Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:13:57.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Nineteen - Adaptive co-management and conflict resolution for rewilding across development contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2019

By
James R.A. Butler ,
Juliette C. Young  and
Mariella Marzano
Edited by
Nathalie Pettorelli ,
Sarah M. Durant  and
Johan T. du Toit
Nathalie Pettorelli
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, London
Sarah M. Durant
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, London
Johan T. du Toit
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Rewilding , pp. 386 - 412
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, N., Wise, R.M., Colloff, M., et al. (2016). Building resilient pathways to transformation when no-one is in charge: insights from Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin. Ecology and Society, 21, 23.Google Scholar
Anglo American. (2017). www.angloamerican.com/about-us/our-stories/connected-communities.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., and Johnson, D. (2006). Can resilience be recognised with globalization and increasingly complex resource degradation in Asian coastal regions? Ecology and Society, 11, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, D.R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., et al. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 95–102.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., Béné, C., Charles, A.T., Johnson, D., and Allison, E.H. (2012). The interplay of well-being and resilience in applying a social–ecological perspective. Ecology and Society, 17, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J., Plummer, R., and Pickering, K. (2014). Priming the governance system for climate change adaptation: the application of a social–ecological inventory to engage actors in Niagara, Canada. Ecology and Society, 19, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, G. (2002). Mining and the environment in Melanesia: contemporary debates reviewed. The Contemporary Pacific, 14, 39–67.Google Scholar
Batson, W.G., Gordon, I.J., Fletcher, D.B., and Manning, A.D. (2015). Translocation tactics: a framework to support the IUCN guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 1598–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beierle, T.C., and Konisky, D.M. (2001). What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and Planning C – Government and Policy, 19, 515–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2009). Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conservation Letters, 2, 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohensky, E., Butler, J.R.A., Costanza, R., et al. (2011). Future takers or future makers? A scenario analysis of climate change and the Great Barrier Reef. Global Environmental Change, 21, 876–893.Google Scholar
Bours, D., McGinn, C., and Pringle, P. (2013). Monitoring and evaluation for climate change adaptation: a synthesis of tools, frameworks and approaches. Phnom Penh: SEA Change CoP, and Oxford: UKCIP.Google Scholar
Brown, K., and Westaway, E. (2011). Agency, capacity and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 321–342.Google Scholar
Brown, K., Tompkins, E., and Adger, W.N. (2001). Trade-off analysis for participatory coastal zone decision-making. overseas development group. Norwich: University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Brown, V.A. (2008). Leonardo’s vision: a guide to collective thinking and action. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J.R.A. (2011). The challenge of knowledge integration in the adaptive co-management of conflicting ecosystem services provided by seals and salmon. Animal Conservation, 14, 599–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Middlemas, S.J., McKelvey, S.A., et al. (2008). The Moray Firth Seal Management Plan: an adaptive framework for balancing the conservation of seals, salmon, fisheries and wildlife tourism in the UK. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18, 1025–1038.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Tawake, L., Tawake, A., Skewes, T., and McGrath, V. (2012). Integrating traditional ecological knowledge and fisheries management in the Torres Strait, Australia: the catalytic role of turtles and dugong as cultural keystone species. Ecology and Society, 17, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Wong, G., Metcalfe, D., et al. (2013). An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 180, 176–191.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Suadnya, W., Puspadi, K., et al. (2014). Framing the application of adaptation pathways for rural livelihoods and global change in Eastern Indonesian islands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 368–382.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Young, J.C., McMyn, I., et al. (2015a). Evaluating adaptive co-management as conservation conflict resolution: learning from seals and salmon. Journal of Environmental Management, 160, 212–225.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Wise, R.M., Skewes, T.D., et al. (2015b). Integrating top-down and bottom-up adaptation planning to build adaptive capacity: a structured learning approach. Coastal Management, 43, 346–364.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Suadnya, I.W., Yanuartati, Y., et al. (2016a). Priming adaptation pathways through adaptive co-management: design and evaluation for developing countries. Climate Risk Management, 12, 1–16.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Bohensky, E.L., Darbas, T., Kirono, D.G.C, Wise, R.M., and Sutaryono, Y. (2016b). Building capacity for adaptation pathways in eastern Indonesian islands: synthesis and lessons learned. Climate Risk Management, 12, A1–A10.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Bohensky, E.L., Suadnya, W., et al. (2016c). Scenario planning to leap-frog the Sustainable Development Goals: an adaptation pathways approach. Climate Risk Management, 12, 83–99.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Bohensky, E., Carter, L., et al. (2017a). A ‘total system health’ approach to tuberculosis control in the transboundary Torres Strait. Brisbane: CSIRO Land and Water.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., McKelvey, S.A., McMyn, I.A.G., Leyshon, B., Reid, R.J., and Thompson, P.M. (2017b). Does community surveillance mitigate by-catch risk to coastal cetaceans? Insights from salmon poaching and bottlenose dolphins in Scotland. Oceanography and Fisheries, 3, 555603.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Darbas, T., Addison, J., et al. (2017c). A hierarchy of needs for achieving impact in international research for development projects. In Schandl, H. and Walker, I. (Eds.), Social science and sustainability (pp. 109–129). Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Campese, J., Nakangu, B., Silverman, A., and Springer, J. (2016). The Natural Resource Governance Framework Assessment Guide: Learning for Improved Natural Resource Governance. NRGF Paper. IUCN and CEESP, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Carey, J. (2016). Rewilding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 806–808.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (1994.). Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development, 22, 1437–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D.A., Workman, L., and Jung, T.S. (2016). Impacts of reintroduced bison on First Nations People in Yukon, Canada: finding common ground through participatory research and social learning. Conservation and Society, 14(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, B., and Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: the new tyranny. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Corlett, R.T. (2016). Restoration, reintroduction, and rewilding in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(6), 453–462.Google Scholar
CSIRO. (2017). www.csiro.au/en/Research/MRF/Areas/Community-and-environment/Social-licence-to-operate/Anglo-AmericanGoogle Scholar
Cundill, G., and Fabricius, C. (2010). Monitoring the governance dimension of natural resource co-management. Ecology and Society, 15(1), 15.Google Scholar
Davies, A., and White, R. (2012). Collaboration in natural resource governance: reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 160–169.Google Scholar
De Groot, R.S. (2006). Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Land Use and Urban Planning, 75, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, S. (1996). Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 183–204.Google Scholar
Ensor, J. (2011). Uncertain futures: adapting development to a changing climate. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.Google Scholar
Fabricius, C., and Cundill, G. (2014). Learning in adaptive management: insights from published practice. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, C., and Currie, B. (2015). Adaptive co-management. In Allen, C.R. and Garmestani, A.S. (Eds.), Adaptive management of social–ecological systems (pp. 147–179). Dordrecht: Springer Science Business Media.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating public policy. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., et al. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. The Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government Scientific Background Paper, Stockholm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.Google Scholar
Ford, R.M., and Williams, K.J.H. (2016). How can social acceptability research in Australian forests inform social licence to operate? Forestry, 89, 512–524.Google Scholar
Gallopin, G.C. (1991). Human dimensions of global change: linking the global and the local processes. International Social Science Journal, 130, 707–718.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. (2004). Representation, community leadership and participation: neighbourhood renewal and local governance. Prepared for the Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
Gray, T.N.E., Crouthers, R., Ramesh, K., et al. (2017). A framework for assessing readiness for tiger Panthera tigris reintroduction: a case study from eastern Cambodia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 2383–2399.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, R.J., Wood, K.A., Redpath, S.M., and Young, J.C. (2016). Conservation conflicts: future research challenges. In Mateo, R., Arroyo, B., and Garcia, J.T. (Eds.), Current trends in wildlife research (Vol. 1, pp. 267–282). Wildlife Research Monologues. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Harrison, C., and Burgess, J. (2000). Valuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9, 1115–1130.Google Scholar
Hegger, D., Lamers, M., Van Zeijl-Rozema, A., and Dieperink, C. (2012). Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environmental Science and Policy, 18, 52–65.Google Scholar
Hockings, M., Dudley, N., MacKinnon, K., Whitten, T., and Leverington, F. (2003). Reporting progress in protected areas: a site-level management effectiveness tracking tool. Washington, DC: World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, M., and Gupta, J. (2015). The split ladder of participation: a diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary. Environmental Science and Policy, 50, 100–113.Google Scholar
IUCN/SSC. (2013). Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. Version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Species Survival Commission.Google Scholar
Jung, T.S. (2017). Extralimital movements of reintroduced bison (Bison bison): implications for potential range expansion and human–wildlife conflict. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 62(3), 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, D.A., Martin, T.G., McDonald-Madden, E., and Walters, C. (2011). Uncertainty and adaptive management for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 144, 1175–1178.Google Scholar
Kendal, D., and Ford, R.M. (2018). The role of social license in conservation. Conservation Biology, 32, 493–495.Google Scholar
Lacey, J., and Lamont, J. (2014). Using social contract to inform social licence to operate: an application in the Australian coal seam gas industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 831–839.Google Scholar
Marzano, M., Dandy, N., Allen, W., et al. (2017). The role of the social sciences and economics in understanding and informing tree biosecurity policy and planning: a global synthesis. Biological Invasions, 19(11), 3317–3332.Google Scholar
McCool, S.F., Guthrie, K., and Smith, J.K. (2000). Building consensus: legitimate hope or seductive paradox? USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. (2002). Beyond resolution: what does conflict transformation actually transform? Peace and Conflict Studies, 9(1), Article 1.Google Scholar
Moffat, K., Lacey, J., Zhang, A., and Leipold, S. (2016). The social licence to operate: a critical review. Forestry, 89, 477–488.Google Scholar
Nilsson, D., Baxter, G., Butler, J.R.A., Wich, S.A., and McAlpine, C.A. (2016a). How do community-based conservation programs in developing countries change human behaviour? A realist synthesis. Biological Conservation, 200, 93–103.Google Scholar
Nilsson, D., Gramotnev, G., Baxter, G., Butler, J.R.A., Wich, S.A., and McAlpine, C.A. (2016b). What motivates communities in developing countries to adopt conservation behaviours? A Sumatran orangutan case study. Conservation Biology, 30(4), 816–826.Google Scholar
Nogués-Bravo, D., Simberloff, D., Rahbek, C., and Sanders, N.J. (2016). Rewilding is the new Pandora’s box in conservation. Current Biology, 26, R83–R101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, L., Marzano, M., and White, R.W. (2013). Participatory interdisciplinarity: towards the integration of disciplinary diversity with stakeholder engagement for new models of knowledge production. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), 51–61.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, E. (2014). The reintroduction of the white-tailed sea eagle to Ireland: people and wildlife. Land Use Policy, 38, 129–137.Google Scholar
Ojha, H.R., Ford, R., Keenan, R.J., et al. (2016). Delocalizing communities: changing forms of community engagement in natural resources governance. World Development, 87, 274–290.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 75–90.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L.H., Carpenter, S.R., et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 18.Google Scholar
Oteros-Rozas, E., Martín-López, B., Daw, T., et al. (2015). Participatory scenario-planning in place-based social–ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies. Ecology and Society, 20(4), 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J.R., and Kemp, D. (2013). Social licence and mining: a critical perspective. Resources Policy, 38, 29–35.Google Scholar
Parsons, R., and Moffat, K. (2014). Constructing the meaning of social licence. Social Epistemology, 28, 340–363.Google Scholar
Pasha, M.K.S., Stolton, S., Baltzer, M., and Belecky, M. (2014). Conservation Assured|Tiger Standards (CA|TS): A Multifunctional Protected Area Management Tool to Aid Implementation of International Conventions, Multilateral Treaties, Global Initiatives and National Action. Conservation Assured, Petaling Jaya.Google Scholar
Phillipson, J., and Lowe, P. (2006). The scoping of an interdisciplinary research agenda. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 163–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, R. (2009). The adaptive co-management process: an initial synthesis of representative models and influential variables. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 24.Google Scholar
Plummer, R., and Armitage, D.R. (2007). A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics, 61, 62–74.Google Scholar
Plummer, R., Crona, B., Armitage, D.R., Olsson, P., Tengö, M., and Yudina, O. (2012). Adaptive co-management: a systematic review and analysis. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 11.Google Scholar
Plummer, R., Baird, J., Dzyundzyak, A., Armitage, D., Bodin, O., and Schultz, L. (2017). Is adaptive co-management delivering? Examining relationships between collaboration, learning and outcomes in UNESCO Biosphere Reserves. Ecological Economics, 140, 79–88.Google Scholar
Pratt Miles, J.D. (2013). Designing collaborative processes for adaptive management: four structures for multi-stakeholder collaboration. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 5.Google Scholar
Primmer, E., and Kyllonen, S. (2006). Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 838–853.Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., and Miall, H. (2014). Contemporary conflict resolution. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Redpath, S., Young, J., Evely, A., et al. (2013). Understanding and managing conflicts in biodiversity conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(2), 100–109.Google Scholar
Redpath, S., Linnell, J., Festa-Bianchet, M., et al. (2017). Don’t forget to look down – collaborative approaches to predator conservation. Biological Reviews, 92(4), 2157–2163.Google Scholar
Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., et al. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933–1949.Google Scholar
Renn, O. (2006). Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy, 23, 34–43.Google Scholar
Rist, L., Felton, A., Samuelsson, L., Sandstrom, C., and Rosvall, O. (2013). A new paradigm for adaptive management. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, A., Colas, B., Guigon, I., et al. (2015). Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: a demographic assessment. Animal Conservation, 18, 397–406.Google Scholar
Roche, C., and Bice, S. (2013). Anticipating social and community impacts of deep sea mining. In Baker, E. and Beaudoin, Y. (Eds.), Deep sea minerals: deep sea minerals and the green economy (Vol. 2, pp. 59–80). Fiji: Secretariat of the Pacific Community.Google Scholar
Schultz, L., Folke, C., and Olsson, P. (2007). Enhancing ecosystem management through social–ecological inventories. Lessons learned from Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve. Environmental Conservation, 34, 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillitoe, P. (1998). The development of indigenous knowledge. Current Anthropology, 39, 223–252.Google Scholar
Smedstad, J.A., and Gosnell, H. (2013). Do adaptive co-management processes lead to adaptive co-management outcomes? A multi-case study of long-term outcomes associated with the National Riparian Service Team’s place-based riparian assistance. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 8.Google Scholar
Soulé, M., and Noss, R. (1998). Rewilding and biodiversity: complementary goals for continental conservation. Wild Earth, 8, 19–28.Google Scholar
Stone-Jovicich, S. (2015). Probing the interfaces between the social sciences and social–ecological resilience: insights from integrative and hybrid perspectives in the social sciences. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 25.Google Scholar
Stringer, L.C., Dougill, A.J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., and Reed, M.S. (2006). Unpacking ‘participation’ in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 39.Google Scholar
Sutton, A.E. (2015). Leadership and management influences the outcome of wildlife reintroduction programs: findings from the Sea Eagle Recovery Project. PeerJ, doi: 10.7717/peerj.1012Google Scholar
UNCED. (1992). Agenda 21: Programme for Action for Sustainable Development. United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, June 1992.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworldGoogle Scholar
Vogel, I. (2012). Review of the use of ‘Theory of Change’ in international development. Report for the UK Department for International Development.Google Scholar
Walker, B.H. (1992). Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 18–23.Google Scholar
Walker, B.H., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.C., and Kinzig, A.P. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 9, 5.Google Scholar
Walker, B.H., Anderies, J.M., Kinzig, A.P., and Ryan, P. (2006). Exploring resilience in social–ecological systems: comparative studies and theory development. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Wiens, J.A., and Hobbs, R.J. (2015). Integrating conservation and restoration in a changing world. BioScience, 65, 302–312.Google Scholar
Williams, B.K., Szaro, R.C., and Shapiro, C.D. (2009). Adaptive management: the US Department of the Interior technical guide. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Yen, S.-C., Chen, K.H., Wang, Y., and Wang, C.-P. (2015). Residents’ attitudes toward reintroduced sika deer in Kenting National Park, Taiwan. Wildlife Biology, 21(4), 220–226.Google Scholar
Young, J., Marzano, M., White, R.M., et al. (2010). The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: characteristics and management strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(14), 3973–3990.Google Scholar
Young, J., Butler, J.R.A., Jordan, A., and Watt, A.D. (2012). Less government intervention in biodiversity management: risks and opportunities. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(4), 1095–1100.Google Scholar
Young, J.C., Thompson, D., Moore, P., MacGugan, A., Watt, A.D., and Redpath, S.M. (2016). A conflict management tool for conservation agencies. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(3), 705–711.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×