Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Old and New Comedy
- An Approach to Shakespearian Comedy
- Shakespeare, Molière, and the Comedy of Ambiguity
- Comic Structure and Tonal Manipulation in Shakespeare and Some Modern Plays
- Laughing with the Audience: ‘The Two Gentlemen of Verona’ and the Popular Tradition
- Shakespearian and Jonsonian Comedy
- Two Magian Comedies: ‘The Tempest’ and ‘The Alchemist’
- ‘Thou that beget’st him that did thee beget’: Transformation in ‘Pericles’ and ‘The Winter’s Tale’
- The Words of Mercury
- Why Does it End Well? Helena, Bertram, and The Sonnets
- Some Dramatic Techniques in ‘The Winter’s Tale’
- Clemency, Will, and Just Cause in ‘Julius Caesar’
- Thomas Bull and other ‘English Instrumentalists’ in Denmark in the 1580s
- Shakespeare in the Early Sydney Theatre
- The Reason Why: The Royal Shakespeare Season 1968
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate Section
The Reason Why: The Royal Shakespeare Season 1968
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2007
- Frontmatter
- Old and New Comedy
- An Approach to Shakespearian Comedy
- Shakespeare, Molière, and the Comedy of Ambiguity
- Comic Structure and Tonal Manipulation in Shakespeare and Some Modern Plays
- Laughing with the Audience: ‘The Two Gentlemen of Verona’ and the Popular Tradition
- Shakespearian and Jonsonian Comedy
- Two Magian Comedies: ‘The Tempest’ and ‘The Alchemist’
- ‘Thou that beget’st him that did thee beget’: Transformation in ‘Pericles’ and ‘The Winter’s Tale’
- The Words of Mercury
- Why Does it End Well? Helena, Bertram, and The Sonnets
- Some Dramatic Techniques in ‘The Winter’s Tale’
- Clemency, Will, and Just Cause in ‘Julius Caesar’
- Thomas Bull and other ‘English Instrumentalists’ in Denmark in the 1580s
- Shakespeare in the Early Sydney Theatre
- The Reason Why: The Royal Shakespeare Season 1968
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate Section
Summary
It is an enormous achievement that the Royal Shakespeare Company, since 1960, has been able to maintain such a large head of steam in so many parts of its machine. When the theatre history of the sixties comes to be written this company will occupy a dominant position. The National Theatre (a later starter) still shows but few signs of catching up with the devious, athletic and exciting pace of its rival. Indeed, so far as Shakespeare is concerned, it has shown more signs of fruitless emulation than studied competitiveness. A Much Ado which seemed a self-congratulatory refugee from comic opera and an As You Like It from the Danny La Rue stable represent the image that most people carry with them of the National’s inventive and creative conception of our national dramatist.
Peripatetic academics return annually to this country with optimistic but strangely frequent apologias about the events on the boards at Stratford Ontario and Connecticut. They remain in Stratford, England, awhile; they often fulminate about what they see at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, but it is possible to detect, in the eyes, as they give you the last handshake, a look already of nostalgia for what they are leaving. So many of them tacitly seem to accept that, for all its shortcomings, the Royal Shakespeare Theatre is the true and vital home of Shakespeare at mid-century.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 135 - 144Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1970