Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare’s Middle Comedies: A Generation of Criticism
- ‘Perfect Types of Womanhood’: Rosalind, Beatrice and Viola in Victorian Criticism and Performance
- The Stage Representation of the ‘Kill Claudio’ Sequence in Much Ado About Nothing
- As You Like It Adapted: Charles Johnson’s Love in a Forest
- Social Relations and the Social Order in Much Ado About Nothing
- Sexual Disguise in As You Like It and Twelfth Night
- Twelfth Night and the Myth of Echo and Narcissus
- ‘Smiling at grief’: Some Techniques of Comedy in Twelfth Night and Così Fan Tutte
- ‘My Lady’s a Catayan, we are politicians, Maluolios a Peg-a-ramsie’ (Twelfth Night II, iii, 77-8)
- The Importance of Being Marcade
- A Hebrew Source for The Merchant of Venice
- The Marriage Contracts in Measure for Measure: A Reconsideration
- Richard III: Antecedents of Clarence’s Dream
- Deep Plots and Indiscretions in ‘The Murder of Gonzago’
- ‘What is’t to leave betimes?’ Proverbs and Logic in Hamlet
- The Tempest: Language and Society
- Pictorial Evidence for a Possible Replica of the London Fortune Theatre in Gdansk
- A Year of Comedies: Stratford 1978
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study: 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate section
Social Relations and the Social Order in Much Ado About Nothing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2007
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare’s Middle Comedies: A Generation of Criticism
- ‘Perfect Types of Womanhood’: Rosalind, Beatrice and Viola in Victorian Criticism and Performance
- The Stage Representation of the ‘Kill Claudio’ Sequence in Much Ado About Nothing
- As You Like It Adapted: Charles Johnson’s Love in a Forest
- Social Relations and the Social Order in Much Ado About Nothing
- Sexual Disguise in As You Like It and Twelfth Night
- Twelfth Night and the Myth of Echo and Narcissus
- ‘Smiling at grief’: Some Techniques of Comedy in Twelfth Night and Così Fan Tutte
- ‘My Lady’s a Catayan, we are politicians, Maluolios a Peg-a-ramsie’ (Twelfth Night II, iii, 77-8)
- The Importance of Being Marcade
- A Hebrew Source for The Merchant of Venice
- The Marriage Contracts in Measure for Measure: A Reconsideration
- Richard III: Antecedents of Clarence’s Dream
- Deep Plots and Indiscretions in ‘The Murder of Gonzago’
- ‘What is’t to leave betimes?’ Proverbs and Logic in Hamlet
- The Tempest: Language and Society
- Pictorial Evidence for a Possible Replica of the London Fortune Theatre in Gdansk
- A Year of Comedies: Stratford 1978
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study: 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate section
Summary
The distinction between appearance and reality is articulated as a theme in Shakespeare’s comedies in two distinct ways: (1) fortune, or some other external force, imposes on the characters some incorrect perception of reality, and, as the plot proceeds, that misperception rectifies itself (e.g. Comedy of Errors, Twelfth Night, Midsummer Night’s Dream); or (2) some characters voluntarily create deceptions that impel the plot, initially by deceiving other characters about reality and ultimately by demonstrating the necessity of distinguishing appearance from and achieving useful knowledge about reality (e.g. Love’s Labour’s Lost, As You Like It, Measure for Measure, The Tempest). Much Ado About Nothing fits neither pattern, for the series of deceptions that compose the plot, although created by the characters, are lived through en route to other deceptions, and are not overcome; false perception characterizes rather than disrupts the norm of the society depicted in the play. The characters adopt superficial attitudes toward what, in other dramas, might have been metaphysical crises; their overt considerations never become epistemological, as will those of Hamlet, Troilus, and Othello-the latter two at least involved in similar plots but in radically different societies.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 49 - 62Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1980