Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:09:35.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Peer Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2023

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Peer review is a process by which the quality, novelty and originality of scholarly works are assessed and appraised. It is an established mechanism in making decisions about the acceptance and rejection of manuscripts. As such, it also serves as a form of quality control in scholarly publishing: a peer reviewed article is a manuscript that has been vetted by subject experts in the research area. In the guidelines for good practice, Hames (2007, 2–3) suggests that peer review performs the following functions:

  • 1 prevent the publication of bad work and filter out studies that have been poorly conceived, designed or executed

  • 2 check that the research reported has been carried out well and there are no flaws in the design or methodology

  • 3 ensure that the work is reported correctly and unambiguously, with acknowledgment to the existing body of work

  • 4 ensure that the results presented have been interpreted correctly and all possible interpretations considered

  • 5 ensure that the results are not too preliminary or too speculative, but at the same time not block innovative new research and theories

  • 6 select work that will be of the greatest interest to the readership

  • 7 provide editors with evidence to make judgements as to whether articles meet the selection criteria for their particular publications

  • 8 generally improve the quality and readability of a publication.

Why should an author consider the peer-review process when choosing where to publish? It is because the peer-review process can vary for different publication types and for different publishers. It is important for an author to consider the peer-review process before submission because there are advantages and disadvantages associated with the process, depending on the author's career stage, the speed of publication and the thoroughness and openness of peer reviews. For conference proceedings and journal articles, double- and single-blind peer reviews are the most common, while open peer review and post-publication peer review have been proposed and adopted in recent years. For monographs and edited books, the peer-review process can vary from the book proposal stage to the final manuscript. Understanding the peer-review process is essential when preparing a manuscript or book proposal.

The peer-review process

The peer-review process begins with the selection of peer reviewers. Ideally, the reviewers are peers who are familiar with the theories, methodologies and methods in a subject area.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Scholarly Communication Handbook
From Research Dissemination to Societal Impact
, pp. 51 - 62
Publisher: Facet
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Peer Review
  • Lai Ma
  • Book: The Scholarly Communication Handbook
  • Online publication: 17 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783306268.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Peer Review
  • Lai Ma
  • Book: The Scholarly Communication Handbook
  • Online publication: 17 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783306268.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Peer Review
  • Lai Ma
  • Book: The Scholarly Communication Handbook
  • Online publication: 17 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783306268.006
Available formats
×