Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:09:36.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postscript

Evaluating Treatments with the Science-Based Tolin Criteria: A Call to Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2025

By
Cassandra L. Boness ,
Stephen Hupp  and
David F. Tolin
Edited by
Stephen Hupp  and
David F. Tolin
Stephen Hupp
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
David F. Tolin
Affiliation:
Institute of Living
Get access

Summary

The postscript opens by reviewing the original Chambless criteria for identifying empirically supported treatments. A table lists well-established treatments for all of the disorders discussed in the book. Next, the postscript reviews the newer, more stringent criteria – sometimes called the “Tolin criteria” – for identifying empirically supported treatments, and a second table summarizes the reviews of disorders using these newer criteria.

Keywords

empirically supported treatmentsESTswell-established treatmentsChambless criteriaTolin criteriascience-based therapyevidence-based practice
Type
Chapter
Information
Science-Based Therapy
Raising the Bar for Empirically Supported Treatments
 , pp. 399 - 405
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beutler, L. E. (1998). Identifying empirically supported treatments: What if we didn’t? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/blatt10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boness, C. L., Hershenberg, R., Grasso, D., et al. (2021). The Society of Clinical Psychology’s manual for the evaluation of psychological treatments using the Tolin criteria [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8hcsz.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boness, C. L., Hershenberg, R., Kaye, J., et al. (2020). An evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: A systematic review and application of Tolin’s Criteria for empirically supported treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 27(4), e12348. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101780.Google Scholar
Boness, C. L., Votaw, V. R., Schwebel, F. J., et al. (2023). An evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy for substance use disorders: A systematic review and application of the society of clinical psychology criteria for empirically supported treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fensterheim, H., & Raw, S. D. (1996). Psychotherapy research is not psychotherapy practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00067.x.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P. (1999). Achieving evidence-based psychotherapy practice: A psychodynamic perspective on the general acceptance of treatment manuals. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 442–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.6.4.442.Google Scholar
Goldfried, M. R., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2004). On the need for a new psychotherapy research paradigm: comment on Westen, Novotny, and Thompson-Brenner (2004). Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 669–673; author reply 677–683. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1996). Psychotherapy practice and research: Repairing a strained alliance. American Psychologist, 51(10), 1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.51.10.1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1998). Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, J. J., & Chambers, D. A. (2002). The tangled and thorny path of science to practice: Tensions in interpreting and applying “evidence.” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.2.204.Google Scholar
Hupp, S. & Hupp, V. (2023). Science-based clinical psychology. In Stea, J. N. & Hupp, S. (Eds.), Investigating Clinical Psychology: Pseudoscience, Fringe Science, and Controversies (pp. 195–205). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levant, R. F. (2004). The empirically validated treatments movement: A practitioner/educator perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph075.Google Scholar
Norcross, J. C. (1999). Collegially validated limitations of empirically validated treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.6.4.472.Google Scholar
Pfund, R. A., Ginley, M. K., Boness, C. L., et al. (2022). Contingency management for drug use disorders: Meta-analysis and application of Tolin’s criteria. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice [advance online publication]. https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfund, R. A., Ginley, M. K., Kim, H. S., et al. (2023). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for gambling harm: Umbrella review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 102336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P. (1996). Science as an ally of practice. American Psychologist, 51(10), 1072–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolin, D. F., McKay, D., Forman, E. M., Klonsky, E. D., & Thombs, B. D. (2015). Empirically Supported Treatment: Recommendations for a New Model. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22(4), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12122.Google Scholar
Tolin, D. F., Melnyk, T., & Marx, B. (2015). Exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder. www.div12.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Treatment-Review-ERP-for-OCD.pdf.Google Scholar
Wachtel, P. L. (2010). Beyond “ESTs”: Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westen, D., & Morrison, K. (2001). A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatments for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: An empirical examination of the status of empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(6), 875–899. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11777114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004a). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 631–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004b). The next generation of psychotherapy research: Reply to Ablon and Marci (2004), Goldfried and Eubanks-Carter (2004), and Haaga (2004). Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 677–683. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15250817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×