Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2023
And I may confidently say, That God’s controversie with the Kings of the Earth; is for their Arbitrary and Tyrannical Government.
On 30 January 1649, Charles I stepped out of the window of the Banqueting House of the Palace of Whitehall onto the scaffold on which his execution would take place, an event that brought to an end ‘One Act of our lamentable Tragedy’. Notoriously, the Scots began the next act of their tragedy with the proclamation of his son, Charles II, not just as king of Scots, but as king of Great Britain and Ireland. This provoked an invasion of Scotland by Oliver Cromwell in the summer of 1650, which resulted in two humiliating Scottish defeats, first at Dunbar on 3 September 1650 and then, on 3 September 1651, at Worcester. The result was a decade of English military occupation and Scotland’s incorporation into what became the ‘Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland’. Because English hostility to Charles I’s regime culminated in ‘republicanism’, it makes sense to ask whether Scottish hostility to Charles I’s regime might not also have had ‘republican’ tendencies. This also raises the question of what is meant by ‘republicanism’ in a seventeenth-century context. But before addressing these questions, some more discussion of that context is needed.
I
The Worcester campaign in 1651 was the fourth time since 1640 that a Scottish army had entered or invaded England. The first invasion had been during the second of the two Bishops’ Wars (1639 and 1640), which saw the Scottish rebellion against Charles I of 1637–38 transformed into a military conflict. The Scottish covenanting regime then allied itself with the English parliament against Charles I in the Solemn League and Covenant of 1643, as a result of which Scottish troops crossed the border again in January 1644. A Scottish army entered England for a third time, this time in an alliance with Charles, the Engagement of December 1647. This was the product of a counter-revolution in Scotland in which Scottish royalists made common cause with moderate members of the Scottish parliamentary regime. The defeat of the Army of the Engagement by Cromwell’s forces at Preston in 1648 allowed the radical wing of the covenanting movement, those who had refused to participate in the Engagement, to seize power. But it was this same radical regime that later proclaimed Charles II as king and negotiated his return to Scotland.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.