Book contents
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Legal Cases
- Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties
- 1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights
- 2 Backlash in Theoretical Context
- 3 The Politics of Withdrawal
- 4 Replacing the International Justice Regime
- 5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
- 6 Doctrinal Challenges
- 7 How to Save the International Justice Regime
- Appendix Additional Human Rights Courts, Quasi-Judicial Human Rights Institutions, and International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals
- Select Bibliography
- Index
4 - Replacing the International Justice Regime
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2021
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Legal Cases
- Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties
- 1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights
- 2 Backlash in Theoretical Context
- 3 The Politics of Withdrawal
- 4 Replacing the International Justice Regime
- 5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
- 6 Doctrinal Challenges
- 7 How to Save the International Justice Regime
- Appendix Additional Human Rights Courts, Quasi-Judicial Human Rights Institutions, and International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 4 focuses on the second manifestation of backlash politics: the creation of alternate or substitute justice mechanisms. This chapter considers how the tribunals’ dependency on member states, normative discontent, the domestic implications of international human rights and criminal adjudication, and the likelihood of future repression prompted a set of African Union (AU) member states to try to orchestrate a mass walkout of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the establishment of a new, tri-chamber AU court that would supplant – but not fully replace – the ICC’s jurisdiction. The chapter then pivots to Latin America and examines a similar effort led by Venezuela to create a UNASUR human rights court that would supplant the Inter-American Human Rights System.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Saving the International Justice RegimeBeyond Backlash against International Courts, pp. 88 - 111Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021