Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:13:29.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion - (Re)Creating Ritual Experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

By
Blanka Misic  and
Abigail Graham
Edited by
Blanka Misic  and
Abigail Graham
Blanka Misic
Affiliation:
Champlain College, Lennoxville
Abigail Graham
Affiliation:
Institute of Classical Studies, London
Get access

Summary

How can we use cognitive approaches to embed the dynamic and often variant outcomes of ritual experiences? Key themes that have emerged in both individual and communal rituals are the subjectivity and variation in these experiences: the role of physical and emotional interaction in shaping memory. The concluding chapter begins with a vivid discussion of cognition, sensation and experience, exploring how these elements function together, creating a spectrum of variable experiences and outcomes in modern and ancient ritual contexts. This section is used to further develop ideas, common themes and issues connecting the different chapters – the versatility of ritual experience(s), the role of embodied cognition in constructing ritual experience(s), the importance of the relationship between distributed cognition and ritual experience(s) - and how these themes help to expand disciplinary boundaries in the study of ancient religions and religious rituals. The concluding chapter also situates the themes of the volume within current cognitive science of religion research as well as broader disciplines such as art, heritage and museum studies. These discussions address how the study of ancient religions from a cognitive perspective can contribute to a number of disciplines, opening up new venues for research and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Keywords

Cognitionsensationritual experiencesvariancereligionneurodiversityperceptionperformanceritual transgressionemotions.
Type
Chapter
Information
Senses, Cognition, and Ritual Experience in the Roman World , pp. 200 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M., Cairns, D. and Sprevak, M. 2019. Eds. Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. and Nelis, D. 2017. Eds. Emotions in the Classical World: Methods, Approaches, and Directions. Vandoeuvres.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2007. ‘Theatre rituals’, in Wilson, P., ed. The Greek Theatre and Festivals. Documentary Studies, 48–66. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2012. ‘Moving stones: the study of emotions in Greek inscriptions’, in Chaniotis, A., ed. Unveiling Emotions: Sources and Methods for the Study of Emotions in the Greek World, 91–129. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Corley, R. P., Beltz, A. M., Wadsworth, S. J. and Berenbaum, S. A. 2015. ‘Genetic influences on pubertal development and links to behavior problems’, Behavior Genetics 45: 294–312.Google Scholar
Czachesz, I. 2022. ‘Religious experience in Mediterranean antiquity’, in Geertz, A. W., Ambasciano, L., Eidinow, E., Martin, L. H., Laigaard Nielbo, K., Roubekas, N. P., van Mulukom, V. and Xygalatas, D., eds. Studying the Religious Mind: Methodology in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 167–76. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Day, J. 2013. Ed. Making Senses of the Past: Towards a Sensory Archaeology. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Dillion, M., Eidinow, E. and Maurizio, L. 2016. Eds. Women’s Ritual Competence in the Greco-Roman Mediterranean. London.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W., Deeley, Q. and North, J. 2022. ‘Introduction’, in Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W. and North, J., eds. Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, 1–16. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, R. 2010. The Eye of the Beholder: Deformity and Disability in the Graeco-Roman World. Second edition. London.Google Scholar
Geertz, A. W. 2017. ‘Religious bodies, minds and places: a cognitive science of religion perspective’, in Carnevale, L., ed. Spazi e luoghi sacri espressioni ed esperienze di vissuto religioso, 35–52. Bari Santo Spirito.Google Scholar
Graham, A. 2021. ‘Reading visual cues on the so-called Archive Wall at Aphrodisias: a cognitive approach to monumental documents’, American Journal of Archaeology 125(4): 571–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2011. ‘Archaeologies of the senses’, in Insoll, T., ed. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion, 208–25. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. and Theou, E. 2013. ‘Enacted multi-temporality: the archaeological site as a shared, performative space’, in Gonzalez-Ruibal, A., ed. Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity, 181–94. London.Google Scholar
Hüsken, U. 2007. ‘Ritual dynamics and ritual failure’, in Hüsken, U., ed. When Rituals Go Wrong: Mistakes, Failures, and the Dynamics of Ritual, 337–66. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, L. B., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F. and Bouchard, T. J. 2005. ‘Religiousness: findings for retrospective and current religiousness ratings’, Journal of Personality 73(2): 471–88.Google Scholar
Kundtová Klocová, E. and Geertz, A. W. 2019. ‘Ritual and embodied cognition’, in Uro, R., Day, J. J., Demaris, R. E. and Roitto, R., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Ritual, 74–94. Oxford.Google Scholar
Laes, C. 2016. Disability in Antiquity. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Latham, J. A. 2016. Performance, Memory, and Processions in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. N. 2020. ‘Recent trends in the cognitive science of religion: neuroscience, religious experience, and the confluence of cognitive and evolutionary research’, Zygon 55(1): 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, R. N. and Graham, G. 2020. Hearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind. What Mental Abnormalities Can Teach Us About Religions. Oxford.Google Scholar
McNamara, P. 2014. The Neuroscience of Religious Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Milton, D. 2020. ‘Neurodiversity past and present: an introduction to the neurodiversity reader’, in Milton, D., Murray, D., Ridout, S., Martin, N. and Mills, R., eds. The Neurodiversity Reader, 3–6. Hove.Google Scholar
Moser, C. and Feldman, C. 2014. Eds. Locating the Sacred: Theoretical Approaches to the Emplacement of Religion. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newson, M., Buhrmester, M., Xygalatas, D. and Whitehouse, H. 2022. ‘Go WILD, not WEIRD’, in Geertz, A. W., Ambasciano, L., Eidinow, E., Martin, L. H., Laigaard Nielbo, K., Roubekas, N. P., van Mulukom, V. and Xygalatas, D., eds. Studying the Religious Mind: Methodology in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 17–43. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Pachis, P. 2014. ‘Data from dead minds? Dream and healing in the Isis/Serapis cult during the Graeco-Roman age’, Journal of Cognitive Historiography 1(1): 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, C., Hamilakis, Y., Kyparissi-Apostolika, N., and Guardamino-Diaz, M. 2019. ‘Digital sensoriality: neolithic figurines from Koutrolou Magoula, Greece’, Cambridge Archaeology Journal 29(4): 625–52.Google Scholar
Poe, E. A. 1845. ‘The system of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether’, Graham’s Magazine 28(5): 193–200.Google Scholar
Popkin, M. and Ng, D. 2021. Eds. Future Thinking in Roman Culture: New Approaches to History, Memory and Cognition. London.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2016. On Roman Religion: Lived Religion and the Individual in Ancient Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, E. 1998. ‘Problematising performance’, in Hughes-Freeland, F., ed. Ritual, Performance, Media. New York.Google Scholar
Schjoedt, U., Sørensen, J., Laigaard Nielbo, K., Xygalatas, D., Panagiotis, M. and Bulbulia, J. 2013. ‘Cognitive resource depletion in religious interactions’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 3(1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J. and Chabris, C. F. 1999. ‘Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events’, Perception 28: 1059–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skeates, R. and Day, J. 2020. Eds. The Routledge Handbook of Sensory Archaeology. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Slingerland, E. 2022. ‘Toward a second wave of consilience in the cognitive scientific study of religion’, in Geertz, A. W., Ambasciano, L., Eidinow, E., Martin, L. H., Laigaard Nielbo, K., Roubekas, N. P., van Mulukom, V. and Xygalatas, D., eds. Studying the Religious Mind: Methodology in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 501–11. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Sofer, A. 2010. The Stage Life of Props. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Stavrianopoulou, E. 2006. Ed. Rituals and Communication in the Graeco-Roman World. Kernos Supplement 16. Liège.Google Scholar
Toner, J. 2009. Popular Culture in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van Gelder, T. and Port, R. F. 1995. ‘Preface’, in Port, R. F. and van Gelder, T., eds. Mind As Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, vii–x. Cambridge.Google Scholar
van Mulukom, V. 2017. ‘Remembering religious rituals: autobiographical memories of high-arousal religious rituals considered from a narrative processing perspective’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 7(3): 191–205. https://doi.org.10.1080/2153599X.2016.1232304Google Scholar
Van Nijf, O. 2015. ‘Re-inventing traditions: connecting contests in the Hellenistic and Roman World’, in Boschung, D., Busch, A. and Versluys, M. J., eds. Reinventing ‘The invention of tradition’? Indigenous pasts and the Roman present. Conference Cologne 14-15 November 2013, 95–111. Paderborn.Google Scholar
White, C. 2021. An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion. Connecting Evolution, Brain, Cognition, and Culture. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xygalatas, D. 2014. ‘On the way towards a cognitive historiography: are we there yet?’ Journal of Cognitive Historiography 1(2): 193–200.Google Scholar
Xygalatas, D. 2022. Ritual. How Seemingly Senseless Acts Make Life Worth Living. New York.Google Scholar
Xygalatas, D., Schjoedt, U., Bulbulia, J., Konvalinka, I., Jegindø, E.-M., Reddish, P., Geertz, A. W. and Roepstorff, A. 2013. ‘Autobiographical memory in a fire-walking ritual’, Journal of Cognition and Culture 13: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×