Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:13:44.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Theoretical Chapters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2024

Edited by
Samantha M. Curle  and
Jack Pun
Samantha M. Curle
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Jack Pun
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Researching English Medium Instruction
Quantitative Methods for Students and Researchers
 , pp. 9 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson, J. O., Lin, H.-S., Treagust, D. F., Ross, S. P., & Yore, L. D. (2007). Using large-scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9090-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardo, A. I. (2005). Language and modeling word problems in mathematics among bilinguals. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.413-425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, D., & Moncada-Comas, B. (2022). English-medium instruction in higher education and the ELT gaze: STEM lecturers’ self-positioning as NOT English language teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1689917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carin, A. A., Bass, J. E., & Contant, T. L. (2005). Methods for teaching science as inquiry. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In Street, B. & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., volume 2: Literacy, pp. 71–83). New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2015). How to reverse a legacy of exclusion? Identifying high-impact educational responses. Language and Education, 29(3), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.994528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1219535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Masri, Y. H., Baird, J. A., & Graesser, A. (2016). Language effects in international testing: The case of PISA 2006 science items. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 427–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1218323Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2000). Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 195–207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Graham, B. E. (2010). Mother tongue education: Necessary? Possible? Sustainable? Language and Education, 24(4), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500781003678696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044Google Scholar
Ho, E. S. C. (2007). Overview of accomplishment & challenges of Hong Kong basic education: From PISA 2000+ to PISA 2006. www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/~hkpisa/events/2006/events2006_20071210.htmGoogle Scholar
Ho, E. S. C., & Man, E. Y. F. (2007). Student performance in Chinese medium-of-instruction (CMI) and English medium-of-instruction (EMI) schools: What we learned from the PISA study. Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Igboanusi, H. (2008). Mother tongue-based bilingual education in Nigeria: Attitudes and practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(6), 721–734. http://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802149291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, N. A., & Awang, H. (2012). Student factors and mathematics achievement: Evidence from TIMSS 2007. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 249–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.843aGoogle Scholar
Jerrim, J., Lopez‐Agudo, L. A., & Marcenaro‐Gutierrez, O. D. (2022). The impact of test language on PISA scores. New evidence from Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. L. (2017). What do we know and not know about choice of medium of education in South-East Wales? Wales Journal of Education, 19(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.16922/wje.19.2.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, A., Nygård Larsson, P., & Jakobsson, A. (2019). Multilingual students’ use of translanguaging in science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2049–2069. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launio, R. M. (2015). Instructional medium and its effect on students’ mathematics achievement. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 3, 462–465.Google Scholar
Lin, A. M. (2019). Theories of trans/languaging and trans-semiotizing: Implications for content-based education classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1515175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou, P. Y., & Hung, Y. C. (2015). Statistical techniques utilized in analyzing PISA and TIMSS data in science education from 1996 to 2013: A methodological review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1449–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9558-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Y. Y., & Lo, E. S. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of English-medium education in Hong Kong. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Hooper, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods.htmlGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. O., von Davier, M., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2020). Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/methodsGoogle Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/Google Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., Arora, A., & Erberber, E. (2005). TIMSS 2007 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2020). PISA 2018 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Olufunminiyi, A. A., & Afolabi, F. (2010). Analysis of science process skills in West African senior secondary school certificate physics practical examinations in Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 5(4), 234–240.Google Scholar
Perez, A. L., & Alieto, E. (2018). Change of “tongue” from English to a local language: A correlation of mother tongue proficiency and mathematics achievement. The Asian ESP Journal, 14, 132–150.Google Scholar
Prinsloo, C. H., & Harvey, J. C. (2020). The differing effect of language factors on science and mathematics achievement using TIMSS 2015 data: South Africa. Research in Science Education, 50, 2207–2226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165–018–9769-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J., & Macaro, E. (2019). The effect of first and second language use on question types in English medium instruction science classrooms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1510368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J. K., & Tai, K. W. (2021). Doing science through translanguaging: A study of translanguaging practices in secondary English as a medium of instruction science laboratory sessions. International Journal of Science Education, 43(7), 1112–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1902015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J., Thomas, N., & Bowen, N. E. J. A. (2022). Questioning the sustainability of English-medium instruction policy in science classrooms: Teachers’ and students’ experiences at a Hong Kong secondary school. Sustainability, 14(4), 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricablanca, J. D. (2014). Effectiveness of mother tongue-based instruction on pupils’ achievement in mathematics. Unpublished Thesis. Central Mindanao University.Google Scholar
Tai, K. W., & Wei, L. (2021a). Co-learning in Hong Kong English medium instruction mathematics secondary classrooms: A translanguaging perspective. Language and Education, 35(3), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1837860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tai, K. W., & Wei, L. (2021b). Constructing playful talk through translanguaging in English Medium Instruction mathematics classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 42(4), 607–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thien, L. M., & Ong, M. Y. (2015). Malaysian and Singaporean students’ affective characteristics and mathematics performance: Evidence from PISA 2012. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064–015-1358-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilakaratne, C. T. K., & Ekanayake, T. M. S. S. K. Y. (2017). Achievement level of science process skills of junior secondary students: Based on a sample of grade six and seven students from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(9), 2089–2108.Google Scholar
Tsui, C. Y. (2008). From PISA 2006 Results to some issues in Hong Kong science education. Paper presented in the NARST Conference, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Tupas, R. (2015). Inequalities of multilingualism: Challenges to mother tongue-based multilingual education. Language and Education, 29(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.977295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Brande, J., Hillary, J., & Cullinane, C. (2019). Selective comprehensives: Great Britain. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER)Google Scholar
van Laere, E., Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2014). The role of students’ home language in science achievement: A multilevel approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2772–2794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.936327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. (2002). A language gained: A study of language immersion at 11–16 years of age. School of Education, University of WalesGoogle Scholar
Yip, D. Y., & Tsang, W. K. (2007). Evaluation of the effects of the medium of instruction on science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Students’ self-concept in science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763–006-9043-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, D. Y., Tsang, W. K., & Cheung, S. P. (2003). Evaluation of the effects of medium of instruction on the science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Performance on the science achievement test. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(2), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2003.10162808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yore, L., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 689–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aizawa, I., Rose, H., Thompson, G., & Curle, S. (2023). Beyond the threshold: Exploring English language proficiency, linguistic challenges, and academic language skills of Japanese students in an English medium instruction programme. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820965510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ament, J., Vidal, C. P., & Parés, J. B. (2018). The effects of English-medium instruction on the use of textual and interpersonal pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 28(4), 517–545. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17042.ameGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R. A. (2017). Recommendations for analysis of repeated‐measures designs: Testing and correcting for sphericity and use of MANOVA and mixed model analysis. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 37(5), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12399CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrios, E., & López-Gutiérrez, A. (2023). Language learning in a partially English-taught teacher education programme: Language gains and student perceptions. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(2), 504–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1888956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2008). Effect size and eta squared. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12(2), 38–43.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of measurement? Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15(1), 10–14.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curle, S., Jablonkai, R., Mittelmeier, J., Sahan, K., & Veitch, A. (2020). English Medium Part 1: Literature review. In N. Galloway (Ed.) English in higher education (Report No. 978-0-86355-977–8). British Council. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/english-higher-education-%E2%80%93-english-medium-part-1-literature-reviewGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, E., & Camacho-Miñano, M. M. (2016). Exploring the impact of English-medium instruction on university student academic achievement: The case of accounting. English for Specific Purposes, 44, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrel, P. J., & Stewart, K. R. (2006). Comprehensive study of tests for normality and symmetry: Extending the Spiegelhalter test. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 76(9), 803–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360500109023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R (1st ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52, 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, N., Curle, S., Jablonkai, R. R., Mittelmeier, J., Sahan, K., & Veitch, A. (2020a). English in higher education: English medium. Part 1 - Literature review. London: British Council. www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/L020_English_HE_lit_review_FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Galloway, N., Numajiri, T., & Rees, N. (2020b). The “internationalisation,” or “Englishisation,” of higher education in East Asia. Higher Education, 80(3), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734–019-00486-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glantz, S. A., Slinker, B. K., & Neilands, T. B. (2016). Primer of applied regression & analysis of variance (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Guo, H., Tong, F., Wang, Z., Min, Y., & Tang, S. (2018). English- vs. Chinese-medium instruction in Chinese higher education: A quasi-experimental comparison. Sustainability, 10(11), 4230. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, B., & van Meurs, F. (2022). Dutch students’ evaluations of EMI and L1MOI lectures: The role of non-native pronunciation. System, 108, 102849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennebry, M., & Gao, X. (2021). Interactions between medium of instruction and language learning motivation. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(7), 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1530190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kim, V. (2018). Technology-enhanced feedback on student writing in the English-medium instruction classroom. English Teaching, 73(4), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.4.201812.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, V., & Kim, J. Y. (2020). Roles of teacher feedback in promoting effective English-medium instruction of a business subject. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(3), 889–905. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.3.9.889Google Scholar
Kim, V., & Thompson, G. (2022). The interplay between gender and major on content knowledge and self-beliefs in the English-medium instruction context: A comparative study between university students from Japan and South Korea. System, 107, 102824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2022.102824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojima, N., & Yashima, T. (2017). Motivation in English medium instruction classrooms from the perspective of self-determination theory and the ideal self. JACET Journal, 61, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.32234/jacetjournal.61.0_23Google Scholar
Köylü, Z., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2022). Learning English in today’s global world: A comparative study of at home, anglophone, and lingua franca study abroad. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(5), 1330–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kym, I., & Kym, M. H. (2014). Students’ perceptions of EMI in higher education in Korea. Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(2), 35–61.Google Scholar
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, M. G. (2008). Analysis of variance. Circulation, 117(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.654335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasagabaster, D. (2016). The relationship between motivation, gender, L1 and possible selves in English-medium instruction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2015.1105806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared and the misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 612–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00828.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E., & Akincioglu, M. (2018). Turkish university students’ perceptions about English medium instruction: Exploring year group, gender and university type as variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1367398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(01), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, S. T. (2012). Mauchly test. In Salkind, N. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288Google Scholar
Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Eta-and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316684904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
Sahan, K., & Şahan, Ö. (2021). Investigating student and alumni perspectives on language learning and career prospects through English medium instruction. Teaching in Higher Education, 26, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973407Google Scholar
Soruç, A., Altay, M., Curle, S., & Yuksel, D. (2021). Students’ academic language-related challenges in English medium instruction: The role of English proficiency and language gain. System, 103, 102651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2020). Experimental designs using ANOVA (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (2018). Insights for efficacy development from an exploration of Japanese business management students’ EAP self-efficacy beliefs. The Asian ESP Journal, 14(7.1), 244–284.Google Scholar
Wei, R., Hu, Y., & Xiong, J. (2019). Effect size reporting practices in applied linguistics: A study of one major journal. SAGE Open, 9, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019850035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, S., Thompson, G., & Zhou, S. (2023). Transition from secondary school to an English medium transnational university in China: A longitudinal study of student self-efficacy and motivational beliefs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2023.2213376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bearden, W. O., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1999). Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belson, W. A. (1966). The effects of reversing the presentation order of verbal rating scales. Journal of Advertising Research, 6 (December), 30–37.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. F., & Smith, A. (2001). Response-order effects and the early Gallup split-ballots. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, G. C., Hensel, P. J., & James, K. E. (2005). Marketing scales handbook. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
Busch, M. (1993). Using Likert scales in L2 research. A researcher comments. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 733–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byun, K., Chu, H., Kim, M., Park, I., Kim, S., & Jung, J. (2011). English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: Policy debates and reality. Higher Education, 62, 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L. (1994). A psychometric evaluation of four-point and six-point Likert-type scale in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, A. M., Chau, J. P., & Holroyd, E. (1999). Translation of questionnaires and issues of equivalence. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(2), 316–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, P. K. (2010). “Weep for Chinese university”: A case study of English hegemony and academic capitalism in higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399–403.Google Scholar
Chyung, S. Y., Kennedy, M., & Campbell, I. (2018). Evidence‐based survey design: The use of ascending or descending order of Likert‐type response options. Performance Improvement, 57(9), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Surveys, longitudinal, cross-sectional and trend studies. In Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (Eds.), Research methods in education (pp. 334–360). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, J. M., & Presser, S. (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire (Vol. 63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croasmun, J. T., & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-Type scales in the social sciences. Journal of Adult Education, 40(1), 19–22.Google Scholar
Curle, S. M., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). Trends in using questionnaires for EMI research: Suggestions for future improvements. In Research methods in English medium instruction (pp. 32–45). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. W. (2017). Likert scales. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (Online), 111(5), 488–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011a). The first term at university: Implications for EAP. ELT Journal, 65(4), 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011b). The student experience of English-medium higher education in Hong Kong. Language and Education, 25(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104–110.Google Scholar
Friedman, H. H., Herskovitz, P. J., & Pollack, S. (1994). The biasing effects of scale-checking styles on response to a Likert scale. In Proceedings of the American statistical association annual conference: Survey research methods (Vol. 792, pp. 792–795).Google Scholar
Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable. Marketing Bulletin, 2(1), 66–70.Google Scholar
Höhne, J. K., & Krebs, D. (2018). Scale direction effects in agree/disagree and item-specific questions: A comparison of question formats. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höhne, J. K., & Lenzner, T. (2015). Investigating response order effects in web surveys using eye tracking. Psihologija, 48, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jan, S. L., & Shieh, G. (2014). Sample size determinations for Welch’s test in one‐way heteroscedastic ANOVA. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(1), 72–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johns, R. (2010). Likert items and scales. Survey Question Bank: Methods Fact Sheet, 1(1), 11.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamaşak, R., Sahan, K., & Rose, H. (2020). Academic language-related challenges at an English-medium university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, D., & Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. H. (2010). Positive first or negative first? Effects of the order of answering categories on response behavior. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6, 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. R. (1993). Multipoint scales: Mean and median differences and observed significance levels. International Journal of Human‐Computer Interaction, 5(4), 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W., Liu, N. F., & Yu, C. (1996). Hong Kong tertiary students’ attitudes and proficiency in spoken English. RELC Journal, 27(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, H. (2015). Response option configuration of online administered Likert scales. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, N. (2008). Completion time and response order effects in web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 914–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGorry, S. Y. (2000). Measurement in a cross‐cultural environment: Survey translation issues. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(2), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. (2017). Survey methods in social investigation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, J. T., Weston, R., & Voyles, E. C. (2015). Stuck in the middle: The use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. The Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Muircheartaigh, C. A., Krosnick, J. A., & Helic, A. (2001). Middle alternatives, acquiescence, and the quality of questionnaire data. Chicago, IL: Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Poon, A. Y. (2010). Language use, and language policy and planning in Hong Kong. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(1), 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rammstedt, B., & Krebs, D. (2007). Does response scale format affect the answering of personality scales? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, C., & Morrison, B. (2021). Challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong revisited a decade later. In Language use in English-medium instruction at university (pp. 167–192). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, C., & Rose, H. (2023). English medium higher education in Hong Kong: Linguistic challenges of local and non-local students. Language and Education, 37(6), 788–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 7, pp. 497–516). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Thompson, G., Aizawa, I., Curle, S., & Rose, H. (2022). Exploring the role of self-efficacy beliefs and learner success in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 236–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Altman, D. G., Simera, I., Hoey, J., Moher, D., & Schulz, K. (2008). EQUATOR: Reporting guidelines for health research. Open Medicine, 2(2), e49.Google ScholarPubMed
Aromataris, E., & Pearson, A. (2014). The systematic review: An overview. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 114(3), 53–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, England: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Vos, J. F., Schriefers, H., Nivard, M. G., & Lemhöfer, K. (2018). A meta-analysis and meta-regression of incidental second language word learning from spoken input. Language Learning, 68(4), 906–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlak, J. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917–928. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta‐analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J. L. (1993). Review papers: The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2(2), 121–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Koizumi, R., & Tomita, Y. (2019). Meta-analysis in applied linguistics. In McKinley, J. & Rose, H. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 240–252). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google ScholarPubMed
Lo, Y. Y., & Lo, E. S. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of English-medium education in Hong Kong. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2017). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444817000350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pun, J. (2019). Salient language features in explanation texts that students encounter in secondary school chemistry textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 100781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J. (2021). Translanguaging in Partial-Emi Secondary Science Classrooms in Hong Kong. In Paulsrud, B., Tian, Z. & Toth, J. (Eds.), English-medium instruction and translanguaging. (pp. 94–107). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pun, J. (2022). Effects of prior English exposure on Hong Kong tertiary science students’ experiences in EMI learning. RELC Journal.Google Scholar
Pun, J., & Cheung, K. K. C. (2021). Meaning making in collaborative practical work: A case study of multimodal challenges in a Year 10 chemistry classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(1), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1895101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J., & Macaro, E. (2019). The effect of first and second language use on question types in English medium instruction science classrooms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1510368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J., & Tai, K. W. H. (2021). Doing science through translanguaging: A study of translanguaging practices in secondary English as a medium of instruction science laboratory sessions. International Journal of Science Education, 43(7), 1112–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1902015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J., & Thomas, N. (2020). English medium instruction: Teachers’ challenges and coping strategies. ELT Journal, 74(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J., Thomas, N., & Bowen, N. E. J. A. (2022). Questioning the sustainability of English-medium instruction policy in science classrooms: Teachers’ and students’ experiences at a Hong Kong Secondary School. Sustainability, 14(4), 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, J., & Xina, J. (2021). Student challenges and learning strategies at Hong Kong EMI universities. PloS One, 16(5), e0251564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J., & Pun, J. (2021). A typology of English-medium instruction. RELC Journal, 54(1), 216–240. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0033688220968584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J., & Pun, J. (2022a). Teaching and learning in English medium instruction: An introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J., & Pun, J. (2022b). Teacher strategies in implementing English medium instruction. ELT Journal, 76(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, P. (2015a). How to read a forest plot in a meta-analysis. BMJ, 351, h4028. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, P. (2015b). Meta-analyses: What is heterogeneity? BMJ, 350, h1435. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25778910CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, J. (2013). Critical appraisal skills programme. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 4(1), 76–76. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500x.107697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E., Hernandez, A. V., & Kattan, M. W. (2008). Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 75(6), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.75.6.431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Theoretical Chapters
  • Edited by Samantha M. Curle, University of Bath, Jack Pun, City University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Researching English Medium Instruction
  • Online publication: 14 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009425407.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Theoretical Chapters
  • Edited by Samantha M. Curle, University of Bath, Jack Pun, City University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Researching English Medium Instruction
  • Online publication: 14 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009425407.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Theoretical Chapters
  • Edited by Samantha M. Curle, University of Bath, Jack Pun, City University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Researching English Medium Instruction
  • Online publication: 14 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009425407.004
Available formats
×