (Eds.), Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 269–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N. and Rönkkö, M. (2019, July). The endogeneity problem in random intercept models: Are most published results likely false? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 18927.Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. and Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120.Google Scholar
Barber, J. D. (1972). The presidential character: Predicting performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Best, H. (2011). Does personality matter in politics? Personality factors as determinants of parliamentary recruitment and policy preferences. Comparative Sociology, 10(6), 928–948.Google Scholar
Bjarnegård, E. and Kenny, M. (2015). Revealing the “secret garden”: The informal dimensions of political recruitment. Politics and Gender, 11(4), 748–753.Google Scholar
Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C. and Pillai, R. (2011). Romancing leadership: Past, present, and future. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1058–1077.Google Scholar
Bono, J. E. and Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901.Google Scholar
Buendgens-Kosten, J. (2014). Authenticity. ELT Journal, 68(4), 457–459.Google Scholar
Callander, S. (2008). Political motivations. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(3), 671–697.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. and Childs, S. (2010). ‘Wags’, ’wives’ and ‘mothers’… but what about women politicians? Parliamentary Affairs, 63(4), 760–777.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. and Cowley, P. (2014). What voters want: Reactions to candidate characteristics in a survey experiment. Political Studies, 62(4), 745–765.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. and Lovenduski, J. (2015). What should MPs do? Public and parliamentarians’ views compared. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(4), 690–708.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Consiglio, C., Picconi, L. and Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Personalities of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 849–856.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V. and Cervone, D. (2000). Personality: Determinants, dynamics, and potentials. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Francescato, D., Mebane, M., Sorace, R. and Vecchione, M. (2010). Personality foundations of ideological divide: A comparison of women members of parliament and women voters in Italy. Political Psychology, 31(5), 739–762.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M. and Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprara, G. V. and Silvester, J. (2018). The personality attributes of political elites. In Best, H. and Higley, J. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 467–488). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M. and Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Why people do not vote: The role of personal values. European Psychologist, 17, 266–278.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V. and Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59(7), 581–594.Google Scholar
Cassese, E. C. and Holman, M. R. (2018). Party and gender stereotypes in campaign attacks. Political Behavior, 40(3), 785–807.Google Scholar
Christie, R. and Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. and Matthews, G. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (2006). Trait and factor theories. In Thomas, J. C. and Segal, D. L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology (Vol. I). Personality and everyday functioning 36. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Costantini, E. and Craik, K. H. (1980). Personality and politicians: California party leaders, 1960–1976. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 641–661.Google Scholar
Davis, K. M. and Gardner, W. L. (2012). Charisma under crisis revisited: Presidential leadership, perceived leader effectiveness, and contextual influences. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 918–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, R. E. and van Prooijen, J. W. (2019). Voters rating politicians’ personality: Evaluative biases and assumed similarity on honesty-humility and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 100–104.Google Scholar
Deluga, R. J. (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(3), 339–363.Google Scholar
Deluga, R. J. (1998). American presidential proactivity, charismatic leadership, and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(3), 265–291.Google Scholar
Diermeier, D., Keane, M. and Merlo, A. (2005). A political economy model of congressional careers. American Economic Review, 95(1), 347–373.Google Scholar
Dietrich, B. J., Lasley, S., Mondak, J. J., Remmel, M. L. and Turner, J. (2012). Personality and legislative politics: The Big Five trait dimensions among US state legislators. Political Psychology, 33(2), 195–210.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2020). Authoritarianism. In Zeigler-Hill, V. and Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E. and Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumitrica, D. (2014). Politics as “customer relations”: Social media and political authenticity in the 2010 municipal elections in Calgary, Canada. Javnost-The Public, 21(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573.Google Scholar
Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61.Google Scholar
Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C. and McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557.Google Scholar
Foti, R. J., Bray, B. C., Thompson, N. J. and Allgood, S. F. (2012). Know thy self, know thy leader: Contributions of a pattern-oriented approach to examining leader perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(4), 702–717.Google Scholar
Fredriksson, P. G., Wang, L. and Mamun, K. A. (2011). Are politicians office or policy motivated? The case of US governors’ environmental policies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 241–253.Google Scholar
Gallagher, M. and Marsh, M. (1988). Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics (Vol. 18). London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Garzia, D. (2011). The personalization of politics in Western democracies: Causes and consequences on leader–follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 697–709.Google Scholar
George, A. L. and George, J. L. (1998). Presidential personality and performance. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Hart, W., Adams, J. M. and Burton, K. A. (2016). Narcissistic for the people: Narcissists and non-narcissists disagree about how to make a good impression. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 69–73, ISSN 0191-8869.Google Scholar
Hermann, M. G. (1980). Explaining foreign policy behavior using the personal characteristics of political leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, R. J., Spangler, W. D. and Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the US Lombardo, MM, Ruderman, MN, and McCauley, CD (1988). Explanations of success and derailment in upper-level management positions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 199–216.Google Scholar
Jones, B. (2016). Authenticity in political discourse. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(2), 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, K. N. and Pennebaker, J. W. (2017). The exception or the rule: Using words to assess analytic thinking, Donald Trump, and the American presidency. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 312.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R. and Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E. and Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 542–552.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F. and Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875.Google Scholar
Kapoutsis, I., Papalexandris, A., Treadway, D. C. and Bentley, J. (2017). Measuring political will in organizations: Theoretical construct development and empirical validation. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2252–2280.Google Scholar
Kartik, N. and McAfee, R. P. (2007). Signaling character in electoral competition. American Economic Review, 97(3), 852–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, J. D., Hollibaugh, G. E. and Ramey, A. J. (2019). What I like about you: Legislator personality and legislator approval. Political Behavior, 41 , 499–525.Google Scholar
Knapen, J. E., Blaker, N. M. and Pollet, T. V. (2017). Size, skills, and suffrage: Motivated distortions in perceived formidability of political leaders. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0188485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowert, P. A. (1996). Where does the buck stop?: Assessing the impact of presidential personality. Political Psychology, 17(3), 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, M. and Childs, S. (2010). Women, gender, and politics: A reader. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, K. P. (1969). Political socialization (Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, J. L. (2015). Female candidates and legislators. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 349–366.Google Scholar
Lee, E. J., Lee, H. Y. and Choi, S. (2020). Is the message the medium? How politicians’ Twitter blunders affect perceived authenticity of Twitter communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106188.Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J. and De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343–378.Google Scholar
Lyons, M. (1997). Presidential character revisited. Political Psychology, 18(4), 791–811.Google Scholar
McCann, S. J. (1992). Alternative formulas to predict the greatness of U.S. presidents: Personological, situational, and zeitgeist factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 469–479.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, H., Silvester, J., Sealy, R., Billimoria, D., Peters, K., Huse, M., Moltner, H., Jane, S. and Göke, J. (2018). Women in power: Contributing factors that impact on women in organizations and politics; psychological research and best practice. Organizational Dynamics, 47 , 189–199.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2009). The Five-Factor Model of personality traits: Consensus and controversy. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 148–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. and Sutin, A. R. (2018). A five‐factor theory perspective on causal analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(3), 151–166.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. J. and Halperin, K. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335–362.Google Scholar
Murray, G. R. and Schmitz, J. D. (2011). Caveman politics: Evolutionary leadership preferences and physical stature. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1215–1235.Google Scholar
Murray, R. (2010). Cracking the highest glass ceiling: A global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Santa Barbara: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Nai, A., Martínez i Coma, F. and Maier, J. (2019). Donald Trump, populism, and the Age of Extremes: Comparing the personality traits and campaigning styles of Trump and other leaders worldwide. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 49(3), 609–643.Google Scholar
Olivola, C. Y. and Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 83–110.Google Scholar
Pillai, R., Williams, E. A., Lowe, K. B. and Jung, D. I. (2003). Personality, transformational leadership, trust, and the 2000 US presidential vote. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2), 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, L. A., Raile, A. N. and Raile, E. D. (2010). Defining political will. Politics and Policy, 38(4), 653–676.Google Scholar
POTUS.com (2020). Presidential Heights. Accessed from www.potus.com/presidential-facts/presidential-heights/.Google Scholar
Ramey, A., Klingler, J. and Hollibaugh, G. (2016). Measuring elite personality using speech. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(1), 163–184.Google Scholar
Raskin, R. N. and Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45(2), 590.Google Scholar
Rice, M. G., Remmel, M. L. and Mondak, J. J. (2020). Personality on the Hill: Expert Evaluations of US Senators’ Psychological Traits. Political Research Quarterly, 74(3), 674–687. doi:10.1177/1065912920928587Google Scholar
Roets, A. and Van Hiel, A. (2009). The ideal politician: Impact of voters’ ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 60–65.Google Scholar
Rohrer, S. R. (2014). What makes a prime minister great?: A leadership trait analysis of the effectiveness of British prime ministers from 1902 to 2004. Research and Politics, 1(3), 1–8.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rubenzer, S. J., Faschingbauer, T. R. and Ones, D. S. (2000). Assessing the US presidents using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Assessment, 7(4), 403–419.Google Scholar
Sajons, G. B. (2020). Estimating the causal effect of measured endogenous variables: A tutorial on experimentally randomized instrumental variables. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 1–17.Google Scholar
Schill, D. (2012). The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication, 12(2), 118–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M. and Bos, A. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35(2), 245–266.Google Scholar
Schumacher, G. and Zettler, I. (2019). House of Cards or West Wing? Self-reported HEXACO traits of Danish politicians. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 173–181.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Individual values across cultures. In: Chuch, A. T. (Ed.) The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 137–182.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Caprara, M. G., Cieciuch, J., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Lönnqvist, J. E., Mamali, C., Manzi, J., Pavlopoulos, V., Posnova, T., Schoen, H., Silvester, J., Tabernero, C., Torres, C., Verkasalo, M., Vondráková, E., Welzel, C. and Zaleski, Z. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36(4), 899–930.Google Scholar
Silvester, J. (2012). Recruiting politicians: Designing competency-based selection for UK parliamentary candidates. In Weinberg, A. (Ed.), The psychology of politicians (pp. 21–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silvester, J. (2008). The good, the bad and the ugly: Politics and politicians at work. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23, 107–148.Google Scholar
Silvester, J. and Dykes, C. (2007). Selecting political candidates: A longitudinal study of assessment centre performance and political success in the 2005 UK General Election. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), 11–25.Google Scholar
Silvester, J. and Wyatt, M. (2018). Political effectiveness at work. In Ones, D. S., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C. and Sinangil, H. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology: V1: Personnel psychology and employee performance, 228–247. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Silvester, J., Wyatt, M., Ellen, B.P. III, and Ferris, G. R. (2020). Candidate effects on election outcomes: Political skill, campaign efficacy and intentions in a British general election. Applied Psychology: An International Review 1–41, doi.org/10.1111/apps.12292.Google Scholar
Silvester, J., Wyatt, M. and Randall, R. (2014). Politician personality, Machiavellianism, and political skill as predictors of performance ratings in political roles. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 258–279.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2006). Presidential IQ, openness, intellectual brilliance, and leadership: Estimates and correlations for 42 US chief executives. Political Psychology, 27(4), 511–526.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Presidential style: Personality, biography, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 928–936.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986). Presidential personality: Biographical use of the Gough Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 149.Google Scholar
Spangler, W. D. and House, R. J. (1991). Presidential effectiveness and the leadership motive profile. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 439.Google Scholar
Stiers, D., Larner, J., Kenny, J., Breitenstein, S., Vallée-Dubois, F. and Lewis-Beck, M. (2021). Candidate Authenticity: ‘To Thine Own Self Be True’. Political Behavior, 43, 1181–1204.Google Scholar
Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S. and Pollet, T. V. (2013). Tall claims? Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 159–171.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P. (2010). The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: Archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1669–1702.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P., Cross, R. W. and Brcic, J. (2011). Two years of ups and downs: Barack Obama’s patterns of integrative complexity, motive imagery, and values. Political Psychology, 32(6), 1007–1033.Google Scholar
Sussman, A. B., Petkova, K. and Todorov, A. (2013). Competence ratings in US predict presidential election outcomes in Bulgaria. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 771–775.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 365.Google Scholar
Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A. and Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626.Google Scholar
Treadway, D. C. (2012). Political will in organizations. In Ferris, G. R. and Treadway, D. C. (Eds.), Politics in organizations: Theory and research considerations: 531–556. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
UN Women (2018). Facts and figures: Leadership and political participation. www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/leadership-and-political-participation/facts-andfigures. Accessed date: 2 July 2019.Google Scholar
Valgarðsson, V., Clarke, N., Jennings, W. and Stoker, G. (2020). The good politician and political trust: An authenticity gap in British politics? Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321720928257Google Scholar
Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Schoen, H., Cieciuch, J., Silvester, J., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Mamali, C., Manzi, J., Pavlopoulos, V., Posnova, T., Torres, C., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.‐E., Vondráková, E., Welzel, C. and Alessandri, G. (2015). Personal values and political activism: A cross‐national study. British Journal of Psychology, 106(1), 84–106.Google Scholar
Vivyan, N. and Wagner, M. (2015). What do voters want from their local MP? The Political Quarterly, 86(1), 33–40.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, M (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, D. G. (2010). Why achievement motivation predicts success in business but failure in politics: The importance of personal control. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1637–1668.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (2003). Measuring the motives of political actors. In Post, J. (Ed.), The psychological assessment of political leaders (pp. 153–177). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196–202.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M. and Silvester, J. (2018). Do voters get it right? A test of the ascription-actuality trait theory of leadership with political elites. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 609–621.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×