Book contents
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Reviews
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought: History, Image, and Structure
- Part I Histories of the Legal Contemporary
- Part II Images of the Legal Contemporary?
- Part III Structures of the Legal Contemporary
- Index
- References
Part II - Images of the Legal Contemporary?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 December 2017
Book contents
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Reviews
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought: History, Image, and Structure
- Part I Histories of the Legal Contemporary
- Part II Images of the Legal Contemporary?
- Part III Structures of the Legal Contemporary
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 197 - 362Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Works Cited – Chapter 10
Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bilder, Mary 2008. The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Tomlins, Christopher (eds.) 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escorihuela, Alejandro Lorite 2011. “Humanitarian law and human rights law: the politics of distinction,” Michigan State Journal of International Law 19: 299–407.Google Scholar
Eslava, Luis 2015. Local Space, Global Life: The Everyday Operation of International law and Development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eslava, Luis, Nesiah, Vasuki, and Fakhri, Michael (eds.) 2017. Bandung, Global History and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fassin, Didier 2012. Humanitarian Reason. A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Golder, Ben 2017. “Contemporary legal genealogies,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David 2013. “Law and the political economy of the world,” Leiden Journal of International Law 26: 7–48.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2007. “The fate of international law” between technique and politics,” The Modern Law Review 70: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2009. “Miserable comforters. International relations as a new natural law,” European Journal of International Relations 15: 395–422.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2010. “Human rights mainstreaming as a strategy for institutional power,” Humanity 1: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Andrew 2011. World Trade Law after Neoliberalism. Re-Imagining the Global Economic Order. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieblich, Eliav and Shachar, Yoram 2014. “Cosmopolitanism at a crossroads: Hersch Lauterpacht and the Israeli declaration of independence,” British Year Book of International Law 84: 1–51.Google Scholar
Marks, Susan 2011. “Human rights and root causes,” Modern Law Review 74: 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orford, Anne 2015. “Hammarskjöld Economic Thinking, and the UN,” in Stahn and Melber (eds.), pp. 156–89.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia 2014. Expulsions. Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sayed, Hani 2017. “Bandung at 60: The humanization of the third world,” in Eslava, et al. (eds.), pp. 431–49.Google Scholar
Slotte, Pamela and Halme-Tuomisaari, Miia (eds.) 2015). Revisiting the Origins of Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy 2015. Resistance and Change in the International law of Foreign Investment, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stahn, Carsten and Henning, Melber (eds.) 2015. Peace Diplomacy, Global Justice, and International Agency: Rethinking Human Security and Ethics in the Spirit of Dag Hammarskjöld. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael J. 2015. Advanced Introduction to International Trade Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edwin Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trüper, Henning, Chakrabarty, Dipesh, and Subrahmanyan, Sanjay 2015. Historical Teleologies in the Modern World: London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
UNCTAD 2017. Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Review of Developments in 2016. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Issues Note IIA.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus 2013. Sovereign Choices and Sovereign Constraints. Judicial Restraint in Environmental Treaty Arbitration. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Margaret (ed.) 2012. Regime Interaction and International Law: Facing Fragmentation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 11
Beaudonnet, Xavier (ed.) 2010. International Labour Law and Domestic Law: A training manual for judges, lawyers and legal educators. Turin: ILO International Training Center.Google Scholar
Bellace, Janice R. 2011. “Achieving social justice: the nexus between the ILO's fundamental rights and decent work,” Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 15: 5–28.Google Scholar
Bellace, Janice R. 2014. “The ILO and the right to strike,” International Labour Review 153: 29–70.Google Scholar
Bellace, Janice R. 2015. “Pushback on the right to strike: resisting the thickening of soft-law,” in Blackett, and Trebilcock, (eds.), pp. 181–193.Google Scholar
Blackett, Adelle and Trebilcock, Anne (eds.) 2015. Research Handbook on Transnational Labour Law. Northampton, MA: Edwin Elgar.Google Scholar
Doumbia-Henry, Cleopatra. 2007. “The future of standards supervision: Reconciling development and adjustment,” in Politakis, (ed.), pp. 279–282.Google Scholar
Ebert, F. C., and Oelz, M. 2012. “Bridging the gap between labour rights and human rights: The role of ILO law in regional human rights courts,” International Institute for Labor Studies Discussion Paper DP/212/2012. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. and Munger, Frank W. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, Keith D. 2013. “Myth and reality of the right to strike as a ‘fundamental labour right’,” International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 29: 145–65.Google Scholar
Follows, John W. 1951. Antecedents of the International Labour Organization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ghebali, Victor-Yves 1989. The International Labour Organisation: A Case Study on the Evolution of U.N. Specialised Agencies. London: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig (ed.) 2011. Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ILO 2016. “Committee on the Application of Standards: Statement by Ms. Corinne Varga, Representative of the Secretary-General.” C.App., D.3, International Labour Conference, 105th Session, Geneva.Google Scholar
ILO 2009. Edward Phelan and the ILO: Life and Views of an International Social Actor. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
ILO 1994. “General survey of the reports on the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize Convention (no. 87), 1948 and the Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining Convention (no. 98), 1949.” Report III, Part 4B, International Labour Conference, 81st Session, Geneva.Google Scholar
ILO 1990. “Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations.” Report III, Part 4A, International Labour Conference, 77th Session, Geneva.Google Scholar
Javillier, Jean-Claude and Gernigon, Bernard (eds.) 2004. Les Normes Internationales du Travail: Un Patrimoine pour l'Avenir. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Kairys, David (ed.) 1982. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1976. “Form and substance in private law adjudication,” Harvard Law Review 89: 1685–778.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl E. 1982 “Critical theory and labor relations law,” in Kairys, (ed.), pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl E. 1981. “Labor law as ideology: toward a new historiography of collective bargaining law,” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 4: 450–82.Google Scholar
La Hovary, Claire 2013. “Showdown at the ILO? A historical perspective on the employers’ group's 2012 challenge to the right to strike,” Industrial Law Journal 42: 338–68.Google Scholar
Langille, Brian A. 1999. “The ILO and the new economy: recent developments,” International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 15: 229.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward C. 2001. Defining Global Justice: The History of U.S. International Labor Standards Policy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Maul, Daniel R. 2011. “The International Labour Organization and the globalization of human rights, 1944–1970,” in Hoffmann, (ed.), pp. 301–20.Google Scholar
Maupain, Francis. 2005. “Revitalization not retreat: the real potential of the 1998 ILO Declaration for the Universal Protection of Workers’ Rights,” European Journal of International Law 16: 439–65.Google Scholar
Maupain, Francis 2009. “New foundation or new facade? The ILO and the 2008 Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization,” European Journal of International Law 20: 823–52.Google Scholar
Maupain, Francis 2010. “Une Rolls Royce en mal de revision? L'efficacité du système de supervision de l'OIT à l'approche de son centenaire,” Revue Générale de Droit Publique 3: 465–98.Google Scholar
Maupain, Francis 2012. L'OIT à l’Épreuve de la Mondialisation Financière, Peut-on Réguler Sans Contraindre. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Maupain, Francis 2013. “The ILO regular supervisory system: a model in crisis,” International Organizations Law Review 10: 117–65.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: The Legal Consciousness of Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Politakis, George P. (ed.) 2007. Protecting Labour Rights as Human Rights: Present and Future of International Supervision: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the 80th Anniversary of the ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, Geneva, 24–25 November 2006. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Simpson, William R. 2004. “Standard-setting and supervision: a system in difficulty,” in Javillier, and Gernigon, (eds.), pp. 47–73.Google Scholar
Swepston, Lee 2013. “Crisis in the ILO supervisory system: dispute over the right to strike,” International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 29: 199–218.Google Scholar
Tapiola, Kari 2007. “The ILO system of regular supervision of the application of conventions and recommendations: a lasting paradigm,” in Politakis, (ed.), pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
Thomas, Constance, Oelz, Martin and Beaudonnet, Xavier 2004. “The use of international labour law in domestic courts: theory, recent jurisprudence, and practical implications,” in Javillier, and Gernigon, (eds.), pp. 249–85.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valticos, N. 1979. “The future prospects for international labour standards,” International Labour Review 118: 679–97.Google Scholar
Valticos, Nicolas and von Potobsky, Geraldo W. 1995. International Labour Law, 2nd Edition. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Van Daele, Jasmien 2005. “Engineering social peace: networks, ideas, and the founding of the International Labour Organization,” International Review of Social History 50: 435–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 12
Barrière, Louis-Augustin 1993. Le Statut Personnel des Musulmans d'Algérie de 1834 à 1962. Editions Universitaires de Dijon.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren A. 2002. Law and Colonial cultures: Legal regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonnichon, André 1931. La Conversion au Christianisme de l'Indigène Musulman Algérien et ses Effets Juridiques (Un Cas de Conflit Colonial). Paris: Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
Christelow, Allan 1985. Muslim Law Courts and the French Colonial State in Algeria. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard 1996. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2015. “Structuralist legal histories,” Law & Contemporary Problems 78: 37–59.Google Scholar
Estoublon, Robert, and Lefébure, Adolphe 1896. Code de l'Algérie, Vol. 1 (1830–1895). Alger: A. Jourdan.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1977. “Nietzsche, genealogy, history” in Language, Counter-memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 139–64.Google Scholar
France. 1834. Procès-Verbaux et Rapports de la Commission d'Afrique. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kugle, Scott Alan 2001. “Framed, blamed and renamed: the recasting of Islamic jurisprudence in colonial South Asia,” Modern Asian Studies 35: 257–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba 2015. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Portalis, Jean-Etienne-Marie, and Portalis, Frédéric 1844. Discours, Rapports et Travaux Inédits sur le Code Civil. Paris: Joubert.Google Scholar
Sartori, Andrew 2008. Bengal in Global Concept History: Culturalism in the Age of Capital. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William Hamilton 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura 2009. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura 2010. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Surkis, Judith 2010. “Propriété, polygamie, et statut personnel en Algérie colonial,” Revue d'Histoire du XIXe Siècle 41: 27–48.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2013. “Law ‘and,’ law ‘in,’ law ‘as’: the definition, rejection and recuperation of the socio-legal enterprise,” Law in Context 29: 137–63.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development. A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voirol, Théophile 1924. Correspondance du Général Voirol, Commandant Par Intérim le Corps d'Occupation d'Afrique 1833–1834 Collection de Documents Inédits sur L'histoire de l'Algérie Après 1830 1e Série Correspondance Générale. Paris: É. Champion.Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick 2002. Qu'est-ce qu'un Français? Histoire de la Nationalité Française depuis la Révolution. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond 1977. Marxism and literature, Marxist introductions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 13
Assier-Andrieu, Louis 2015a. “Brève théorie culturelle du droit,” in Dedek, and Van Praagh, (eds.), pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
Assier-Andrieu, Louis (ed.) 2015b. L'Indépendance des Avocats: Le Long Chemin d'une Liberté. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1986. “La force du droit. Éléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique,” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 4: 3–19.Google Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin Nathan 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward [1628] 1832. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. London: J. & W.T. Clarke (19th edition).Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix 1935. “Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach,” Columbia Law Review 35: 809–49.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K., Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte, and Wilson, Richard A. (eds.) 2001. Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dedek, Helge 2015. “De iure hominis et homunculi: rights, Tristram Shandy, and the language of isolation,” in Gephart, and Suntrup, (eds.), pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
Dedek, Helge and Van Praagh, Shauna (eds.) 2015. Stateless Law. Evolving Boundaries of a Discipline. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Foblets, Marie-Claire and Renteln, Alison Dundes (eds.) Multicultural Jurisprudence: Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael D. A. (ed.) 2006. Law and Sociology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1969. “Legal culture and social development,” Law and Society Review 4: 29–44.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 2006. “The place of legal culture in the sociology of law,” in Freeman, (ed.), pp. 185–99.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 2011. The Human Rights Culture: A Study in History and Context. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1934. “American legal realism,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 32: 429–62.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1983. “Fact and law in comparative perspective,” in Geertz, Clifford, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, pp. 167–234.Google Scholar
Gephart, Werner and Suntrup, Jan Christoph (eds.) 2015. Rechtanalyse als Kulturforschung II. Frankfurt: Verlag Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick 2004. “Legal cultures and legal traditions,” in Van Hoecke, (ed.), pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick 2010. Legal Traditions of the World. Sustainable Diversity in Law (4th edition). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holder, Cindy and Reidy, David (eds.) 2013. Human Rights. The Hard Questions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kairys, David (ed.) 1982. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Hermann 1934. “Some rationalism about realism,” Yale Law Journal 43: 1240–53.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1982. “Legal education as training for hierarchy,” in Kairys, (ed.), pp. 40–63.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006 [1975]. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Beard Books.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. and Kluckohn, Clyde 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of Archeology and Ethnology Papers, 47, 1.Google Scholar
Leonard, Jerry D. (ed.) 1995. Legal Studies as Cultural Studies: A Reader in (Post) Modern Critical Theory. Albany: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1930–1931. “Some realism about realism – response to Dean Pound,” Harvard Law Review 44: 1222–64.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1960. The Common Law Tradition – Deciding Appeals. Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. and Hoebel, E. Adamson 1941. The Cheyenne Way. Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1975. “Proceedings of the third Rhine province assembly: debates on the law of the theft of wood [1842],” in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Collected Works. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 2001. “Changing Rights, Changing Culture,” in Cowan, , Dembour, , and Wilson, (eds.), pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
Mohawk, John 2010. Thinking in Indian: A John Mohawk Reader. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2010. The Last Utopia. Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Cinneide, Colm 2009. “‘A million mutinies now’: why claims of cultural uniqueness cannot be used to justify violation of basic human rights,” in Oliver, (ed.), pp. 131–156.Google Scholar
Oliver, Dawn (ed.) 2009. Justice, Legality and the Rule of Law. Lessons from the Pitcairn Prosecutions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2009. “The use and abuse of cultural defense,” in Foblets, and Renteln, (eds.), pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2013. “The significance of cultural differences for human rights,” in Holder, and Reidy, (eds.), pp. 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von 1831. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence [1814]. Hayward, Abraham (ed.). London: Littlewood and Co.Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo 2012. The Invention of Law in the West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2003. “The aesthetics of American law,” Harvard Law Review 115: 1049–118.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2015. “L'autonomie des avocats: une conception problématique parmi des développements démoralisants,” in Assier-Andrieu, (ed.), pp. 103–14.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam 1987. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, [1776]. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri 1995. “Constitutions and culture studies,” in Leonard, (ed.), pp. 155–74.Google Scholar
Stelmach, Jerzy, Brozek, Bartosz, and Hohol, Mateusz (eds.) 2013. The Many Faces of Normativity. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Social Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward Burnett 2012. Primitive Culture. Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom, [1871]. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira 1976. Law in Modern Society. Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Van Hoecke, Mark (ed.) 2004. Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 14
Kant, Immanuel 1993. The Critique of Practical Reason. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Silva, Denise Ferreira da 2001. “Toward a critique of the socio-logos of justice: the Analytics of Raciality and the production of universality,” Social Identities 7: 421–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Denise Ferreira da 2005. “‘Bahia pelô negro’: can the subaltern (subject of raciality) speak?” Ethnicities 5: 321–42.Google Scholar
Silva, Denise Ferreira da 2007. Toward a Global Idea of Race. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Denise Ferreira da 2009. “No-bodies: Law, raciality, violence,” Griffith Law Review 18: 212–36.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 15
Barros, D. Benjamin (ed.) 2010. Hernando de Soto and Property in a Market Economy. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Baucom, Ian 2005. Specters of the Atlantic: Finance Capital, Slavery and the Philosophy of History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bhandar, Brenna 2015. “Title by registration: instituting modern property law and creating racial value in the settler colony,” Journal of Law and Society 42: 253–82.Google Scholar
Bhandar, Brenna and Toscano, Alberto 2015. “Race, real estate and real abstraction,” Radical Philosophy 194: 8–17.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas 2004. Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brief of Amicus Curiae 2009. “Civil Rights Scholars and Advocates in Support of Plaintiffs, Myron Orfield, Minneapolis Urban League, Jewish Community Action, and ACORN Housing Corporation)” in Jackson, Brown, Doane et al v Mortgage Electronic Recording Systems Inc., and Richard W. Stanek in his official capacity as Sherriff of Hennepin County Civil Action No. A08–397.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books,.Google Scholar
Curtin, Philip D. 1962. The Atlantic Slave Trade: A Census. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Dyal-Chand, Rashmi 2010. “Leaving the body of property law? Meltdowns, land rushes, and failed economic development,” in Barros, (ed.), pp. 83–96.Google Scholar
Evans, Mary 2004. Killing Thinking: The Death of the Universities. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Roderick 2012. The Reorder of Things: The University and its Pedagogies of Minority Difference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Ruth Wilson. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Oakland: University of Califormia Press.Google Scholar
Goodheart, Lawrence B. 1990. Abolitionist, Actuary, Atheist: Elizur Wright and the Reform Impulse. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Heen, Mary 2009. “Ending Jim Crow life insurance rates,” Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy 4: 360–99.Google Scholar
Higher Education Funding Council for England 2014. Staff selection for inclusion in the REF 2014, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2015/201517/.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Frederick Ludwig. 1896. Race Traits and Tendencies of the American Negro. Ithaca, NY: Andrus and Church.Google Scholar
Jappe, Anselm 2013. “Sohn-Rethel and the origin of ‘real abstraction’: a critique of production or a critique of circulation?” Historical Materialism 21: 2–14.Google Scholar
Levy, Jonathan 2008. “The way of providence: capitalism, risk and freedom in America, 1841–1935.” PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1975. Early Writings. Livingstone, Rodney and Benton, Gregor (transl.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
McFall, Liz 2007. “The disinterested self: the idealised subject of life assurance,” Cultural Studies 21: 591–609.Google Scholar
Newfield, Christopher 2008. The Unmaking of the Public University: The Forty Year Assault on the Middle Class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Paltrow, Scot J. 2001a. “At least 75 insurance firms may face race-policy probes,” Wall Street Journal (March 26).Google Scholar
Paltrow, Scot. J. 2001b. “Old memos show in black and white Metlife's use of race to screen clients,” Wall Street Journal (July 24).Google Scholar
Petty, William 1899. The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty. Hull, Charles Henry (ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pickard, Jim 2015. “Osborne privatisations on a scale not seen since Thatcher,” The Financial Times (November 23).Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary 2008. Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Britain. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Price, David Price 2015. “To stop REF game playing, why not let everyone take part?” Times Higher Education (September 17). Available at https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/research-excellence-framework-to-stop-game-playing-why-not-let-everyone-take-part (accessed November 2015).Google Scholar
Rupprecht, Anita 2016. “‘Inherent vice’: marine insurance, slave ship rebellion and the law” in Race and Class 57: 31–44.Google Scholar
Savitt, Todd L. 1977. “Slave life insurance in Virginia and North Carolina,” Journal of Southern History 43: 583–600.Google Scholar
Sayer, Derek 1987. The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytic Foundations of Historical Materialism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph W. 2013. “Foreclosure and the failures of formality, or subprime mortgage conundrums and how to fix them,” Connecticut Law Review 46: 497–559.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn 1997. “‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British university system,” European Review 5: 305–21.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2015. “The Presence and Absence of Legal Mind: A Comment on Duncan Kennedy's Three Globalizations,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 1–18.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2010. Freedom Bound: Law, Labor and Civic Identity in Colonising English America 1580–1865. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Elizur 1873. Politics and Mysteries of Life Insurance. Boston: Lee and Shepard.Google Scholar
Wright, Philip Green and Wright, Elizabeth Q. 1937. Elizur Wright: The Father of Life Insurance. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 16
Boydston, Jo Ann (ed.) 1988. John Dewey. The Later Works, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. 2012 [1924]. The Legal Foundations of Capitalism. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange.Google Scholar
Deakin, Simon, Gindis, David, Hodgson, Geoffrey M, Kainan, Huang, and Pistor, Katharine 2017. “Legal institutionalism: capitalism and the constitutive role of law,” Journal of Comparative Economics 44: 188–200.Google Scholar
Hale, Robert L. 1923. “Coercion and distribution in a supposedly non-coercive state,” Political Science Quarterly 38: 470–94.Google Scholar
Hale, Robert L. 1935. “Force and the state: a comparison of ‘political’ and ‘economic’ compulsion,” Columbia Law Review 35: 149–201.Google Scholar
Hale, Robert L. 1943. “Bargaining, duress, and economic liberty,” Columbia Law Review 43: 603–28.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 2013 [1976]. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1991. “The stakes of law, or Hale and Foucault!” Legal Studies Forum 15: 327–65.Google Scholar
March, James G. 1982. “Theories of choice and making decisions,” Transaction/Society 21: 29–39.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1998. “Wandering the road form pluralism to Posner: the transformation of law and economics in the twentieth century,” The Transformation of American Economics: From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism: History of Political Economy Annual Supplement 30: 202–24.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. and Mercuro, Nicholas 2006. Economics and the Law: From Posner to Post Modernism and Beyond, 2nd edition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Peter (ed.) 1998 The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
North, Douglas C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. St. Louis: Washington University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglas C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pistor, Katharina 2013. “A legal theory of finance,” Journal of Comparative Economics 41: 315–30.Google Scholar
Polanyí, Karl 1957 [1944]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2014. Economic Analysis of Law (9th ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Viktor J. 1998. “Freiburg school of law and economics,” in Newman, (ed.) Volume 2 pp. 172–9.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Viktor J. 2001. The Constitution of Markets Essays in Political Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Viktor J. 2011. “Liberal constitutionalism, constitutional liberalism and democracy,” Constitutional Political Economy 22: 1–20.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 17
Alston, Philip 1987. “The right to development at the international level,” in Snyder, and Sathirathai, (eds.), pp. 811–24.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bair, Jennifer 2009. “Taking aim at the New International Economic Order,” in Mirowski, and Plehwe, (eds.), pp. 347–85.Google Scholar
Bedjaoui, Mohammed 1979. Towards a New International Economic Order. Paris: UNESCO/Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Bhuiyan, Sharif, Sands, Philippe, and Schrijver, Nico (eds.) 2014. International Law and Developing Countries: Essays in Honour of Kamal Hossain. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Borgwardt, Elizabeth 2005. A New Deal for the World: America's Vision for Human Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, Subrata Roy 1988. “Permanent sovereignty over natural resources: substratum of the Seoul Declaration,” in de Waart, , Peters, , and Denters, (eds.), pp. 59–85.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew 2007. The Decolonization of International Law: State Succession and the Law of Treaties. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Waart, Paul, Peters, Paul, and Denters, Erik (eds.) 1988. International Law and Development. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dekker, Ige F. 1976. “The New International Economic Order and the legal relevance of structural violence,” Revue Belge de Droit International 12: 467–98.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2015. “Structuralist legal histories,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 37–59.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G. 2010. Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dicke, Detlev , Christian (ed.) 1987. Foreign Investment in the Present and a New International Economic Order. Fribourg: University Press Fribourg.Google Scholar
Eckel, Jan and Moyn, Samuel (eds.) 2013. The Breakthrough: Human Rights in the 1970s. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall, Maier, Charles S., Manela, Erez, and Sargent, Daniel J. (eds.) 2010. The Shock of the Global: The 1970s in Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79. Senellart, Michel (ed.), Burchell, Graham (transl.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Wolfgang 1964. The Changing Structure of International Law. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Nils 2015. “The New International Economic Order: a reintroduction,” Humanity 6: 1–16.Google Scholar
Gordon, Ruth 2009. “The dawn of a new, New International Economic Order?” Law and Contemporary Problems 72: 131–62.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Johan 1988. Conference Diplomacy: An Introductory Analysis. 2nd edition. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kinley, David, Sadurski, Wojciech, and Walton, Kevin (eds.) 2013. Human Rights: Old Problems, New Possibilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Reissue with New Epilogue). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krever, Tor, Lisberger, Carl, and Utzschneider, Max 2015. “Law on the left: a conversation with Duncan Kennedy,” Unbound: Harvard Journal of the Legal Left 10: 1–35.Google Scholar
Marks, Susan 2013. “Four human rights myths,” in Kinley, , Sadurski, , and Walton, (eds.), pp. 217–35.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark 2012. Governing the World: The History of an Idea, 1815 to the Present. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip 2009. “Defining neoliberalism,” in Mirowski, and Plehwe, (eds.), pp. 417–55.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip 2013. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go To Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter (eds.) 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2014. “A powerless companion: human rights in the age of neoliberalism,” Law and Contemporary Problems 77: 147–69.Google Scholar
Nesadurai, Helen E. S. 2008. “Bandung and the political economy of north-south relations: sowing the seeds for re-visioning international society,” in Tan, and Acharya, (eds.), pp. 68–101.Google Scholar
Ogle, Vanessa 2014. “State rights against private capital: the ‘New International Economic Order’ and the struggle over aid, trade, and foreign investment, 1962–1981,” Humanity 5: 211–34.Google Scholar
O'Connell, Paul 2007. “On reconciling irreconcilables: neo-liberal globalisation and human rights,” Human Rights Law Review 7: 483–509.Google Scholar
Özsu, Umut 2015. “‘In the interests of mankind as a whole’: Mohammed Bedjaoui's New International Economic Order,” Humanity 6: 129–43.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 1987. “Sovereignty, international law and the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations,” in Dicke, (ed.) pp. 310–36.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, Balakrishnan 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rist, Gilbert 2014. The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith. 4th edition. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Röling, Bernard Victor Aloysius 1960. International Law in an Expanded World. Amsterdam: Djambatan.Google Scholar
Röling, Bernard Victor Aloysius 1982. “The history and the sociological approach of the NIEO and the third world,” Thesaurus Acroasium 12: 181–243.Google Scholar
Röpke, Wilhelm 1954. “Economic order and international law,” Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International de La Haye 86: 203–73.Google Scholar
Salomon, Margot E. 2013. “From NIEO to now and the unfinishable story of economic justice,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62: 31–54.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P. 1981. “From economic to socio-cultural emancipation: the historical context of the New International Economic Order and the new international socio-cultural order,” Third World Quarterly 3: 48–61.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P. 2015. “The negotiations of the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations: experience and lessons learned,” Journal of World Investment and Trade 16: 11–87.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry 2015. “Three Globalizations: an essay in inquiry,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 19–35.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Nico 1988. “Permanent sovereignty over natural resources versus the common heritage of mankind: complementary or contradictory principles of international economic law?” in de Waart, , Peters, , and Denters, (eds.), pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Nico 1997. Sovereignty over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and Duties. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, Patrick 2015. “Between north and south: the World Bank and the New International Economic Order,” Humanity 6: 189–200.Google Scholar
Slobodian, Quinn 2014. “The world economy and the color line: Wilhelm Röpke, apartheid, and the white Atlantic,” German Historical Institute Bulletin Supplement 10: 61–87.Google Scholar
Snyder, Frederick E. and Sathirathai, Surakiart (eds.) 1987. Third World Attitudes toward International Law: An Introduction. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy 2014. “The return of the NIEO and the retreat of neo-liberal international law,” in Bhuiyan, , Sands, , and Schrijver, (eds.), pp. 32–59.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, Daniel 2012. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, See Seng and Acharya, Amitav (eds.) 2008. Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian-African Conference for International Order. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2015. “The presence and absence of legal mind: a comment on Duncan Kennedy's Three Globalizations,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 1–17.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tzouvala, Konstantina 2016. “Letters of blood and fire: a socio-economic history of international law,” Ph.D. dissertation, Durham University.Google Scholar
Vasak, Karel 1977. “A thirty-year struggle: the sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” UNESCO Courier 30: 29–32.Google Scholar
van der Pijl, Kees 2012. The Making of an Atlantic Ruling Class. 2nd edition. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 18
Freeman, Alan 1988. “Racism, rights and the quest for equality of opportunity: a critical legal essay,” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 23: 295–392.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan and Gabel, Peter 1984. “Roll Over Beethoven,” Stanford Law Review, 36: 1–56.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1976. “Form and substance in private law adjudication,” Harvard Law Review, 89: 1685–778.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael 1989. Liar's Poker: Rising Through the Wreckage on Wall Street. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 1984. “Law and the behavioral sciences: is there any there there?” Law & Policy 6: 149–88.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert. 2011. “Race and representation: researching employment civil rights litigation in the post-civil rights United States,” Baldy Center for Law and Social Policy, State University of New York, Buffalo.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engel, David, Hans, Valerie, and Lawrence, Susan (eds.) 1998. Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, P. 2009. “Spam jurisprudence, air law and the rank anxiety of nothing happening,” Georgetown Law Journal, 97: 803–36.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry 1995. American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry 2009. “On the many flavors of capitalism, or reflections on Schumpeter's ghost,” Buffalo Law Review, 56: 965–1025.Google Scholar
Schweber, Howard 1999. “The “science” in legal science: the model of the natural sciences in nineteenth century American legal education,” Law and History Review, 17: 421–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar