Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T20:26:07.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shakespeare, Lyly and Ovid: The Influence of ‘Gallathea’ on ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2007

Get access

Summary

In the words of Anne Barton ‘although there is no identifiable narrative or dramatic source for the plot, a good deal of general reading seems to underlie’ A Midsummer Night’s Dream. The nature and extent of that reading has been amply illustrated by previous commentators whose conclusions have almost invariably contained some reference to the influence exerted by Lyly on Shakespeare at this stage of the dramatist’s career. Marco Mincoff, for example, maintains that ‘with A Midsummer Night’s Dream comes a new advance’ towards the work of a largely uncongenial predecessor, while Anne Barton suggests that Shakespeare’s young lovers ‘would probably have reminded many members of Shakespeare’s audience of equivalent characters’ in Lyly’s plays. Conversely, writers on Lyly have sought to show the relationship between the first major exponent of the comic form in England and his more illustrious successor, and it is in this area that the most detailed and persuasive analyses may be found. As early as 1902 R. Warwick Bond cited some interesting parallels between Shakespeare’s play and Lyly’s Midas, Endimion and The Woman in the Moon while, more recently, G. K. Hunter has argued that both Love’s Labour’s Lost and A Midsummer Night’s Dream are ‘completely Lylian in their construction’, pointing, in the case of the latter play, to the ‘balancing [of] a number of self-contained groups, one against the other’, to the introduction of successive groups of characters, each entry expounding ‘what is to be its intention and outlook for the rest of the play’ and to the ‘clearly exposed debate subject of . . . imagination versus reason’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 125 - 134
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×