Book contents
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Legal Cases
- Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties
- 1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights
- 2 Backlash in Theoretical Context
- 3 The Politics of Withdrawal
- 4 Replacing the International Justice Regime
- 5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
- 6 Doctrinal Challenges
- 7 How to Save the International Justice Regime
- Appendix Additional Human Rights Courts, Quasi-Judicial Human Rights Institutions, and International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals
- Select Bibliography
- Index
5 - Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2021
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Legal Cases
- Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties
- 1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights
- 2 Backlash in Theoretical Context
- 3 The Politics of Withdrawal
- 4 Replacing the International Justice Regime
- 5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
- 6 Doctrinal Challenges
- 7 How to Save the International Justice Regime
- Appendix Additional Human Rights Courts, Quasi-Judicial Human Rights Institutions, and International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 5 examines two subtle forms of backlash politics: bureaucratic and budgetary restrictions. Using examples from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the ICC, this chapter explains why states turn to these bureaucratic and budgetary levers to undermine international courts. By imposing bureaucratic restrictions and tightening the tribunals’ purse strings, states and political elites can undermine the structural, adjudicative, and normative authority of courts. While this form of backlash politics does not garner the same attention as withdrawals or threatened substitutions, as the case studies show, it can be equally damaging. Moreover, because of the tribunals’ abiding dependence on member states for material and staff support, it is particularly difficult for the tribunals to guard against this form of backlash.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Saving the International Justice RegimeBeyond Backlash against International Courts, pp. 112 - 132Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021