Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:32:09.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2024

Mitsuaki Shimojo
Mitsuaki Shimojo
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Salience of Information in Japanese
Discourse and the Syntax–Pragmatics Interface
 , pp. 247 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akiguchi, Madoka, and Jeong, Hyunhee. 2002. Shokyuu chuukyuu no nihongo gakushuusha no bunshoo hyoogen ni tsuite: chuugokujin ryuugakusee kankokujin ryuugakusee no jiree (On written expressions by beginning and intermediate-level Japanese language learners: a case study of Chinese and Korean international students). Journal of the International Support Center 5: 51–19. Niigata University.Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura. 2009. Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Alfonso, Anthony. 1966. Japanese Language Patterns. Tokyo: Sophia University Press.Google Scholar
Amazaki, Osamu. 2006. A functional analysis of numeral quantifier constructions in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas. 1999. Discourse and the focus/background distinction. In Bosch, P. and van der Sandt, R., eds., Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 247–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, Keira Gebbie. 2004. Givenness as a ranking criterion in Centering Theory: evidence from Yapese. Oceanic Linguistics 43, 49–72.Google Scholar
Balogh, Kata. 2021. Additive particle uses in Hungarian: a Role and Reference Grammar account. Studies in Language 45, 428–69.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 1999. Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: a research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning 49(4): 677–713.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia. 2023. The RRG approach to information structure. In Bentley, Delia, Usón, Ricardo Mairal, Nakamura, Wataru, and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Role and Reference Grammar, 456–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bower, Keith M. 2003. When to use Fisher’s exact test. American Society for Quality, Six Sigma Forum Magazine 2(4), 35–7.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5th ed. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Michiko Todokoro. 2007. VP ellipsis in Japanese. BLS 33, 31–43.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 2007. Notes towards an incremental implementation of the Role and Reference Grammar semantics-to-syntax linking algorithm for English. In Hannay, Mike and Steen, Gerard J., eds., Structural-Functional Studies in English Grammar: In Honour of Lachlan Mackenzie, 275–307. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S., and Gonzálvez-García, Francisco. 2014. Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Buysse, Manon. 2015. Clause linking in L2 English: the interaction between syntax and semantics. EuroSLA Yearbook 15(1), 41–68.Google Scholar
Buysse, Manon, Housen, Alex, and Pierrard, Michel. 2018. A Role and Reference Grammar account of clause linkage development in second language: an application to English and French. Studia Linguistica 72(2), 472–508.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1974. Language and consciousness. Language 50, 111–33.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles, ed., Subject and Topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, 1979. The flow of thought and the flow of language. In Givón, Talmy, ed., Discourse and Syntax, 159–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, R., ed., Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Danielewicz, Jane. 1987. Properties of written and spoken language. In Horowitz, Rosalind and Jay Samuels, S., eds., Comprehending Oral and Written Language, 83–113. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, Craig, and Parker, Kate. 1990. Discourse markedness and structural markedness: the acquisition of English noun phrases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ping. 1984. A Discourse Analysis of Third Person Zero Anaphora in Chinese. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Chiarcos, Christian. 2009. Mental salience and grammatical form: toward a framework for salience metrics in natural language generation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Cho, Sungdai, and Whitman, John. 2020. Korean: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Hye-Won. 1999. Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clamons, C. Robin, Mulkern, Ann E., and Sanders, Gerald. 1993. Salience signaling in Oromo. Journal of Pragmatics 19, 519–36.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1980. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In Chafe, W. L., ed., The Pear Stories, 127–202. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1982. Written and spoken style in Japanese narratives. In Tannen, D., ed., Spoken and Written Language, 55–76. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 2020. To link or not to link: clause chaining in Japanese narratives. Frontiers in Psychology 10, Article 3008.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., and Downing, Pamela. 1987. The use of wa as a cohesion marker in Japanese oral narratives. In Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko K., and Iwasaki, Shoichi, eds., Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese WA, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Brennan, Susan E.. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Resnick, Lauren B., Levine, John M., and Teasley, Stephanie D., eds., Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 127–49. Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 2008a. Socializing Identities through Speech Style: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 2008b. Style shifts in Japanese academic consultations. In Jones, K. and Ono, T., eds., Style Shifting in Japanese, 9–38. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 2016. Adult L2 learners’ acquisition of style shift: the masu and plain forms. In Minami, Masahiko, ed., Handbook of Japanese Applied Linguistics, 151–73. Boston and Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. 1973. Introducing Applied Linguistics. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deane, Paul D. 1991. Limits to attention: a cognitive theory of island constraints. Cognitive Linguistics 2, 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, Paul D. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Di Eugenio, Barbara. 1998. Centering in Italian. In Walker, Marilyn A., Joshi, Aravind K., and Prince, Ellen F., eds., Centering Theory in Discourse, 115–37. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon et al. 1980. On the typology of focus phenomena. GLOT: Leids taalkundig bulletin 3, 41–74.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela. 1996. Numeral Classifier Systems: The Case of Japanese. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 1996. Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 475–523.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin, ed. 1995. Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Mariam, and Bodman., Jean W. 1986. “I very appreciate”: expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics 7, 167–85.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax–Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fakhri, Ahmed. 1989. Variation in the use of referential forms. In Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D., and Selinker, L., eds., Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Vol. II. Psycholinguistic Issues, 189–201. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Falk, Simone. 2014. On the notion of salience in spoken discourse: prominence cues shaping discourse structure and comprehension. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage 30, 1–23.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2007. Reformulation and common grounds. In Fetzer, Anita and Fischer, Kerstin, eds., Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, 157–79. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2018. Discourse analysis. In Jucker, A. H., Schneider, K. P., and Bublitz, W., eds., Methods in Pragmatics, 395–423. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fry, John. 2003. Ellipsis and Wa-Marking in Japanese Conversation. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fujii, Noriko, and Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2000. The occurrence and non-occurrence of the Japanese direct object marker o in conversation. Studies in Language 24, 1–39.Google Scholar
Fujii, Yoko. 1991. Reversed word order in Japanese: a discourse-pragmatic analysis. Gengo Kenkyu 99, 58–81.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Kazuhiko. 2003. Verb-raising and numeral classifiers in Japanese: incompatible bedfellows. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12, 313–47.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Alex. 2011. “I prefer not text”: developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning 61(3), 786–819.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. In Givón, Talmy, ed., Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study, 4–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1988. The pragmatics of word-order: predictability, importance and attention. In Hammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith A., and Wirth, Jessica R., eds., Studies in Syntactic Typology, 243–84. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1993. Coherence in text, coherence in mind. Pragmatics & Cognition 1, 171–227.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry, eds., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III. Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara, Joshi, Aravind K., and Weinstein, Scott. 1995. Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21(2), 203–25.Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., and Sidner, Candace L.. 1986. Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3), 175–204.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E., and Wirth, J., eds., Studies in Linguistic Typology, 209–39. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Headberg, Nancy, and Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69, 274–307.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Stenson, Nancy, and Tarone, Elaine. 1984. Acquiring pronouns in a second language: evidence for hypothesis testing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2), 215–25.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2008. Types of focus in English. In Lee, Chungmin and Gordon, Matthew, eds., Topic and Focus: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Haig, John H. 1981. Particle retention in propredicated and cleft sentences. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 16(1), 7–29.Google Scholar
Hamada, Morio. 1983. Referential choices in theme, subject, and ellipsis in written narrative discourse: a case study of Japanese folktales. Master’s thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1996. A study of Japanese Clause Linkage: The Connective TE in Japanese. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2002. Speech-style shifts and intimate exaltation in Japanese. Paper presented at the 38th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2015. Japanese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yuri. 1993. Hanashi kotoba ni okeru “mujoshi” no kinoo (The function of the null particle in the spoken language). Nihongo kyooiku 80, 158–68.Google Scholar
Hatasa, Yukiko Abe, Hatasa, Kazumi, and Makino, Seiichi. 2015. Nakama 1: Introductory Japanese: Communication, Culture, Context, 3rd ed. Stamford, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Heusinger, Klaus von. 1999. Intonation and information structure. Habilitationschrift, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Hinds, John. 1982. Ellipsis in Japanese. Edmonton, AB: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Hinds, John. 1983. Topic continuity in Japanese. In Talmy, Givón, ed., Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study, 43–93. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hinds, John. 1984. Topic maintenance in Japanese narratives and Japanese conversational interaction. Discourse Processes 7, 465–82.Google Scholar
Hinds, John. 1987. Thematization, assumed familiarity, staging, and syntactic binding in Japanese. In Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko K., and Iwasaki, Shoichi, eds., Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese WA, 83–106. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hinds, John, and Hinds, Wako. 1979. Participant identification in Japanese narrative discourse. In Bedell, George, Kobayashi, Eichi, and Muraki, Masatake, eds., Explorations in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Kazuko Inoue, 201–12. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko K., and Iwasaki, Shoichi, eds. 1987. Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese WA. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Beryl. 1998. Word order, information structure, and centering in Turkish. In Walker, Marilyn A., Joshi, Aravind K., and Prince, Ellen F., eds., Centering Theory in Discourse, 253–71. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hoji, Hajime. 1998. Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 127–52.Google Scholar
Hudson, Mutsuko E. 1993. Processing constraints on Japanese postposing. Paper presented at the 4th International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
Hudson, Mutsuko E. 2011. Students’ honorific usage in conversation with professors. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 3689–706.Google Scholar
Ijuin, Ikuko. 2004. Bogowasha niyoru bamen ni oojita supiichi sutairu no tsukaiwake: bogobamen to sesshokubamen no sooi (A comparison of speech style adaptation between native situations and contact situations). Japanese Journal of Language in Society 6(2), 12–26.Google Scholar
Ikuta, Shoko. 1983. Speech level shift and conversational strategy in Japanese discourse. Language Sciences 5, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Kazuko. 1978. Nihongo no bunpoo kisoku (The Grammatical Rules of Japanese). Tokyo: TaishukanGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Kazuko. 1979. Hurui joohoo, atarashii joohoo (Old Information, new Information). Gekkan Gengo 8(10), 22–34.Google Scholar
Inoue, Kazuko. 1983. Bun no setsuzoku (Sentence connection). In Inoue, K., ed., Kooza gendai no gengo I: nihongo no kihon koozoo (Modern Languages I: The Basic Structure of Japanese), 127–51. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Ishihara, Noriko and Tarone, Elaine. 2009. Subjectivity and pragmatic choice in L2 Japanese: emulating and resisting pragmatic norms. In Taguchi, Naoko, ed., Pragmatic Competence, 101–28. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Noriko. 2011. Learning L2 Japanese “politeness” and “impoliteness”: young American men’s dilemmas during study abroad. Japanese Language and Literature 45(1), 67–106.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1987. Identifiability, scope-setting, and the particle wa: a study of Japanese spoken expository discourse. In Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko K., and Iwasaki, Shoichi, eds., Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese WA, 107–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2002. Japanese. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese, revised ed. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 2001. The dimensions of topic-comment. Linguistics 39(4), 641–81.Google Scholar
Kameyama, Megumi. 1985. Zero anaphora: the case of Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kameyama, Megumi. 1998. Intra-sentential centering: a case study. In Walker, M. A., Joshi, A. K., and Prince, E. F., eds., Centering Theory in Discourse, 89–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kamide, Yuki. 2006. Incrementality in Japanese sentence processing. In Nakayama, Mineharu, Mazuka, Reiko, and Shirai, Yasuhiro, eds., The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: Japanese, 249–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, and Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriere, and Dahl, Merete. 1991. Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, 215–47.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriere, and Schmidt, Richard. 1996. Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 149–69.Google Scholar
Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak. 1995. Word order at the noun phrase level in Japanese: quantifier constructions and discourse functions. In Downing, Pamela, ed., Word Order in Discourse, 199–246. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kim, Ilkyu. 2015. Is Korean -(n)un a topic marker? On the nature of -(n)un and its relation to information structure. Lingua 154, 87–109.Google Scholar
Koizumi, Masatoshi. 2000. String vacuous overt verb raising. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9, 227–85.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire. 2006. From communicative competence to symbolic competence. Modern Language Journal 90, 249–52.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire, and Whiteside, Anne. 2008. Language ecology in multilingual settings: towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics 29, 645–71.Google Scholar
Kumpf, Lorraine E. 1992. Preferred argument in second language discourse: a preliminary study. Studies in Language 16(2), 369–403.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1972. Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3, 269–320.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1978a. Danwa no bunpoo (The Grammar of Discourse). Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1978b. Japanese: a characteristic OV language. In Lehmann, W., ed., Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, 57–138. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1995. Null elements in parallel structures in Japanese. In Mazuka, Reiko and Nagai, Noriko, eds., Japanese Sentence Processing, 209–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu, and Kaburaki, Etsuko. 1977. Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 627–72.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Shigeyuki. 1980. Bunkoozoo no hikaku (Comparison of sentence structures). In Kunihiro, T., ed., Nichieigo Hikaku Kooza 2: Bunpoo (Japanese–English Comparative Studies 2: Grammar), 23–62. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 2005. Focusing on the matter of topic: a study of wa and ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14, 1–58.Google Scholar
Kurokawa, Naoko. 2007. Repetition in Japanese conversation in discourse. ICU Studies in Japanese Language Education 3, 65–79.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1986. Topic, focus and the grammar of spoken French. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1987. Sentence focus, information structure, and the thetic–categorial distinction. BLS 13, 366–82.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: A Theory of Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 2000. When subjects behave like objects: a markedness analysis of sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language 24, 611–82.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Latrouite, Anja and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2023. Information structure and argument linking. In Bentley, Delia, Usón, Ricardo Mairal, Nakamura, Wataru, and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Role and Reference Grammar, 488–522. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Duck-Young. 2002. The function of the zero particle with special reference to spoken Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 645–82.Google Scholar
Lee, EunHee, and Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2016. Mismatch of topic between Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25(1), 81–112.Google Scholar
Lee, Kiri. 2002. Nominative case-marker deletion in spoken Japanese: an analysis from the perspective of information structure. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 683–709.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra. A. 1979. Third person pronouns and zero anaphora in Chinese discourse. In Givón, Talmy, ed., Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and Syntax, 311–35. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, Naicong, and Zubin, David A.. 1995. Discourse continuity and perspective taking. In Duchan, Judith F., Bruder, Gail A., Hewitt, Lynne E., eds., Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, 287–307. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McGloin, Naomi Hanaoka. 1987. The role of wa in negation. In Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko K., and Iwasaki, Shoichi, eds., Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese WA, 165–83. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McGloin, Naomi Hanaoka. 1990. The pragmatics of object topicalization in Japanese. In Kamada, O. and Jacobsen, W. M., eds., On Japanese and How to Teach It: In Honor of Seiichi Makino, 111–20. Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar
Machi, Saeko. 2021. Cross-speaker repetition in Japanese: the development of conversation and participant relationships. Ph.D. dissertation, Japan Women’s University.Google Scholar
Makino, Seiichi. 1982. Japanese grammar and functional grammar. Lingua 57, 125–73.Google Scholar
Makino, Seiichi. 2002. When does communication turn mentally inward? A case study of Japanese formal-to-informal switching. In Akatsuka, Noriko and Strauss, Susan, eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics: Vol. 10, 121–35. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Makino, Seiichi, Osamu, Kamada, Hiroyuki, Yamauchi, Mariko, Saito, Chikako, Ogiwara, Tokumi, Ito, Miyoko, Ikezaki, and Kazuko, Nakajima. 2001. ACTFL-OPI nyuumon: nihongo gakushuusha no “hanasu chikara” o kyakkantekini hakaru (Introduction to the ACTFL OPI: Objective Assessment of Japanese Learners’ Speaking Competence). Tokyo: ALC.Google Scholar
Maruyama, Naoko. 1996. Joshi no datsuraku genshoo (The phenomenon of particle drop). Gekkan gengo 25, 74–80.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Masuda, Mariko. 2001. Danwa tenkai gata rentaisetsu: “okotta oya wa kodomo o shikatta” toiu iikata (On the discourse function of a type of non-restrictive relative clause in Japanese). Journal of Japanese Language Teaching 109, 50–59.Google Scholar
Masunaga, Kiyoko. 1988. Case deletion and discourse context. In Poser, W. J., ed., Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, 145–56. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Kenjiroo. 1995. Variable zero-marking of (o) in Tokyo Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Matsumura, Yoshiko, and Chinami, Kyoko. 1998. Nihongo danwa ni okeru sutairu kootai no jittai to sono kooka (The actual state and effect of style shifting in Japanese discourse). Gengokagaku 33, 109–18.Google Scholar
Matsushita, Daizaburo. 1930. Hyoojun nihon koogohoo (The Standard Colloquial Japanese). Reprinted in 1977. Tokyo: Benseisha.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1980. Discourse functions of the Japanese theme marker – wa. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1987. Thematization as a staging device in the Japanese narrative. In Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko K., and Iwasaki, Shoichi, eds., Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese WA, 57–82. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1989. Japanese Conversation: Self-Contextualization through Structure and Interactional Management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1990. Conversation management in contrast: listener response in Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 14, 397–412.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1991. Pragmatics of discourse modality: a case of da and desu/masu forms in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 15, 551–82.Google Scholar
Mazuka, Reiko, and Itoh, Kenji. 1995. Can Japanese speakers be led down the garden path? In Mazuka, Reiko, and Nagai, Noriko, eds., Japanese Sentence Processing, 295–329. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mikami, Akira. 1963. Nihongo no ronri: wa to ga (The Logic of the Japanese Language: Wa and Ga). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Mayu. 2019. Capturing L2 oral proficiency with CAF measures as predictors of the ACTFL OPI rating. Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, Satoko. 2015. Nihongo bogowasha oyobi nihongo gakushuusha niyoru dooshi chuushikee no shiyoo jookyoo: YNU kakikotoba koopasu no choosa o tsuujite (Usage conditions of the continuative form of verb by Japanese native speakers and Japanese-language learners: analysis of the YNU Corpus). Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 39, 179–94.Google Scholar
Mulkern, Ann Elizabeth. 2003. Cognitive status, discourse salience, and information structure: evidence from Irish and Oromo. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Mulkern, Ann Elizabeth. 2007. Knowing who’s important: relative discourse salience and Irish pronominal forms. In Hedberg, Nancy A. and Zacharski, Ron, eds., The Grammar–Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette K. Gundel, 113–42. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Natsuko, Asao, Yoshihiko, and Nagaya, Naonori. 2008. Information structure and intonation of right-dislocation sentences in Japanese. Kyoto University Linguistic Research 27, 1–22.Google Scholar
Nakahama, Yuko. 2003. Development of reference management in L2 Japanese: silent film retelling task. Studies in Language and Culture 25(1), 127–46.Google Scholar
Nakahama, Yuko. 2011. Referent Markings in L2 Narratives: Effects of Task Complexity, Learners’ L1 and Proficiency Level. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Nakaiwa, Hiromi, Shirai, Satoshi, Iehara, Satoru, and Kawaoka, Tsukasa. 1995. Extrasentential resolution of Japanese zero pronouns using semantic and pragmatic constraints. AAAI ’95 Spring Symposium, 99–105.Google Scholar
Nariyama, Shigeko. 2003. Ellipsis and Reference Tracking in Japanese. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nemser, William. 1971. Approximative systems of foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics 9, 115–24.Google Scholar
Kenkyuukai, Nihongo Kijutsu Bunpoo. 2008. Gendai nihongo bunpoo 6: Fukubun (Modern Japanese Grammar 6: Complex Clauses). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Niwa, Tetsuya. 1989. Mujoshikaku no kinoo (The function of the zero particle). Kokugo kokubun 58, 38–57.Google Scholar
Obana, Yasuko. 2003. Anaphoric choices in Japanese fictional novels: the discourse arrangement of noun phrases, zero and third person pronouns. Text 23(3), 405–43.Google Scholar
Oku, Satoshi. 1998. LF copy analysis of Japanese null arguments. Chicago Linguistic Society 34, 299–314.Google Scholar
Okugawa, Ikuko. 2011. Monogatari danwa ni okeru rentai shuushokusetsu: nihongo bogowasha to cyuugokujin gakushuusha no sakubun hikaku (Relative clauses in story narratives: a comparative study between native Japanese speakers and Chinese learners of Japanese). Japanese Language Teaching 55, 129–42.Google Scholar
Ono, Hideichi. 1973. Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: Hokuseido Press.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Suzuki, Ryoko. 1992. Word order variability in Japanese conversation: motivations and grammaticization. Text 12, 429–45.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Thompson, Sandra A., and Suzuki, Ryoko. 2000. The pragmatic nature of the so-called subject marker ga in Japanese: evidence from conversation. Discourse Studies 2, 55–84.Google Scholar
Otani, Hiromi. 1995. Wa to ga to Ø: wa mo ga mo tukaenai bun (Wa, ga, and Ø: sentences in which wa or ga cannot be used). In Miyajima, T. and Nita, Y., eds., Nihongo ruiji hyoogen no bunpoo: tanbun hen (Japanese Grammar of Similar Expressions: Simple Sentences), 287–95. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Otani, Kazuyo, and Whitman, John. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 345–58.Google Scholar
Peng, F. C. C. 1977. Josei gengo no chiikisa, nendaisa to kojinsa: toshika ni yoru ikkoosatsu (Regional, generational, and individual variations in women’s language: a study in terms of urbanization). In Peng, F. C. C., ed., Language and Context, 73–112. Tokyo: Bunka Hyoron.Google Scholar
Poesio, Massimo, Stevenson, Rosemary, Di Eugenio, Barbara and Hitzeman, Janet. 2004. Centering: a parametric theory and its instantiations. Computational Linguistics 30(3), 309–63.Google Scholar
Polio, Charlene. 1995. Acquiring nothing? The use of zero pronouns by nonnative speakers of Chinese and the implications for the acquisition of nominal reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, 353–77.Google Scholar
Prat-Sala, Mercè, and Branigan, Holly P.. 2000. Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: a cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 42, 168–82.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981a. Topicalization, focus movement and Yiddish movement: a pragmatic differentiation. BLS 7, 249–64.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981b. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, P., ed., Radical Pragmatics, 223–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1992. The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Mann, William C. and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17, 409–41.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rangkupan, Suda. 2007. The syntax and semantics of GIVE-complex constructions in Thai. Language and Linguistics 8(1), 193–234.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Sakoda, Kumiko. 2016. Errors and learning strategies by learners of Japanese as a second language. In Minami, Masahiko, ed., Handbook of Japanese Applied Linguistics, 129–50. Boston and Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Sato, Manami, Schafer, Amy J., and Bergen, Benjamin K.. 2013. One word at a time: mental representations of object shape change incrementally during sentence processing. Language and Cognition 5(4), 345–73.Google Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10(3), 209–31.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet. 1983. Subject ellipsis and topic in Japanese. In Kitagawa, Chisato and Miyagawa, Shigeru, eds., Studies in Japanese Language Use, 233–65. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet. 1985. Japanese Women’s Language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 1995. Focus structure and morphosyntax in Japanese: wa and ga, and word order flexibility. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2004. Quantifier float and information processing: a case study from Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 375–406.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2005. Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2008. How missing is the missing verb? The verb-less numeral quantifier construction in Japanese. In Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., ed., Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface, 285–304. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2009. Focus structure and beyond: discourse-pragmatics in RRG. In Guerrero Valenzuela, Lilián, Ibáñez, Sergio, and Belloro, Valeria A., eds., Studies in Role and Reference Grammar, 75–95. México: The IIFL-UNAM Press.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2011. The left periphery and focus structure in Japanese. In Nakamura, Wataru, ed., New Perspectives in Role and Reference Grammar, 266–93. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2016. Saliency in discourse and sentence form: zero anaphora and topicalization in Japanese. In Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest, M. M. and Van Valin, Robert Jr., eds., Information Structure and Spoken Language in a Cross-linguistic Perspective, 55–75. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2018. Kadai kaiketsugatakaiwa ni okeru supiichi sutairu shifuto: nihongo bogowasha to nihongo gakushuusha no hikaku (Speech style shifting in problem-solving discourse: a comparison of native Japanese speakers and learners of Japanese). Proceedings of CAJLE 2018: The Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Japanese Language Education, 244–53.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith and Selby, Henry, eds., Meaning in Anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Mutsuko E. 1989. An analysis of the postposing construction in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1964. Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria 30, 96–118.Google Scholar
Strube, Michael, and Hahn, Udo. 1999. Functional centering: grounding referential coherence in informational structure. Computational Linguistics 25(3), 309–44.Google Scholar
Surányi, Balázs. 2016. Discourse-configurationality. In Féry, Caroline and Ishihara, Shinichiro, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, 422–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko. 1995. The functions of topic-encoding zero-marked phrases: a study of the interaction among topic-encoding expressions in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 23, 607–26.Google Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko. 2009. Pragmatic competence in Japanese as a second language: an introduction. In Taguchi, Naoko, ed., Pragmatic Competence, 1–18. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Takagi, Tomoyo. 2002. Contextual resources for inferring unexpressed referents in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics 12, 153–82.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Minako, Yabe, Hiroko, and Honda, Akiko. 2017. Daisansha gengo sesshoku bamen ni okeru supiichi reberu shifuto no kinoo: nihongo gakushuusha dooshi no shizendanwa no bunseki kara (Functions of speech level shifts in third-party language contact situation: an analysis of natural discourse among learners of Japanese). Kotoba 38, 46–62.Google Scholar
Takami, Ken-Ichi. 1995. Kinooteki koobunron ni yoru nichieego hikaku: Ukemibun koochibun no bunseki (A Comparison of Japanese and English in Functional Theories: An Analysis of Passive and Postposing Constructions). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Takano, Yuji. 2002. Surprising constituent. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 243–301.Google Scholar
Tanimura, Midori, and Yoshida, Etsuko. 2003. Pear Story saikoo: nichieego parareru koopasu ni okeru shijihyoogen no sentaku to sono yooin nitsuite (Reconsidering the Pear Story: the choice of referring expressions and its factors in Japanese–English parallel corpora). English Corpus Studies 10, 55–72.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1987. Repetition in conversation: toward a poetics of talk. Language 63(3), 574–605.Google Scholar
Tashiro, Hitomi. 1995. Chuujookyuu nihongo gakushuusha no bunshoo hyoogen no mondaiten: fushizensa wakarinikusa no gen-in o saguru (Problems in intermediate and advanced Japanese learners’ writing: analysis of the cause of unnaturalness and incomprehensibility). Journal of Japanese Language Teaching 85, 25–37.Google Scholar
Tominaga, Waka. 2014. Validating the scoring inference of the Japanese OPI ratings: the use of extended turns, connective expressions, and discourse organization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 1998. The laziest pronouns. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7, 515–31.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russel S. 1990. Functionalism in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 155–77.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russel S. 1995. Focal attention, voice, and word order: an experimental, cross-linguistic study. In Downing, Pamela and Noonan, Michael, eds., Word Order in Discourse, 517–54. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1987. Apology strategies in natives/non-natives. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 147–67.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Michio. 1984. Particle ellipses in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Turan, Ümit Deniz. 1998. Ranking forward-looking centers in Turkish: universal and language-specific properties. In Walker, Marilyn A., Joshi, Aravind K., and Prince, Ellen F., eds., Centering Theory in Discourse, 139–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Usami, Mayumi. 1995. Danwa-reberu kara mita keigo shiyoo: supiichi-reberu-shifuto seiki no jooken to kinoo (Conditions for speech-level shift occurrence in Japanese discourse). Gakuen 662, 27–42.Google Scholar
Usami, Mayumi. 2020. Shizen kaiwa bunseki e no goyooronteki apuroochi: BTSJ koopasu o riyooshite (Pragmatic Approaches to the Analysis of Spontaneous Conversations: Based on the BTSJ Natural Conversation Corpus). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1981. Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In Tannen, Deborah, ed., Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, 177–95. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1999. A typology of the interaction of focus structure and syntax. In Raxilina, Ekatarina and Testelec, Yakov G., eds., Typology and Linguistic Theory: From Description to Explanation, 511–24. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2001. The acquisition of complex sentences: a case study in the role of theory in the study of language development. In Boyle, J., Lee, J.-Y., and Okrent, A., eds., Chicago Linguistic Society Parasession 36, 511–31. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2006. Semantic macroroles and language processing. In Bornkessel, Ina, Schlesewsky, Matthias, Comrie, Bernard, and Friederici, Angela D., eds., Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking, 263–301. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2008. RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories in Role and Reference Grammar. In Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., ed., Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface, 161–78. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2014. On the place of information structure in a grammar. Comunicación, Cognición, Cibernétic@. Actas del XXXI Congreso de AESLA, 86–106.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2023. Principles of Role and Reference Grammar. In Bentley, Delia, Usón, Ricardo Mairal, Nakamura, Wataru, and Van Valin, Robert D., Jr., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Role and Reference Grammar, 17–177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr., and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning & Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Marilyn, Iida, Masayo, and Cote, Sharon. 1994. Japanese discourse and the process of centering. Computational Linguistics 20(2), 193–232.Google Scholar
Walker, Marilyn, Joshi, Aravind, and Prince, Ellen. 1998. Centering in naturally occurring discourse: an overview. In Walker, Marilyn A., Joshi, Aravind K., and Prince, Ellen F., eds., Centering Theory in Discourse, 1–28. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Noriko. 1990. WA and GA: from the perspective of the deictic center in discourse. In Hoji, Hajime, ed. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 129–40. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Yasuko. 1989. The function of wa and ga in Japanese discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Yasuko. 1994. Clause-chaining, switch-reference and action/event continuity in Japanese discourse: the case of te, to and zero-conjunction. Studies in Language 18, 127–203.Google Scholar
White, Lydia. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Lydia. 2015. Linguistic theory, universal grammar, and second language acquisition. In VanPattern, Bill and Williams, Jessica, eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 2nd ed., 34–53. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, Jessica. 1989. Pronoun copies, pronominal anaphora and zero anaphora in second language production. In Gass, Susan, Madden, Carolyn, Preston, Dennis, and Selinker, Larry, eds., Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Vol. I. Discourse and Pragmatics, 153–89. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Yabuki-Soh, Noriko. 2013. Nihongo gakushuusha bogowasha niyoru stooriiteringu deno rentaishuushokusetsu no yoohoo (The use of noun-modifying clauses in storytelling by L2 learners and native speakers of Japanese). Gengo Bunka to Nihongo Kyooiku (Language Culture and Japanese Language Education) 46, 1–10.Google Scholar
Yagi, Kimiko. 1999. Chuukangengo ni okeru shudai no fuhenteki takuetsu: wa to ga no shuutoku kenkyuu kara no koosatsu (Universal topic-prominence in interlanguage: from the perspective of SLA research on wa and ga). Daini gengo toshiteno nihongo no shuutoku kenkyuu (Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language) 2, 57–67.Google Scholar
Yagi, Kimiko. 2000. Wa to ga no shuutoku: shokyuu gakushuusha no sakubun to forooappuintabyuu no bunseki kara (The acquisition of “wa” and “ga”: analyses of compositions written by elementary-level Japanese learners and interviews). Japanese-Language Education around the Globe: Vol. X, 91–107. Tokyo: Japan Foundation.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Toshiko. 2007. Japanese Language in Use: An Introduction. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Yamasaki, Yumi. 2005. Constituent ordering in spoken Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.Google Scholar
Yamashita, Hiroko. 2002. Scrambled sentences in Japanese: linguistic properties and motivations for production. Text 22, 597–633.Google Scholar
Yamashita, Sayoko. 1996. Formal–informal style shifting in university JSL teacher talk. Research Studies in TESOL 4, 23–54.Google Scholar
Yamura-Takei, Mitsuko. 2005. Theoretical, technological and pedagogical approaches to zero arguments in Japanese discourse: making the invisible visible. Doctoral thesis, Hiroshima City University.Google Scholar
Yamura-Takei, Mitsuko, and Fujiwara, Miho. 2007. Japanese native speakers’ intuition of ZERO use: an account by Centering theory. In Minami, Masahiko, ed., Applying Theory and Research to Learning Japanese as a Foreign Language, 213–39. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Yuko. 1985. Informational predictability and case-marking variation in Japanese. Text 5, 123–45.Google Scholar
Yanagimachi, Tomoharu. 2000. JFL learners’ referential-form choice in first- through third-person narratives. Japanese-Language Education around the Globe: Vol. X, 109–28. Tokyo: Japan Foundation.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Etsuko. 2011. Referring Expressions in English and Japanese: Patterns of Use in Dialogue Processing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Mitsuaki Shimojo, State University of New York, Buffalo
  • Book: Salience of Information in Japanese
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009421805.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Mitsuaki Shimojo, State University of New York, Buffalo
  • Book: Salience of Information in Japanese
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009421805.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Mitsuaki Shimojo, State University of New York, Buffalo
  • Book: Salience of Information in Japanese
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009421805.010
Available formats
×